Pediatric-specific Training Research Articles

Variability in pediatric and neonatal organ offering, acceptance and utilization: a survey of Canadian pediatric transplant programs and organ donation organizations.

Solid organ transplantation in children is a lifesaving therapy, however, pediatric organ donation rates remain suboptimal. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Canadian organ donation organizations (ODOs) and pediatric transplant programs (TPs), aiming to describe policies and practices for pediatric organ allocation, acceptance, and utilization in Canada. Response rates were 82% and 83% respectively for ODOs and transplant programs comprising 7 kidney, 3 heart, 2 lung, 2 liver and 1 intestine programs. All 9 ODOs reported offering pediatric organs following death by neurological criteria (DNC), while 8 reported offering organs following death by circulatory criteria (DCC) for some organs. Variability was found across ODOs and TPs. There was little agreement on both absolute and organ-specific donor exclusion criteria between ODOs. There was further disagreement in organ specific acceptance criteria between ODOs and TPs and between TPs themselves. Notably, despite the development of pediatric donation after DCC guidelines, organs from DCC donors are excluded by many ODOs and TPs. Further variability in pediatric specific training, policies, and allocation guidelines are also documented. Significant areas for improvement in standardization in organ acceptance, offering, and allocation in pediatric donation and transplantation across Canada were identified.

Qualification of non-pediatric ophthalmologists in examining children.

This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical approach of non-pediatric ophthalmologists, working in community-based clinics towards Pediatric Patients and their management including referral rates to Pediatric Ophthalmologists and Orthoptists. an online survey was sent to all community ophthalmologists through national society and social media platforms. The questionnaire included questions regarding the responders' professional experience as well as regarding the responders' approach to children younger than 8 years, and the level of confidence in 4 main aspects of children's management and referral rates. 93 physicians working as general ophthalmologists completed the questionnaire. Most respondents have been in practice for over 10 years (64/93, 68.8%) and over two-thirds were also hospital affiliated (65/93, 69.1%). The responders estimated on average that 35.1 ± 29.6% of patients under 8 years of age are referred for a consult to a pediatric ophthalmologist The level of confidence of three aspects unique to Pediatric Ophthalmology; cycloplegic refraction, strabismus evaluation, and prescribing glasses were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than confidence in performing a basic eye exam. many Ophthalmologists do not feel fully capable or experienced to perform the appropriate tests for the pediatric population, especially during the critical timeframe, before 8 years of age. The very high rate of referrals stands in contradiction to the reported low rate of eye pathologies in the pediatric population. These findings suggest that more pediatric-specific training is needed to improve the physician's skills to perform a comprehensive evaluation of pediatric patients in order to reduce the referral burden.

Resources for Improving Pediatric Readiness and Quality of Care in Rural Communities and Emergency Departments.

To share the process and products of an 8-year, federally funded grant from the Health Resources and Services Administration Emergency Medical Services for Children program to increase pediatric emergency readiness and quality of care provided in rural communities located within 2 underserved local emergency medical services agencies (LEMSAs) in Northern California. In 2 multicounty LEMSAs with 24 receiving hospital emergency departments, we conducted focus groups and interviews with patients and parents, first responders, receiving hospital personnel, and other community stakeholders. From this, we (a regional, urban children's hospital) provided a variety of resources for improving the regionalization and quality of pediatric emergency care provided by prehospital providers and healthcare staff at receiving hospitals in these rural LEMSAs. From this project, we provided resources that included regularly scheduled pediatric-specific training and education programs, pediatric-specific quality improvement initiatives, expansion of telemedicine services, and cultural competency training. We also enhanced community engagement and investment in pediatric readiness. The resources we provided from our regional, urban children's hospital to 2 rural LEMSAs facilitated improvements in a regionalized system of care for critically ill and injured children. Our shared resources framework can be adapted by other regional children's hospitals to increase readiness and quality of pediatric emergency care in rural and underserved communities and LEMSAs.

