Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team Research Articles

A Review of Patient Population Requiring Novel Critical Care Pediatric Transport Stroke Clinical Practice Guideline: A Three Year Single Site Analysis

<h3>Objectives</h3> 1. To identify patients transported by a pediatric critical care transport team for suspected or confirmed acute ischemic stroke who met qualifications of stroke activation. 2. Retrospective calculation of Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) score of patients meeting criteria for transport stroke protocol activation. <h3>Background</h3> There are many pre-hospital Emergency Medical Service (EMS) and transport protocols as well as Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) screening tools that exist for rapid transport of an adult patient with suspected or confirmed acute ischemic stroke to the nearest stroke center for rapid diagnosis. These screening algorithms aid in identifying adult patients who benefit from transport directly to an adult comprehensive stroke center. No data has been published on pre-hospital and transport evaluation and treatment algorithms for suspected acute ischemic stroke in children. Our institution created and implemented a transport stroke clinical practice guideline specific to pediatric stroke to improve recognition and management of patients with suspected stroke by our interfacility critical care transport team. <h3>Methods</h3> A retrospective chart review of patients transported by our institution's critical care transport teams from September 1, 2016 and March 1, 2020 meeting institutional criteria for stroke activation. LVO scores were calculated retrospectively based on clinical information documented within the transport medical record. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 17,244 patients transported by our institution's critical care transport, 17 patients met criteria during the defined study period. Average/median age was 173 months, or 14.4 years old. 4 of 17 had radiographic evidence of thrombus with 3 of those 4 underwent definitive management with tPA or endovascular retrieval. Hemiplegia is the most common presenting symptom with confirmed stroke in this population. The confirmed stroke group scored significantly lower on Glasgow Coma Scale (median of 8 vs. 15, p = 0.014), significantly higher on the LAMS LVO score (median 4 vs. 0, p = 0.021) and significantly higher on the RACE LVO (median 4 vs. 0, p = 0.036). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Acute ischemic stroke is a rare occurrence in pediatric patients. A standardized clinical practice guideline for transport can facilitate early recognition, appropriate management, and transport to a pediatric specific stroke care for timely diagnosis and intervention. LVO scores designed for adult population have not been validated for use in pediatric patients for suspected stroke, but may be useful in triage of pediatric patients with stroke-like symptoms to a stroke center with specialized care in pediatric stroke.

Is Parental Presence in the Ambulance Associated With Parental Satisfaction During Emergency Pediatric Intensive Care Retrieval? A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Quality standards for pediatric intensive care transport services in the U.K. state that at least one parent should be allowed to travel with their child during emergency transport to a PICU. We aimed to identify the reasons why parents do, or do not, accompany their child and whether there is an association between parental presence in the ambulance and their satisfaction with the transport. National cross-sectional parent questionnaire. Pediatric Critical Care Transport (PCCT) teams and PICUs in England and Wales. Parents of children transferred to one of 24 participating PICUs between January 2018 and January 2019. None. A parent feedback questionnaire was completed by parents whose child received an emergency interhospital transfer. As part of the questionnaire, a brief nine-item scale was developed to summarize parental transport experience (ranging from 1 to 5). The association between parental presence in the ambulance and parental experience was analyzed. A total of 4,558 children were transported during the study. Consent was obtained from 2,838 parents, and questionnaires received in 2,084 unique transports (response rate: 45.7%). In 1,563 transports (75%), at least one parent traveled in the ambulance. Parents did not travel in 478 transports (23%) and, in most instances (442 transports; 93%), offered reasons (emotional, practical, and health-related) for declining to travel or explanations why they were not permitted to travel (mainly due to space restrictions). Most parents rated their experience with the retrieval teams very highly, and within this context, we found evidence of greater variability in experience ratings if parents were not present in the ambulance and if this was not their choice. Most parents who completed questionnaires rated their experience with their PCCT team highly. Parental presence and choice to travel in the ambulance were associated with a more positive experience.

Peripheral and Central/Intraosseous Vasoactive Infusions During and After Pediatric Critical Care Transport: Retrospective Cohort Study of Extravasation Injury.

