Pediatric Primary Care Clinic Research Articles

Improving Substance Use Screening among Teens utilizing S2BI in a Pediatric Primary Care Clinic

Improving Substance Use Screening among Teens utilizing S2BI in a Pediatric Primary Care Clinic

Parent attitudes and perceptions of integrated behavioral health care delivery for pediatric patients

Introduction: Patient access to high-quality behavioral health services has been a well-documented problem that has only been further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic, especially within the pediatric population. Although integrated models of care have demonstrated efficacy for improving access, there is little research examining parents’ preferences for key elements of integrated practice, which now include increased utilization of virtual care. Parent/caregiver perspectives are essential to understand and enhance behavioral health service delivery within an integrated model of care because they are largely responsible for initiating, facilitating, and intimately participating in their children’s behavioral health care.
 Methods and Aims: The Parent Acceptance of Pediatric Integrated Care Survey Revised (PAPICS-R) was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of integrated care experts to evaluate caregiver perceptions of behavior health care delivery models for pediatric patients. A major component of the revised survey was a focus on virtual care, which has become ubiquitous since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. Eight hundred thirty-four parents from diverse backgrounds across the United States who had children under 18-years old completed the revised survey online. Survey responses were analyzed using various statistical modeling techniques. Detailed demographic data was collected and associations of demographic variables with item responses were assessed using ANOVA and Chi-square tests.
 Results: Results indicated parent support for core components of integrated care such as co-location of medical and behavioral health care, interactive communication between providers, and shared access to health records. Parents also tended to prefer to be involved in their child’s therapy and indicated acceptability of virtual behavioral health care. Significant differences in parent responses were evident across several demographic variables such as race/ethnicity, parent age, child age, number of children and parent education. Notably, patient privacy and stigma were primary concerns for certain groups. These key findings will be shared to explore how specific demographic differences affect parent integrated care perspectives and how best to address these differences in practice.
 Conclusions: Results from the PAPICS-R provide valuable insight into parent perceptions of integrated behavioral health care. Notably, parent attitudes toward the integrated model of care (including virtual healthcare delivery methods) are largely positive. The findings have directly impacted multiple key aspects of the IBH program including future format of care delivery, trainee education, program expansion, and quality improvement. These adaptations will be discussed along with broader implications.
 Future Directions: Additional data are being gathered to examine the impact of various parent demographic variables on perspectives of an integrated primary care model. We are also currently working to disseminate results from the PAPICS-R survey to health care providers and organizations as the data are expected to provide valuable insight for those looking to establish integrated pediatric primary care clinics or improve their current model of care. Applicability of implementation within a diverse range of communities and regions will be discussed.

Delabeling Penicillin Allergy in A Pediatric Primary Care Clinic.

Delabeling Penicillin Allergy in A Pediatric Primary Care Clinic.

Pediatric collaborative care outcomes in a regional model

BackgroundDespite the movement toward hospital-based medical centers acquiring pediatric primary care offices, many primary care pediatricians still work in small, independent practices. To expand mental healthcare access, service delivery models must consider primary care practice needs and regionally available resources.ObjectiveThis report describes the implementation and evaluation of the Mood, Anxiety, ADHD Collaborative Care (MAACC) program over a 4 years period. MAACC. MAACC engaged 97 pediatric primary care clinicians across 39 practices in mental health training and supported the treatment of referred patients through a collaborative care model. To support psychosocial treatment needs, we built a child community therapy referral network of 213 licensed psychotherapy providers.MethodsData were collected on service delivery patterns (e.g., referrals, treatment use, and attrition) and patient outcomes. Measures included parent and children and adolescents PROMIS anxiety and depression short forms and the Parent NICHQ Vanderbilt.ResultsSix hundred ninety-six children and adolescents aged 6–18 were evaluated and provided treatment recommendations. Anxiety disorders were the most common diagnosis (45.4%), followed by ADHD (30.7%) and mood disorder (17%). For children and adolescents with an anxiety or mood disorder, significant improvement was observed from baseline to any initial follow-up and from baseline to 6, 12-, and 18 weeks on children and adolescents and parent measures of anxiety and depression. For children and adolescents with ADHD, significant improvement was observed from baseline to any initial follow-up measure and at 6 and 18 weeks on parent-reported inattentive symptoms. Significant differences in treatment outcomes were identified for children and adolescents with anxiety receiving psychotherapy alone and medication management and psychotherapy.ConclusionMAACC utilization and patient outcomes suggest that real-world collaborative care can effectively provide high-quality care while cultivating increased primary care treatment capacity and building on existing community resources.

