Peak-dose Dyskinesia Research Articles

Gait and Balance Dysfunction in Adults.

Determining the precise cause of gait dysfunction in adults is often difficult because of the multifactorial nature of the disorder. Additionally, elderly patients have other comorbidities that further complicate their diagnosis. A proper history and physical examination, however, often allow the clinician to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Once a diagnosis is reached, appropriate therapeutic decisions can be made. Patients presenting with Parkinsonism need a thorough evaluation to rule out potentially reversible conditions, such as normal pressure hydrocephalus. Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease usually develop gait difficulty and freezing episodes late in the course of the illness. Another important cause of gait disturbance in adults is the cerebellar ataxias. Among the sporadic forms, gluten sensitivity is an important consideration. Identification of this entity is important, because the disease process can be halted with a gluten-free diet. Another group is the paraneoplastic ataxias, which can often be diagnosed in the proper clinical setting. Most of the adult-onset hereditary ataxias are autosomal dominant conditions. Except for the episodic ataxias, treatment of these conditions has been disappointing. Mixed results have been obtained with the use of amantadine, buspirone, and 5-hydroxytryptophan. Physical therapy plays an important role in the gait rehabilitation of these patients. Over the past several years, researchers have developed a greater understanding of motor control and how it relates to freezing. Clinicians can now train patients to use external cues to overcome their motor blocks. Another important advance has been the development of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in the treatment of patients with troublesome peak dose dyskinesia and other motor fluctuations. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation should be considered when best medical treatment fails. Cortical myoclonus can be treated with levetiracetam, which has US Food and Drug Administration approval as an antiepileptic agent. It has been quite effective in the treatment of myoclonus and should be considered when other medications fail.

Motor effects of a dopamine stabilizer (GMC1111) in primate models of Parkinson and hemiparkinsonism

The effects on motor behavior of a new potential dopamine stabilizer: 2-amino-6-( N, N-di- n-propylamino)thiazolo[4,5- f]indan (GMC1111) were investigated in common marmosets with 6-hydroxydopamine lesions within the median forebrain bundle (12 unilateral, 6 bilateral). GMC1111 was administered orally or subcutaneously (s.c.) to unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned monkeys, either alone or together with s.c. injections of apomorphine (0.2 mg/kg) and the effect on rotational behavior was examined. GMC1111 (0.03–3.0 mg/kg) alone, orally or s.c., did not induce rotational behavior. When apomorphine and GMC1111 were injected simultaneously, rotations were nearly abolished in three monkeys with a baseline apomorphine-induced rotation rate below 13/min, whereas GMC1111 did not modify the rotations in three high-rotating animals (>17/min). Oral administration of GMC1111 (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) abolished the apomorphine-induced rotations in another six unilaterally dopamine-denervated monkeys, indicating a good oral bioavailability. A low dose of GMC1111 (0.3 mg/kg) administered s.c. to marmosets with bilateral nigrostriatal lesions produced a reduction of Parkinson symptoms of approximately the same degree as with levodopa/benserazide (15/3.75 mg/kg), while higher doses of GMC1111 were less effective. When levodopa/benserazide was administered together with various doses of GMC1111 (0.3–3.0 mg/kg), the levodopa-induced peak-dose dyskinesias were reduced with the highest dose of GMC1111 (3 mg/kg). Taken together, GMC1111 modifies dopaminergic activity in a normalizing direction. Parkinson symptoms, as well as levodopa-induced dyskinesias are both reduced. This suggests the arrival of another member of the new dopamine stabilizer family.

Naloxone reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesias and apomorphine-induced rotations in primate models of parkinsonism.

Using in situ hybridization, it was found that subchronic treatment with levodopa/benserazide increased preproenkephalin-A and preproenkephalin-B mRNAs in the dopamine-depleted striatum. In order to examine whether dysfunction of the endogenous opioid system may underlie the development of levodopa-induced dyskinesias, the effect of naloxone, an opioid antagonist, on dyskinesias was investigated in two models of parkinsonism in the common marmoset. MPTP-treated monkeys were administered a daily oral dose of levodopa/benserazide which relieved the parkinsonian symptoms but induced severe and reproducible dyskinetic movements. Naloxone (0.1, 0.2 or 0.5 mg/kg) was given subcutaneously (s.c.) during peak-dose dyskinesia, which reduced the dyskinesias significantly using the highest dose, normalized the motor activity, but did not modify the antiparkinson effect. Unilaterally 6-OHDA -lesioned marmosets received apomorphine s.c., which caused a contralateral turning behavior that could be reduced up to 35 percent by concomitant administration of naloxone. Taken together the present results suggest a possible role for the endogenous opioid system in the pathogenesis of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in primates.

