Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of a newly developed interspinous process device (IPD), called TAU. This device was compared with another IPD (SPIRE) and the pedicle screw fixation (PSF) technique at the surgical and adjacent levels of the lumbar spine.Materials and methodsA three-dimensional finite element model analysis of the L1-S1 segments was performed to assess the biomechanical effects of the proposed IPD combined with an interbody cage. Three surgical models—two IPD models (TAU and SPIRE) and one PSF model—were developed. The biomechanical effects, such as range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), disc stress, and facet loads during extension were analyzed at surgical (L3-L4) and adjacent levels (L2-L3 and L4-L5). The study analyzed biomechanical parameters assuming that the implants were perfectly fused with the lumbar spine.ResultsThe TAU model resulted in a 45%, 49%, 65%, and 51% decrease in the ROM at the surgical level in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively, when compared to the intact model. Compared to the SPIRE model, TAU demonstrated advantages in stabilizing the surgical level, in all directions. In addition, the TAU model increased IDP at the L2-L3 and L4-L5 levels by 118.0% and 78.5% in flexion, 92.6% and 65.5% in extension, 84.4% and 82.3% in lateral bending, and 125.8% and 218.8% in axial rotation, respectively. Further, the TAU model exhibited less compensation at adjacent levels than the PSF model in terms of ROM, IDP, disc stress, and facet loads, which may lower the incidence of the adjacent segment disease (ASD).ConclusionThe TAU model demonstrated more stabilization at the surgical level than SPIRE but less stabilization than the PSF model. Further, the TAU model demonstrated less compensation at adjacent levels than the PSF model, which may lower the incidence of ASD in the long term. The TAU device can be used as an alternative system for treating degenerative lumbar disease while maintaining the physiological properties of the lumbar spine and minimizing the degeneration of adjacent segments.

Highlights

  • Spinal fusion is a common procedure for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases [1, 2]

  • The TAU model resulted in a 45%, 49%, 65%, and 51% decrease in the range of motion (ROM) at the surgical level in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively, when compared to the intact model

  • The TAU model exhibited less compensation at adjacent levels than the pedicle screw fixation (PSF) model in terms of ROM, intradiscal pressure (IDP), disc stress, and facet loads, which may lower the incidence of the adjacent segment disease (ASD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal fusion is a common procedure for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases [1, 2]. Spinal fusion using pedicle screw fixation (PSF) technique combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion has several advantages such as high rate of fusion, increase the height of intervertebral disc space, and maintaining the stability of spine [3, 4]. The PSF technique is a popular surgical method for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease, it is technically demanding and can result in several complications [5]. The rigid fixation of lumbar spine can increase the range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure (IDP) of adjacent levels, and cause adjacent segment diseases (ASDs) [6]. Implantation of IPD has been reported in several studies to be effective in the surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases [7,8,9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call