A detailed and rigorous geomechanical analysis of the stability of overpressured, gently sloping, sediment layers is presented that underlies the Multi‐Unit Delta Model described in Part I (Crans, Mandl and Haremboure, Journ. Petrol. Geol., 2, 3, 1980). That delta model explains and permits quantitative reproduction of main features associated with growth faulting. Starting from the equilibrium equations, the Coulomb‐Mohr yield criterion and the proper initial and boundary conditions, the elastic and plastic stress fields in the sloping, overpressured layer are derived. The plastic stress field is calculated on the grid generated by the “characteristics” of the hyperbolic partial differential equation for the plastic stress state. These characteristics, being called in stress analyses “slip lines”, are potential faults. In the case considered, a parameter equation is derived for one set of slip lines, (potential growth faults), which may simplify into cycloids under special conditions. Once the plastic stress field has been generated, the plastic deformation of the layer can be calculated by introducing the proper boundary conditions to the flow rules or plastic “velocity equations” being discussed extensively. To complete the rheological description, the behavior of the sediment layer is described by attributing also thixotropic properties to the sediment. Although the case discussed is a very specific one, it illustrates how structural geological phenomena can be modeled on the computer in an appropriate geomechanical way. Such a numerical computer model shows the unique relation between plastic stress state and fault pattern, and the non‐unique relation between plastic stress state and deformation pattern, being typical for the theory of plasticity. Generally, the unique relation between stress state and fault pattern is of utmost importance for the seismic interpreter in judging the feasibility of fault patterns. Inversely, one may deduce the stress state in the formation from a convincing fault pattern obtained from structural seismic interpretation which is, among others, important for the evaluation of acoustic properties of the sedimentary sequence used for the probabilistic assessment of seismic amplitude anomalies in the search for hydrocarbons (Crans and Berkhout, 1979, 1980; Crans and Ausburn, 1980).