Initial development of tools to identify child abuse and neglect in pediatric primary care

BackgroundChild abuse and neglect (CAN) is prevalent, associated with long-term adversities, and often undetected. Primary care settings offer a unique opportunity to identify CAN and facilitate referrals, when warranted. Electronic health records (EHR) contain extensive information to support healthcare decisions, yet time constraints preclude most providers from thorough EHR reviews that could indicate CAN. Strategies that summarize EHR data to identify CAN and convey this to providers has potential to mitigate CAN-related sequelae. This study used expert review/consensus and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to develop and test a lexicon to characterize children who have experienced or are at risk for CAN and compared machine learning methods to the lexicon + NLP approach to determine the algorithm’s performance for identifying CAN.MethodsStudy investigators identified 90 CAN terms and invited an interdisciplinary group of child abuse experts for review and validation. We then used NLP to develop pipelines to finalize the CAN lexicon. Data for pipeline development and refinement were drawn from a randomly selected sample of EHR from patients seen at pediatric primary care clinics within a U.S. academic health center. To explore a machine learning approach for CAN identification, we used Support Vector Machine algorithms.ResultsThe investigator-generated list of 90 CAN terms were reviewed and validated by 25 invited experts, resulting in a final pool of 133 terms. NLP utilized a randomly selected sample of 14,393 clinical notes from 153 patients to test the lexicon, and .03% of notes were identified as CAN positive. CAN identification varied by clinical note type, with few differences found by provider type (physicians versus nurses, social workers, etc.). An evaluation of the final NLP pipelines indicated 93.8% positive CAN rate for the training set and 71.4% for the test set, with decreased precision attributed primarily to false positives. For the machine learning approach, SVM pipeline performance was 92% for CAN + and 100% for non-CAN, indicating higher sensitivity than specificity.ConclusionsThe NLP algorithm’s development and refinement suggest that innovative tools can identify youth at risk for CAN. The next key step is to refine the NLP algorithm to eventually funnel this information to care providers to guide clinical decision making.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Pediatric Medical Clinicians’ Application of Fluoride Varnish

Fluoride varnish reduces children's tooth decay, yet few clinicians provide it. Most state Medicaid programs have covered this service during medical visits for children aged 1 to 5 years, but private insurers began covering it only in 2015 due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate that they cover a set of recommended preventive services without cost-sharing. Evidence on clinicians' behavior change postmandate is limited. To examine monthly changes in fluoride varnish applications among pediatric clinicians following the ACA mandate. Using all-payer claims data from Massachusetts, this cohort study applied an interrupted time-series approach with linear regression models comparing changes in monthly clinician-level outcomes before and after the mandate. Participants included clinicians who billed at least 5 well-child visits for patients aged 1 to 5 years and were observed at least once premandate. Adjusted for clinician fixed effects, models were assessed overall and separately for clinicians categorized by their monthly share of well-child visits paid by private insurers before the mandate: mostly private (>66% of visits paid by private insurers), mostly public (<33% of visits paid by private insurers), or mixed (33%-66% of visits paid by private insurers) insurance types. Analysis was performed from June 1, 2022, to July 31, 2023. Preenactment and postenactment of the ACA mandate for private insurers to cover fluoride varnish applications without cost-sharing. Clinician-month measures of whether fluoride varnish was provided during at least 1 well-child visit and the share of such visits, analyzed separately for clinicians who did and did not apply fluoride varnish premandate. The sample included 2405 clinicians, with 107 841 clinician-months. Premandate, 10.48% of the visits included fluoride varnish applications. Two years postmandate, the likelihood of ever applying fluoride varnish was 13.64 (95% CI, 10.97-16.32) percentage points higher. For clinicians providing fluoride varnish premandate, the share of visits with fluoride varnish increased by 9.22 (95% CI, 5.41-13.02) percentage points. This increase was observed in clinicians who treated children with insurance that was mostly mixed and mostly private; no substantial change was observed among those treating children with mostly public insurance. In this cohort study of pediatric primary care clinicians, an association between the ACA mandate and an increase in fluoride varnish application was observed, especially among clinicians primarily treating privately insured patients and those applying it premandate. However, application remains infrequent, suggesting persistent barriers.

An eHealth Prevention Program for Substance Use, Sexual Assault, and Sexual Risk Behaviors for Adolescents in Primary Care: Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Teen Well Check.

Substance use, sexual assault, and sexual risk behaviors are common among adolescents and are interrelated. Nearly 1 in 5 adolescents use substances before sexual encounters, placing these young people at risk for both sexual assault and sexual risk behaviors. Primary care visits present a unique opportunity to address multiple health risk behaviors. Teen Well Check is a web-based integrated prevention program for substance use, sexual assault, and sexual risk behaviors with demonstrated usability and acceptability among patients and providers. The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess feasibility. Adolescents (n=123) aged 14 to 18 years from diverse backgrounds were recruited from primarily Medicaid-serving pediatric primary care clinics. Participants completed a baseline survey; were randomized to receive Teen Well Check or an assessment-only control; and completed 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up surveys. Feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment and retention rates. Preliminary changes from baseline to follow-up periods were examined separately in the Teen Well Check and control conditions. We recruited 123 participants (Teen Well Check: n=61, 49.6%; control: n=62, 50.4%). Of the 61 participants assigned to the Teen Well Check condition, 55 (90%) completed the full program and viewed all intervention content. Of the 123 participants, 105 (85.4%) were retained across at least 1 follow-up period, and there was no difference in follow-up rates between the conditions (χ21=0.6; P=.43). The completion of Teen Well Check took an average of 6.2 (SD 5.8) minutes. Preliminary analyses revealed that there were significant reductions in perceived peer norms (descriptive norms) for substance use before sex across follow-ups among participants in the Teen Well Check condition (P=.001 from baseline to 6 months), whereas there were significant increases among participants in the control condition (P=.003 from baseline to 6 months). In addition, there were nonsignificant reductions in substance misuse risk from baseline to the 6-month follow-up among participants in the Teen Well Check condition (P=.16). These findings support the feasibility of Teen Well Check delivery within pediatric primary care clinics. A randomized clinical trial is needed to assess efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT3489434; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03489434.

Considerations for Behavioral Health Integration Program Implementation in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: A Qualitative Study

BackgroundMore than 16% of children in the United States have a behavioral health (BH) disorder, but less than half receive recommended care. Integrated BH programs in primary care settings can address gaps in BH care. This qualitative study sought to understand pediatric primary care clinicians’ experiences with the novel multicomponent Behavioral Health Integration Program (BHIP) in a large network of independent pediatric practices and to identify potential barriers and facilitators for implementation of such programs. MethodsSemistructured interviews were conducted virtually with a purposive sample of clinicians in BHIP practices from November 2021 to April 2022. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was the study’s theoretical framework. Interviews were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed inductively and deductively using Charmaz’s constructivist grounded theory approach. ResultsOf the 31 participants, 74% identified as female and 97% as white. Most participants felt that BH care should be integrated into pediatric primary care and that BHIP helped to do so. Most barriers and facilitators identified centered on inner and outer setting Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains, including BH care delivery and finance; practice structures (staffing, training, scope of services, and management); practice culture (leadership, communication, and teamwork); and effects of integration on clinicians. ConclusionsBHIP provided important support for BH integration across varied settings. Potential considerations for effective implementation in other settings included expanded training for BH clinicians, tailoring integration to organizational and practice-level contexts, and increased advocacy to address the structural factors limiting of BH care delivery.

