Peak GH Response Research Articles

Collagen metabolites in the prediction of response to GH therapy in short children

To evaluate the role of collagen metabolites in the prediction of the response to GH treatment we measured the serum concentrations of the C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP) and the N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) with specific RIAs in 35 short children (16 boys) before and after 5 days, 5 weeks and 3 months of GH therapy. The mean age of the children was 10.3 years (range 1.9-16.4 years) and the bone age ranged from 1.2 to 12.5 years (mean 7.6 years). The initial mean relative height (RH) was -3.6 SDS (range -6.6 to -2.4 S.D.). Nineteen children were found to have GH deficiency (GHD; peak GH responses in two pharmacological tests < 10 micrograms/l), while the remaining 16 were considered to have undefined short stature (USS). The children were treated with recombinant human GH (0.1 U/kg given subcutaneously at bedtime 6-7 times/week). The increases in RHI over the first 6 and 12 months of therapy were used as response measures. There was already a significant increase (P < 0.001) in both the serum PICP and PIIINP levels at 5 days, and the concentrations continued to rise up to 3 months, PICP levels rising less than the PIIINP levels. In the whole group the RHI over 6 months correlated most strongly with the absolute PICP concentrations at 3 months (rS = 0.59; P < 0.05), while the absolute PIIINP concentrations at 3 months showed the strongest relation to the one year RHI (rS = 0.69; P < 0.001). In the GHD group the 6 month RHI was most strongly related to the absolute PICP concentration at 3 months (rS = 0.59; P < 0.05). In the USS group the absolute PICP concentrations at 3 months correlated most strongly with the one year RHI (rS = 0.82; P < 0.01). Significant correlations were also observed between the absolute PIIINP levels at 3 months and the 6 month RHI (rS = 0.60; P < 0.05) and 12 month RHI (rS = 0.76; P < 0.01) in this group. These results show that GH therapy results in an unequivocal increase in circulating concentrations of PICP and PIIINP. The serum PICP and PIIINP concentrations may be of value in the prediction of the long-term response to GH therapy.

Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome: a clinical-biological-genetic assessment of its pathogenesis.

The detection of pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) by magnetic resonance imaging is a diagnostic marker of permanent GH deficiency (GHD), but the pathogenesis of PSIS is unknown. Fifty-one patients (27 males) with GHD and PSIS were classified according to whether the GHD was isolated (group 1, 16 cases) or associated with other anterior pituitary abnormalities (group 2, 35 cases). The 2 groups had similar characteristics (frequencies of perinatal abnormalities, ages at occurrence of first signs and at diagnosis, height, GH peak response to stimuli other than GHRH), but associated malformations were less frequent in group 1 (12%) than in group 2 (54%; P < 0.01), hypoglycemia occurred in 25% of group 1 and 70% of group 2 (P < 0.01), and the GH peak response to GHRH was less than 10 micrograms/L in 0% of group 1 (4 cases evaluated) and 57% of group 2 (21 cases; P < 0.05). Thirty-one cases (61%; 25 from group 2) had features suggesting an antenatal origin: familial form (4 cases), microphallus (10 boys), and/or associated malformations (50%; 21 cases). Twenty-seven cases (53%, 22 from group 2) had features suggesting a hypothalamic origin. The three group 1 patients with a GH peak of 1 microgram/L or less had no large GH-N gene deletion. One familial form had no linkage between the GHD phenotype and abnormal GH-N locus, and the only mutation described to date in the GHRH receptor gene was absent. The two patients with low plasma PRL levels had no Pit-1 gene abnormality. Thus, most of the patients with GHD associated with multiple anterior pituitary abnormalities and PSIS have features suggesting an antenatal origin. The GH-N, GHRH receptor, and Pit-1 genes do not seem to be implicated in PSIS.

Adrenocorticotropin- and cortisol-releasing effect of hexarelin, a synthetic growth hormone-releasing peptide, in normal subjects and patients with Cushing's syndrome.

GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic, nonnatural molecules that strongly stimulate GH secretion, but also slightly increase PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels in man. To investigate the mechanism underlying the ACTH- and cortisol-releasing activity of GHRPs in man, we compared the ACTH- and cortisol-releasing activity of Hexarelin (HEX; 2.0 micrograms/kg, iv), a hexapeptide belonging to the GHRP family, with that of human CRH (hCRH; 2.0 micrograms/kg, iv) in normal subjects (6 men and 6 women, 24-68 yr old) and patients with Cushing's syndrome (2 men and 15 women, 16-68 yr old). The GH response to HEX administration was also studied. In normal subjects, HEX administration significantly increased ACTH (peak us. baseline, mean +/- SD, 32.4 +/- 17.7 vs. 16.3 +/- 7.2 pg/mL; P < 0.005) and cortisol levels (135.9 +/- 51.0 vs. 110.0 +/- 31.6 micrograms/L; P < 0.01). The ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH [35.7 +/- 13.2 vs. 17.1 +/- 7.7 pg/mL (P < 0.01) and 162.8 +/- 50.1 vs. 102.8 +/- 28.1 micrograms/L (P < 0.01), respectively] were similar to the responses to HEX. The stimulatory effect of HEX, but not that of hCRH, on both ACTH and cortisol secretion in Cushing's disease was clearly higher (P < 0.01) than that observed in normal subjects. In fact, in Cushing's disease both HEX and hCRH elicited a clear increase in ACTH levels [381.1 +/- 350.0 vs. 52.4 +/- 25.0 (P < 0.005) and 100.0 +/- 86.2 vs. 53.3 +/- 29.7 pg/mL (P < 0.01), respectively but the ACTH increase induced by HEX was about 7-fold greater (P < 0.02) than that induced by hCRH. Similarly, both HEX and hCRH elicited a significant increase in cortisol levels [366.9 +/- 189.5 vs. 189.7 +/- 86.3 micrograms/L (P < 0.005) and 209.9 +/- 125.4 vs. 167.2 +/- 96.3 micrograms/L (P < 0.02), respectively], but the cortisol increase induced by HEX was about 4-fold greater (P < 0.05) than that induced by hCRH. In patients with Cushing's syndrome due to adrenal adenoma or ectopic ACTH, no change in ACTH and cortisol levels was observed after either HEX or hCRH administration. The peak GH response to HEX in normal subjects was clearly higher (P < 0.03) than that in hypercortisolemic patients (45.8 +/- 20.5 vs. 22.4 +/- 21.1 micrograms/L). In conclusion, the ACTH- and cortisol-releasing activity of HEX is similar to that of hCRH in normal subjects, whereas it is dramatically enhanced in patients with Cushing's disease. This evidence indicates the importance of the ACTH-releasing activity of GHRPs and suggests that it could be at least partially independent of CRH-mediated mechanisms. As the stimulatory effect of HEX on ACTH and cortisol secretion is lost in patients with Cushing's syndrome due to adrenal adenoma or ectopic ACTH, these findings suggest the usefulness of GHRPs to investigate the activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in pathophysiological conditions and possibly to differentiate pituitary from ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome.

Growth hormone--insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis in prepubertal children with chronic renal failure.

The hypothalamic-pituitary insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis was evaluated in 12 children with chronic renal failure (CRF) aged 3.2 to 16.5 yr (mean 9.5) on chronic dialysis, and in 13 renal transplantation patients aged 7.5 to 15.0 yr (mean 11.1). Height standard deviation score (SDS) was -2.8 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- SE) and -3.0 +/- 0.3 SDS (p = NS), and growth velocity was 3.7 +/- 0.4 and 1.5 +/- 0.3 cm/year (p < 0.01), respectively. Mean nocturnal growth hormone (mean GH) and number of pulses > 5 ng/ml in CRF and transplantation children were 4.2 +/- 0.8 vs 2.4 +/- 0.3 ng/ml, p = 0.08 and 1.7 +/- 0.2 vs 1.0 +/- 0.2, p < 0.05, respectively. In transplant children there was a positive correlation between mean GH and growth velocity (p < 0.02). GH peak response and the area under the curve post GH releasing hormone test were significantly higher in CRF and transplant children treated with deflazacort (new steroid derived from prednisolone) vs transplant children treated with methylprednisone. Mean serum IGF-I levels were -0.5 +/- 0.2 SDS for chronological age (CA) in CRF patients and +0.8 +/- 0.2 SDS(CA) in transplant patients, p = NS. In the latter, serum IGF-I values were positively correlated with growth velocity (p < 0.02) and negatively correlated with methylprednisone dose (p < 0.05). Patients with CRF and growth retardation have a higher number of GH peaks and slightly elevated mean GH levels compared to transplant patients. After renal transplantation GH secretion may be influenced by glucocorticoids as shown by the lower GH response to GHRH which improved with deflazacort and the inverse correlation between methylprednisone dose and IGF-I levels.

Normal growth hormone secretion in growth hormone insufficient children retested after completion of linear growth.