To compare the prevalence of adverse events related to vasoactive drug infusions administered via a peripheral venous catheter versus a central venous or intraosseous catheter. Retrospective observational study. A pediatric critical care transport team, and the PICUs and regional hospitals within the North Thames and East Anglia regions of the United Kingdom. Children (up to 18 yr old) transported by the Children's Acute Transport Service receiving an infusion of a vasoactive drug (epinephrine, dobutamine, dopamine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin). None. The medical records of all children transported between April 2017 and May 2020 receiving a vasoactive drug infusion were reviewed and cross-referenced with the service critical incident database. The outcome measure was anatomic catheter-related adverse events (including extravasation) reported during transport or in the first 24 hours on the PICU. During the study period, the service undertook 3,836 transports. Vasoactive drugs were administered during 558 patient transports (14.5%). During 198 of 558 transports (35.5%), vasoactive drugs were administered via a peripheral venous catheter, with seven of 198 (3.5%) adverse events. One extravasation event resulted in tissue necrosis. The median time to injury after the infusion was commenced was 60 minutes (interquartile range, 30-60 min). During 360 of 558 transports (64.5%), vasoactive infusions were administered by central venous or intraosseous catheter, with nine of 360 (2.5%) adverse events. During pediatric critical care transport, we did not find a difference in prevalence of adverse events following the administration of vasoactive drugs via peripheral venous catheters or via central venous and intraosseous catheters.

Improving Mobilization Times of a Specialized Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team

ObjectivesThe Ground and Air Medical Quality Transport database identifies the average mobilization time (AMT) of the transport team as a metric for benchmarking. Our specific aim was to decrease our AMT to < 25 minutes for our expanded role, ground, nonsimultaneous transports by the end of quarter 4 of 2018. MethodsStandardization of data collection with awareness building, ambulance vendor involvement, and team-focused interventions were the different phases of project implementation. Documentation of reasons for delay was performed pre- and postimplementation. ResultsOur AMT decreased from a baseline of 30.3 minutes to 24.5 minutes after project implementation. Communication delays (19.0%), reason for delay not documented (16.5%), no team available (14.0%), rotor wing vendor delays (12.4%), and ambulance vendor delays (7.4%) were the common reasons for delay on our preimplementation Pareto analysis. Communication and pharmacy delays were the most common reasons during all 3 phases of our project. ConclusionsImplementation of the project allowed us to achieve our goal of improving our AMT. Understanding the reasons for delay is a crucial consideration, and success depends on careful change management. Further iterations will need to focus on improving communication and the pharmacy medication dispatch process.

Severity of Illness Scoring for Pediatric Interfacility Transport: A North American Survey.

Severity of illness scoring during pediatric critical care transport may provide objective data to determine illness trajectory and disposition and contribute to quality assurance data for pediatric transport programs. The objective of this study was to ascertain the breadth of severity of illness scoring tool application among North American pediatric critical care transport teams. A cross-sectional quantitative survey using REDCap was distributed to 137 North American pediatric transport programs. Baseline team characteristics were established along with questions related to severity of illness tool application.Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. There were 55 responses (40%), and of those, 13 (24%) use a severity of illness scoring tool within their practice. A variety of tools were used including: Transport Risk Index of Physiologic Stability, Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, Canadian Triage and Acuity Score, Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics, Pediatric Early Warning Scores, Levels of Acuity, Transport Pediatric Early Warning Scores, and an unspecified tool. The timing of scoring, team personnel who applied the score, and the frequency of analysis varied between transport programs. Severity of illness scoring is not consistently performed by pediatric interfacility transport programs in North America. Among the programs that use a scoring tool, there is variability in its application. There is no universally accepted or performed severity of illness scoring tool for pediatric interfacility transport.Future research to validate and standardize a pediatric transport severity of illness scoring tool for North America is necessary.

Non-Invasive Respiratory Support During Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A Retrospective Cohort Study

AbstractNon-invasive respiratory support (NRS) including high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is increasingly used for children with respiratory failure requiring interhospital transport by pediatric critical care transport (PCCT) teams. In this retrospective observational study of children receiving NRS on transport between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019 by a single PCCT service in England, we describe a cohort of children, looking at patient characteristics, journey logistics, adverse events, and failure of NRS (as defined by emergency intubation on transport or within 24 hours of arriving on the pediatric intensive care unit), and to attempt to identify risk factors that were associated with NRS failure. A total of 3,504 patients were transported during the study period. Three hundred and seventeen (9%) received NRS. Median age was 4.9 months (IQR 1.0–18.2); median weight was 5.1 kg (IQR 3.1–13). The primary diagnostic category was cardiorespiratory in 244/317 (77%) patients. Comorbidities were recorded in 189/317 (59.6%) patients. Median Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM3) score was 0.024 (IQR 0.012–0.045). Median stabilization time was 80 minutes while median patient journey time was 40 minutes. Nineteen adverse events were described (clinical deterioration, equipment failure/interface issues) affecting 6% of transports. The incidence of NRS failure was 6.6%. No risk factors associated with NRS failure were identified. We concluded that NRS can be considered safe during pediatric transport for children with a wide range of diagnoses and varying clinical severity, with a low rate of adverse events and need for intubation on transport or on the PICU.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Endotracheal Tube Confirmation for Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team Through Remote Learning and Teleguidance

ObjectivePoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used to manage patients in real time. This study aimed to teach pediatric critical care team members to use POCUS for endotracheal tube (ETT) placement confirmation. A secondary aim was to assess the feasibility of a remote curriculum for this purpose. MethodsThe Kern 6-step approach was used. The curriculum involved virtual didactics, asynchronous learning modules, and remote hands-on sessions using teleguidance with the Butterfly IQ+ probe, Butterfly Network, Inc, Guilford, CT. Participants learned direct and indirect methods of ETT placement confirmation and were directed to practice independently. Outcomes included attitudes and satisfaction, knowledge and skills acquisition and retention, and the use of POCUS on shift. ResultsTen participants completed the curriculum. The average knobology and quiz scores improved by 29.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Improvement was sustained at re-evaluation. Seven of 10 participants performed independent scans. At the 3-month reassessment, most demonstrated mastery of thoracic scans. All required prompting for satisfactory tracheal scans. All felt positively toward POCUS and the remote curriculum. ConclusionPediatric critical care team members acquired and retained knowledge and skills for POCUS basics and ETT placement confirmation through a remote curriculum. Participants were satisfied with the course. Further studies are needed to reassess longer-term knowledge and skill retention and the effects on patient outcomes.

Pediatric Transport Safety Collaborative: Adverse Events With Parental Presence During Pediatric Critical Care Transport.

In Canada, critically ill pediatric patients require transfer to a tertiary care center for definitive medical and surgical management. Some studies suggest that family accompaniment could compromise care; currently, limited research has examined patient safety and outcomes during pediatric critical care transport with family presence, and no Canada-specific data currently exists. The primary objective of this study was to compare the rate of adverse events during the transport of pediatric patients by a specialized pediatric critical care transport team with parental accompaniment to those without parental accompaniment. Secondary objectives included whether geographic or patient-specific factors affected rates of parental accompaniment and if parental presence during transport was related to patient outcomes. Retrospective cohort study in a pediatric critical care unit convenience sample at an academic children's hospital. Inclusion criteria constituted all patients younger than 18 years who were admitted to the pediatric critical care unit after interfacility transport by the London Health Sciences Center Neonatal Pediatric Transport Team between April 1, 2018, and April 30, 2020, inclusive. Adverse event rates, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared. There were 357 transports eligible for analysis. Of these, there were 180 transports with, and 177 without, parental accompaniment. The primary outcome was adverse event occurrence using the composite definition of adverse events, previously defined by a Canadian consensus process, which included patient-, transport provider-, laboratory-, and system/vehicle-related safety factors. The occurrence of adverse events was not significantly different between transports with and without parental accompaniment, 49.4% and 54.8%, respectively (odds ratio, 0.80; P = 0.311). This is the first study to compare the effect on adverse event rate and clinically relevant outcomes between transports with and without parental presence during interfacility pediatric critical care transport. Our study found no significant difference in the adverse event rate between transports with and without parental presence.

Fast Versus Safe Transport: Does Time Taken by a Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team Affect Survival?

Fast Versus Safe Transport: Does Time Taken by a Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team Affect Survival?

