Pediatric Trauma Center Research Articles

Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Morphine in Fracture Reduction in a Pediatric Trauma Center.

Pain management in orthopaedic manipulation in the emergency department (ED) is crucial to decrease fracture reduction performed in the operating room. This study compared intranasal fentanyl (INF) with oral morphine in time of care and effectiveness on pain during the reduction of bone fractures in a pediatric trauma center. A before-and-after INF implementation study was conducted in a pediatric ED with a trauma center on children with a confirmed displaced closed fracture on radiographs with reduction and casting performed in the ED. The time of care, time for sufficient analgesia, effectiveness on pain, and tolerance were compared between both analgesics in 3 consecutive phases. 77 children were included: 31 children received oral morphine and 46 INF. The time of care was shorter in the INF group (150 [111 to 193] minutes versus 215 [155 to 240], P = 0.01) as the time for sufficient analgesia (10 [9 to 13] minutes versus 80 [53 to 119], P < 0.001) with a higher pain reduction after a dose of INF (3 [0 to 4] versus 6 [3 to 7], P < 0.001) and less dose requirement (P = 0.002). Although pain scores were similar at arrival in both groups (P = 0.15), the pain was significantly lower before and during the procedure in the INF group and equivalent after the procedure (2 [0 to 4] versus 3 [0 to 5], P = 0.02, 3 [1 to 5] versus 7 [3 to 9], P < 0.001, and 1 [0 to 2] in both groups, P = 0.87, respectively). Keeping pain levels low during the procedure in the INF group allowed the extension to lower limb fracture reductions (P = 0.04). No serious adverse events were reported. INF reduces the time to obtain sufficient analgesia and time of care, with good effectiveness maintained during the procedure in fracture reduction, allowing the extension to lower limb fractures. Thus, this rapid and efficient analgesia facilitates orthopaedic care in the pediatric ED that would otherwise require to be reduced in the operating room under general anesthesia.

A Pilot Study of Saliva MicroRNA Signatures in Children with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background/Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in children. Currently, no biological test can predict outcomes in pediatric TBI, complicating medical management. This study sought to identify brain-related micro-ribosomal nucleic acids (miRNAs) in saliva associated with moderate-to-severe TBI in children, offering a potential non-invasive, prognostic tool. Methods: A case-control design was used, enrolling participants ≤ 18 years old from three pediatric trauma centers. Participants were divided into moderate-to-severe TBI and non-TBI trauma control groups. Saliva samples were collected within 24 h of injury, with additional samples at 24-48 h and >48 h post-injury from the TBI group. miRNA profiles were visualized with partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) and hierarchical clustering. Mann-Whitney testing was used to compare miRNAs between groups, and mixed models were used to assess longitudinal expression patterns. DIANA miRPath v3.0 was used to interrogate the physiological functions of miRNAs. Results: Twenty-three participants were enrolled (14 TBI, nine controls). TBI and control groups displayed complete separation of miRNA profiles on PLSDA. Three miRNAs were elevated (adj. p < 0.05) in TBI (miR-1255b-5p, miR-3142, and miR-4320), and two were lower (miR-326 and miR-4646-5p). Three miRNAs (miR-3907, miR-4254, and miR-1273g-5p) showed temporal changes post-injury. Brain-related targets of these miRNAs included the glutamatergic synapse and GRIN2B. Conclusions: This study shows that saliva miRNA profiles in children with moderate-to-severe TBI may differ from those with non-TBI trauma and exhibit temporal changes post-injury. These miRNAs could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for prognosticating pediatric TBI outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Impact of Surgical Team Involvement at the Time of Trauma Activation for Pediatric Patients With Motorized Cycle or All-Terrain Vehicle Injury Mechanism.