The recognition of the syndrome of adult GH deficiency suggests that young GH deficient adults, deprived of GH replacement at completion of linear growth, may suffer effects of GH deficiency. We assessed GH reserve in young adults previously diagnosed as having idiopathic GH insufficiency, who were treated with hGH replacement (14 IU/m2/week) in childhood. Eight patients (7 males, 1 female) diagnosed as having GH insufficiency by insulin tolerance test (ITT) in childhood (ages 8.5-15.6 years) were retested by ITT at completion of linear growth (ages 15.1-19.6 years), 3 months after discontinuation of hGH therapy. GH reserve was measured during ITT at diagnosis and at retesting. Height velocity (HV) and HV SDS were calculated before and during GH therapy. At diagnosis, the mean peak GH response to ITT was 10.5 +/- 2.0 mU/l (range 7.7-13.6). At retesting, mean GH was 52.4 +/- 33.2 mU/l (range 10.4-100), 7/8 subjects having peak GH levels greater than 15 mU/l. During hGH therapy mean HV increased from 4.0 +/- 1.5 cm/year at diagnosis to 7.3 +/- 1.9 cm/year during the 1st year (P = 0.004) and 6.9 +/- 2.3 cm/year during the 2nd year (P = 0.02). Mean HVSDS increased from -1.6 +/- 2.1 at diagnosis to 3.1 +/- 2.9 during the 1st year (P = 0.004) and 2.2 +/- 4.2 during the 2nd year (P = 0.05, NS) of treatment. Seven out of 8 children diagnosed as having idiopathic GH insufficiency had normal GH secretion at completion of linear growth. Children with GH insufficiency cannot be assumed to become GH deficient adults and should not continue on GH therapy into adult life without reinvestigation. All who were GH insufficient children should be retested at completion of linear growth to identify those who are truly GH insufficient adults and may benefit from replacement therapy.

Reliability of provocative tests to assess growth hormone secretory status. Study in 472 normally growing children.

The reliability of provocative stimuli of GH secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency is still controversial. Until now, normative values of GH response to various stimuli have not been established properly. In 472 children and adolescents with normal stature (n = 295, height SDS range -1.5 to 1.2) or normal short stature (n = 177, height SDS range -3.7 to -1.8), we studied the GH response to physical exercise, insulin-induced hypoglycemia, arginine (ARG), clonidine, levodopa, glucagon, pyridostigmine (PD), GHRH, PD + GHRH, and ARG + GHRH. The peak GH responses (range) to various stimuli were: 1) physical exercise: 3.0-28.3 micrograms/L; 2) insulin-induced hypoglycemia: 2.7-46.4 micrograms/L; 3) ARG: 0.5-48.4 micrograms/L; 4) clonidine: 3.8-86.0 micrograms/L; 5) levodopa: 1.9-40.0 micrograms/L; 6) glucagon: 1.9-49.5 micrograms/L; 7) PD: 2.5-35.0 micrograms/L; 8) GHRH: 2.7-102.7 micrograms/L; 9)PD + GHRH: 19.6-106.0 micrograms/L; and 10) ARG + GHRH: 19.4-120.0 micrograms/L. Our results show that all conventional stimuli of GH secretion frequently failed to increase GH levels, showing values lower than that arbitrarily assumed, so far, as minimum normal GH peak, i.e. 7 or 10 micrograms/L. When combined with PD or ARG (substances inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin release), GHRH becomes the most powerful test to explore the secretory capacity of somatotrope cells (the GH response being always higher than 19 micrograms/L). Therefore, only GHRH combined with PD or ARG may be able to clearly differentiate normal children from patients with GH deficiency, though a normal GH response to these tests cannot rule out the existence of GH hyposecretory state because of hypothalamic dysfunction.

Enhancement of pulsatile growth hormone secretion by continuous infusion of a growth hormone-releasing peptide mimetic, L-692,429, in older adults--a clinical research center study.

L-692,429 ([L]) is a GH-releasing peptide mimetic that stimulates GH secretion when administered acutely. To determine the effect of its continuous administration, six older adults (four men and two women, aged 64-82 yr) received i.v. transfusions of 1) saline for 24 h (control), 2) [L] (0.05 mg/kg.h) for 24 h (low dose), and 3) [L] (0.1 mg/kg.h) for 12 h, then saline for 12 h (high dose), followed on all admissions by saline for 2.5 h. GHRH (1 microgram/kg, i.v.) was given 30 min before the end of each 24-h treatment. Blood was collected every 10 min for GH measurement, and GH secretion was assessed by deconvolution analysis. Pulsatile GH secretion continued throughout both [L] infusions. During the first 12 h (when comparison of both doses was possible), [L] exerted a dose-dependent stimulatory effect on mean GH concentrations, from 0.6 +/- 0.1 (control, mean +/- SE), to 1.2 +/- 0.2 (low dose [L]) and 2.3 +/- 0.5 microgram/L (high dose [L]; P < 0.05, high dose vs. control), and on calculated GH secretory rates [1.6 +/- 0.3 (control), 2.5 +/- 0.3 (low dose [L]), and 5.8 +/- 0.7 microgram/L distribution vol.h (high dose [L]); P < 0.05, high dose vs. control]. GH secretory pulse height and area increased significantly in a dose-responsive manner, without significant changes in GH secretory pulse number, half-duration of pulses, or GH half-life. GH concentrations remained elevated during the second 11.5 h of low dose [L] infusion. Over the 23.5-h period before GHRH administration, mean GH concentrations and secretion rates were significantly higher than control values with high dose, but not low dose, [L]. Low dose [L] enhanced the peak GH response to GHRH (17.4 +/- 3.5 micrograms/L) compared to the control value (8.4 +/- 2.8 micrograms/L; P < 0.05). We conclude that the administration of [L] to healthy older adults by continuous i.v. infusion enhances pulsatile GH secretion by increasing the mass of GH secreted per pulse, but not the number of secretion pulses, and increases the GH response to GHRH.