The Impact of Videolaryngoscopy on Endotracheal Intubation Success by a Pediatric/Neonatal Critical Care Transport Team

Introduction Endotracheal intubation may be required for the transport of critically ill neonates and children. Data suggest that first pass success (FPS) is associated with lower rates of complications. Thus, understanding factors associated with FPS can have important implications for clinical outcomes. We aimed to determine the impact of videolaryngoscopy (VL) on FPS by a pediatric critical care transport team (CCTT). Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study on pediatric patients (≤ 18 years of age) requiring endotracheal intubation by a tertiary care-based pediatric CCTT between 2011 and 2019. Patients were categorized as neonatal (≤ 28 days of age, either preterm or term) or pediatric (> 28 days of age). All intubation attempts using VL were performed with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope. Our primary outcome was rate of FPS. Descriptive statistics of patient, provider, and procedure characteristics were calculated. Multivariate regression was used to test the association between FPS and type of laryngoscope (video versus direct) adjusting for significant clinical predictors. Results: Over the study period, 135 patients were intubated by the CCTT. Sixty percent of these patients were neonates, and 40% were pediatric. The overall FPS rate was 61%, with lower rates in neonates (54%) and higher rates in pediatric patients (70%). Use of videolaryngoscopy increased over the study period. First pass success rate using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope was 72% compared to 42% for direct laryngoscopy across the whole study population. In adjusted analyses, FPS using VL was significantly higher in the pediatric patient population (aOR 12.42 [95%CI 3.33, 46.29]), but not in neonates (aOR 1.08 [0.44, 2.63]). Use of VL increased significantly over the study period. Conclusion: We found use of a C-MAC videolaryngoscope by a critical care transport team was associated with improved FPS during endotracheal intubation of pediatric patients but not neonates, after controlling for other patient and provider characteristics. In addition to the impact on FPS, use of VL may offer additional educational and quality benefits.

A Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care Transport Team’s Standard of Care for Suspected Stroke of a Pediatric Patient

BACKGROUND A 314 bed free standing Children’s Hospital is the region’s first and only dedicated pediatric stroke center offering comprehensive, individualized treatment protocols for children (Children’s Mercy, 2018). The WHO estimates 1-2/210,000 children will have a stroke. Mortality is 2-11% but persistent neurological deficit will occur in 68-73% of children who experience a stroke (Bernard Ann Neurol 2008). “Recognition and early intervention are critical to minimizing brain damage” (Mutka Sharma, MD). Depending on the length of time since the stroke, treatment options …

A Novel Simulation Based Method For Training Pediatric & Neonatal Critical Care Transport Teams

Background: Critically ill pediatric patients often require care in tertiary/quaternary institutions, necessitating transport from community hospitals to these specialized centers. Such inter-facility transport is accomplished using specially trained critical care transport teams. These teams manage and support critically children in a resource limited environment prior to the stabilization that advanced ICU care can provide. Because support on transport impacts both short- and long-term outcomes for these patients, ongoing training is essential and …

A Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care Transport Team’s Standard of Care for Suspected Stroke of a Pediatric Patient

A Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care Transport Team’s Standard of Care for Suspected Stroke of a Pediatric Patient

Cross-sectional Survey of Canadian Pediatric Critical Care Transport.

This study aimed to better understand the unique aspects of pediatric critical care transport programs across Canada by characterizing the current workforce of each transport program. A cross-sectional questionnaire was sent to the 13 medical directors of Canada's pediatric critical care transport teams, and to 2 nonhospital-affiliated transport services. If a children's hospital did not have a dedicated team for pediatric transport, the regional transport team providing this service was identified. Eight of the 13 pediatric intensive care units surveyed have unit-based pediatric transport teams. The median annual transport volume for the 8 hospital-based teams was 371 (range, 45-2300) with a total of 5686 patients being transported annually. Among patients transported by the 8 teams, 45% (2579 patients) were pediatric patients (older than 28 days and younger than 18 years) and 40% (1022 patients) of the pediatric patients were admitted to the pediatric intensive care units. Eighty-eight percent of the responding teams also transported neonates (older than 28 days), and 38% transported premature infants.A team composition of registered nurse-respiratory therapist-physician was used by 6/13 teams (75%); however, it accounted for only a small proportion of the transports for most of the teams (median, 2%; range, 2%-100%).The average transport time from dispatch (from team home site) to arrival at receiving facility was reported by 6 teams, and has a median of 195 minutes (range, 90-360 minutes). The median distance from home site to the farthest referral site in the catchment area was 700 km (range, 15-2500 km). This is the first Canadian nationwide study of pediatric critical care transport programs. It revealed a complexity and variability in transport team demographics, transport volume, team composition, and decision-making process.

