Care Payment Research Articles

Out-of-Pocket Expenses for Long-Term Care by Dementia Status and Residential Setting among US Older Adults

ObjectiveTo examine long-term care out-of-pocket payments by dementia status and residential setting. DesignCompare monthly out-of-pocket long-term care expenses paid to facilities and helpers, total monthly out-of-pocket long-term expenses and as a percentage of monthly income by dementia status and residential status (community, residential facility, and nursing home). Setting and ParticipantsUS Nationwide, 2019 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) respondents aged ≥70 years. MethodsWe analyzed respondent-level data from the nationally representative 2019 NHATS. Weighted descriptive statistics were calculated for long-term care payments by source and summarized by dementia status and the respondent's residential status. ResultsAmong 4505 respondents aged ≥70 years, 1750 (38.8%) had possible or probable dementia and 2755 (61.2%) had no dementia. The median monthly out-of-pocket long-term care expenses for persons with dementia was $1465 for those living in nursing homes, and $2925 for those living in other residential facilities, much higher than those with dementia living in the community ($260). Although these are similar to the median out-of-pocket payments for persons without dementia by setting, those with dementia were at greater risk of facing catastrophic out-of-pocket expenses for long-term care than those without dementia, with the 75th percentile value of out-of-pocket payment at $4566 among dementia adults living in non–nursing home residential care facilities, and $7500 for those in nursing homes, compared to $3694 and $3100 among those without dementia. At median, these expenses accounted for 100% of monthly income of respondents with dementia living in facilities. Conclusions and ImplicationsPersons with dementia living in facilities often face substantial financial burdens from high out-of-pocket long-term care expenses. Policies that provide sufficient financial assistance are needed to address long-term care–related financial burdens experienced by older adults and their families, especially for those with dementia.

Factors influencing public and private healthcare utilisation in Uganda.

In Uganda, health care utilisation remains very low despite a number of government reforms that have been implemented in the health sector since the 1990's such as decentralization and removal of user fees in public health facilities among others. To examine the factors influencing public and private health care utilisation in Uganda. The study used cross sectional data from the Uganda National Household Survey collected between July 2016 and June 2017. Anderson's conceptual framework was used to identify explanatory variables associated with choice of health care providers and a multinomial logistic regression model was estimated. Out of the 17,912 individuals who sought care, 36% used a government facility, 60% used private facility while 4% had self- care/treatment. The results show that out of pocket health expenditure, age, level of education, marital status, residence, and type of illness significantly influenced choice of public healthcare providers. Similarly, utilisation of private healthcare providers was associated with household welfare, level of education, residence, marital status, illness days, and type of illness. The findings highlight the need for a national health insurance scheme to reduce out of pocket payments for health care and enable the poor and vulnerable patients visit the modern health facilities.

Pneumonia is not just pneumonia: Differences in utilization and costs with common comorbidities.

We sought to explore the heterogeneity among patients hospitalized with pneumonia, a condition targeted in payment reform. In a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for pneumonia, we compared postacute care utilization and costs of 90-day episodes of care among patients with and without comorbidities of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or heart failure. Of the 1,926,674 discharges, 28.1% had COPD, 14.3% had heart failure, and 14.6% carried both diagnoses. Patients with pneumonia were more likely to be discharged to a facility than those with pneumonia and COPD with or without heart failure, though less likely than those with pneumonia and heart failure only. Compared to patients with pneumonia only, patients with COPD and/or heart failure had higher episode payments. Acute conditions such as pneumonia may hold promise for episode-based care payment reform; however, the heterogeneity within this diagnosis indicates the need to consider other patient characteristics in interventions to improve value-based care.

County Hospital Responses to Funding Reforms in Zhejiang, China: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis

ABSTRACT This study aimed to assess the effects of a two-stage funding reform, involving DRGs-based (Diagnostic Related Groups) payments for inpatient care and capitation funding for outpatient care, respectively, on services volume and care expenditure of county hospitals in Zhejiang province, China. A quasi-experimental design was adopted, involving 6 hospitals from 2 counties in the intervention group and 12 hospitals from 5 counties in the control group. The DRGs-based payments for inpatient care and capitation funding for outpatient care were introduced in January 2018 and January 2019, respectively. Controlled interrupted time-series analyses were performed to determine the effects of the funding reforms using monthly data over the period from January 2017 to December 2019. The volume of inpatient care decreased after the introduction of the first-stage DRGs-based payments, which was accompanied by an increase in the volume of outpatient visits. The DRGs-based payments led to a reduction of on average 1390 Yuan total expenditure per episode of inpatient care and 1116 Yuan out-of-pocket (OOP) payment per episode of inpatient care. However, the average outpatient expenditure per visit increased. So did the corresponding OOP payment per outpatient visit. The introduction of the second-stage capitation funding for outpatient care reversed the increasing trend of outpatient care. The average expenditure and OOP payment per outpatient visit decreased. The funding reforms create a significant effect on service volumes and expenditures in county hospitals. A coordinated approach to both inpatient and outpatient funding mechanisms is needed to minimize cost-shifting between inpatient and outpatient care and to achieve the intended policy outcomes.

