Peak Hip Flexion Moment Research Articles

Changes in physical impairments in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome following arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a motion-related condition causing hip pain in young active adults. Physical impairment measures of body function include objective and reproducible measures of hip mobility, muscle power, and movement coordination. Limited data on physical impairments and the effects of arthroscopic surgery exist. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate changes in physical impairments in those with FAIS, pre- and post-arthroscopic surgery. Six databases were searched for English-language studies reporting on pre- and postoperative physical impairments using physical outcome measures. Reporting quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS); for pooled data [standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI)]. Seventeen studies were included (two randomized controlled trials; fifteen pre/postintervention studies), varying from low-critical risk of bias, low-moderate on the MINORS, and very low reporting quality using the GRADE tool. Postoperatively, participants with FAIS walked with a higher peak hip flexion moment [SMD 0.5, 95% CI (0.12–0.88); heterogeneity I2 = 0%, P = .82] and reduced external rotation range [SMD −0.68, 95% CI (−1.34 to −0.01); heterogeneity I2 = 61%, P = .05]. Surgery increased participant hip flexion moment and impulse, hip strength and faster gluteus maximus contraction time. Patients demonstrated reduced hip extension, abduction and adduction angles during walking gait, and peak hip extension moments during gait and squatting. While this review found some physical impairments changed postoperatively, further research into specific subgroups of FAIS would enhance understanding and inform rehabilitation programs and optimize patient outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV (systematic review of III and IV evidence).

A Faster Walking Speed Is Important for Improving Biomechanical Function and Walking Performance in Stroke Survivors.

This study compares joint kinematics and kinetics of young stroke survivors who walk <0.79m/s (slow) or >0.80m/s (fast) with reference to a healthy able-bodied group and provides clinical recommendations for guiding the gait rehabilitation of stroke survivors. Twenty-two young stroke survivors (18-55y) were recruited from 6 hospital sites in the United Kingdom. Stroke participants were classified by walking speed as slow (<0.79) or fast (>0.80m/s), and joint kinematics and kinetics at the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle were measured during walking on level ground at self-selected speed. Ten walking biomechanical parameters correlated to walking speed (ρ ≥ .550). Stroke survivors in the slow group walked with significantly greater range of sagittal plane pelvic motion (P < .009), reduced range of hip adduction and abduction (P < .011), and smaller peak hip extension angle (P < .011) and hip flexion moment (P < .029) for the paretic limb. For the nonparetic limb, a significantly reduced hip flexion moment (P < .040) was observed compared with the fast group and control. We are the first to report how biomechanical function during walking is compromised in young stroke survivors classified by walking speed as slow (<0.79m/s) or fast (>0.80m/s) and propose that these biomechanical parameters be used to inform rehabilitation programs to improve walking for stroke survivors.

Investigation of Biomechanical Differences in Level Walking between Patients with Bilateral and Unilateral Total Knee Replacements.

Due to the high risk of a bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKR) following unilateral TKR, this study was performed to investigate bilateral TKR patients. Specifically, we examined biomechanical differences between the first replaced and second replaced limbs of bilateral patients. Furthermore, we examined bilateral TKR effects on hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics, compared to the replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients. Eleven bilateral patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and fifteen unilateral TKR patients (65.67 ± 6.18 years, 1.73 ± 0.10 m, 87.72 ± 15.70 kg) were analyzed while performing level walking. A repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze between-limb differences within the bilateral TKR group. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) ANOVA was used to determine differences between bilateral and unilateral patients. Our results showed that the second replaced limb exhibited a lower peak initial-stance knee extension moment than the first replaced limb. No other kinematic or kinetic differences were found. Bilateral patients exhibited lower initial-stance knee extension moments, knee abduction moments, and dorsiflexion moments, compared to unilateral patients. Bilateral patients also exhibited lower push-off peak hip flexion moments and vertical GRF. The differences between the first and second replaced limbs of bilateral patients may indicate different adaptation strategies used following a second TKR. The significant group differences indicate that adaptations are different between these groups, and it is not recommended to use patients with unilateral and bilateral TKR together in gait analyses.

Lower Limb Joint Mechanics during Maximal Accelerative and Decelerative Running.