Uncuffed Endotracheal Tubes: Not Appropriate for Pediatric Critical Care Transport

ObjectiveThe effect of using uncuffed endotracheal tubes in children during interfacility critical care transport has not yet been assessed. We hypothesized that many children with uncuffed endotracheal tubes experience complications leading to replacement with a cuffed tube after arrival at a tertiary pediatric care facility. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective case review of all intubated patients transported by our dedicated pediatric critical care transport team to our pediatric intensive care unit over a 3-year period. The incidence of urgent reintubation was studied. ResultsA total of 213 children were referred for transport with an endotracheal tube in place, with 55 of those with an uncuffed endotracheal tube (25.8% of all intubated patients). Of those with uncuffed tubes, 24 patients needed their tubes replaced on an urgent basis by the medical team because of issues with ineffective ventilation (43.6% of patients with uncuffed tubes or 11.3% of all intubated patients). No cuffed tubes required replacement. ConclusionPlacing an uncuffed endotracheal tube in the critically ill child who is referred to tertiary pediatric care results in a significant number of these patients undergoing a repeat laryngoscopy, with all associated risks, to replace the uncuffed tube with a cuffed tube.

Effects of Medical Transport on Outcomes in Children Requiring Intensive Care.

The need to centralize patients for specialty care in the setting of regionalization may delay access to specialist services and compromise outcomes, particularly in a large geographic area. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of interhospital transferring of children requiring intensive care in a Canadian regionalization model. A retrospective cohort design with a matched pair analysis was adopted to compare the outcomes in children younger than 17 years admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a Canadian children's hospital by a specialized transport team (pediatric critical care transported [PCCT] group) and those children admitted directly to PICU from its pediatric emergency department (PED group). The outcomes of interest included mortality 72 hours from initial contact with the critical care team (ie, either PICU transport team or intrahospital PICU team). In total, 680 (27%) transports met our inclusion criteria, whereas 866 (7%) cases of 11 570 total PICU admissions were admitted directly from the emergency department. A total of 493 pairs were formed for the matched analyses. Odds of mortality within 72 hours in the PCCT group were significantly higher than in the PED group (odds ratio [OR]: 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-4.45; P = .032). When excluding cases who had at least one episode of cardiac arrest before involvement of the pediatric critical care (PCC) transport team, the OR dropped to 1.66 (95% CI: 0.77-3.46). Children transported from nonpediatric hospitals had a higher 72-hour mortality when compared to those children admitted directly to a children's hospital PICU from its own PED in a Canadian regionalized health-care model.

A Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care Transport Team's Standard of Care for Suspected Stroke of a Pediatric Patient

Background A 314 bed free standing Children's Hospital is the region's first and only dedicated pediatric stroke center offering comprehensive, individualized treatment protocols for children (Children's Mercy, 2018). The WHO estimates 1-2/210,000 children will have a stroke. Mortality is 2-11% but persistent neurological deficit will occur in 68-73% of children who experience a stroke (Bernard Ann Neurol 2008). Recognition and early intervention are critical to minimizing brain damage (Mutka Sharma, MD). Depending on the length of time since the stroke, treatment options can vary. Rapid identification and treatment can be lifesaving and/or potentially improve neurologic outcomes (Children's Mercy 2018). Objectives To provide a Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care Transport team the training, job aides and standardization for the recognition and treatment of a pediatric patient with stroke symptoms requiring transport to a Pediatric Stroke Center. ●Identify pediatric patients with symptoms concerning for stroke ●Initiate a Stroke Alert Protocol if child has focal neurologic deficit and meets criteria for activation ●Aid in the pre Pediatric Stroke Center triage process and stroke evaluation ●Provide rapid assessment, stabilization, and transport of children with stroke-like symptoms to pediatric center ●Initiate neuroprotective measures designed to minimize secondary neurologic injury IMPLEMENTATION ●Clinical Practice Guideline ●Suspected Stroke Checklist ●tPA Administration and Monitoring Guidelines Results Because symptoms of a pediatric ischemic stroke can vary greatly from an adult ischemic stroke, our Critical Care Transport Team is specially trained and prepared to transport a pediatric patient with stroke symptoms from anywhere in the area. If a pediatric ischemic stroke is suspected by a referral and/or our transport team, our collaborative team of Medical Control Physicians (MCP), Transport Personnel, Referral Physicians and Emergency Room Physicians are all specially trained to activate our stroke protocol immediately should a patient present with stroke symptoms. Since implementation we have transported and treated 2 patients with basilar artery stroke. Both patients had successful clot retrieval and full neurological recovery! Several other critical diagnosis as a result of being a stroke mimicker were made during the stroke alert and/or stroke activation procedure including brain tumor, HSV encephalitis, brain abscess, Schawannoma and Moya Moya disease. Conclusion There has been an increase in rapid diagnosis, early recognition and treatment of pediatric patients with acute ischemic stroke and other stroke mimickers that required emergent intervention following implementation of our Stroke Alert Protocol, Clinical Practice Guideline, Suspected Stroke Checklist and tPA Administration and monitoring Guideline for Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care Transport.