Body weight, levodopa pharmacokinetics and dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease.

We conducted a pharmacokinetic study in 164 patients with sporadic Parkinson's disease (PD) to address the relationship between body weight and levodopa pharmacokinetics. Patients underwent an oral acute levodopa test with 250 mg levodopa and pharmacokinetic variables were further assessed. Plasmatic levodopa area under the curve (AUC-l) and body weight were significantly and inversely correlated. Women were significantly lighter and more dyskinetic than men, and had greater AUC-l values. Our data suggest that during long-term treatment, lighter PD patients, especially women, may receive a greater cumulative dosage of levodopa per kilogram of body weight. This could explain gender differences for the development of levodopa-induced peak-dose dyskinesias observed during the course of the disease.

Apomorphine monotherapy in the treatment of refractory motor complications of Parkinson's disease: long-term follow-up study of 64 patients.

Continuous subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine is now increasingly recognized as an effective treatment for refractory off periods and peak-dose dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease. We have reviewed our experience with apomorphine infusions, after a strategy decision in 1995 based on emerging preclinical data, to treat all patients with steady-state plasma levels of apomorphine throughout the waking day, minimizing additional pulsatile stimulation either by oral dopaminergic medication or bolus parenteral injections of apomorphine. Sixty-four patients have been treated with apomorphine pumps and 45 of these successfully converted to monotherapy, managing to discontinue all other forms of dopaminergic stimulation during the daytime treatment period with apomorphine. Patients were followed up for a mean of 33.8 months (range, 4-108 months) and clinical data analyzed retrospectively. The mean maintenance dose of apomorphine was 98 mg per 24 hours (monotherapy group: 103 mg/24 hours; polytherapy group: 93 mg/24 hours), which did not significantly increase at final follow-up. There was a mean maximum dyskinesia reduction of 64% (S.D. = 20) in the monotherapy group, compared to 30% (S.D. = 33) in those continuing on polytherapy (P < 0.001), despite a maintained increase in on time (monotherapy group: 55%, P < 0.005; polytherapy group: 50%, P = 0.05). Fifteen patients failed to successfully convert to monotherapy but benefited nonetheless, and only 3 failed apomorphine infusional therapy altogether. Reasons for failure were mixed, including difficulty with compliance and adverse effects such as daytime somnolence, skin complications, and painful dystonias. There was a significantly higher success rate in patients able to manage the treatment either independently or with the help of their caregiver. These results confirm that subcutaneous apomorphine monotherapy can reset peak-dose dyskinesia threshold in levodopa-treated patients and further reduce off-period disability after all available forms of oral medication, including long-acting dopamine agonists, have been tried.

Dyskinesias and grip control in Parkinson's disease are normalized by chronic stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.

Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus appears to reduce levodopa-induced dyskinesias, but whether this effect is caused by the reduction of the total levodopa ingestion or represents a direct effect on the motor system is unknown. Precision grip force of grasping movements and levodopa-induced dyskinesias was analyzed in 10 parkinsonian patients before and after 3 months of deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Peak grip force was abnormally increased before surgery in the off-drug state and, particularly, in the on-drug state (sensitization). This grip force upregulation normalized with chronic deep-brain stimulation in both conditions (desensitization). Peak-dose dyskinesias also improved, and off-dystonia was completely abolished. Mean dosage of dopaminergic drugs was reduced, but force overflow and dyskinesias were equally improved in 2 patients without a reduction. Despite the same single levodopa test dose, force excess and levodopa-induced dyskinesias were drastically reduced after 3 months of deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. This indicates that direct effects of deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on levodopa-induced dyskinesias are likely to occur. Grip force overflow is a promising parameter to study the desensitizing effect of chronic deep-brain stimulation on levodopa-induced dyskinesias.

Beginning-of-dose and rebound worsening in MPTP-treated common marmosets treated with levodopa.