At our institution, level 2 trauma (L2T) activations are primarily managed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, whereas level 1 activations are co-managed by pediatric surgery and PEM. Starting in September 2019, the response to L2T activations due to all-terrain vehicles or motorized cycles (ATVs/MCs) changed to include surgical assessment upon patient arrival due to increased likelihood of significant injuries and need for higher level of care. The impact of PEM/surgery co-management of ATV/MC L2T patients on time to an admission decision is unknown. We retrospectively reviewed patients <18 years of age presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center as L2T activations with ATV/MC mechanism between 1/2016 and 10/2022. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, details of imaging, interventions, and emergency department (ED) course were recorded. The χ2 and Fisher exact tests were performed. One hundred fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria prior to augmenting our response to include surgical presence at L2T-ATV/MC activations, and 216 patients were treated after our protocol change. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, transfer status, vehicle subtype, or Injury Severity Scores between groups. Trauma surgery was involved in the care of 74.8% of L2T-ATV/MC patients before protocol augmentation and 87% after (P = 0.003). Time to an admission decision significantly decreased by 22.5 minutes (117 minutes [interquartile range, 72-178] vs 94.5 minutes [interquartile range, 60-139]; P = 0.023) after protocol augmentation. There was a trend toward increased completion of mandated postsecondary survey communication huddles after protocol change (84.6% to 91.2%, P = 0.089). The median total ED length of stay did not differ between admitted and discharged patients. Early surgical assessment for pediatric patients with ATV/MC injuries improved time to an admission decision and trauma communication huddle compliance. Next steps include identifying process improvement opportunities to decrease ED total length of stay for patients with ATV/MC injuries.

Fluid Management in Critically Ill Children: Single-Center Retrospective Comparison of Trauma and Postoperative Patients, 2020-2022.

Injury and surgery both represent well-defined starting points of a predictable inflammatory response, but the consequent response to IV fluids has not been studied. We aimed to review and compare our single-center fluid management strategies in these two populations. Retrospective cohort study from January 2020 to July 2022. The primary outcome was total IV fluid volume administered. Net fluid balances and select clinical outcomes were also evaluated. Single tertiary academic center and level 1 pediatric trauma center in New York. A dataset of critically ill trauma and surgical patients aged 0-18 years who were admitted to the PICU, 2020-2022. Trauma patients had at least moderate traumatic injuries (Injury Severity Score ≥ 9) and surgical patients had at least a 1-hour operation time. None. We identified 25 trauma and 115 surgical patients. During the first 5 days of hospitalization, we did not identify an association between grouping and total IV fluids administered and fluid balance in the prehospital, emergency department, and operating room (p = 0.90 and p = 0.79), even when adjusted for weight (p = 0.96). Time trend graphs of net fluid balance and IV fluid administered illustrated analogous fluid requirement and response with the transition from net positive to net negative fluid balance between 48 and 72 hours. There was an association between total IV fluid and ventilator requirement (p = 0.003). Critically ill pediatric trauma and postoperative patients seem to have similar fluid management and balance after injury or surgery. In our opinion, these two critically ill populations could be combined in large prospective studies on optimal fluid therapy in critically ill children.

Development and Validation of a Bayesian Network Predicting Intubation Following Hospital Arrival Among Injured Children

BackgroundInadequate airway management can contribute to preventable trauma deaths. Current machine learning tools for predicting intubation in trauma are limited to adult populations and include predictors not readily available at the time of patient arrival. We developed a Bayesian network to predict intubation in injured children and adolescents using observable data available upon or immediately after patient arrival. MethodsWe obtained patient demographic, injury, resuscitation, and transportation characteristics from trauma registries from four American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma centers from January 2010 through December 2021. We trained and validated a Bayesian network to predict emergent intubation after pediatric injury. We evaluated model performance using the area under the receiver operating and calibration curves. ResultsThe final model, TITAN (Timing of Intubation in Trauma Analysis Network), incorporated five factors: Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism of injury, injury type (e.g., penetrating, blunt), systolic blood pressure, and age. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% CI 0.80, 0.85) and had a calibration curve slope of 0.98 (95% CI 0.67, 1.29). TITAN had high specificity (98%), negative predictive value (97%), and accuracy (96%) at a binary probability threshold of 22.6%. ConclusionThe TITAN Bayesian network predicts the risk of intubation in pediatric trauma patients using five factors that are observable early in trauma resuscitation. Prospective validation of the model performance with patient outcomes is needed to assess real-life application benefits and risks. Level of EvidencePrognostic and Epidemiological, Level III.