Maximal acceleration and deceleration tasks are frequently required in team sports, often occurring rapidly in response to external stimuli. Accelerating and decelerating can be associated with lower limb injuries; thus, knowledge of joint mechanics during these tasks can improve the understanding of both human high performance and injury mechanisms. The current study investigated the fundamental differences in lower limb joint mechanics when accelerating and decelerating by directly comparing the hip, knee, and ankle joint moments and work done between the two tasks. Twenty participants performed maximal effort acceleration and deceleration trials, with three-dimensional marker trajectories and ground reaction forces collected simultaneously. Experimental data were combined with inverse dynamics analysis to compute joint moments and work. Net joint work for all lower limb joints was positive during acceleration and negative during deceleration. This occurred because of significantly greater positive work production from the ankle and hip during acceleration and significantly greater negative work production from all joints during deceleration. The largest contributions to positive work during acceleration came from the ankle, followed by the hip and knee joints, whereas the largest contributions to negative work during deceleration came from the knee and hip joints, followed by the ankle. Peak joint moments were significantly greater when decelerating compared with accelerating, except for the peak ankle plantarflexion and hip flexion moments, which were significantly greater when accelerating. Our findings may help to guide training interventions, which aim to enhance the performance of acceleration and deceleration tasks, while also mitigating the associated injury risk.

Hip joint and muscle loading for persons with bilateral transfemoral/through-knee amputations: biomechanical differences between full-length articulated and foreshortened non-articulated prostheses

BackgroundCurrently, there is little available in-depth analysis of the biomechanical effect of different prostheses on the musculoskeletal system function and residual limb internal loading for persons with bilateral transfemoral/through-knee amputations (BTF). Commercially available prostheses for BTF include full-length articulated prostheses (microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees with dynamic response prosthetic feet) and foreshortened non-articulated stubby prostheses. This study aims to assess and compare the BTF musculoskeletal function and loading during gait with these two types of prostheses.MethodsGait data were collected from four male traumatic military BTF and four able-bodied (AB) matched controls using a 10-camera motion capture system with two force plates. BTF completed level-ground walking trials with full-length articulated and foreshortened non-articulated stubby prostheses. Inverse kinematics, inverse dynamics and musculoskeletal modelling simulations were conducted.ResultsFull-length articulated prostheses introduced larger stride length (by 0.5 m) and walking speed (by 0.3 m/s) than stubbies. BTF with articulated prostheses showed larger peak hip extension angles (by 10.1°), flexion moment (by 1.0 Nm/kg) and second peak hip contact force (by 3.8 bodyweight) than stubbies. There was no difference in the hip joint loading profile between BTF with stubbies and AB for one gait cycle. Full-length articulated prostheses introduced higher hip flexor muscle force impulse than stubbies.ConclusionsCompared to stubbies, BTF with full-length articulated prostheses can achieve similar activity levels to persons without limb loss, but this may introduce detrimental muscle and hip joint loading, which may lead to reduced muscular endurance and joint degeneration. This study provides beneficial guidance in making informed decisions for prosthesis choice.

Trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force improves dynamic sagittal alignment in postoperative patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

This study aimed to determine whether a trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force (TORF) modifies sagittal malalignment during level walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Fifteen patients, 6 months after undergoing surgery for LSS, performed level walking at a self-selected speed while wearing a TORF. Dynamic sagittal alignment, including sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt, and spatiotemporal data as well as lower limb kinematic and kinetic data were recorded using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and six force plates. Statistical analysis was performed to compare these data with and without the TORF, respectively. Compared to the condition without the TORF, the use of the TORF significantly decreased positive sagittal vertical axis (p < 0.05) and increased the lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt (p < 0.05). Peak hip flexion angle and extension moment during loading response (LR) significantly increased (p < 0.05), and peak hip extension angle and flexion moment during PS statistically decreased (p < 0.05). There was no difference in spatiotemporal data between the two conditions. Our findings suggest that TORF may modify the dynamic sagittal global alignment and lower limb kinematic and kinetics in postoperative LSS patients during level walking.

Human muscle activity and lower limb biomechanics of overground walking at varying levels of simulated reduced gravity and gait speeds.

