PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 利用不同方法测定红松人工林叶面积指数的季节动态 DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306181727 作者: 作者单位: 东北林业大学生态研究中心,东北林业大学生态研究中心,东北林业大学林学院,东北林业大学生态研究中心 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 林业公益性行业科研专项资助项目(201204320);长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助(IRT1054) Seasonal dynamics of leaf area index using different methods in the Korean pine plantation Author: Affiliation: Center for Ecological Research,Northeast Forestry University,Center for Ecological Research,Northeast Forestry University,School of Forestry,Northeast Forestry University,Center for Ecological Research,Northeast Forestry University Fund Project: 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:采用2种异速生长方程法、凋落物法、综合法(对光学仪器法进行木质部分及集聚效应校正后结合凋落物法)和光学仪器法测定了小兴安岭红松(Pinus koraiensis)人工林的叶面积指数(LAI)。首先利用光学仪器法测定有效叶面积指数(Le)的季节动态;其次为获得相对准确LAI,基于生长季节(5-8月)的展叶调查,结合凋落物法、综合法和2种异速生长方程法分别测定LAI的季节动态。结果表明:生长季节红松叶片8月初停止生长,迟于其他树种约两周;不同方法测定红松人工林LAI的季节变化均呈单峰型,且在8月初达到峰值,分别为异速生长方法-B(10.58) > 凋落物法(7.90) > 异速生长方法-A(6.70) > 综合法(4.41) > 光学仪器法(1.81);在整个调查期内(5月至11月),相对于异速生长方法-B、凋落物法、异速生长方法-A和综合法,光学仪器法分别平均低估81.69%、75.50%、70.18%和48.90%。本研究探讨了非破坏条件下测定红松人工林LAI季节动态的直接方法,并比较了不同方法之间的差异,研究结果可为有效测定常绿针叶林LAI提供参考。 Abstract:Leaf area index (LAI), defined as half the total leaf area per unit ground surface area, and is one of the most important characteristics of the plant canopy structure. LAI controls the flux of carbon, solar energy, and water in forest ecosystems. Thus, accurately estimating LAI is essential for simulating the forest process. Furthermore, the seasonality of LAI estimation is of particular interest. Methods directly estimating LAI mainly include destructive sampling, allometry, and litterfall. The results of these methods are assumed to provide values close to the true LAI. However, the first two methods destroy the samples, as well as labor intensive. By contrast, the litterfall method is the best choice in obtaining accurate LAI. At present, the optical method has been widely used to estimate LAI because of its convenience and speed. However, the accuracy of optically measured LAI needs to be verified. This verification is performed because the indirect method often underestimates LAI. In the present study, allometry method (including two different allometry equations, namely, A and B), litterfall method, combinational method (the LAI derived from optical method were calibrated by taking into consideration the woody-to-total ratio (α), as well as the clumping index, and combining the litterfall method), and optical method were used to estimate LAI in the Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) plantation in Xiaoxing'an Mountains. First, we estimated the effective leaf area index (Le) and its seasonality in the Korean pine plantation using optical method (hemispherical photography). To obtain accurate LAI, we estimated the LAI seasonal dynamics by combining litterfall method, combinational method, and allometry methods in accordance with the leaf seasonality observation from May to August. Subsequently, we compared the results obtained from the different methods. The results showed that P. koraiensis leaf stopped growing in early August, which was approximately two weeks later than the other tree species. The major species had different leaf fall pattern in the Korean pine plantation. P. koraiensis had two rapidly decreasing flush. The first flush was in June. The second was in late September. However, other species had single rapidly decreasing flush in late September. The LAI seasonal dynamic derived from different methods all show a uni-modal pattern with a peak in early August, with the following order: Allometry-B method (10.58) > Litterfall method (7.90) > Allometry-A method (6.70) > Combinational method (4.41) > Optical method (1.81). In the entire study period (from May to November), the LAI derived from optical method underestimated LAI by an average of 81.69%, 75.50%, 70.18%, and 48.90%, respectively, which were in contrast with contrast Allometry-B method, Litterfall method, Allometry-A method, and Combinational method. In the present study, we investigated a practical method for estimating LAI in the Korean pine plantation using a non-destructive method. Furthermore, we compared the difference between the different methods. In addition, this study lays a foundation for the valid LAI estimation of evergreen conifer forest in subsequent studies. 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献