Routine Urology Consultation and Follow-up After Pediatric Blunt Renal Trauma is Likely Unnecessary

IntroductionThis study examines the outcomes of high-grade renal trauma in pediatric patients and evaluates the intervention rate. In our hospital, we routinely consult urology on all high-grade injuries. We anticipated minimal intervention, casting doubt on the need for routine urology consultation and follow-up. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review at a single pediatric trauma center from January 2018 to June 2023, focusing on patients with severe (grade III-V) renal injuries. Data collected included demographics, trauma-related variables, hospital course, interventions, and follow-up. When the grade was not readily available in the electronic medical record, we had a board-certified pediatric radiologist review the imaging and provide the grade. Follow-up was included only if it was with a pediatric urologist. ResultsThere were 92 patients that met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 47 were grade III, 32 were grade IV, and 13 were grade V. Six (6.5%) patients required inpatient renal stent procedures. Follow-up occurred in 55/92 (60%) patients with a pediatric urologist. Follow-up by grade is as follows: 22/47 (47%) grade III, 22/32 (69%) grade IV, and 11/13 (85%) grade V. Overall 5.8% of patients required antihypertensive medications and this was more likely as injury grade increased. All stents were removed outpatient and there were 3 (3.3%) additional outpatient interventions, all in patients that were symptomatic. ConclusionGiven the low prevalence of interventions after discharge, routine consultation and follow-up with urology is likely unnecessary in the absence of an inpatient urologic procedure during the index hospitalization. Patients with high-grade injuries should instead follow up with a trauma clinic or general provider with urology follow-up based on symptoms. Type of StudyRetrospective Review. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in High-Risk Pediatric Trauma Patients

The indications, safety, and efficacy of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (cVTE) in pediatric trauma patients remain unclear. A set of high-risk criteria to guide cVTE use was recently recommended; however, these criteria have not been evaluated prospectively. To examine high-risk criteria and cVTE use in a prospective multi-institutional study of pediatric trauma patients. This cohort study was completed between October 2019 and October 2022 in 8 free-standing pediatric hospitals designated as American College of Surgeons level I pediatric trauma centers. Participants were pediatric trauma patients younger than 18 years who met defined high-risk criteria on admission. It was hypothesized that cVTE would be safe and reduce the incidence of VTE. Receipt and timing of chemical VTE prophylaxis. The primary outcome was overall VTE rate stratified by receipt and timing of cVTE. The secondary outcome was safety of cVTE as measured by bleeding or other complications from anticoagulation. Among 460 high-risk pediatric trauma patients, the median (IQR) age was 14.5 years (10.4-16.2 years); 313 patients (68%) were male and 147 female (32%). The median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 23 (16-30), and median (IQR) number of high-risk factors was 3 (2-4). A total of 251 (54.5%) patients received cVTE; 62 (13.5%) received cVTE within 24 hours of admission. Patients who received cVTE after 24 hours had more high-risk factors and higher ISS. The most common reason for delayed cVTE was central nervous system bleed (120 patients; 30.2%). There were 28 VTE events among 25 patients (5.4%). VTE occurred in 1 of 62 patients (1.6%) receiving cVTE within 24 hours, 13 of 189 patients (6.9%) receiving cVTE after 24 hours, and 11 of 209 (5.3%) who had no cVTE (P = .31). Increasing time between admission and cVTE initiation was significantly associated with VTE (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = .01). No bleeding complications were observed while patients received cVTE. In this prospective study, use of cVTE based on a set of high-risk criteria was safe and did not lead to bleeding complications. Delay to initiation of cVTE was significantly associated with development of VTE. Quality improvement in pediatric VTE prevention may center on timing of prophylaxis and barriers to implementation.