A wide range of motor fluctuations develop in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients after prolonged levodopa (L-dopa) treatment, but few experimental models exist in which these can be investigated. We report on motor fluctuations occurring in MPTP-treated common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) treated repeatedly with L-dopa. All animals showed an improvement in motor function in response to L-dopa, and rapidly developed peak-dose dyskinesia. During the period of L-dopa action, brief periods of immobility were occasionally observed. After acute L-dopa challenge, animals exhibited a worsening of motor function before improvement, and after the beneficial response to L-dopa declined, motor performance showed rebound worsening to below-baseline values. Before L-dopa challenge and during wearing-off and rebound worsening, leg dystonias were observed. Although these findings cannot necessarily be generalized to all MPTP-treated nonhuman primates, they demonstrate that MPTP-treated marmosets show a range of different motor fluctuations analogous to those seen in PD patients chronically treated with L-dopa. Therefore, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated primates can provide a model in which the pathophysiology of treatment complications can be investigated.

Force overflow and levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease.

We assessed force coordination of the hand in Parkinson's disease and its relationship to motor complications of levodopa therapy, particularly to levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID). We studied two groups of Parkinson's disease patients with (Parkinson's disease + LID, n = 23) and without levodopa-induced dyskinesias (Parkinson's disease - LID, n = 10), and age-matched healthy controls. The motor score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, a dyskinesia score and force in a grip-lift paradigm were assessed ON and OFF levodopa. A pathological increase of forces was seen in ON-state in Parkinson's disease + LID only. In Parkinson's disease + LID, the force involved in pressing down the object before lifting was significantly increased by levodopa (by 61%, P < 0.05). An overshooting of peak grip force by 51% (P < 0.05) and of static grip force by 45% (P < 0.01) was observed in the ON- compared with the OFF-drug condition. In contrast, no excessive force was found in Parkinson's disease - LID. Peak grip force in ON-state was 140% (P < 0.05) higher in Parkinson's disease + LID than in Parkinson's disease - LID, while static grip force was increased by 138% (P < 0.01) between groups. Severity of peak-dose dyskinesias was strongly correlated with grip force in ON-state (r = 0.79 with peak force, P < 0.01). No correlation was observed between forces and the motor score as well as with the daily dose of dopaminergic medication. Force excess was only observed in patients with LID and motor fluctuations. A close relationship was seen between the overshooting of forces and dyskinesias in the ON-drug condition. We postulate that both LID and grip force excess share common pathophysiological mechanisms related to motor fluctuations.

Body weight influences pharmacokinetics of levodopa in Parkinson's disease.

Changes in body weight may induce substantial variations in peripheral pharmacokinetics of drugs, but the relation between body weight and levodopa (LD) pharmacokinetics has never been investigated in Parkinson's disease. To address this issue, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study with 164 patients with sporadic Parkinson's disease. Patients underwent an oral acute LD test with 250 mg of LD, and pharmacokinetic variables were assessed at baseline and at 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after LD administration. Plasmatic-LD areas under the curve and body weight were significantly and inversely correlated as well as the elimination of the half-life of LD and body weight. In our sample, women were significantly lighter and had a significantly greater area under the curve than men. Moreover, a greater percentage of women showed LD peak-dose dyskinesias compared with men. Our findings suggest that lighter patients with Parkinson's disease probably receive a greater cumulative dosage of LD per kilogram of body weight during long-term treatment, because in clinical practice, LD is administered without any adjustment of the dose to body weight. This could explain gender differences for the development of LD-induced peak-dose dyskinesias observed during the course of the disease.

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias and continuous subcutaneous infusions of apomorphine: results of a two-year, prospective follow-up.

Twelve patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesias were treated with continuous subcutaneous apomorphine. A markedly significant reduction in peak dose dyskinesias occurred over a two-year follow-up.

Enhanced associated movements in the contralateral limbs elicited by brisk voluntary contraction in choreic disorders

Objectives: To study the deficit of inhibition of excessive motor drive generated in the central nervous system in chorea. Methods: Identical associated movements in the contralateral limb elicited by rapid hand squeezing were measured in 6 patients with Huntington's disease, 7 patients with peak-dose dyskinesia, 10 patients with Parkinson's disease, 8 patients with spinocerebellar degeneration and in 8 normal subjects. The intensity of associated movements was assessed by the EMG amplitude ratio of associated contractions to active contractions. Results: The associated movement ratios were larger in Huntington's disease and peak-dose dyskinesia as compared to other groups. The ratios in akinetic ‘off’ phase were smaller than those in dyskinetic ‘on’ phase in all peak-dose dyskinesia patients. Conclusions: Enhanced associated movements support a possible common mechanism that chorea may result from failure in inhibition of phasic neural activity pathologically generated in the brain.