The prevalence of severe growth hormone deficiency in adults who received growth hormone replacement in childhood

The few previous studies in which reassessment of GH status has been carried out in young adults treated with GH therapy for childhood GH deficiency concentrated on determining the incidence of 'transient GH deficiency'. As the benefits of GH replacement therapy in adults become increasingly appreciated, it is likely that GH therapy started in childhood for GH deficiency will be continued into adult life in many of those with severe GH deficiency. The aim of this study is to determine how many patients who received GH replacement therapy in childhood until completion of growth have GH deficiency severe enough to be considered for GH replacement therapy in adult life. Retrospective analysis of the peak GH responses to provocative stimuli performed at the time of diagnosis of GH deficiency in childhood and at the completion of growth after GH replacement therapy had been stopped. Eighty-eight adults (49 male, 39 female) who had received GH therapy in childhood for a diagnosis of GH deficiency. The aetiology of the GH deficiency included craniopharyngioma, radiation induced associated with either a cerebral tumour or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, histiocytosis-X and idiopathic. In childhood the original diagnosis of GH deficiency was based biochemically on the failure of the peak GH response to reach 20 mU/l during two provocative tests in 59 of the 88 patients and to a single test in the remaining 29. A total of 147 tests were performed, the most common being an insulin tolerance test (ITT, n = 72) and an arginine stimulation test (AST, n = 53). At reassessment in young adult life 146 tests were performed (74 ITT, 64 AST). Severe GH deficiency was defined arbitrarily as a peak GH response of less than 9 mU/l to a single (n = 33) or to two (n = 55) pharmacological stimuli. By definition all patients were considered GH deficient at the time of initial diagnosis. A peak GH response of less than 9 mU/l was seen in 64.8% at initial assessment and 60.2% at reassessment. Analysis in aetiological terms, however, showed that between assessments the incidence of severe GH deficiency increased in the group of radiation induced (48.8 vs. 55.8%) but decreased in the idiopathic group (78.1 vs. 53.1%). Out of the 55 patients who underwent two tests at reassessment, 47.3% of those with a GH peak less than 9 mU/l at one test had a GH peak greater than 9 mU/l at the second test. Fifteen of the 55 patients had additional pituitary hormone deficiencies and all 15 had a GH peak below 9 mU/l in both tests. Our study suggests that all children who have received GH replacement therapy in childhood should undergo reassessment of GH status in young adult life. Between 40 and 60% of such patients merit consideration for GH therapy in adult life depending on the definition of severe GH deficiency in use. Patients with isolated GH deficiency should undergo two provocative tests of GH secretion, but those with additional anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies require only one test at reassessment.

Beyond the somatopause: growth hormone deficiency in adults over the age of 60 years.

GH secretion declines by 14% decade of adult life, leading to the suggestion that people over the age of 60 yr are functionally GH deficient. If this is the case, one might not be able to detect a difference in GH secretion between the elderly with documented hypothalamic-pituitary disease and an age-matched control group. We studied GH secretion in 24 patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and 24 controls matched for body mass index and age using 24-h GH profiles, arginine stimulation tests, and serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels. The median (range) area under the curve of the GH profile [< 9.6 (< 9.6-20) vs. 18.5 (10.7-74.4) micrograms/L.24 h; P < 0.0001], the median stimulated peak GH response to arginine [< 0.4 (< 0.4-7.7) vs. 8.0 (1.6-37.0) micrograms/L; P < 0.0001], and the median serum IGF-I concentration [102 (< 14-162) vs. 147 (65-255) ng/mL; P = 0.0002] were significantly lower in the patients than in the controls. Fifteen patients showed no evidence of spontaneous or stimulated GH secretion, whereas all controls had evidence of both. The area under the GH curve in the 33 subjects with demonstrable GH secretion correlated significantly with the peak GH response to arginine (r = 0.71; P < 0.0001), but not with serum IGF-I concentration. This study suggests that organic GH deficiency in the elderly is distinct from the decline in GH secretion associated with the aging process. These patients may benefit from GH replacement therapy.

Diagnostic studies with intravenous and intranasal growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 in children of short stature.