Evolution of a Bidirectional Pediatric Critical Care Educational Partnership in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Introduction: Children in resource-limited settings are disproportionately affected by common childhood illnesses, resulting in high rates of mortality. A major barrier to improving child health in such regions is limited pediatric-specific training, particularly in the care of children with critical illness. While global health rotations for trainees from North America and Europe have become commonplace, residency and fellowship programs struggle to ensure that these rotations are mutually beneficial and do not place an undue burden on host countries. We created a bidirectional, multimodal educational program between trainees in Manila, Philippines, and Baltimore, Maryland, United States, to improve the longitudinal educational experience for all participants.Program Components: Based on stakeholder input and a needs assessment, we established a global health training program in which pediatricians from the Philippines traveled to the United States for observerships, and pediatric residents from a tertiary care center in Baltimore traveled to Manila. Additionally, we created and implemented a contextualized simulation-based shock curriculum for pediatric trainees in Manila that can be disseminated locally. This bidirectional program was adapted to include telemedicine and regularly scheduled “virtual rounds” and educational case conferences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers from the two institutions have collaborated on educational and clinical research projects, offering opportunities for resource sharing, bidirectional professional development, and institutional improvements.Conclusion: Although creating a mutually beneficial global health partnership requires careful planning and investment over time, establishment of a successful bidirectional educational and professional development program in a limited-resource setting is feasible and benefits learners in both countries.

Community Hospice Nurses’ Perspectives on Needs, Preferences, and Challenges Related to Caring for Children With Serious Illness

Many of the 50 000 children who die annually are eligible for provision of community-based hospice care, yet few hospice organizations offer formal pediatric services. Population-level data demonstrate that hospice nurses lack training, experience, and comfort in caring for children, but their specific educational needs and preferences are poorly understood. To assess the pediatric-specific training and support needs of hospice nurses caring for children in the community. For this qualitative study, 41 nurses were purposively seletected from a population-level cohort of 551 hospice nurses who completed a previous mixed-methods survey; these 41 nurses participated in semistructured interviews between February and April 2019. Hospice nurses were recruited from all accredited hospice organizations in Tennessee, Mississippi, and Arkansas that offer care to pediatric patients. Content analysis of interview transcripts was conducted. The interview guide probed for topics related to prior pediatric hospice training experiences, desires and preferences for training, and perceived barriers to training. Interviews were conducted with 41 nurses representing different geographic regions and levels of comfort with pediatric hospice provision (as self-reported in the prior survey). Thirty-eight of the nurses were women (92.7%), with a median age of 40-49 years (range, 20-29 to ≥60 years) and median tenure of 5-9 years (range, <1 to ≥20 years) as a hospice nurse. Respondents included 1 American Indian or Alaska Native nurse (2.4%), 1 Black nurse (2.4%), and 39 White nurses (95.1%). Across interviews, most hospice nurses reported feeling uncomfortable caring for children with serious illness, and all nurses used language to express the immediacy behind the need for pediatric-specific training and support. Nurses explained why further training and support are needed and clear preferences for who should provide the education, educational modalities, and specific training topics. Nurses also articulated barriers to training and support opportunities and proposed innovative suggestions for overcoming these challenges. Notably, nurses emphasized the need for connection with experts, a sense of community, and solidarity to support frontline clinicians providing end-of-life care to children in the community. In this qualitative study, community hospice nurses expressed an urgent need for improvements in pediatric-specific training opportunities and support, clear preferences for how education should be provided, and recommendations for circumventing barriers to training. These findings are a call to action for the palliative care community to collaborate in rapid implementation of educational programs and networks to systematically support hospice nurses caring for children in the community.

Abstracts of the 29th Annual Pediatric Pharmacy Association (PPA) Meeting April 29 to May 3, 2020

Abstracts of the 29th Annual Pediatric Pharmacy Association (PPA) Meeting April 29 to May 3, 2020

An Evaluation of a Community Hospital’s Emergency Department Ultrasonography Processes for the Diagnosis of Acute Pediatric Appendicitis