Neural mechanisms underlying peak-dose dyskinesia induced by levodopa and apomorphine are distinct: evidence from the effects of the alpha(2) adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan.

Dyskinesia, secondary to dopamine replacement therapy, is the major complication of currently available therapies for Parkinson's disease. Alpha(2) adrenoceptor antagonists, such as idazoxan, can significantly reduce levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned, nonhuman primate model of Parkinson's disease and in human. This action of adrenoceptor antagonists may involve blockade of the actions of noradrenaline synthesised from levodopa. We hypothesise that, because dopamine receptor agonists, such as apomorphine, cannot be metabolised to produce noradrenaline, activation of adrenoceptors may not be involved in dyskinesia produced by such agents. If this were the case, idazoxan would not be expected to reduce apomorphine-induced dyskinesia. MPTP-lesioned marmosets with stable dyskinesia induced by prolonged levodopa therapy were given an acute challenge with apomorphine (0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously) or levodopa (8.0 mg/kg orally), these doses produced equivalent peak-dose dyskinesia. Idazoxan (2.5 mg/kg p.o.), or vehicle, was then administered with either apomorphine or levodopa. Idazoxan abolished levodopa-induced dyskinesia but did not affect apomorphine-induced dyskinesia (P < 0.05 and P > 0.05, respectively, Wilcoxon matched pairs test). Idazoxan also extended the anti-parkinsonian actions of levodopa but did not affect those of apomorphine. The pharmacological characteristics of the neural mechanisms underlying levodopa-induced dyskinesia and apomorphine-induced dyskinesia in parkinsonism thus appear to be distinct, at least with respect to the involvement of alpha(2) adrenoceptors. Specifically, levodopa, but not apomorphine-induced dyskinesia, involves activation of adrenoceptors. This finding may have major implications for understanding dyskinesia and should be borne in mind when designing clinical studies in which levodopa or dopamine receptor agonist challenges are employed to assess potential anti-dyskinetic properties of drugs.

Dopamine D2 receptor gene polymorphism and the risk of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in PD.

To investigate whether polymorphisms in the genes for dopamine receptors D1 and D2 are associated with the risk of developing peak-dose dyskinesias in PD. Peak-dose dyskinesias are the most common side effects of levodopa therapy for PD. The identified predictors may only partially account for the risk of developing peak-dose dyskinesias because a substantial proportion of patients never develop peak-dose dyskinesias. Genetic factors could play a role in determining the occurrence of peak-dose dyskinesias. A case-control study of 136 subjects with sporadic PD and 224 population control subjects. We studied three polymorphisms involving the dopamine receptor D1 gene and one intronic short tandem repeat polymorphism of the dopamine receptor D2 gene. The polymorphisms of the dopamine receptor D1 gene were not associated with the risk of developing PD or peak-dose dyskinesias. The 15 allele of the polymorphism of the dopamine receptor D2 gene was more frequent in parkinsonian subjects than in control subjects. More important, the frequency of both the 13 allele and the 14 allele of the dopamine receptor D2 gene polymorphism was higher in nondyskinetic than in the dyskinetic PD subjects. The risk reduction of developing peak-dose dyskinesias for PD subjects carrying at least 1 of the 13 or 14 alleles was 72% with respect to the PD subjects who did not carry these alleles. Certain alleles of the short tandem repeat polymorphism of the dopamine receptor D2 gene reduce the risk of developing peak-dose dyskinesias and could contribute to varying susceptibility to develop peak-dose dyskinesias during levodopa therapy.