Food Pantry Referral and Utilization in a Pediatric Primary Care Clinic

This study aimed to characterize progression from screening for food insecurity risk to on-site food pantry referral to food pantry utilization in pediatric primary care. This retrospective study included 14,280 patients aged 0-21 years with ≥1 pediatric primary care visit from March 2018 to February 2020. Analyses were conducted in 2020-2022 using multivariable regression to examine patient-level demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics and systems-related factors associated with progression from screening positive for food insecurity risk to food pantry referral to completing ≥1 food pantry visit. Of patients screened for food insecurity risk, 31.9% screened positive; 18.5% of food-insecure patients received an on-site food pantry referral. Among patients referred, 28.9% visited the food pantry. In multivariable models, higher odds of referral were found for patients living near the clinic (AOR=1.28; 95% CI=1.03, 1.59), for each additional health-related social need reported (AOR=1.23; 95% CI=1.16, 1.29), and when the index clinic encounter occurred during food pantry open hours (AOR=1.62; 95% CI=1.30, 2.02). Higher odds of food pantry visitation were found for patients with a preferred language of Haitian Creole (AOR=2.16; 95% CI=1.37, 3.39), for patients of Hispanic race/ethnicity (AOR=3.67; 95% CI=1.14, 11.78), when the index encounter occurred during food pantry open hours (AOR=1.96; 95% CI=1.25, 3.07), for patients with a clinician letter referral (AOR=6.74; 95% CI=3.94, 11.54), or for patients with a referral due to a screening-identified food emergency (AOR=2.27; 95% CI=1.30, 3.96). There was substantial attrition along the pathway from screening positive for food insecurity risk to food pantry referral and utilization as well as patient-level characteristics and systems-related factors associated with successful referrals and utilization.

Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Fluoride Varnish Application

ObjectiveNational guidelines recommend that all children under age six receive fluoride varnish (FV) in medical settings. However, application rates remain low. This study aimed to update understanding of barriers and facilitators to guideline concordant FV application. MethodsWe conducted virtual semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample (eg, FV application rates, geographic location, practice size and type) of pediatric primary care clinicians and medical assistants in Massachusetts between February 1 and June 30, 2022. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) served as the study’s theoretical framework and data were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. ResultsOf the 31 participants, 90% identified as White and 81% as female. Major themes, which linked to four CFIR domains, included: variation in perceived adequacy of reimbursement; differences in FV application across practice types; variation in processes, protocols, and priorities; external accountability for quality of care; and potential levers for change. Important subthemes included challenges for small practices; role of quality measures in delivering guideline-concordant preventive oral health care; and desire for preventive care coordination with dentists. ConclusionsThis study suggests that potential barriers and facilitators to guideline concordant FV application exist at multiple levels that may warrant further study. Examples include testing the effectiveness of quality measures for FV application and testing strategies for implementing consistent processes and protocols for improving FV application rates.

Social Needs as a Risk Factor for Positive Postpartum Depression Screens in Pediatric Primary Care.

The goal of this study was to examine the association between self-reported social needs and postpartum depression (PPD) symptoms of mothers screened in pediatric primary care clinics. This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from 3,616 pediatric patients (age 0 to 6 months), whose mothers completed the Edinburg Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and a social needs screening in a large pediatric primary care network between April 2021 and February 2022. Mothers were screened for four self-reported social needs (food, housing, transportation, and utilities). Logistic regression evaluated the association between report of any social need and a positive EPDS screen (≥10), adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics and ZIP code-level poverty. Overall, 8.6% of mothers screened positive for PPD and 10.0% reported any social needs. The odds of a positive depression screen were significantly higher among mothers who reported any social need compared to those not reporting a social need (OR 4.18, 95% CI 3.11-5.61). The prevalence of all depressive symptoms on the EPDS was significantly higher among those who reported any social need, relative to those reporting no needs. Mothers reporting any social needs were significantly more likely to report thoughts of self-harm (6.9% vs. 1.5%, p<0.005). Self-report of social need was significantly associated with positive PPD screens during infant well-child visits. Social needs may be a target of future interventions addressing PPD in pediatric settings. Improving care for social needs may have added benefit of alleviating risk for PPD.

Assessment of Adoption and Early Implementation Barriers and Facilitators of the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) Model.