CT in pediatric trauma patients.

The decision as to whether to perform a computed tomography (CT) examination in severe pediatric trauma poses a challenge. The therapeutic benefit of computed tomography in injured children is lower compared to adults, while the potential negative effects of ionizing radiation may be higher. Thus, the threshold for CT should be higher. Centers that less frequently treat pediatric cases tend to conduct more whole-body CT examinations than dedicated pediatric trauma centers, indicating a clinical overestimation of injury severity with subsequently unnecessary imaging due to inexperience. On the other hand, a CT scan that is not performed but is actually necessary can also have negative consequences if an injury is detected with a delay. An injured child presents a challenging situation for all involved healthcare providers, and thus requires a structured approach to decision-making.Selective literature review of the benefits and risks of CT in injured children, as well as indications for whole-body and region-specific CT imaging.This article provides an overview of current guidelines, recent insight into radiation protection and the benefits of CT in injured children, and evidence-based decision criteria for choosing the appropriate modality based on the mechanism of injury and the affected body region. · Whole-body CT has less of an influence on treatment decisions and mortality in severely injured children than in adults.. · For radiation protection reasons, the indication should be determined more conservatively in children than in adult trauma patients.. · The indication for CT should ideally be determined separately for each region of the body.. · Ultrasound and MRI are a good alternative for the primary diagnostic workup in many situations.. · Appelhaus S, Schönberg SO, Weis M. CT in pediatric trauma patients. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2341-7559.

Characteristics of fatal and non-fatal drownings at a Texas level-1 paediatric trauma centre

BackgroundDrowning is a leading cause of death for young children and knowing what puts a child at risk helps efforts across the spectrum of prevention. The purpose of this study...

Long Leg Versus Short Leg Cast Immobilization for Treatment of Salter-Harris II Distal Tibial Fractures After Closed Reduction: A Multisite Retrospective Study

BACKGROUNDDistal tibial physeal fractures are common injuries that can frequently be treated nonoperatively. Most commonly, long leg cast immobilization is recommended after closed reduction. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between long leg cast (LLC) and short leg cast (SLC) immobilization after closed reduction of Salter-Harris II (SH-II) distal tibial fractures. METOHDSA retrospective, multicenter comparative study was performed evaluating skeletally immature patients treated with closed reduction of a displaced SH-II distal tibia fracture at three Level I Pediatric Trauma Centers between 2012 and 2018. Radiographs after casting were compared to those at the time of cast removal to assess for the primary study outcome of loss of reduction (LOR). Secondary outcomes included the length of casting, premature physeal closure, time to weight-bearing, and time to release to activities. RESULTSA total of 148 patients with a median age of 12.7 years (IQR 11.2-13.7) met inclusion criteria. LLC were utilized in 110 cases while 38 patients received a SLC. Loss of reduction occurred in 10 patients (6.8%), nine with a LLC and one in a SLC (p=0.454). Those treated in SLC had a shorter length of casting (p=0.030) and quicker release to activities (p=0.004) than those with LLC. CONCLUSIONSFindings of this retrospective, multi-center study show similar rates of loss of reduction between SLC and LLC immobilization for SH-II distal tibial fractures after closed reduction. Patients received less total casting and returned to sports quicker after SLC immobilization. KEYWORDS CONCEPTS•Salter-Harris II distal tibia fractures can be treated with closed reduction and short leg casting without an increased rate of displacement•Distal tibial physeal fractures treated in a short leg cast can possibly return to sports quicker•The rate of interval displacement of a SH-II distal tibia fracture after closed reduction is approximately 6.7%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel III Retrospective Comparative Study

Implementing Screening, Brief Interventions, and Referral to Treatment at Pediatric Trauma Centers: A Step Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