Possible relation of atypical parkinsonism in the French West Indies with consumption of tropical plants: a case-control study

In Europe and North America, Parkinson's disease is the major form of parkinsonism; less than 4% of cases are progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and about 20% are atypical parkinsonism. The distribution of these subgroups is different in the French West Indies. We aimed to define the clinical and demographic specificity of these disorders in Guadeloupe and to investigate a postulated link with consumption of herbal tea and fruits from the Annonaceae family (Annona muricata and Annona squamosa), which contain neurotoxic benzyltetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids. Between September, 1996, and August, 1998, 87 consecutive patients with parkinsonism were referred to the single neurological department in Guadeloupe. After detailed clinical, neurophysiological, cognitive, and neuroradiological assessment, they were classified by generally accepted criteria as having Parkinson's disease, PSP, or atypical parkinsonism. We compared the amount of tropical fruits and herbal tea consumed by the various parkinsonian subgroups and by frequency-matched controls (patients with benign symptoms and no neurodegenerative disease). Of the 87 patients, 22 had Parkinson's disease, 31 had PSP, 30 had atypical parkinsonism, and four had atypical parkinsonism associated with motor neuron disease, 44 of the patients with PSP or atypical parkinsonism were male. The patients with atypical parkinsonism had symmetrical rigidity and bradykinesia, and no levodopa peak-dose dyskinesias. Patients with PSP differed from those with atypical parkinsonism because they had supranuclear vertical down-gaze palsy, severe gait and balance problems, and frontal-lobe syndrome. 29 patients with PSP reported regular consumption of pawpaw fruit, and 26 drank herbal tea. 30 patients with atypical parkinsonism reported regular consumption of pawpaw fruit, and 24 drank herbal tea. Both of these groups consumed significantly more fruit and herbal tea than patients with Parkinson's disease (fruit: odds ratio 23.6; herbal tea: 28.2); and controls (fruit: 20.7; herbal tea: 6.48). Our study confirms the over-representation of atypical parkinsonism and PSP in patients with parkinsonism in the French West Indies. Chronic exposure to neurotoxic alkaloids could be an important aetiological factor because these compounds induce parkinsonism in animals. A larger epidemiological study, to clarify the link between these fruits with atypical parkinsonism and PSP, is proposed.

Worsening of levodopa-induced dyskinesias by motor and mental tasks.

Ten patients who had Parkinson's disease with disabling dyskinesia were included in this study to evaluate the role of mental (mental calculation) and motor (flexion/extension of right fingers, flexion/extension of left fingers, flexion/extension of the neck, speaking aloud) tasks on the worsening of peak-dose dyskinesia following administration of an effective single dose of apomorphine. Compared with the score at rest (1.3+/-0.3), a significant aggravation of the dyskinesia score was observed during speaking aloud (5.2+/-1.1, p<0.05), movements of right (4.5+/-1.0, p<0.05) and left (3.7+/-0.8, p<0.05) fingers, movements of the neck (5.1+/-1.0, p<0.05), and mental calculation (3.1+/-1.0, p<0.05). These results suggest that activation tasks such as "speaking aloud" could be used for objective assessment of dyskinesia severity.

Treating and preventing levodopa-induced dyskinesias: current and future strategies.

Prevention of levodopa-induced dyskinesias is a therapeutic challenge for physicians. At present, it seems only possible to delay dyskinesias and motor fluctuations. In younger patients (aged <50 years), the strategy is to use a dopamine D2 agonist as monotherapy and then to add levodopa treatment when the parkinsonian symptoms progress. In older patients, (aged >50 years to <70 years), the therapeutic approach is to use early combination therapy of levodopa and a D2 agonist. The treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias must be considered in regard to the subtype and the severity of dyskinesias, and the patient. The general approach to the treatment of peak dose dyskinesias is to maintain dopamine brain stimulation at as stable a level as possible by keeping plasma and brain levodopa concentrations in the therapeutic range (above the therapeutic threshold but below the dyskinesia threshold). An appropriate strategy is to reduce the individual dose of levodopa, to spread out the daily levodopa dose and/or to try treatment with the sustained-release form of the drug. Combination treatment with the standard and sustained-release levodopa formulations is also possible. Stopping selegiline (deprenyl) therapy may reduce dyskinesias; reducing the dose of, or stopping treatment with, a dopamine agonist may also be beneficial. Anti-dyskinetic drugs such as amantadine, buspirone, fluoxetine, propanolol and principally clozapine may be used. In severe dyskinesias, apomorphine infusion may be tried. In refractory dyskinesia, surgical procedures such as pallidotomy and chronic deep brain stimulation (globus pallidus/subthalamic nucleus) may be proposed. Theoretically, treatment of diphasic dyskinesias requires the maintenance of plasma levodopa concentrations above the dyskinesia threshold. However, this approach leads to constant and severe dyskinesia after only a few weeks of treatment. Thus, the strategy used to treat diphasic dyskinesia is close to the treatment of peak-dose dyskinesias. Apomorphine (or the liquid form of levodopa) may be helpful to prevent diphasic dyskinesias. In selected patients, a midday rest in the 'off' phase may decrease the duration of dyskinesia. Treatment of early morning dystonia is based on the addition to the regimen of the sustained release formulation of levodopa before bedtime. Liquid levodopa and apomorphine injection may be used just before the appearance of the dystonic posture. Botulinum toxin may be helpful in severe dystonia.