Tracking progress towards equitable maternal and child health in Yunnan: a systematic assessment for the Health Programme for Poverty Alleviation in China during 2015–2020

ObjectivesTo inform the impacts of health programmes which aimed at preventing women and children from being trapped in or returning to poverty because of illness in Yunnan, the main battlefield...

Prevalence and patterns of catastrophic spending for antidiabetic medication in 2020.

BACKGROUND: Medication costs for antidiabetic drugs have risen significantly in the United States, causing concerns about the affordability of these essential treatments. OBJECTIVE: To examine out-of-pocket spending for antidiabetic medication and evaluate what proportion of Americans reach catastrophic spending levels during the year. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis of nationally representative data from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) was analyzed for respondents that reported a diabetes diagnosis. Prescription drug costs were identified from the MEPS Prescribed Medicines File, which included both total prescription payment and out-of-pocket payment for each medication fill. Catastrophic spending thresholds were evaluated based on the World Health Organization's definition, which is spending greater than 40% of a household's nonsubsistence income on health care payments. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 17 and sample weights were applied adjusting for the MEPS complex survey design to produce national estimates. Descriptive statistics were reported as weighted counts and percentages for categorical variables and as medians with interquartile range for continuous variables. Comparisons of reaching catastrophic spending thresholds across study variables were evaluated with Pearson chi-square tests. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in this study. RESULTS: The study included data from a weighted US population of 29.5 million Americans with diabetes. Among this group, 23.8 million (81%) reported use of a prescription medication to treat diabetes. Total reported out-of-pocket payments paid by the patient for antidiabetic medication surpassed $5.2 billion with the largest portion attributable to the insulin subclass, which accounted for 42% or $2.2 billion. The data suggest an estimated 3 million Americans (10.3%) experienced out-of-pocket spending for antidiabetic drugs that reached catastrophic spending thresholds in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Affordability of prescribed medication in community-dwelling persons with diabetes remains a significant challenge for many Americans.

Risk-oriented approach of the organization of quality control and medical safety in the application of medical rehabilitation clinical and statistical groups

In the last decade, the healthcare system has been undergoing reforms to ensure the effective use of budgetary resources given the steady increase in spending on the maintenance of medical institutions and implementation of state policy in healthcare. Improving the payment methods for medical care is one of the main tasks for the healthcare system.
 Medical care payment in a clinical hospital is made using clinical and statistical groups. The work based on the Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia of Russia with clinical and statistical groups within the framework of medical insurance has been implemented since January 2021.
 In total, 2,973 medical records of inpatients treated under medical insurance were analyzed for 2021. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the use of clinical and statistical groups for the profile Medical rehabilitation. The patterns that allowed increasing case efficiency have been identified. These measures helped optimize the expenses of the medical institution for the provision of medical care and preserve all opportunities for long-term growth and development.

Positive impact of perioperative oral management on the risk of surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: Sixteen universities in Japan.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to investigate the ability of perioperative oral management (POM) to reduce the risk of SSI in abdominal surgery Real-world data collected from 16 university hospitals in Japan were reviewed. The medical records of consecutive 2782 patients (1750 men and 1032 women) who underwent abdominal surgery under general anesthesia at 16 university hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Detailed information about SSI was assessed and compared between patients with and without POM in univariate and multivariate analyses. SSI were observed in 275 patients (incidence rate:9.9%), and POM was administered to 778 patients (28.0%). Univariate analyses revealed that diabetes mellitus, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgical site, preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index score, POM, extent of surgery, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss were significantly associated with postoperative SSI (Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U test, P < .01). Multivariate analysis revealed that POM had significant preventive effects against postoperative SSI (estimate: -0.245, standard error: 0.080, P < .01). Surgical site, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and operation time were also significant and independent clinical predictors of SSI. The analysis of real-world data from 16 university hospitals revealed that, regardless of the content and degree of the problem, the addition of POM has significant beneficial effects in reducing the risk of SSI in patients who undergo abdominal surgery. Medical records from each hospital and data from the Health Care Payment Fund were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