BackgroundPediatric trauma centers have had challenges meeting the American College of Surgeons criteria for screening and intervening for alcohol with adolescent trauma patients. The study objective was to conduct an implementation trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the Science to Service Laboratory (SSL) implementation strategy in improving alcohol and other drugs (AOD) screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) delivery at pediatric trauma centers. MethodsUsing a stepped wedge cross-over cluster randomized design, 10 US pediatric trauma centers received the SSL implementation strategy to deliver SBIRT with admitted adolescent (12–17 years old) trauma patients. The strategy adapted three core SSL elements: didactic training, performance feedback, and facilitation. The main outcome measured was SBIRT reach. Data were collected from each center's electronic health record (EHR) during pre- and post-implementation wedges (2018–2022). ResultsEHR data from 8461 adolescent patients were extracted. Aggregated across all sites, the reach of screening with a validated AOD screening tool increased significantly from 25.2% (95% CI: 23.9, 26.5%) of adolescents during pre-implementation to 47.7% (95% CI: 46.3%, 49.2%) post-implementation. There was variability of change across centers. Brief interventions continued to be delivered at high levels to identified adolescents. Referral to primary care providers for further AOD discussion or referral to specialty service for adolescents with high risk use did not improve post-implementation and remained low. ConclusionsThe SSL implementation strategy can be successfully utilized by pediatric trauma centers to improve AOD screening, but challenges exist in connecting adolescents for continuation of AOD discussions after discharge. Level of EvidenceLevel II, Therapeutic.

Validation of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification score in children: a single-institution experience at a level 1 pediatric trauma center.

The Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC) score has not been previously validated for a pediatric population. The authors compared the SLIC treatment recommendations for pediatric subaxial cervical spine trauma with real-world pediatric spine surgery practice. A retrospective cohort study at a pediatric level 1 trauma center was conducted in patients < 18 years of age evaluated for trauma from 2012 to 2021. An SLIC score was calculated for each patient, and the subsequent recommendations were compared with actual treatment delivered. Percentage misclassification, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were calculated. Two hundred forty-three pediatric patients with trauma were included. Twenty-five patients (10.3%) underwent surgery and 218 were managed conservatively. The median SLIC score was 2 (interquartile range = 2). Sixteen patients (6.6%) had an SLIC score of 4, for which either conservative or surgical treatment is recommended; 27 children had an SLIC score ≥ 5, indicating a recommendation for surgical treatment; and 200 children had an SLIC score ≤ 3, indicating a recommendation for conservative treatment. Of the 243 patients, 227 received treatment consistent with SLIC score recommendations (p < 0.001). SLIC sensitivity in determining surgically treated patients was 79.2% and the specificity for accurately determining who underwent conservative treatment was 96.1%. The PPV was 70.3% and the NPV was 97.5%. There was a 5.7% misclassification rate (n = 13) using SLIC. Among patients for whom surgical treatment would be recommended by the SLIC, 29.6% (n = 8) did not undergo surgery; similarly, 2.5% (n = 5) of patients for whom conservative management would be recommended by the SLIC had surgery. The ROC curve for determining treatment received demonstrated excellent discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.96 (OR 3.12, p < 0.001). Sensitivity decreased when the cohort was split by age (< 10 and ≥ 10 years old) to 0.5 and 0.82, respectively; specificity remained high at 0.98 and 0.94. The SLIC scoring system recommended similar treatment when compared with the actual treatment delivered for traumatic subaxial cervical spine injuries in children, with a low misclassification rate and a specificity of 96%. These findings demonstrate that the SLIC can be useful in guiding treatment for pediatric patients with subaxial cervical spine injuries. Further investigation into the score in young children (< 10 years) using a multicenter cohort is warranted.