Although the use of interventions for screening for social determinants of health of families in pediatric primary care clinics has increased in the past decade, research on the barriers and facilitators of implementing such interventions has been limited. We explored barriers, facilitators, and the mechanisms clarifying their roles in the adoption and implementation of the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) model, an approach for strengthening families, promoting children's health and development, and preventing child maltreatment. A total of 28 semistructured interviews were completed with 9 practice champions, 11 primary care professionals, 5 behavioral health professionals, and 3 nursing/administrative staff representing 12 pediatric primary care practices participating in a larger randomized control trial of implementing SEEK. We identified several barriers and facilitators in the stages of SEEK's adoption and early implementation. Barriers associated with outer and inner setting determinants and poor innovation-organization fit declined in importance over time, while facilitators associated with SEEK characteristics increased in importance based on participants' responses. Barriers and facilitators were linked by mechanisms of comparison and contrast of burdens and benefits, and problem-solving to address limited capacity with available resources. Any screening for and addressing social determinants of health demands greater attention to adoption and implementation mechanisms and the processes by which primary care professionals assess and utilize facilitators to address barriers. This occurs in a context defined by perceived burdens and benefits of innovation adoption and implementation, the capacity of the practice, and changes in perception with experiencing the innovation.

Parent Perspectives on Electronic Health Record-Based Social Needs Screening and Documentation: A Qualitative Study.

Social needs interventions in clinical settings can improve child health outcomes; however, they are not routinely delivered in routine pediatric care. The electronic health record (EHR) can support these interventions, but parent engagement in the development of EHR-based social needs interventions is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess parent perspectives on EHR-based social needs screening and documentation and identify family-centered approaches for screening design and implementation. We enrolled 20 parents from four pediatric primary care clinics. Parents completed a social risk questionnaire from an existing EHR module and participated in qualitative interviews. Parents were asked about the acceptability of EHR-based social needs screening and documentation and preferences for screening administration. A hybrid deductive-inductive approach was used to analyze qualitative data. Parents identified the benefits of social needs screening and documentation but expressed concerns related to privacy, fear of negative outcomes, and use of outdated documentation. Some felt self-administered electronic questionnaires would mitigate parent discomfort and encourage disclosure of social needs, while others felt face-to-face screening would be more effective. Parents stressed the importance of transparency on the purpose of social needs screening and the use of data. This work can inform the design and implementation of EHR-based social needs interventions that are acceptable and feasible for parents. Findings suggest strategies such as clear communication and multi-modal delivery methods may enhance intervention uptake. Future work should integrate feedback from multiple stakeholders to design and evaluate interventions that are family-centered and feasible to implement in clinical settings.

Learnings from the implementation of standardized content and processes for integrated behavioral health prevention visits.

Integrated behavioral health (IBH) in pediatric primary care has spread significantly over the past two decades. However, a crucial component of advancing the state of science is articulating specific intervention models and their associated outcomes. Foundational to this research is the standardization of IBH interventions; however, limited scholarship exists. This is particularly true for IBH prevention (IBH-P) interventions, which pose unique challenges to standardization. The present study presents the development of a standardized IBH-P model, processes to ensure fidelity, and fidelity outcomes. The IBH-P model was delivered by psychologists in two large, diverse pediatric primary care clinics. Extant research and quality improvement processes supported the development of standardized criteria. Fidelity procedures were developed through an iterative process, resulting in two measures: provider self-rated fidelity and independent rater fidelity. These tools assessed fidelity to IBH-P visits and comparison of self and independently rated fidelity. Data from both self and independent ratings indicated 90.5% of items were completed across all visits. The agreement between independent rater coding and provider self-coding was high (87.5%). Results indicated a high level of concordance between provider self-ratings and independent coder ratings of fidelity. Findings suggest that a prevention-based, universal, standardized model of care with a psychosocially complex population was feasible to develop and adhere to. Learnings generated from this study may guide other programs seeking to develop standardization interventions and fidelity processes that can ensure high-quality, evidence-based care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A Comparison of Depressive Symptom Presentation in Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes and Pediatric Primary Care Samples