GH secretion is primarily regulated by the hypothalamic-releasing hormones GHRH and somatostatin. Additionally, several neurotransmitters act at the hypothalamus and pituitary to modulate GH release. The agents commonly used in clinical practice to diagnose GH deficiency, such as arginine, insulin and L-dopa, act through the neural GH network. Many children with a poor GH response to conventional agents have a significant serum GH response to iv GHRH. GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic peptides that like GHRH act directly on pituitary somatotrophs to stimulate GH release. GHRP-2, an investigational drug, is one of the most potent members of the GHRP family. It has been shown to be effective in adults via the oral and intranasal as well as the iv route of administration. In this study, GH responses to GHRP-2 were compared with GH responses to other provocative agents in children of short stature. GHRP-2 was administered iv or intranasally to children with short stature. In the same subjects, GHRP-2 was administered iv in combination with GHRH. Twenty-four children undergoing evaluation for GH deficiency received at least one conventional agent (arginine, L-dopa/exercise, insulin) in addition to iv GHRH and GHRP-2. The GH responses to GHRH or GHRP-2 were similar in each child, and both were equally reliable predictors of pituitary reserve. The conventional agents used in GH testing were less likely to predict the capacity of the pituitary to release GH than were either GHRH or GHRP-2. There was no correlation between maximal GH response to standard tests with GH responses to GHRH or GHRP-2. A subset of the group of 21 children who had a robust response to iv GHRP-2 were later administered GHRH+GHRP-2 simultaneously. The GH response to GHRH+GHRP-2 was synergistic in this group of 12 children, similar to previously reported observations in adults of normal stature. Fifteen of the 21 children who had a robust response to the iv GH-releasing factors also received intranasal GHRP-2. All 15 of these children had a significant GH response to intranasal GHRP-2 over a dose range of 5-20 micrograms/kg per dose. The mean peak GH response to 15 micrograms/kg was 31.3 micrograms/L. The intranasal preparation was well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The evolution of radiation-induced growth hormone deficiency in adults is determined by the baseline growth hormone status.

Recent studies of GH replacement have suggested several beneficial effects for GH deficient adults. It would therefore be helpful to predict the time of onset of GH deficiency after external pituitary irradiation. We have studied the evolution of GH deficiency with time in patients irradiated for pituitary adenomas and other hypothalamic pituitary tumours. Analysis of serial peak GH responses to insulin hypoglycaemia following external irradiation to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis using statistical models which allowed for age, sex, previous surgery and the pre-radiotherapy GH peak response. Eighty-five non-acromegalic adults (48 male), 75 of whom had either a pituitary adenoma or a craniopharyngioma and 10 who had other tumours in the hypothalamic-pituitary region. All the patients had received a radiation dose between 37.5 and 45 Gy divided into 15 fractions given over 21 days. The GH responses to an insulin tolerance test (ITT) performed as part of the regular endocrine follow-up in patients who received irradiation to the hypothalamic-pituitary region. Three hundred and forty-five ITTs were performed over a period of 10 years following radiotherapy. There was a decline in the modelled mean peak GH response to an ITT over the first 5 years which then appeared to plateau. Using an extended model, women had higher GH peak responses than men and this difference was maintained throughout the ten-year period. The magnitude of the post-radiotherapy peak GH response at any given time was dependent on the baseline peak GH response, but the rate of the decrease was not affected (P = 0.66). To develop severe GH deficiency (peak GH response less than 5 mU/l) after radiotherapy it took patients with baseline GH peaks of 30, 20 and 10 mU/l approximately 4 years, 3 years and 1 year respectively. Those patients with a baseline GH peak of greater than 50 mU/l are unlikely to develop severe GH deficiency within the first 5 years following radiotherapy. These results provide an insight into the pattern of the decline in GH secretion following radiotherapy in patients with pituitary disease and the factors affecting it. This information will help the clinician predict the frequency and timing of GH deficiency in patients irradiated for pituitary disease and the potential need for GH replacement therapy.

Role of the serotonin receptor subtype 5-HT1D on basal and stimulated growth hormone secretion.

At present, four main types of serotonin (5-HT) receptors have been identified in the brain (5-HT1, 5-HT2, 5-HT3, and 5-HT4). In addition, the 5-HT1 have been further subclassified. We have taken advantage of a new selective 5-HT1D receptor agonist 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-N-methyl-1H-indole-5-methanesulfonamide succinate, Sumatriptan, to evaluate the role of 5-HT1D receptors on GH secretion. To this end, several tests with or without sumatriptan were undertaken in normal prepubertal children. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of Sumatriptan on basal GH secretion and the GH response to GHRH in obese children. In normal children, Sumatriptan administration (3 mg, sc) resulted in an increase in basal GH levels at 30 min (7.7 +/- 1.5 micrograms/L; P < 0.05) and increased GH responses to GHRH (47.3 +/- 6.4 vs. 29.6 +/- 9.7 micrograms/L; P < 0.05). The Sumatriptan-induced increase in GH responses to GHRH was dependent on the stimulus tested. Pretreatment with Sumatriptan did not modify the GH response to clonidine or pyridostigmine, as assessed by the peak GH response and the area under the curve. In contrast, it increased the GH response to arginine. In the obese subjects, the GH response to GHRH was reduced (7.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 29.6 +/- 9.7 micrograms/L at 30 min) compared to that in control children (P < 0.05). Sumatriptan administration did not alter the basal GH value (peak GH, 1.7 +/- 0.3 micrograms/L at 30 min). However, Sumatriptan administration clearly increased the effect of GHRH, resulting in a GH peak of 14.6 +/- 3.1 micrograms/L at 30 min (P < 0.01). To assess the specificity of Sumatriptan on anterior pituitary hormone secretion, we studied its effect on TSH and PRL responses to TRH as well as LH-releasing hormone-induced LH and FSH secretion. Administration of Sumatriptan did not alter the response of any of these hormones. Our results indicate that 5-HT1D receptors have a stimulatory effect on GH secretion, possibly by inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin release.