Reducing the mechanical load on the human body through simulated reduced gravity can reveal important insight into locomotion biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of simulated reduced gravity on muscle activation levels and lower limb biomechanics across a range of overground walking speeds. Our overall hypothesis was that muscle activation amplitudes would not decrease proportionally to gravity level. We recruited 12 participants (6 female, 6 male) to walk overground at 1.0, 0.76, 0.55, and 0.31 G for four speeds: 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 ms-1. We found that peak ground reaction forces, peak knee extension moment in early stance, peak hip flexion moment, and peak ankle extension moment all decreased substantially with reduced gravity. The peak knee extension moment at late stance/early swing did not change with gravity. The effect of gravity on muscle activity amplitude varied considerably with muscle and speed, often varying nonlinearly with gravity level. Quadriceps (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, & vastus medialis) and medial gastrocnemius activity decreased in stance phase with reduced gravity. Soleus and lateral gastrocnemius activity had no statistical differences with gravity level. Tibialis anterior and biceps femoris increased with simulated reduced gravity in swing and stance phase, respectively. The uncoupled relationship between simulated gravity level and muscle activity have important implications for understanding biomechanical muscle functions during human walking and for the use of bodyweight support for gait rehabilitation after injury.

Effects of dual tasks on kinematic and kinetic performances during stair descent: respective effects of manual and cognitive tasks.

Stair descent is one of the most common and challenging daily activities for several populations, particularly under dual-task conditions. This study investigated the effects of cognitive or manual task on kinematics and kinetics during stair descent. A total of 37 participants performed stair descent under three conditions: stair descending only, stair descending while performing a cognitive task and stair descending while performing a manual task. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measures was conducted to test the significant differences among the three conditions. The gait performance, loading rate, lower limb joint moments and powers were significantly lower under the two dual-task conditions compared with stair descending only. The participants had lower knee flexion/extension range of motion, loading rate, peak hip flexion moment, first peak knee extensor moment, second peak ankle plantar flexion moment, first knee power absorption and less stride width under the manual task compared with the cognitive task. Dual tasks during stair descent had a significant impact on the kinematics and kinetics of motion, and the effect was more significant while performing a concurrent manual task in healthy young adults. Further studies could focus on the complexity level of dual tasks on the biomechanical parameters during stair walking.

Effects of body size and load carriage on lower-extremity biomechanical responses in healthy women

BackgroundMusculoskeletal injuries, such as stress fractures, are the single most important medical impediment to military readiness in the U.S. Army. While multiple studies have established race- and sex-based risks associated with a stress fracture, the role of certain physical characteristics, such as body size, on stress-fracture risk is less conclusive.MethodsIn this study, we investigated the effects of body size and load carriage on lower-extremity joint mechanics, tibial strain, and tibial stress-fracture risk in women. Using individualized musculoskeletal-finite-element-models of 21 women of short, medium, and tall statures (n = 7 in each group), we computed the joint mechanics and tibial strains while running on a treadmill at 3.0 m/s without and with a load of 11.3 or 22.7 kg. We also estimated the stress-fracture risk using a probabilistic model of bone damage, repair, and adaptation.ResultsUnder all load conditions, the peak plantarflexion moment for tall women was higher than those in short women (p < 0.05). However, regardless of the load condition, we did not observe differences in the strains and the stress-fracture risk between the stature groups. When compared to the no-load condition, a 22.7-kg load increased the peak hip extension and flexion moments for all stature groups (p < 0.05). However, when compared to the no-load condition, the 22.7-kg load increased the strains and the stress-fracture risk in short and medium women (p < 0.05), but not in tall women.ConclusionThese results show that women of different statures adjust their gait mechanisms differently when running with external load. This study can educate the development of new strategies to help reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in women while running with external load.

Non-amputated limb muscle coordination of unilateral transfemoral amputees

Unilateral transfemoral amputees rely heavily on non-amputated limb muscles to regulate the prosthetic gait. In this study, we compared the non-amputated limb muscle coordination of eight unilateral transfemoral amputees to eight able-bodied controls. Inverse dynamics approach was conducted via a musculoskeletal model to obtain lower limb joint moments and muscle forces. In addition to the muscle forces at the instants of peak joint moments and the maximum muscle forces, the peak joint moments of the lower limbs were also investigated. The results showed that there were significant differences of muscle forces between the non-amputated limbs and the controls at the instant of peak hip extension moment, although the peak hip extension moments themselves were not significantly different between the two groups. The non-amputated limbs had significantly smaller peak hip flexion moment and peak knee extension moment, with significant differences between the muscle forces of non-amputated limbs and controls at the two instants. There was no significant difference between the muscle forces of the non-amputated limbs and controls at the peak knee flexion moment instant, despite the fact that the non-amputated limbs had significantly higher peak knee flexion moments. In addition, the non-amputated limbs had significantly smaller maximum muscle forces than the controls. These results demonstrate that amputees modify their muscle coordination to adapt to the specific joint requirements of the prosthetic gait. Our findings suggest the possibility of non-amputated limb muscle atrophy due to the decrease in the peak muscle forces during walking.