Concentration-response relationship of levodopa in patients at different stages of Parkinson's disease.

To assess differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relations of levodopa in clinically defined groups and to prove that pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters are associated with duration of disease and length of treatment. We studied the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relations of levodopa after a single dose (100 mg levodopa with 25 mg benserazide) among four groups of patients with Parkinson's disease. Group 1 was levodopa-naive patients (n = 8); group 2 was patients in stable condition taking levodopa (n = 10); group 3 was patients with on-and-off fluctuations (n = 11); and group 4 was patients with on-and-off fluctuations and peak-dose dyskinesia (n = 8). The Columbia University Rating Scale was used for clinical assessment. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was based on an estimate of the maximal response model with a semiparametric approach to effect-site equilibrium (equilibration half-life). The mean concentration at half-maximal effect estimated for the different groups was as follows (mean value +/- SD): group 1, 389 +/- 138 ng x ml(-1); group 2, 346 +/- 203 ng x ml(-1); group 3, 543 +/- 245 ng x ml(-1); group 4, 711 +/- 215 ng x ml(-1). Estimate of the maximal response was determined to be the following: group 1, 10 +/- 3; group 2, 12 +/- 5; group 3, 24 +/- 13; group 4, 18 +/- 7. A significant correlation was observed between duration of Parkinson's disease and mean concentration at half-maximal effect (p < 0.001), estimate of maximal response (p < 0.05), and, inversely, equilibration half-life (p < 0.05). The data suggested that levodopa-naive patients and patients in stable condition taking levodopa do not differ in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relations, whereas patients with fluctuations, especially patients with peak-dose dyskinesia, exhibit a larger threshold level (mean concentration at half-maximal effect). It was concluded that progression of the disease (loss of endogenous dopamine synthesis and reduced dopamine storage) is reflected by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters that characterize the demand for exogenous dopamine provided by levodopa.

Early morning dystonia in Parkinson's disease.

We interviewed 383 patients with PD regarding disease onset and medication history and evaluated them using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Sixteen percent of the sample reported the occurrence of early morning dystonia (EMD). Patients with EMD had been taking levodopa for a longer time, were taking higher daily levodopa doses, demonstrated more disability in carrying out their activities of daily living, exhibited dystonia more often before initiation of levodopa treatment, and experienced more peak-dose and diphasic dyskinesias with levodopa therapy.

Extending levodopa action: COMT inhibition.

Degradation of levodopa in the periphery is known to be associated with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. The enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is responsible for much of this degradation. Therefore, inhibiting COMT activity is one method of extending the action of levodopa. The new nitrocatechol-type COMT inhibitors entacapone, nitecapone, and tolcapone inhibit COMT in the periphery; tolcapone also inhibits COMT activity centrally. COMT inhibitors increase patients' duration of response to levodopa and reduce response fluctuations. Administration may prolong levodopa-induced dyskinesia, but peak-dose dyskinesia does not appear to increase. To reduce dyskinesia, the total daily dose of levodopa can be reduced.

Adjuncts to levodopa therapy: dopamine agonists.

The classical role of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy is adjunctive treatment to levodopa once "wearing-off" fluctuations or more malignant types of "on-off" swings have developed. Dopamine agonists reduce the frequency, severity, and duration of "off" periods while allowing the levodopa dose to be reduced. Interest is growing in the role of dopamine agonists as primary monotherapy in PD. Studies of early monotherapy have shown that, even with sustained treatment, drug-induced dyskinesias rarely develop. However, this approach is successful for more than 3 years in only about 30% of all PD patients. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation via subcutaneous dopamine agonist infusions is being investigated as a way to control levodopa-associated peak-dose dyskinesias. Early combined treatment with levodopa has been suggested as effective while avoiding long-term complications, but the therapy remains controversial. Despite the entry of several new dopamine agonists into clinical practice, the ideal agonist, with long duration of action and efficacy equal to that of levodopa, is still lacking. The clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists is reviewed.