Contrastive diagnostic embedding (CDE) model for automated coding – A case study using emergency department encounters

BackgroundBilling codes are utilized for medical reimbursement, clinical quality metric valuation and for epidemiologic purposes to report and follow disease trends and outcomes. The current paradigm of manual coding can be expensive, time-consuming, and subject to human error. Though automation of the billing codes has been widely reported in the literature via rule-based and supervised approaches, existing strategies lack generalizability and robustness towards large and constantly changing ICD hierarchical structure. MethodWe propose a weakly supervised training strategy by leveraging contrastive learning, contrastive diagnosis embedding (CDE) to capture the fine semantic variations between the diagnosis codes. The approach consists of a two-phase contrastive training for generating the semantic embedding space adapted to incorporate hierarchical information of ICD-10 vocabulary and a weakly supervised retrieval scheme. Core strength of the proposed method is that it puts no limit on the 70 K ICD-10 codes set and can handle all rare codes for coding the diagnosis. ResultsOur CDE model outperformed string-based partial matching and ClinicalBERT embedding on three test cases (a retrospective testset, a prospective testset, and external testset) and produced an accurate prediction of rare and newly introduced diagnosis codes. A detailed ablation study showed the importance of each phase of the proposed multi-phase training. Each successive phase of training – ICD-10 group sensitive training (phase 1.1), ICD-10 subgroup sensitive training (phase 1.2), free-text diagnosis description-based training (phase 2) – improved performance beyond the previous phase of training. The model also outperformed existing supervised models like CAML and PLM-ICD and produced satisfactory performance on the rare codes. ConclusionCompared to the existing rule-based and supervised models, the proposed weakly supervised contrastive learning overcomes the limitations in terms of generalization capability and increases the robustness of the automated billing. Such a model will allow flexibility through accurate billing code automation for practice convergence and gains efficiencies in a value-based care payment environment.

The intersection of social determinants of health and family care of people living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A public health opportunity.

In this Perspective article, we highlight current research to illustrate the intersection of social determinants of health (SDOHs) and Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) caregiving. We then outline how public health can support ADRD family caregivers in the United States. Emerging research suggests that family care for persons with ADRD is influenced by SDOHs. Public health actions that address these intersections such as improved surveillance and identification of ADRD caregivers; building and enhancing community partnerships; advancing dementia-capable health care and related payment incentives; and reducing the stigma of dementia and ADRD caregiving can potentially enhance the health and well-being of dementia caregivers. By engaging in one or all of these actions, public health practitioners could more effectively address the myriad of challenges facing ADRD caregivers most at risk for emotional, social, financial, psychological, and health disruption.

Social determinants of health in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty: are they associated with medical complications, healthcare utilization, and payments for care?

Social determinants of health (SDOH) have previously been shown to impact orthopedic surgery outcomes. This study assessed whether greater socioeconomic disadvantage in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fracture was associated with differences in (1) medical complications, (2) emergency department (ED) utilization, (3) readmission rates, and (4) payments for care. A US nationwide database was queried for hemiarthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of socioeconomic disadvantage reported on a scale of 0-100, was used to compare two cohorts of greater and lesser deprivation. Patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty from high ADI (95% +) were 1:1 propensity score matched to a comparison group of lower ADI (0-94%) while controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. This yielded 75,650 patients evenly distributed between the two cohorts. Outcomes studied were 90-day medical complications, ED utilizations, readmissions, and payments for care. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of the relationship between ADI and outcomes. p Values < 0.05 were significant. Patients of high ADI developed greater medical complications (46.74% vs. 44.97%; OR 1.05, p = 0.002), including surgical site infections (1.19% vs. 1.00%; OR 1.20, p = 0.011), cerebrovascular accidents (1.64% vs. 1.41%; OR 1.16, p = 0.012), and respiratory failures (2.27% vs. 2.02%; OR 1.13, p = 0.017) compared to patients from lower ADIs. Although comparable rates of ED visits (2.92% vs. 2.86%; OR 1.02, p = 0.579), patients from higher ADI were readmitted at diminished rates (10.57% vs. 11.06%; OR 0.95, p = 0.027). Payments were significantly higher on the day of surgery ($7,570 vs. $5,974, p < 0.0001), as well as within 90days after surgery ($12,700 vs. $10,462, p < 0.0001). Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients experience increased 90-day medical complications and payments, similar ED utilizations, and decreased readmissions. These findings can be used to inform healthcare providers to minimize disparities in care. III.