Biomechanical asymmetries persist after ACL reconstruction: results of a 2-year study

PurposeThis study was aimed to examine longitudinal (6, 12, 18, 24 months) asymmetries in double-leg landing kinetics and kinematics of subjects with and without unilateral ACLR.MethodsThree-dimensional kinematic and kinetic parameters of 40 participants (n = 20 post-ACLR, n = 20 healthy) were collected with a motion analysis system and force plate during a drop-landing task, and asymmetry indices were compared between groups.ResultsThe asymmetry index (AI) in the ACLR group compared to the healthy group decreased from six to 24 months for vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) from 100% to 6.5% and for anterior posterior ground reaction force (a-pGRF) from 155.5% to 7%. Also, the AI decreased for peak hip flexion moment from 74.5% to 17.1%, peak knee flexion moment from 79.0% to 5.8% and peak ankle dorsiflexion moment from 59.3% to 5.9%. As a further matter, the AI decreased for peak hip abduction moment from 67.8% to 5.1%, peak knee adduction moment from 55.7% to 14.8% and peak knee valgus angle from 48.7% to 23.5%.ConclusionsResults obtained from this longitudinal study showed that ACLR patients still suffer from limb asymmetries during landing tasks, which appear to normalize by 24-monthspost-surgery. This finding can help us to better understand biomechanics of the limbs after ACLR, and design more efficient post-surgery rehabilitation programs.Level of evidenceLevel III.

Influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation

BackgroundAlthough it is assumed that the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) may result in compensatory behaviors that can alter trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics, the influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation has not been established. Research questionDoes the exacerbation of PFP symptoms lead to altered trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation? MethodsThree-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were obtained from 45 women with PFP during stair descent and ascent. Data were obtained before and after a pain exacerbation protocol. The variables of interest were peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion; peak hip, and knee extensor, and ankle plantarflexor moments. Paired t-tests were used to compare the variables of interest before and after pain exacerbation. ResultsFollowing pain exacerbation, there was a decrease in peak knee extensor moment during stair descent (Effect size = −0.68; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = −0.56; p = 0.02); as well as in peak ankle dorsiflexion during stair descent (Effect size = −0.33; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = −0.30; p = 0.01). An increase in ankle plantarflexor moment during stair descent (Effect size = 0.79; p < 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = 0.89; p < 0.01) was also observed. No significant differences were observed for peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment (p > 0.05). SignificanceOur findings show compensatory strategies used by people with PFP in response to symptoms exacerbation that may have a negative impact on knee and ankle mechanics. Our findings also suggest that people with PFP do not seem to change their trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment during stair negotiation in response to symptom exacerbation.

Sex and limb differences during a single-leg cut with body borne load

BackgroundMilitary personnel don body borne loads that produce maladaptive lower limb biomechanics, increasing risk of musculoskeletal injury during common training tasks. Female personnel have over twice the injury risk as males, but it is unknown if a sex dimorphism in lower limb biomechanics exists during common training-related tasks. Research QuestionTo determine whether lower limb biomechanics exhibited during a single-leg cut with military body borne loads differ between sexes. MethodsSixteen females and 20 males had lower limb biomechanics quantified during five single-leg cuts off each limb with four loads (20, 25, 30 and 35 kg). Each cut required participants run 4 m/s, before planting their foot on a force platform and cut 45° towards the opposite limb. Lower limb biomechanics related to musculoskeletal injury were submitted to a repeated measures ANOVA to test for main and interaction effects of load, sex, and limb. ResultsDuring the cut, load increased peak proximal anterior tibial shear force (p < 0.001) and peak hip flexion (p = 0.010) and knee abduction (p = 0.045) moments, but decreased peak knee flexion angle (p = 0.032). Females exhibited greater peak proximal anterior tibial shear (p = 0.014), and peak hip adduction (p < 0.001) and knee external rotation (p = 0.001) moment than males. Dominant limb exhibited larger peak hip adduction (p = 0.002); whereas, the non-dominant limb exhibited greater peak hip internal (p = 0.002) and knee external (p = 0.007) rotation moments. Only the non-dominant limb increased peak knee abduction moment (p = 0.001) with additional load. SignificanceDuring the cut, adding body borne load produced maladaptive biomechanics that may increase knee musculoskeletal injury risk. Load increased peak proximal tibial shear and potential strain of knee’s soft-tissues. Females exhibited a sex dimorphism in lower limb biomechanics that may further elevate their injury risk. Both limbs exhibited biomechanics that may increase injury risk, but only the non-dominant limb further increased injury risk with load.