CONTEXTSince the 1980s, the use of ultrasonography for suspected acute pediatric appendicitis has become increasingly common. Multiple studies have suggested that ultrasound of the appendix has consistently high sensitivity and specificity when the appendix can be clearly visualized. The authors’ primary objective for this study was to retrospectively evaluate their community-based healthcare system’s processes for detecting acute pediatric appendicitis using ultrasonography.METHODSThis was a retrospective medical chart review study of data over a five-year 2014-2018 period at Mercy Health Muskegon in Muskegon, Michigan. All patients aged 3-18 years who had received an appendix ultrasound during this period were identified using the McKesson Radiology (MS) PACS-Lite computer program. Pediatric appendix ultrasound cases were collected and analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value with 95% confidence intervals. Acute appendicitis cases had been confirmed based on pathology reports. Secondary measures including white blood cell, body mass index, and body temperature were also included in analyses.RESULTSIn this sample, the overall sensitivity at detecting acute pediatric appendicitis using ultrasonography was relatively low at approximately 42% (95% CI: 21.1 - 66.0%). On the other hand, sample specificity was quite high at 97% (95% CI: 89.9 – 99.5%). The overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 80% (95% CI: 44.2-96.5%) and the negative predictive Value (NPV) was 86% (95% CI: 75.7-92.4%). The occurrence for false positives was 20% (95% CI: 3.5-55.8%). False negatives were 14% (95% CI: 7.6-24.3%).CONCLUSIONSThe use of ultrasonography at the authors’ institution less often accurately identified cases of later-confirmed pediatric appendicitis compared to some earlier published studies. The authors concluded that this could be due to seeing a lower number of more complex/ambiguous cases of pediatric appendicitis or lack of hospital personnel’s pediatric-specific training and/or experience compared to specialty children’s hospitals. It is possible that imaging improvements could be achieved by either or a combination of: offering training sessions for general ultrasound technicians, offering training session for radiologists, and visiting pediatric physicians and ultrasound technicians. A valuable follow-up study would be to track anticipated improvements and lead to formulation of an acute pediatric appendicitis care protocol within the authors’ healthcare system.

U.S. Military Medical Evacuation and Prehospital Care of Pediatric Trauma Casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan

Background: Traumatic injuries were the most common reason for pediatric admission to military hospitals during the recent wars in the Middle East. We describe injury characteristics and prehospital interventions performed on wartime pediatric trauma casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq, stratified by medical evacuation platform. Methods: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric (age < 18 years) encounters from January 2007 to January 2016. The DODTR is the data repository for all trauma-related injuries managed by deployed US military medical treatment facilities with surgical capabilities. We requested all documented prehospital care, which may have been delivered anywhere from the point-of-injury until a fixed-facility with surgical capabilities. We stratified subjects according to Centers for Disease Control age groupings: <1 year, 1–4 years, 5–9 years, 10–14 years, and 15–17 years. Results: Of the 3,493 pediatric encounters in the DODTR, 1,004 underwent military evacuation from the point of injury: 911 (90.7%) by standard medical evacuation platforms and 93 (9.3%) by nonstandard, improvised evacuation assets. Six hundred seventy-five of the 1004 pediatric trauma casualties were between 5 and 14 years of age. Over 75% were male, over 80% were in Afghanistan, and most were injured by explosives. Across all age groups, serious injuries to the head/neck and extremities were most common. Subjects transported by standard evacuation platforms underwent tourniquet application (12.2% vs 5.3%, p < 0.05) and intraosseous access (12.2% vs 4.3%; p = 0.02) more frequently than those on nonstandard platforms. Casualties evacuated by nonstandard platforms underwent airway adjunct emplacement more frequently those on standard evacuation assets (3.2% vs 0.3%; p = 0.01). IV access and opiate administration were the most commonly performed interventions on both standard and nonstandard assets. Subject survival to hospital discharge was 88.1% on standard platforms and 89.2% on nonstandard platforms (p = 0.75). Conclusions: Approximately 30% of pediatric trauma casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq underwent medical evacuation from the point of injury directly to a military treatment facility with surgical capabilities. Most of those children did not undergo the prehospital interventions studied. Future investigations evaluating pediatric medical evacuation and prehospital care, medical staffing, pediatric-specific training, and equipping of pediatric-specific materials may be beneficial.