Background. Depression is a common comorbidity in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). It is unclear if patterns of responses from questionnaires used to screen for depressive symptoms are influenced by the burden of living with T1D and/or the consequences of hyperglycemia. Based on this gap in the adolescent research, we sought to identify potential differences in depression screening response patterns between adolescents with and without T1D and relate response patterns with glycemic outcomes. Methods. Using a retrospective case–control design, we analyzed electronic health records for age, sex, and race-matched adolescents 13–18 years of age from a pediatric diabetes clinic (n = 477) and a pediatric primary care clinic (n = 477) in the United States. Adolescents in both settings were screened for depressive symptoms during the same time period using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Results. Participant demographics for matched characteristics were: 53.5% male, 71.7% White, median age 13.0 (interquartile range = 13.0, 14.0). After controlling for type of insurance, adolescents with T1D were more likely to have higher total PHQ-9 scores (odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.17, 1.98, p = 0.002 ) and higher somatic subscores (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.20, 2.05, p = 0.001 ) compared to the primary care sample. The pattern of item endorsement greater than “not at all” indicated that adolescents with T1D were more likely to have higher values for somatic items such as “trouble falling asleep” and “feeling tired” than those in the primary care sample. Item-total correlations and Cronbach’s α indicated that all items were contributing to the overall score in the same manner in each group. Conclusions. Symptom endorsement for sleep and fatigue were higher for adolescents with T1D and without T1D. Study results support the need for further examination of the origins of somatic symptoms in T1D and for an additional examination of the specificity of depression screening instruments used in routine pediatric diabetes care.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Body Mass Index Among Hispanic Children Accessing a Primary Care Clinic in Central Texas: An Epidemic Amidst a Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic led to lifestyle disruptions that increased the risk for pediatric obesity and health disparities among Hispanic children. This study aimed to assess weight and body mass index (BMI) trends longitudinally, pre- and intra-COVID-19 pandemic, among Hispanic children. A retrospective chart review included Hispanic children (n=88) accessing a Federally Qualified Health Center, including six pediatric primary care clinics 6 months prepandemic and 6-, 12- and 18-month intrapandemic intervals. Descriptive statistical analyses included paired t tests, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and correlations for weight and BMI percentiles comparisons at prepandemic and intrapandemic intervals. Comparison of prepandemic and 6-month intrapandemic intervals did not identify differences in BMI percentiles. A significant difference in BMI percentiles was found in comparisons of prepandemic and 12- and 18-month intrapandemic intervals, with no differences identified by age or sex. Hispanic children experienced a significant increase in BMI percentiles throughout the pandemic. Addressing this social determinant of health among Hispanic children presenting with anomalous weight gain is imperative to promote health equity by focusing on the pediatric obesity epidemic.

A comparison of electronic health records and the Oregon state immunization registry for human papilloma virus vaccine delivery (2005–2022)

IntroductionImmunization Information Systems (IIS) play an important information-sharing role at the point of care, and provide vital vaccination data for research studies and policy-makers. Previous validation studies comparing the accuracy of state registry data to health records have had mixed results. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of EHR vaccination data for 9–17 year-old patients from 10 Oregon primary care clinics who had at least one ambulatory care visit in the past 3 years from the date of validation data collection. Data on 100 age eligible youth were captured per clinic. We compared HPV and Tdap vaccinations captured in the EHR to the Oregon ALERT IIS. All clinics were located in rural areas with both family medicine (n = 7) and pediatric (n = 3) primary care clinics. ResultsOverall agreement for HPV vaccination between EHR and ALERT IIS was 89.4 % (k = 0.83; p < 0.05). For Tdap vaccination overall agreement was 80.8 % (k = 0.60; p < 0.05). Pediatric clinics showed a higher overall vaccine agreement for both HPV at 93.3 % (k = 0.89; p < 0.05) and Tdap at 95.3 % (k = 0.90; p < 0.05). Among clinics that used bidirectional data exchange (only family medicine clinics), HPV agreement was higher at 91 % (k = 0.85) versus 88 % (k = 0.81; p < 0.05) and was lower for Tdap 75 % with bidirectional data exchange (k = 0.50) versus 86 % without bidirectional data exchange (k = 0.70; p < 0.05). When the EHR and ALERT IIS disagreed, ALERT ISS usually had additional vaccines. ConclusionsALERT IIS data provides more accurate data than EHRs can provide when measuring vaccine delivery among adolescents in rural Oregon.