Individuals with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis walk with lower hip joint contact forces despite higher levels of muscle co-contraction compared to healthy controls

Purpose: Conservative non-pharmacological interventions are recommended for the clinical management of hip osteoarthritis (OA), though no existing treatments can modify structural disease progression. Evidence-based treatment targets are required to inform the development of disease-course altering interventions. Abnormal hip joint loading is potentially modifiable (e.g. gait and/or neuromuscular retraining) and may play an important role in hip OA progression. No previous study has investigated whether individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA exhibit altered hip joint contact forces (HJCF) during gait, or identified any relevant contribution of altered hip muscle co-contraction to hip joint loading in this patient population. This study aimed to compare: (1) HJCF between individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA and healthy controls during walking using an electromyography (EMG)-informed modelling approach; and (2) hip muscle co-contraction levels between groups. Methods: Eighteen participants (age=65±7 yrs; body mass index=27.6±4.8 kg.m-2; 72% females) with mild-to-moderate hip OA and 23 healthy controls without hip pain or radiographic hip OA (age=60±8 yrs; body mass index=25.1±4.8 kg.m-2; 74% females) performed 10 over-ground walking trials at a self-selected speed. Three-dimensional lower-body motion, ground reaction forces, and surface EMG from sixteen lower-limb muscles were synchronously acquired.Hip joint contact forces were solvedby balancing the external joint moments with internal muscle forces estimated using a calibrated EMG-informed neuromusculoskeletal model. Hip muscle contributions and co-contraction ratios (abduction/adduction and flexion/extension) were determined. Demographic, spatiotemporal, and primary outcome measures were compared between groups using independent t-tests. A secondary analysis of HJCF peaks was performed usingaone-way analysis of covariance with body mass index as a covariate (p<0.05). Results: Height, body mass, body mass index, and walking speed did not differ between groups. Participants with hip OA walked with an 11% lower first peak (p=0.01) and 28% lower second peak (p<0.01) HJCF compared to controls (Fig. 1). Differences remained significant when adjusted for body mass index. Participants in the hip OA group exhibited higher levels of hip muscle co-contraction in both flexion/extension (p<0.01) and abduction/adduction (p=0.04) during all phases of stance compared to controls. Hip muscle forces (p<0.01), peakhip extension (p<0.01) and peak hip adduction (p=0.03) joint angles, and peak hip flexion (p=0.01) and peak hip extension (p<0.01) joint moments were also lower in the hip OA compared to control group. Conclusions: Individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA walk with lower HJCF, despite exhibiting higher levels of hip muscle co-contraction, compared to healthy controls. These observations contradict previous assumptions regarding the effect of higher levels of muscle co-contraction on joint loading in this cohort.This is the first study to demonstrate that under-loading is characteristic of individuals with early hip OA, and may suggest that interventions aimed at reducing hip joint loading are not appropriate for this patient group. Future studies are required to evaluate the effects of under-loading on hip cartilage health, with the aim of identifying modifiable treatment targets to slow disease progression in individuals with hip OA.

Mid-flight trunk flexion and extension altered segment and lower extremity joint movements and subsequent landing mechanics