Mechanism of action of hexarelin and GHRP-6: analysis of the involvement of GHRH and somatostatin in the rat.

We have recently reported oral and parenteral bioactivity for a new GH-releasing peptide, hexarelin. In the present study, we have examined the neuroendocrine mechanism by which hexarelin and GHRP-6, two GH-releasing peptides, mediate their actions. Although previous studies have looked at the role of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin in regulating the action of GHRP-6 in culture and in stressed animals, our study looked at the role of both somatostatin and GHRH in regulating the action of hexarelin as well as GHRP-6 in conscious and freely-moving, nonstressed rats. Adult male rats, prepared with indwelling jugular catheters, were pretreated i.v. with either control antiserum (CTLas), growth hormone-releasing hormone antiserum (GHRHas), somatostatin antiserum (SSas), or both GHRHas and SSas. Animals were then treated i.v. with 25 micrograms/kg of either hexarelin or GHRP-6 4 h after i.v. antisera pretreatment. Blood samples were collected every 20 min for the 3 h prior to peptide treatment and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 40 and 60 min following hexarelin or GHRP-6 injection. The peak plasma GH responses in rats pretreated with CTLas were 552 +/- 125 ng/ml following hexarelin administration and 386 +/- 132 ng/ml following GHRP-6 administration. Rats pretreated with SSas exhibited peak GH responses following hexarelin or GHRP-6 of 702 +/- 115 and 312 +/- 42 ng/ml, respectively. These plasma GH responses were similar to those observed in the CTLas-pretreated animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Serum growth hormone-binding protein is unchanged in adult panhypopituitarism.

The role of GH in regulating GH-binding protein (GHBP) and GH receptor concentrations in humans is not clear. Studies performed mostly in children and on a minor scale in adults are somewhat controversial. The key question as to whether GHBP levels are altered in hypopituitarism before GH treatment is instituted remains unanswered. In this study, we have selected a severely GH-deficient group of adult patients with panhypopituitarism, acquired as a result of surgery and irradiation of hypothalamic-pituitary tumors, to evaluate the GHBP/receptor status by measuring GHBP activity in plasma. Twenty panhypopituitary patients (8 males and 12 females; age range, 20-74 yr) and 20 age (22-68 yr)- and sex-matched normal subjects were studied. GH deficiency was confirmed by insulin-induced hypoglycemia and arginine infusion tests; the peak GH response was less than 2 micrograms/L. Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I levels were below or in the low normal range (mean +/- SD, 88.3 +/- 53.6 micrograms/L) and were significantly different from insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels in the normal group (mean +/- SD, 189 +/- 49.8 micrograms/L; P < 0.01). Plasma GHBP activity, measured using a GH-binding/gel chromatography assay, showed similar values in the GH-deficient group (mean +/- SD, 14.1 +/- 3.83%) and the control group (mean +/- SD, 13.7 +/- 3.79%), with no statistically significant difference. Neither the intra- nor intergroup comparison of GHBP levels according to age and sex showed statistically significant differences or age trends. In the light of these data and considering that GHBP activity in plasma probably reflects the GH receptor status in tissues, we may assume that the GH receptor was unaffected by chronic GH deficiency. These findings also support the previously reported concept that the GHBP/receptor level is a relatively fixed determinant of growth, established individually and independently of GH secretory status in early life, perhaps on a genetic basis.

The severity of growth hormone deficiency in adults with pituitary disease is related to the degree of hypopituitarism

A number of studies of the effect of GH replacement therapy in adult patients with GH deficiency have been published, but the definition of GH deficiency has varied considerably. In order to define severe GH deficiency more critically we have determined GH status in the context of gonadotrophin, ACTH and TSH secretion in adult patients with pituitary disease. Analysis of peak GH response to an insulin tolerance test performed during comprehensive assessment of pituitary function. One hundred and ninety non-acromegalic patients (96 male) with pituitary disease whose ages ranged from 16 to 72 (mean 39.4) years. The patients were divided into four groups according to the number of anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies demonstrated; isolated GH deficiency (GHD0), or GH deficiency plus an additional one, two or three pituitary hormone deficits (GHD1, GHD2, GHD3). The four groups were matched for age and blood glucose nadir during the ITT. The median (interquartile range) GH peaks were GHD0, 10.0 (5.4-16); GHD1, 4.0 (2.7-7.7); GHD2, 2.0 (1-2.9); GHD3, 1.8 (1-3.2) mU/l. There was a significant downward trend in the medians (P < 0.0001). The differences between GHD0 and GHD1, and GHD1 and GHD2, were highly significant (P < 0.0001); however, there was no difference between GHD2 and GHD3. Ninety-one per cent of patients in combined groups GHD2 and GHD3, 55% in GHD1 and 24% in GHD0 had a peak GH < 5 mU/l. Our study has shown that GH deficiency is variable according to the degree of hypopituitarism present and that the greater the number of pituitary hormone deficits the more severe the GH deficiency. These observations will help to clarify the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adult life.