Optimizing patient selection for ECMO after pediatric hypothermic cardiac arrest

BackgroundIn 2004, our level 1 regional pediatric trauma center created a protocol to activate ECMO for children with suspected hypothermic cardiac arrest based on inclusion criteria: serum potassium ≤9, submersion <90 min, and core body temperature <30 °C. In 2017, Pasquier et al. developed a model to help predict the survival of adults after hypothermic cardiac arrest (HOPE score) that has not been validated in children. We sought to apply this score to our pediatric patient population to determine if it can optimize our patient selection. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of all patients cannulated onto VA ECMO for hypothermic cardiac arrest between 2004 and 2022. We used abstracted data points to calculate the HOPE score for our patient population, both with and without presumed asphyxia. ResultsOver 19 years, 18 patients were cannulated for suspected hypothermic arrest, with three survivors (17 %). The HOPE score survival prediction ranged from 1 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 6–98 % without presumed asphyxia. Survivor HOPE scores ranged from 9 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 42–98 % without presumed asphyxia. Non-survivors’ scores ranged 1–29 % with asphyxia and 6–57 % without asphyxia. A cutoff of >5 % predicted survival with asphyxia for ECMO could have decreased our cannulations by half without missing survivors. ConclusionECMO can be a lifesaving measure for specific children after hypothermic arrest. However, identifying the patients that will benefit from this resource-intensive intervention remains difficult. HOPE score utilization may decrease the rate of futile cannulation in children, but multi-centered research is needed in the pediatric population.

Age is a predictor of elbow stiffness after type III or IV supracondylar humerus fractures

PurposeSupracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures account for approximately 30% of injuries for those younger than 7 years of age (Cheng et al. in J Pediatr Orthop 19:344–350, 1999). Recent studies examining the association of patient age and SCH fracture outcomes have provided conflicting findings. The purpose of this study is to investigate SCH fracture outcomes in children at different ages of skeletal development.MethodsRetrospective review of a Level I pediatric trauma center between 2010 and 2014 was conducted. 190 patients with SCH fractures, age < 14 years, fracture type Gartland III or IV (AO/OTA 13-M 3.1 III and IV) were included. Patients were sorted into age groups: < 2 years, 4–6 years, and > 8 years. Patients were treated with either a closed or open reduction with percutaneous fixation. Clinical outcomes including postoperative elbow range of motion, nerve palsy, compartment syndrome, infection, and cubitus varus were assessed.ResultsPatients in younger age groups were more likely to obtain postoperative full elbow flexion (< 2 years = 77%; 4–6 years = 66%; > 8 years = 43%) and full elbow extension (< 2 years = 96%; 4–6 years = 88%; > 8 years = 64%). Age was a significant predictor of nerve palsy on admission, mean operative time (< 2 years = 21.8 min; 4–6 years = 43.0 min; > 8 years = 80.7 min), and mean fluoroscopy time (< 2 years = 22.9 s; 4–6 years = 59.5 s; > 8 years = 171.9 s). There were no differences in rates of open reduction, compartment syndrome, pin tract infection, cubitus varus, or reoperation among groups.ConclusionIncreasing age is associated with increased elbow stiffness after percutaneous fixation of Gartland Type III and Type IV SCH fractures. Older patients with SCH fractures may benefit from formal rehabilitation.Level of evidenceIII.

Impact of Trauma Center Type on Outcomes in Pediatric Population Following Severe Isolated Blunt Traumatic Brain Injuries: A National Analysis.