ObjectivesTo assess the effect of mid-flight trunk flexion and extension on the movements of body segments and lower extremity joints and subsequent landing mechanics during a jump-landing task. DesignParticipants performed three jump-landing conditions in a randomized order. MethodsForty-one participants completed jump-landing trials when performing three different mid-flight trunk motion: reaching forward, reaching up, and reaching backward. Whole-body kinematic and ground reaction force data were collected. ResultsThe reaching backward condition resulted in a more posteriorly positioned upper body center of mass (COM) and more anteriorly positioned pelvis COM, legs COM, hip, and knee joint positions relative to the whole-body COM in flight and at initial contact of landing. The reaching backward condition showed the least hip flexion and ankle plantarflexion angles at initial contact as well as the least hip and knee flexion angles and the greatest ankle dorsiflexion angles at 100ms after landing. The reaching backward condition also demonstrated the greatest peak posterior ground reaction forces, peak and average knee extension moments, peak and average hip flexion moments, and peak knee varus moments within the first 100ms after landing. Opposite changes were observed for the reaching forward condition. ConclusionsMid-flight trunk extension resulted in body postures that predisposed individuals to land with increased knee extension and varus moments and decreased knee flexion angles, which are indirectly associated with increased ACL loading. These findings may help to understand altered trunk motion during certain ACL injury events and provide information for developing jump-landing training strategies.

Thigh and Psoas Major Muscularity and Its Relation to Running Mechanics in Sprinters.

We aimed to examine the morphological characteristics of the thigh and psoas major muscles in sprinters as well as interrelations among their muscularity, hip joint mechanics, and running speed during maximal running. T1-weighted magnetic resonance images of the thigh and trunk were obtained from 15 male sprinters (best 100-m sprint times, 10.63-11.57 s) and 12 untrained men. From the magnetic resonance images, the volumes of each of the quadriceps femoris and hamstrings, total adductors, sartorius, tensor fasciae latae, gracilis, and psoas major were determined. For sprinters, the kinetic and kinematic data were measured using a three-dimensional motion capture system and force plates during maximal running. The data for one step from the foot strike of the stance leg to that of the swing leg were analyzed. The center of gravity (CG) velocity and hip joint kinetics were quantified. Compared with untrained men, sprinters had significantly greater thigh muscle volumes of the hip flexors and extensors, total adductors, gracilis, and psoas major, whereas the monoarticular knee extensor and flexor thigh muscle volumes were similar between the two groups. The CG velocity was positively correlated with the hip flexion angular impulse. Only the rectus femoris volume was significantly correlated with the CG velocity and peak hip flexion moment for the swing leg (r = 0.66-0.69). The sprinters in this study presented greater muscularity of the thigh and psoas major but not the monoarticular knee extensor or flexor muscles. The rectus femoris, in particular, may play an important role during the swing phase of sprinting.

Isokinetic dynamometry and gait analysis reveal different hip joint status in patients with hip dysplasia.

Objective assessment of hip dysplasia patients' functional hip joint status routinely involves gait analysis or isokinetic dynamometry. However, these methods have shown equivocal results and have not been employed in the same groups of patients and controls. To assess hip flexor and abductor moments by isokinetic dynamometry in the dysplasia patient and controls, for which we previously reported smaller flexor and slightly larger abductor moments during gait in patients compared to controls. The study was designed as a prospective cohort study (Level of Evidence II) and conducted in a biomechanics laboratory at Aarhus University, Denmark, during 2011. Participants comprised 32 dysplasia patients and 32 age and gender matched controls. Outcome measures were static peak hip flexion moment at 15, 45 and 75° hip flexion; dynamic eccentric and concentric peak hip flexion moment at 60° and 120°/second; dynamic eccentric and concentric hip abductor moment at 30° and 60°/second. Hip dysplasia patients had smaller eccentric peak flexion moments and smaller eccentric and concentric peak abduction moments at all tested velocities. Although dysplasia patients have weaker hip flexion and abductor muscles than controls, their abductor muscles are sufficiently strong to ensure normal function during gait. Hence, gait analysis alone might not reveal the true, subnormal hip joint status in dysplasia patients. We suggest that comprehensive assessment of hip joint function in dysplasia patients should include more strenuous activities than gait, particularly in young(er) patients who are likely to prefer a more active lifestyle.

Differences in Hip and Knee Running Moments across Female Pubertal Development.