Prehospital Interventions Performed on Pediatric Trauma Patients in Iraq and Afghanistan

Background: United States (US) and coalition military medical units deployed to combat zones frequently encounter pediatric trauma patients. Pediatric patients may present unique challenges due to their anatomical and physiological characteristics and most military prehospital providers lack pediatric-specific training. A minimal amount of data exists to illuminate the prehospital care of pediatric patients in this environment. We describe the prehospital care of pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. Methods: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric subjects admitted to US and Coalition fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. Subjects were grouped by age: <1, 1–4, 5–9, 10–14, and 15–17 years. We focused our analysis on interventions related to trauma resuscitation. Results: Of 42,790 encounters in the DODTR during the study period, 3,439 (8.0%) were aged <18 years. Most subjects were in the 5–9 age group (33.1%), male (77.1%), located in Afghanistan (67.8%), injured by explosives (43.1%). Most subjects survived to hospital discharge (90.2%). The most frequently performed interventions were tourniquet placement (6.6%), intubation (6.1%), supplemental oxygen (11.7%), IV access (24.8%), IV fluids (13.3%), IO access (5.1%), and hypothermia prevention (44.5%). The most frequently administered medications were antibiotics (6.2%) and opioids (15.0%). Most procedural and medication interventions occurred in subjects injured by explosives (43.1%) and gunshot wounds (22.1%). Conclusions: Pediatric subjects comprised over 1 in 13 casualties treated in the joint theaters with the majority injured by explosives. Vascular access and hypothermia prevention interventions were the most frequently performed procedures.

Emergency department resuscitation of pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan

BackgroundMilitary hospital healthcare providers treated children during the recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Compared to adults, pediatric patients present unique challenges during trauma resuscitations and have notably been discussed in few research reports. We seek to describe ED interventions performed on pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. MethodsWe queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. Subjects were grouped based on Centers for Disease Control age categories. We used descriptive statistics. ResultsDuring this period, there were 3388 pediatric encounters that arrived at the ED with signs of life or on-going interventions. Most subjects were male (77.2%), located in Afghanistan (67.9%), injured by explosive (43.2%), and admitted to an intensive care unit (57.8%). Most of those arriving to the ED alive or with on-going interventions survived to hospital discharge (91.6%). The most frequently encountered age group was 5–9years (33.3%) followed by 10–14years (31.5%). The most common interventions were vascular access (86.6%), fluid administration (85.0%), and external warming (44.6%). Intubation was the most frequent airway intervention (18.2%). Packed red blood cells were the most frequently administered blood product (33.8% of subjects). ConclusionsPediatric subjects accounted for a notable portion of care delivered in theater emergency departments during the study period. Vascular access and fluid administration were the most frequently performed interventions. Pediatric-specific training is needed as a part of deployment medicine operations.

Overall State of Pediatric Readiness in U.S. Improved Over the Past 10 Years, but Gaps Remain

Overall pediatric readiness has improved over the last 10 years, but many U.S. EDs lack equipment and pediatric specific training for healthcare providers. OVER THE LAST two decades, U.S. researchers have focused on improving pediatric readiness for children in emergency care settings. Last month researchers from the National Pediatric Readiness Project updated a 2006 report assessing the pediatric readiness of U.S. emergency departments (ED) (Gausche-Hill et al., 2015). The study is important because it provides the most up-to-date and comprehensive evaluation of pediatric readiness of U.S. EDs. The current report found that overall pediatric readiness had improved over the last 10 years, but that many U.S. EDs continue to lack pediatric equipment and pediatric-specific training for healthcare workers. To assess pediatric readiness the researchers used a weighted 55 question Web-based survey based on the guidelines for care of children in EDs issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Emergency Physicians, and the Emergency Nurses Association (2009). Previous reports had showed relatively poor, uneven compliance with the guidelines. The investigators assessed pediatric readiness, including physician/nurse training, quality of improvement activities, patient safety initiatives, policies and procedures, availability of equipment and disaster planning. Of the 4,137 assessments completed (83% response rate) in 2013, there was a median score of 69 on the 100-point weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) scale, an increase from a median of 55 in 2003. The researchers found a correlation between the WPRS scores and the annual volume of pediatric patients. Hospitals with less than 1,800 pediatric patients a year had a

Assessment of competence in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy is an invaluable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of upper and lower gastrointestinal diseases in children. Pediatric and adult endoscopy differ in several respects including differences in procedural indications, sedation practices, pre-procedure preparation, equipment, and the importance of routine tissue sampling and terminal ileum intubation. In the same way that performance of endoscopy in children requires pediatric-specific training, assessment of pediatric endoscopists requires an approach that is tailored to pediatric practice and the use of assessment methods and measures that have been developed and validated specifically within the pediatric context.