Reviewed by: Harry Potter and the Other: Race, Justice, and Difference in the Wizarding World ed. by Sarah Park Dahlen and Ebony Elizabeth Thomas Emily Lauer (bio) Harry Potter and the Other: Race, Justice, and Difference in the Wizarding World. Edited by Sarah Park Dahlen and Ebony Elizabeth Thomas. University Press of Mississippi, 2022. The essay collection Harry Potter and the Other: Race, Justice, and Difference in the Wizarding World is a broad-ranging and necessary addition to the ever-evolving field of Harry Potter scholarship. As the editors mention in their introduction to the book, they were motivated by the need to explore "the contradiction that lies at the heart of the Potter series: an author and a world that make the tacit promise of fantastic escape for the marginalized, all while the author inscribes exclu sion and bigotry within the wizarding world—as well as with her public words" (9). The contributors to Harry Potter and the Other employ a breadth of approaches to the vast transmedia landscape of the world of Harry Potter. The collection ranges widely: from analysis of specific fan artists' race-bending illustrations of characters, to a pedagogical essay about how one professor of color uses the Potter series in a college composition course, to an examination of trans-exclusionary themes in the Harry Potter books predating Rowling's public anti-trans stance, to race issues in the film and theater casting of expansions of the Harry Potter series beyond the original six books. The editors Sarah Park Dahlen and Ebony Elizabeth Thomas corral these various perspectives on the "other" in the Harry Potter series into three main sections. The eight essays in part 1, "Race, Gender, and Gender Identity," address how encounters with the other are framed and presented in various texts of the wizarding world, and how fans have reacted. In this section, I found the essay "The Magical (Racial) Contract: Understanding the Wizarding World of Harry Potter through Whiteness" by Christina M. Chica to be a particular standout. Chica posits that in the world of Harry Potter, "wizardness" can be seen as an analog of whiteness. Explaining how "Wizardness (Whiteness) is maintained by property and power over others" (72), Chica details the ways in which the privileges of "wizardness" have political, moral, and legal ramifications in the series. Her essay [End Page 420] has changed the way I think about the functions of magic in the series. Part 2 of Harry Potter and the Other, "#BlackHermione," is much smaller and more focused. The three essays in this section explore the varied fan reactions to the casting of a Black actress to play Hermione in the stage production of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, and analyze J. K. Rowling's tweet endorsing the casting decision. In this section, Ebony Elizabeth Thomas's chapter "Hermione is Black: Harry Potter and the Crisis of Infinite Dark Fantastic Worlds" describes her own experiences as a Black woman in the Harry Potter fandom of previous decades, and provides a useful framework for how fans and scholars are expected to "reconcile multiple storyworlds" (194). Thomas notes that this chapter is a "truncated version of the original" sixth chapter of her book The Dark Fantastic: Race and the Imagination from Harry Potter to Hunger Games (201). In part 3, "History, Pedagogy, and Liberation," the authors of the four essays that comprise this section look at issues of justice within the book series and also in the way the series is used in our world. The final essay of the collection, "The Failed Wizard Justice System: Race and Access to Justice in Harry Potter" by Charles D. Wilson, is a highlight of the collection and a strong finish. Wilson closely examines the way the legal system is portrayed in the Ministry of Magic in the series in order to make clear its various shortcomings. He points out that "this is more of world-building exercise than a focal point of the series" (288), succinctly voicing an underlying issue of so many of the essays in this collection. Wilson's essay, through its critique of the institutions of the wizarding world, clarifies how inconsistent it is in its policies...