The effects of estrogen priming and puberty on the growth hormone response to standardized treadmill exercise and arginine-insulin in normal girls and boys.

To determine the effects of puberty and estrogen priming on the GH response to standardized treadmill exercise and arginine-insulin in normal boys and girls, we performed tests in 84 normal children (41 girls and 43 boys) representing all stages of puberty. A subset of the prepubertal children received the tests twice, with or without the administration of ethinyl estradiol (40 micrograms/m2 daily) for 2 days before the tests. The peak GH response to the three tests increased significantly with pubertal stage (r = 0.57; P < 0.0001), but did not differ between boys and girls at the same stage. With advancing puberty, the percentage of normal children who failed to attain a GH level greater than 7 micrograms/L during any of the three tests declined from 61% at pubertal stage 1 to 44% at stage 2, 11% at stage 3, and 0% at stages 4 and 5. Administration of estrogen to the prepubertal subjects raised the normal range for the peak GH response to the three tests from 1.9-20.3 to 7.2-40.5 micrograms/L. We conclude that both puberty and estrogen administration significantly increase the peak GH response to exercise, arginine, or insulin in normal subjects. Moreover, the conventional criterion that the peak GH response to three stimulation tests should exceed 7 micrograms/L was applicable in our study only to subjects who had attained pubertal stage 4 or 5 or who had received estrogen administration.

An audit of the insulin tolerance test in adult subjects in an acute investigation unit over one year

We audited our practice of insulin tolerance testing (ITT) in terms of safety and technical success. We reviewed the results of those tests performed over a 12-month period. By relating peak cortisol response to 0900 h screening cortisol level, we determined whether we could reduce the number of tests performed. The results of all ITTs performed on our unit between 1 January and 31 December 1991 were reviewed. Patients were prescreened by measurement of serum cortisol and thyroxine, and recording of an electrocardiogram. A subnormal serum thyroxine (< 58 nmol/l), 0900 h serum cortisol (< 100 nmol/l) or an abnormal ECG were taken as contraindications to the test. Minimum glucose and maximum cortisol levels were recorded, along with peak GH responses when measured. The peak cortisol response was compared to the screening and basal cortisol levels. A total of 161 tests were performed, 135 of which fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The test was technically successful in all but 5 of these; a significant adverse event occurred in one patient with full recovery after reversal of hypoglycaemia. Thirty-two patients had a suboptimal serum cortisol response to hypoglycaemia: screening cortisol level ranged from 128 to 493 nmol/l and 0900 h serum cortisol measured prior to the ITT from 97 to 431 nmol/l. The lowest level of screening cortisol above which all patients would be expected to achieve the normal peak cortisol of 580 nmol/l or over is therefore 494 nmol/l. If this cut-off level had been adopted, 10 (8%) ITTs need not have been performed if their only purpose had been to assess cortisol reserve. Altering the criterion for the necessary peak cortisol to 500 nmol/l did not affect the number of ITTs required. Our lower limit for testing could not be revised upwards from 100 nmol/l. Adequacy of cortisol reserve did not predict a normal GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. When performed in an experienced endocrine unit with adequate supervision, the insulin tolerance test is a safe procedure. According to the current sample, fewer tests would be performed without detriment to patient care if those with a screening cortisol of greater than 500 nmol/l did not proceed to testing, unless the purpose of the test was also to exclude GH deficiency. A lower limit of 100 nmol/l appears reasonable and need not be revised upwards.

Cholinergic and adrenergic function in depressed and healthy subjects: A neuroendocrine test battery using the growth hormone axis

AbstractThe two neurotransmitters noradrenaline (NA) and acetylcholine (ACh), both important modulators of GH secretion, have been hypothesised to be reciprocally dysfunctional in depressive illness. This study tested the Adrenergic/Cholinergic Imbalance Hypothesis by comparing GH responses to (a) the cholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine and (b) the indirect noradrenergic agonist desipramine in a depressed group (n = 9) and a matched control group. The depressed patients fulfilled criteria for DSM‐111‐R diagnosis of Major Depression: Melancholic Subtype. Three GH challenge tests were administered in each subject: desipramine, pyridostigmine and GH‐releasing hormone (GHRH). The latter was performed to determine pituitary reserve. Each subject also had a dexamethasone suppression test. GH responses (as measured by peak minus baseline values) to GHRH were significantly blunted in the depressed (26·1 ± 4·9 mU/L) compared to the control group (48·4 ± 4·9 m U/L: t = 2·2, df = 16, p &lt; 0·05); and were positively correlated to desipramine/GH responses in both the depressed and control groups (p &lt; 0·001). Peak GH responses to pyridostigmine were relatively increased in the depressed sample (12·2 ± 1·8 m U/L Vs 6·9 ± 1·5 m U/L; t 2·5, df = 16, p &lt; 0·05). Within the depressed group, dexamethasone non‐suppressors had blunted GH responses to desipramine compared to those who cortisol suppressed (p &lt; 0·05). These findings (a) lend some support to the ‘Cholinergic/Adrenergic Imbalance Hypothesis’, (b) suggest that desipramine may bring about the release of GH via the GHRH pathway and (c) blunting of the desipramine/GH response is associated with hypercortisolaemia.

