You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: SWL, Ureteroscopic or Percutaneous Stone Removal IV1 Apr 20101890 THE “ALL-SEEING NEEDLE“ – AN OPTICAL PUNCTURE SYSTEM CONFIRMING PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS IN PCNL Markus Bader, Christian Gratzke, Boris Schlenker, Derya Tilki, Oliver Reich, Christian Gozzi, Rudolf Pfab, and Christian Stief Markus BaderMarkus Bader München, Germany More articles by this author , Christian GratzkeChristian Gratzke Munich, Germany More articles by this author , Boris SchlenkerBoris Schlenker Munich, Germany More articles by this author , Derya TilkiDerya Tilki München, Germany More articles by this author , Oliver ReichOliver Reich Munich, Germany More articles by this author , Christian GozziChristian Gozzi Munich, Germany More articles by this author , Rudolf PfabRudolf Pfab Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany More articles by this author , and Christian StiefChristian Stief Munich, Germany More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1844AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES In PCNL, real time fluoroscopy and ultrasound have made the percutaneous access substantially safer and have reduced access related complications. However, there is no final confirmation of the quality of the access until the tract has been dilated and the nephroscope has been inserted. After the full size access has been established, there is hardly a way to correct a suboptimal or wrong access. METHODS We describe our initial experience of using a micro-optical system through a particular puncture needle in order to confirm the quality of the chosen access prior to dilating the operating tract to standard nephroscope sizes of 24-28F. We used micro-optics of 0.9mm (angle of view: 120°) and 0.6 mm (angle of view: 70°) diameter, with resolutions of up to 10k Pixels suitable for exploration of renal calyces and pelvis. The micro-optics with integrated light lead are inserted in the working sheath of the puncture needle. The special needle has an outer diameter of 1.6mm (4.85F), slightly larger than the diameter of a standard needle of 1.3mm. The needle comprises a Y-piece for connection of irrigation. The optics are length adjusted so that the distal end is flush with the tip of the needle. The optics are connected via a zoom ocular and light adapters to standard endoscopic camera systems and to Xenon light sources of at least 100W power. RESULTS The optical puncture needle was used in 15 patients during PCNL procedures. In all cases, we were able to visualize the punctured kidney calyces and to confirm presence of calculi prior to dilating up the tract for insertion of the operating nephroscope. The 0.9mm optic was found to be superior in terms of field of view, brightness and sharpness. Sufficient irrigation was confirmed for both optical systems. The puncture with the 1.6mm needle was smooth and no differences compared to standard 1.3mm needles were perceived. CONCLUSIONS The optical puncture needle for PCNL appears to be extremely helpful for confirming the percutaneous access to the kidney prior to dilation of the operating tract, thus making PCNL, a surgery where access is the key, inherently safer. In our opinion, this system can substantially assist the learning curve for puncturing of the kidney. The space inside the working sheath of the needle is even sufficient to introduce a laser fiber (365 micrometer with the 0.9mm optics, up to 600 micrometer with the 0.6mm optics) for lithotripsy of small fragments into spontaneously passable fragments. This therapeutic extension will be investigated in future treatment series. © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDesai M, Sharma R, Mishra S, Sabnis R, Stief C and Bader M (2018) Single-Step Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Microperc): The Initial Clinical ReportJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 1, (140-145), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011. Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e734-e735 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Markus Bader München, Germany More articles by this author Christian Gratzke Munich, Germany More articles by this author Boris Schlenker Munich, Germany More articles by this author Derya Tilki München, Germany More articles by this author Oliver Reich Munich, Germany More articles by this author Christian Gozzi Munich, Germany More articles by this author Rudolf Pfab Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany More articles by this author Christian Stief Munich, Germany More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...