AbstractIncreased migration possibilities of graduates can lead to brain drain. It isshown that surplus-maximizing governments react to this threat by lowering thequality of the regular university degree and enlarging the student body. Thispolicy keeps more human capital in the country and avoids fiscal externalitiesof public subsidies to higher education. Therefore, the implementation of thebachelor’s degree in many European countries could be interpreted as a rationalresponse to increased international integration.JEL Classification: F15, H73, I28Keywords: brain drain, education quality, bachelor’s degree, educational subsi-dies 1 Introduction The education that an individual has attained can influence her migration possibilitiesduring her whole life. This is obvious for the case of language abilities, which areacquired most easily when young. But also the subject studied seems to play a majorrole. Some fields of study, like medicine or economics, can be applied anywhere inthe world, while other ones, like law, stick more to the country where they have beentaught. Starting from this observation, a growing literature analyzes how globalizationchanges the composition of the higher education offered because the new pattern ofmobility can be strategically exploited by governments.Thum and Ubelmesser (2003) present a model in which a gerontocratic majority faces¨the classical holdup problem with respect to the human-capital investment of the younggeneration. The promise of a low contribution rate for the PAYG pension system inthe future is not credible as long as the young are in the minority and have no exit