Growth hormone-binding protein levels: Studies of children with short stature

A high-affinity growth hormone-binding protein (GHBP) in serum is derived from the extracellular domain of the GH receptor. In an attempt to investigate the differences in GHBP levels in various conditions of poor growth, we measured GHBP levels by two methods—an Ultrogel chromatographic technique and a ligand-mediated immunofunctional assay (LIFA). The following three groups of children were studied: Turner's syndrome (n = 7), idiopathic and/or familial short stature ([ISS] n = 15), and organic or idiopathic hypopituitarism (n = 19). All groups were similar in age (Turner's syndrome, 10.1 ± 0.9 years; ISS, 10.0 ± 0.7; hypopituitarism, 11.5 ± 1.0) and height SEM score (Turner's syndrome, −2.9 ± 0.3; ISS, −3.0 ± 0.4; hypopituitarism, −2.3 ± 0.4). Their values were compared with those values of GHBP in healthy controls of similar age. Immunofunctional assay values for GHBP were as follows: Turner's syndrome, 235.4 ± 26.0 pmol/L; ISS, 122.4 ± 11.0; and hypopituitarism, 157.1 ± 23.0. These results were significantly different in subjects with ISS and hypopituitarism as compared with a group of healthy controls between the ages of 9 and 12 years (N = 255; GHBP = 287.9 ± 10.9 pMol/L; P < .001 compared with both ISS and hypopituitarism). Similar changes were found using Ultrogel chromatography. This difference in GHBP levels is still significant even when more stringent criteria are applied to define hypopituitarism (ie, peak GH responses to stimuli <6.0 ng/mL, instead of ≤ 10 ng/mL originally). Correlation analysis was performed for GHBP values in all three groups and several parameters of growth, including age, height, height SD score, weight, plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), peak GH response to stimuli, and growth velocity. The only consistent significant correlation found was between GHBP and weight in all three groups (Turner's syndrome, r = .92; ISS, .61; hypopituitarism, .55; P < .01). In conclusion, girls with Turner's syndrome have normal GHBP levels. However, in ISS a relative deficiency of the GHBP is present, similar to patients with hypopituitarism. This may represent a quantitative GH receptor deficiency, which might contribute to these patients' poor linear growth.

PLASMA ICFI AND IGF-BP3 LFVELS AS DIAGNOSIS CRITERIA OF GH DEFICIENCY

Idiopathic GH deficiency (GHD) is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous condition, making it difficult to diagnose. We have shown that the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aspect (Argyropoulon, J pediatr 1992, p.886) and the growth response during the first 2 yrs of hGH therapy are good criteria of GHD. Forty nine patients with height of ←2SD and a GH peak response after 2 pharmacological stimulation tests of < 10 ng/ml were classified according to the accuracy of the diagnosis of GHD: Group I (n=22) certain GHD with pituitary stall interruption or familial form;m Group II (n=14) without these criteria; Group III (n=13) tranisient GHD with GH peak ≥ 10 ng/ml after a 3rd provocative test performed after a 15-d interruption of hGH therapy. In groups II and III pituitary height on MRI was normal in 9,←2SD in 6 and not evaluated in 12 patients. Other causes of short stature were excluded. IGFI was measured in the plasma without extraction by the non-equilibrium technic described by Furlanetto and al. and IGF-BP3 by a RIA (DSL., Webster, Texas). The results were compared to those found in prepubertal idiopathic short childre : lowest limits were 0.2u/ml and 2 μg/ml for IGFI and IGF-BP3 respectively (m±SE : 0.8±0.1 u/ml and 4±10 1 μ/ml). GH peak, IGFI and IGF-BP3 were lower(p<0.001) in I than in II and III. In Group I, these 3 parameters were not modified by associated thyrotropin deficiency (10 cases) or spontateous hypoglycemia (9 cases). Conclusion. Almost all patients with certain GHD had low values of IGFI and IGF-BP3. Conversely those with transient form and /or normal pituitary anatomy had normal values. Pituitary stalk interruption, height increase ≥ ISD during the 1st years of hGH therapy, IGFI<0.2u/ml, and IGF-BP3<2μg/ml are markers of the diagnosis of GHD. When these criteria are absebt or disordant further evaluation is necessary. (supported by a grant from Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de paris.)