This study aims to evaluate the association between trauma center type, verification level, and clinical outcomes in pediatric trauma patients with moderate and severe isolated blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Program (TQP) Participant Use File (PUF) database from 2017 to 2021. Severely injured pediatric (<18years) trauma patients with isolated moderate and severe TBI (AIS head >2, all other body regions <3) were included. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, intensive care unit length-of-stay (ICU-LOS), and ventilator-free days (VFDs). Patients treated at a level-I combined adult and pediatric trauma centers (CTCs) had significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality than those treated at adult trauma centers (ATCs) (OR .495, 95% CI 0.291-.841, P = .009). Patients treated at level-I pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) (OR 2.726, 95% CI 2.059-3.609, P < .001) and level-II PTCs (OR 6.18, 95% CI 3.402-11.239, P < .001) were significantly more likely to be discharged home than equivalent-level ATCs. Pediatric patients with isolated blunt moderate and severe TBI treated at level-I PTCs and CTCs had reduced odds of in-hospital mortality compared to level-I ATCs. Patients at level I and II PTCs had significantly higher odds of discharge home than those at equivalent-level CTCs and ATCs.

Prehospital time and mortality in pediatric trauma

PurposeThe “Golden Hour” of transportation to a hospital has long been accepted as a central principal of trauma care. However, this has not been studied in pediatric populations. We assessed for non-linearity of the relationship between prehospital time and mortality in pediatric trauma patients, redefining the threshold at which reducing this time led to more favorable outcomes.MethodsWe performed an analysis of the 2017–2018 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program, including trauma patients age < 18 years. We examined the association between prehospital time and odds of in-hospital mortality using linear, polynomial, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models, ultimately selecting the non-linear RCS model as the best fit.Results60,670 patients were included in the study, of whom 1525 died and 3074 experienced complications. Prolonged prehospital time was associated with lower mortality and fewer complications. Both models demonstrated that mortality risk was lowest at 45–60 min, after which time was no longer associated with reduced probability of mortality.ConclusionsThe demonstration of a non-linear relationship between pre-hospital time and patient mortality is a novel finding. We highlight the need to improve prehospital treatment and access to pediatric trauma centers while aiming for hospital transportation within 45 min.

Pediatric Burns - Who Requires Follow-up? A Study of Urban Pediatric Emergency Department Patients.

Hundreds of children suffer burn injuries each day, yet care guidelines regarding the need for acute inpatient treatment vs outpatient follow-up vs no required follow-up remain nebulous. This gap in the literature is particularly salient for the emergency clinician, who must be able to rapidly determine appropriate disposition. This was a retrospective review of patients presenting to a Level II pediatric trauma center, January 1, 2017-December 31, 2019, and discharged with an International Classification of Diseases, Rev 10, burn diagnosis. We obtained and analyzed demographics, burn characteristics, and follow-up data using univariate and bivariate analysis as well as logistic regression modeling. Patients were stratified into three outcome groups: group 1-patients who underwent emergent evaluation at a burn center or were admitted at their first follow-up appointment; group 2-patients who followed up at a burn center (as an outpatient) or at the emergency department (and were discharged home); and group 3-patients with no known follow-up. A total of 572 patients were included in this study; 58.9% of patients were 1-5years of age. Sixty-five patients met group 1 criteria, 189 patients met group 2 criteria, and 318 patients met group 3 criteria. Sixty-five percent of patients met at least one American Burn Association criteria, and 79% of all burns were second-degree burns. Flame and scald burns were associated with increased odds (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, OR 1.12) of group 1 vs group 2 + group 3 (P = 0.02, P < 0.001). Second/third-degree burns and concern for non-accidental trauma were also associated with increased odds of group 1 vs 2 or 3 (OR = 1.11, 1.35, P ≤ 0.001, 0.001, respectively). Scald burns were associated with increased odds of group 2 compared to group 3 (OR 1.11, P = 0.04). Second/third degree burns were also associated with increased odds of group 2 vs 3 (OR 1.19, P ≤ 0.001). There were few statistically significant variables strongly associated with group 1 (emergent treatment/admission) vs group 2 (follow-up/outpatient treatment) vs group 3 (no follow- up). However, one notable finding in this study was the association of scald burns with treatment (admission or follow-up) suggesting that the presence of a scald burn in a child may signify to clinicians that a burn center consult is warranted.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Transfer Patterns: An Analysis of Area Deprivation Index and Clinical Outcomes