This study aimed to investigate whether knee and hip running moments differ across stages of female pubertal development. This was a cross-sectional study comparing the barefoot running moments of 91 prepubertal (n = 31, Tanner stage I), early/midpubertal (n = 30, Tanner stages II and III), and late/postpubertal (n = 30, Tanner stages IV and V) girls. External peak moments for knee abduction (KAbM), knee adduction (KAM), knee flexion (KFM), and knee internal rotation (KIRM) were analyzed. Secondary measures of hip adduction moment at the time of peak KAbM and hip flexion moment at the time of peak KFM were also derived. Between-group differences were analyzed using a series of one-way ANOVAs and ANCOVAs. At the knee, the late/postpubertal girls displayed a higher peak KFM and KAM compared with the prepubertal group (P < 0.05), and the early/midpubertal group exhibited a higher peak KFM than the prepubertal group (P = 0.034). No between-group differences were found for peak KAbM or KIRM (P > 0.05). At the hip, both the late/postpubertal (P = 0.03) and early/midpubertal girls (P = 0.039) ran with a lower hip adduction moment at the time of peak KAbM than the prepubertal girls. The hip flexion moment at the time of peak KFM in late/postpubertal girls was also significantly lower than both the early/mid- and prepubertal girls (P < 0.001). Girls at the latter stages of puberty exhibit higher peak external knee flexion and adduction moments, but not abduction or internal rotation moments. This may be partly attributed to a lower hip flexion but higher hip abduction moment at the time of peak knee moments. Future research should examine whether these differences in knee kinetics between pubertal stages have implications for knee injuries such as patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Sagittal Plane Hip, Knee, and Ankle Biomechanics and the Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective Study.

Background:Stiff landings with less knee flexion and high vertical ground-reaction forces have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The literature on the association between other sagittal plane measures and the risk of ACL injuries with a prospective study design is lacking.Purpose:To investigate the relationship between selected sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics and the risk of ACL injury in young female team-sport athletes.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 171 female basketball and floorball athletes (age range, 12-21 years) participated in a vertical drop jump test using 3-dimensional motion analysis. All new ACL injuries, as well as match and training exposure data, were recorded for 1 to 3 years. Biomechanical variables, including hip and ankle flexion at initial contact (IC), hip and ankle ranges of motion (ROMs), and peak external knee and hip flexion moments, were selected for analysis. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. The combined sensitivity and specificity of significant test variables were assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results:A total of 15 noncontact ACL injuries were recorded during follow-up (0.2 injuries/1000 player-hours). Of the variables investigated, landing with less hip flexion ROM (HR for each 10° increase in hip ROM, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.99]; P < .05) and a greater knee flexion moment (HR for each 10-N·m increase in knee moment, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.04-1.40]; P = .01) was significantly associated with an increased risk of ACL injury. Hip flexion at IC, ankle flexion at IC, ankle flexion ROM, and peak external hip flexion moment were not significantly associated with the risk of ACL injury. ROC curve analysis for significant variables showed an area under the curve of 0.6, indicating a poor combined sensitivity and specificity of the test.Conclusion:Landing with less hip flexion ROM and a greater peak external knee flexion moment was associated with an increased risk of ACL injury in young female team-sport players. Studies with larger populations are needed to confirm these findings and to determine the role of ankle flexion ROM as a risk factor for ACL injury. Increasing knee and hip flexion ROMs to produce soft landings might reduce knee loading and risk of ACL injury in young female athletes.

Can Repeated Ponseti Management for Relapsed Clubfeet Produce the Outcome Comparable With the Case Without Relapse? A Clinical Study in Term of Gait Analysis.

The prevention and treatment of relapsed clubfoot remained challenging tasks. There were controversies as to treatment options and management, such as complete subtalar release, application of an Ilizarov external frame, or repeated Ponseti method; and different options were available in different treatment centers. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of relapsed clubfeet treated by repeated Ponseti method in comparison with the cases without relapse in term of gait analysis and to clarify the clinical efficacy of repeated Ponseti method in treating the relapsed clubfeet. Thirty-seven patients (53 feet) were retrospectively identified from our database according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the 37 patients, 17 cases (25 relapsed clubfeet) were assigned to group I, whereas 20 cases (28 clubfeet without relapse) were assigned to group II. Clinical examination, gait analysis, and kinematic gait deviation criteria from Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children were used for evaluation. There was statistically significant difference in the parameters of foot length, stride length, and single limb support time (%gait cycle) between the 2 groups (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the kinematic parameters of total hip, knee, and ankle excursion, peak knee and ankle flexion and extension, and internal foot progression (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in peak hip, knee, and ankle flexion moment, peak knee valgus moment, and peak ankle power (P>0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in equinus and calcaneus gait, increased ankle dorsiflexion, foot drop, and internal foot progression angle (P>0.05). Repeated Ponseti method for relapsed clubfeet can yield good or excellent clinical results. We recommend repeated Ponseti method as the treatment choice for relapsed clubfeet in the early stage. Level III-retrospective comparative study.