Key attributes of child psychiatry access programs

The gap between the need for and the availability of pediatric mental health providers is well documented. One solution is regional/state Child Psychiatry Access Programs (CPAPs), which aid in the assessment and management of youth with behavioral health (BH) concerns by providing consultation to Pediatric Primary Care Clinicians. Our authorship team and the National Network of Child Psychiatry Access Programs (NNCPAP) board worked to describe operational definitions for CPAPs elements and related outcome monitoring processes and data systems. CPAP elements include regional child psychiatry availability by phone; real time phone availability; referral and resource assistance; and, expedited face-to-face psychiatric evaluation. Defining a child psychiatry consultation program as a CPAP and describing key attributes for CPAPs is an important step in facilitating implementation of the model and advancing research into its effectiveness.

Screening for parent and child ADHD in urban pediatric primary care: pilot implementation and stakeholder perspectives

BackgroundADHD commonly co-occurs in children and parents. When ADHD is untreated in parents, it contributes to negative child developmental and treatment outcomes. Screening for parent and child ADHD co-occurrence in pediatric primary care may be an effective strategy for early identification and treatment. There is no data on whether this screening model can be implemented successfully and there exists limited guidance on how to effectively approach parents about their own ADHD in pediatric settings. Even greater sensitivity may be required when engaging with families living in urban, low SES communities due to systemic inequities, mistrust, and stigma.MethodsThe current pilot study described the first 6 months of implementation of a parent and child ADHD screening protocol in urban pediatric primary care clinics serving a large population of families insured through Medicaid. Parents and children were screened for ADHD symptoms at annual well-child visits in pediatric primary care clinics as part of standard behavioral health screening. Independent stakeholder group meetings were held to gather feedback on factors influencing the implementation of the screening and treatment strategies. Mixed methods were used to examine initial screening completion rates and stakeholder perspectives (i.e., parents, primary care office staff, pediatricians, and behavioral health providers) on challenges of implementing the screening protocol within urban pediatric primary care.ResultsScreening completion rates were low (19.28%) during the initial 6-month implementation period. Thematic analysis of stakeholder meetings provided elaboration on the low screening completion rates. Identified themes included: 1) divergence between provider enthusiasm and parent hesitation; 2) parent preference versus logistic reality of providers; 3) centering the experiences of people with marginalized identities; and 4) sensitivity when discussing parent mental health and medication.ConclusionsFindings highlight the importance of developing flexible approaches to screening parent and child ADHD in urban pediatric health settings and emphasize the importance of cultural sensitivity when working with marginalized and under-resourced families.Trial registrationNCT04240756 (27/01/2020).

Assessing and Improving WIC Enrollment in the Primary Care Setting: A Quality Initiative.

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides food and other resources to mitigate the harmful effects of food insecurity on child and maternal health. From a 2009 peak, nationwide WIC participation declined through 2020. Our objectives were to understand factors influencing WIC engagement and improve WIC enrollment through novel, primary care-based quality improvement interventions. Plan-do-study-act cycles were implemented at a majority Medicaid-insured pediatric primary care clinic. Universal WIC screening at <5-year-old well-child visits was initiated, with counseling and referrals offered to nonparticipants. Clinic providers received WIC education. WIC screening, counseling reminders, and referrals were streamlined via the electronic health record. Families were surveyed on WIC participation barriers. Patient demographic data were analyzed for predictors of WIC participation. Mean new WIC enrollments increased significantly (42%) compared with baseline, with sustained special cause variation after study interventions. Provider WIC knowledge improved significantly at study end (P <.001). Rates of WIC screening, counseling, and referrals remained stable for >1 year after study interventions. The most common family-reported barriers to WIC participation were "Access problems" and "WIC knowledge gap." Factors associated with decreased WIC participation in multivariable analysis were increasing age (P <.001), and non-Medicaid insurance status (P = .03). We demonstrate feasible primary care-based screening, education, and referral interventions that appear to improve WIC enrollment. We identify knowledge gap and access problems as major potentially modifiable barriers to WIC participation. The expansion of similar low-cost interventions into other settings has the potential to benefit under-resourced children and families.