Incidence of catastrophic health spending in Indonesia: insights from a Household Panel Study 2018–2019

BackgroundIndonesia implemented one of the world’s largest single-payer national health insurance schemes (the Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional or JKN) in 2014. This study aims to assess the incidence of catastrophic health spending (CHS) and its determinants and trends between 2018 and 2019 by which time JKN enrolment coverage exceeded 80%.MethodsThis study analysed data collected from a two-round cross-sectional household survey conducted in ten provinces of Indonesia in February–April 2018 and August–October 2019. The incidence of CHS was defined as the proportion of households with out-of-pocket (OOP) health spending exceeding 10% of household consumption expenditure. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the incidences of CHS across subgroups for each household characteristic. Logistic regression models were used to investigate factors associated with incurring CHS and the trend over time. Sensitivity analyses assessing the incidence of CHS based on a higher threshold of 25% of total household expenditure were conducted.ResultsThe overall incidence of CHS at the 10% threshold fell from 7.9% to 2018 to 4.4% in 2019. The logistic regression models showed that households with JKN membership experienced significantly lower incidence of CHS compared to households without insurance coverage in both years. The poorest households were more likely to incur CHS compared to households in other wealth quintiles. Other predictors of incurring CHS included living in rural areas and visiting private health facilities.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the overall incidence of CHS decreased in Indonesia between 2018 and 2019. OOP payments for health care and the risk of CHS still loom high among JKN members and among the lowest income households. More needs to be done to further contain OOP payments and further research is needed to investigate whether CHS pushes households below the poverty line.

Does Anesthesia Quality Improvement Participation Lead to Incremental Savings in a Surgical Quality Collaborative Population? A Retrospective Observational Study.

The Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE) Collaborative Quality Initiative (CQI) was launched as a partnership among hospitals to measure quality, review evidence-based practices, and improve anesthesia-related outcomes. Cost savings and improved patient outcomes have been associated with surgical CQI participation, but the impact of an anesthesia CQI on health care cost has not been thoroughly assessed. In this study, we evaluated whether participation in an anesthesia CQI led to health care savings. We hypothesized that ASPIRE participation is associated with reduced total episode payments for payers and major, high-volume procedures included in the Michigan Value Collaborative (MVC) registry. In this retrospective observational study, we compared MVC episode payment data from Group 1 ASPIRE hospitals, the first cluster of 8 Michigan hospitals to join ASPIRE in January 2015, to non-ASPIRE matched control hospitals. MVC computes price-standardized, risk-adjusted payments for patients insured by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Preferred Provider Organization, Blue Care Network Health Maintenance Organization, and Medicare Fee-for-Service plans. Episodes from 2014 comprised the pre-ASPIRE time period, and episodes from June 2016 to July 2017 constituted the post-ASPIRE time period. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis to evaluate whether ASPIRE implementation was associated with greater reduction in total episode payments compared to the change in the control hospitals during the same time periods. We found a statistically significant reduction in total episode (-$719; 95% CI [-$1340 to -$97]; P = .023) payments at the 8 ASPIRE hospitals (N = 17,852 cases) compared to the change observed in 8 matched non-ASPIRE hospitals (N = 12,987 cases) for major, high-volume surgeries, including colectomy, colorectal cancer resection, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, hysterectomy, joint replacement (knee and hip), and hip fracture repair. In secondary analyses, 30-day postdischarge (-$354; 95% CI [-$582 to -$126]; P = .002) payments were also significantly reduced in ASPIRE hospitals compared to non-ASPIRE controls. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant reduction in total episode payments for joint replacements (-$860; 95% CI [-$1222 to -$499]; P < .001) at ASPIRE-participating hospitals. Sensitivity analyses including patient-level covariates also showed consistent results. Participation in an anesthesiology CQI, ASPIRE, is associated with lower total episode payments for selected major, high-volume procedures. This analysis supports that participation in an anesthesia CQI can lead to reduced health care payments.

NC InCK: A Case Study in Whole-Child Care.

North Carolina Integrated Care for Kids (NC InCK) is a pilot health care delivery and payment model for Medicaid-enrolled children in five North Carolina counties. We describe early learnings from the NC InCK approach to promote the vision of whole-child health for children in North Carolina.

Association of Hospice Agency Location and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage in the U.S.