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a significant health burden, particularly among pediatric populations, leading to long-term cognitive, physical, and psychosocial impairments. Timely transfer to specialized trauma centers is crucial for optimal management, yet the influence of socioeconomic factors, such as the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), on transfer patterns remains understudied. A retrospective study was conducted on pediatric TBI patients presenting to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center between January 2012 and July 2023. Transfer status, distance, mode of transport, and clinical outcomes were analyzed in relation to ADI. Statistical analyses were performed using Student t-test and analysis of variance. Of 359 patients, 53.5% were transferred from outside hospitals, with higher ADI scores observed in transfer patients (P<0.01). Air transport was associated with greater distances traveled and higher ADI compared to ground ambulance (P<0.01). Despite similarities in injury severity, intensive care unit admission rates differed between transfer modes, with no significant impact on mortality. High ADI patients were more likely to be transferred, suggesting disparities in access to specialized care. Differences in transfer modes highlight the influence of socioeconomic factors on logistical aspects. While transfer did not independently impact outcomes, disparities in intensive care unit admission rates were observed, possibly influenced by injury severity. Integrating socioeconomic data into clinical decision-making processes can inform targeted interventions to optimize care delivery and improve outcomes for all pediatric TBI patients. Prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further elucidate these relationships.

Treatment of unstable forearm fractures at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction in children: antegrade ESIN vs. transepiphyseal intramedullary K-wire fixation.

Treatment of unstable forearm fractures in the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) zone is still a matter of debate. Major drawbacks of all types of fixations include either invasiveness, technical impracticality, or lack of acceptance by patients. This study reports results after antegrade ESIN (a-ESIN) compared to transepiphyseal intramedullary K-wire (TIK) for unstable MDJ forearm fractures. The MDJ of the forearm was defined as the square over the joints of both forearm bones subtracted with the square over the metaphysis of the radius alone. The data of 40 consecutive patients < 16 years of age who were treated either by a-ESIN (later treatment period) or TIK (early treatment period) for an unstable MDJ forearm fracture at a single high-volume pediatric trauma center were retrospectively analyzed. The average age was slightly lower in the first group (TIK = 7.42 years; a-ESIN = 10.5 years). An additional ulna fracture was found in 50% of cases and was treated with a classic antegrade ESIN in 10/20 (TIK) and 6/20 cases (a-ESIN). Additional plaster cast immobilization was performed in all cases with TIK and in three cases with a-ESIN. After TIK, no complication, malalignment, or functional limitation occurred. After a-ESIN, 19/20 patients had an event-free course with stable retention and healing without axial malalignment. In one case, a temporary sensor dysfunction occurred. The same patient suffered a refracture two months after the original trauma, which required a closed reduction. Metal removal was performed after 84 days (TIK) and 150 days (a-ESIN). The outcome in all patients was good. Both a-ESIN and TIK are minimally invasive procedures that are technically easy to perform. Both methods are safe and lead to a complete restoration of the forearm's range of motion. The decisive advantage of a-ESIN is the possibility of postoperative immobilization-free rehabilitation.

What If Nice Terrorist Attack Would Have Happened in Milan? Drawing a Disaster Plan for Mass Casualty Incidents Involving the Pediatric Population.

Terrorist attacks involving children raised concern regarding the preparedness to treat pediatric trauma patients during mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The purpose of this project was to assess the resources available in Milan to respond to MCIs as the 2016 Bastille Day attack in Nice. Literature and guidelines were reviewed and minimal standard requirements of care of pediatric trauma patients in MCIs were identified. The hospitals that took part in the study were asked to answer a survey regarding their resource availability. An overall surge capability of 40-44 pediatric trauma patients was identified, distributed based on age and severity, hospital resources, and expertise. The findings showed that adult and pediatric hospitals should work in synergy with pediatric trauma centers, or offer an alternative if there is none, and should be included in disaster plans for MCIs. Simulations exercises need to be carried out to evaluate and validate the results.