Interhospital Transport of Critically Ill Children to PICUs in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: Analysis of an International Dataset.

International data on characteristics and outcomes of children transported from general hospitals to PICUs are scarce. We aimed to 1) describe the development of a common transport dataset in the United Kingdom and Ireland and 2) analyze transport data from a recent 2-year period. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Specialist pediatric critical care transport teams and PICUs in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Critically ill children less than 16 years old transported by pediatric critical care transport teams to PICUs in the United Kingdom and Ireland. None. A common transport dataset was developed as part of the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network, and standardized data were collected from all PICUs and pediatric critical care transport teams from 2012. Anonymized data on transports (and linked PICU admissions) from a 2-year period (2014-2015) were analyzed to describe patient and transport characteristics, and in uni- and multivariate analyses, to study the association between key transport factors and PICU mortality. A total of 8,167 records were analyzed. Transported children were severely ill (median predicted mortality risk 4.4%) with around half being infants (4,226/8,167; 51.7%) and nearly half presenting with respiratory illnesses (3,619/8,167; 44.3%). The majority of transports were led by physicians (78.4%; consultants: 3,059/8,167, fellows: 3,344/8,167). The median time for a pediatric critical care transport team to arrive at the patient's bedside from referral was 85 minutes (interquartile range, 58-135 min). Adverse events occurred in 369 transports (4.5%). There were considerable variations in how transports were organized and delivered across pediatric critical care transport teams. In multivariate analyses, consultant team leader and transport from an intensive care area were associated with PICU mortality (p = 0.006). Variations exist in United Kingdom and Ireland services for critically ill children needing interhospital transport. Future studies should assess the impact of these variations on long-term patient outcomes taking into account treatment provided prior to transport.

Epidemiology of Pediatric Critical Care Transport in Northern Alberta and the Western Arctic.

Specialized pediatric critical care transport teams are essential to pediatric retrieval systems. This study aims to describe the contemporary transports performed by a Canadian pediatric critical care transport team and to compare the treatment and outcomes of children referred from high-level care (hospitals offering pediatric services where an adult ICU exists) and nonhigh-level care (all other hospitals) hospitals. A descriptive cohort study. The Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton, Alberta, Western Canada. Children younger than 17 years old transported by the transport team from referral hospitals within the Stollery Children's Hospital catchment area to Stollery Children's Hospital between 1998 and 2015. None. Characteristics of transports, patient demographics presenting vital signs, and outcomes were described overall and compared by transport-related time and referral hospital types (high-level care and nonhigh-level care). In total, 3,352 transports met the inclusion criteria; 1,049 were retrieved from eight high-level care hospitals and 2,303 from 53 nonhigh-level care hospitals; the median one-way transport distance was 383 kilometers, and 70% of the transports were air transports. The annual number of transports has increased during the study period. The PICU admission rate was between 40% and 55%. Transports from high-level care hospitals had significantly higher odds of being admitted to the PICU (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.31-2.93). The odds of intubation at the referral hospital were higher in the high-level care group, but the odds of intubation upon PICU admission was similar between the two groups. Mortality during or after transport was not significantly different between high-level care and nonhigh-level care hospitals. The current transport system has multiple priorities with regard to efficiency and quality. The medical services at referral hospitals may affect the likelihood of PICU admission and subsequent PICU length of stay; however, no negative impact was observed in other outcomes including mortality.

Improving Standardized Hand-Off Communication Through Education for a Pediatric Neonatal Critical Care Transport Team

Introduction: The Critical Care Transport Team at University of California Davis Medical Center Children's Hospital provides safe and expedient transport of critically ill children and neonates through collaboration with a Pediatric or Neonatal ICU attending physician (MCP). Clear and concise communication is essential in the care of these fragile patients. According to JCAHO, a standardized hand-off communication tool is necessary. It was determined that there was a need for a practice change and therefore an educational quality improvement project was initiated.