Despite the growing increase in the utilization of hospice in the U.S, disparities exist in the utilization of hospice. Accumulating evidence has shown that neighborhood characteristics have an impact on availability of hospice agencies. To assess the association between neighborhood social vulnerability and hospice agency availability. Using the Medicare Post-Acute Care and Hospice Provider Utilization and Payment Public Use Files (PAC PUF) for 2019. Hospice agency addresses were geocoded to the census tract level. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to assess the association between socioeconomic status SVI theme and hospice agency availability adjusting for number of home health agencies, primary care health profession shortage, per cent Black, and Percent Hispanic at the census tract level and rurality. The socioeconomic status SVI subtheme was associated with decreased likelihood of hospice agency availability (adjusted IRR (aIRR), .56; 95% CI, .50- .63; P < .001). Predominantly Black, and predominantly Hispanic neighborhoods had lower rates of hospice agency availability (aIRR, .48; 95% CI, .39-.59; P < .001 and aIRR, .29; 95% CI, .24-.36; P < .001), respectively. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with lower availability of hospice agencies. Policies aimed at increasing access to hospice should be cognizant of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage.

Community Health Center Staff Perspectives on Financial Payments for Social Care.

A growing crop of national policies has emerged to encourage health care delivery systems to ask about and try to address patients' social risks, e.g., food, housing, and transportation insecurity, in care delivery contexts. In this study, we explored how community health center (CHC) staff perceive the current and potential influence of fee-for-service payments on clinical teams' engagement in these activities. We interviewed 42 clinicians, frontline staff, and administrative leaders from 12 Oregon CHC clinical sites about their social care initiatives, including about the role of existing or anticipated financial payments intended to promote social risk screening and referrals to social services. Data were analyzed using both inductive and deductive thematic analysis approaches. We grouped findings into three categories: participants' awareness of existing or anticipated financial incentives, uses for incentive dollars, and perceived impact of financial incentives on social care activities in clinical practices. Lack of awareness of existing incentives meant these incentives were not perceived to influence the behaviors of staff responsible for conducting screening and providing referrals. Current or anticipated meaningful uses for incentive dollars included paying for social care staff, providing social services, and supporting additional fundraising efforts. Frontline staff reported that the strongest motivator for clinic social care practices was the ability to provide responsive social services. Clinic leaders/managers noted that for financial incentives to substantively change CHC practices would require payments sizable enough to expand the social care workforce as well. Small fee-for-service payments to CHCs for social risk screening and navigation services are unlikely to markedly influence CHC social care practices. Refining the design of financial incentives-e.g., by increasing clinical teams' awareness of incentives, linking screening to well-funded social services, and changing incentive amounts to support social care staffing needs-may increase the uptake of social care practices in CHCs.

Scourge of out-of-pocket expenditure on health: A study on its burden and predictors in a rural community of West Bengal.

Globally, one-third of current health expenditure had been out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE). The health system financing of almost all low- and middle-income countries including India rely heavily on out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for health care. OOPE on health payments is particularly hard on any community, especially the poor leading to incomplete or even no treatment during their ill health. This study estimated OOPE among residents of a rural community in West Bengal and explored the associated factors with high OOP expenses. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural community in Singur, West Bengal from June 2019 to February 2020. The study was done among 398 villagers selected from 15 clusters or villages. Households were randomly selected in each village. All members of the selected households were interviewed. SPSS was used for data analysis both for descriptive and inferential statistics. Only 14.6% of morbid persons had catastrophic expenditure. The incidence of catastrophic expenditure was higher among those who opted for private practitioners and or ayurveda, yoga and naturopathy, unani, siddha, and homeopathy (AYUSH) facilities. There was zero catastrophic expenditure for the unqualified sector. There was an increasing trend of OOP payments among the lower socioeconomic groups. Again, low-income individuals had a higher share in cumulative expenditure (Gini coefficient of 0.35). Most of the participants (78.4%) had no health insurance coverage. Promotion for higher utilization of public health facilities may reduce the burden of OOP expenses. Government health insurance schemes must be widened with the inclusion of coverage of outpatient services. Integrating AYUSH services in the public sector is another option to reduce OOP expenses.

Catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for dental treatment: regional evidence from Spain

BackgroundTo estimate the incidence and concentration of catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for healthcare and dental treatment, by region in Spain (calculated as the proportion of households needing to exceed a given threshold of their income to make these payments) in 2008, 2011 and 2015.MethodsThe data analysed were obtained from the Spanish Family Budget Survey reports for the years in question. The study method was that proposed by Wagstaff and van Doorslaer (2003), contrasting payments for dental treatment versus household income and considering thresholds of 10%, 20%, 30% and 40%, thus obtaining incidence rates. In addition, relevant sociodemographic variables were obtained for each household included in the study.ResultsWith some regional heterogeneity, on average 4.75% of Spanish households spend more than 10% of their income on dental treatment, and 1.23% spend more than 40%. Thus, 38.67% of catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for dental services in Spain corresponds to payments at the 10% threshold. This value rises to 55.98% for a threshold of 40%.ConclusionsAn important proportion of catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for health care in Spain corresponds to dental treatment, a service that has very limited availability under the Spanish NHS. This finding highlights the need to formulate policies aimed at enhancing dental cover, in order to reduce inequalities in health care and, consequently, enhance the population’s quality of life and health status.

Improving the model of payment for medical care for chronic viral hepatitis C in the framework of the implementation of the Program of State Guarantees of Free Provision of Medical Care to Citizens for 2023 and for the planned period of 2024–2025

Background. In 2021, new clinical guidelines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in adults were published that did not contain interferon drug therapy regimens. Current therapy of chronic HCV is based on modern drugs of direct-acting antivirals (DAA). In this regard, the model of diagnosis-related groups (DRG) with the use of interferon-containing drugs as etiotropic therapy, which has been in effect until now, has lost its relevance and cannot be used to pay for cases of medical care for chronic HCV within the framework of the Program of State Guarantees of Free Medical Care to Citizens for 2023 and for the planning period of 2024–2025 (PSG). Objective: to improve the DRG model to pay for medical care for chronic HCV in a day hospital based on current clinical recommendations.Material and methods. Regulatory legal documents on the subject of the study, proposals and expert opinions of specialists, as well as feedback from public organizations, including patients, regarding the payment of medical care for chronic HCV, sent as part of a public discussion of the draft PSG, were studied. For the calculations were used: the current version of the clinical recommendations "Chronic viral hepatitis C"; impersonal personalized information of the database of registers of bills for payment for medical care for 2020–2021; the state register of manufacturers' maximum selling prices for medicines included in the list of vital and essential drugs.Results. A DRG model was developed to pay for medical care during drug therapy of chronic HCV, including for children. When calculating the model, the cost of medicines, patient days and the principles of accounting for the duration of hospitalization were updated.Conclusion. The developed DRG model to pay for medical care for chronic HCV in a day hospital with the use of drug therapy regimens with DAA recommended by clinical guidelines, including for children with HCV, contributes to improving the effectiveness of the system of payment for medical care provided as part of the implementation of the PSG and accessibility of medical care for this contingent of patients.

Association between "Balance Billing" Legislation and Anesthesia Payments in California: A Retrospective Analysis.

Insured patients who receive out-of-network care may receive a "balance bill" for the difference between the practitioner's charge and their insurer's contracted rate. In 2017, California banned balance billing for anesthesia care. This study examined the association between California's law and subsequent payments for anesthesia care. The authors hypothesized that, after the law's implementation, there would be no change in in-network payment amounts, and that out-of-network payment amounts and the portion of claims occurring out-of-network would decline. The study used average, quarterly, California county-level payment data (2013 to 2020) derived from a claims database of commercially insured patients. Using a difference-in-differences approach, the change was estimated in payment amounts for intraoperative or intrapartum anesthesia care, along with the portion of claims occurring out-of-network, after the law's implementation. The comparison group was office visit payments, expected to be unaffected by the law. The authors prespecified that they would refer to differences of 10% or greater as policy significant. The sample consisted of 43,728 procedure code-county-quarter-network combinations aggregated from 4,599,936 claims. The law's implementation was associated with a significant 13.6% decline in payments for out-of-network anesthesia care (95% CI, -16.5 to -10.6%; P < 0.001), translating to an average $108 decrease across all procedures (95% CI, -$149 to -$64). There was a statistically significant 3.0% increase in payments for in-network anesthesia care (95% CI, 0.9 to 5.1%; P = 0.007), translating to an average $87 increase (95% CI, $64 to $110), which may be notable in some circumstances but did not meet the study threshold for identifying a change as policy significant. There was a nonstatistically significant increase in the portion of claims occurring out-of-network (10.0%, 95% CI, -4.1 to 24.2%; P = 0.155). California's balance billing law was associated with significant declines in out-of-network anesthesia payments in the first 3 yr after implementation. There were mixed statistical and policy significant results for in-network payments and the proportion of out-of-network claims.