Chromosome Segregation Pattern Research Articles

Genome-Wide Maps of Recombination and Chromosome Segregation in Human Oocytes and Embryos Show Selection for Maternal Recombination Rates

Conservative estimates have been made that 10% to 30% of natural conceptions are aneuploid. The underlying causes are still unclear. Maternal age is one well-known cause of aneuploidy. Another important factor that predisposes to aneuplody is recombinant segregation errors in meiosis during fetal development in females. Crossover segregation errors occurring in oocytes during fetal development affect the risk of women having an aneuploid conception decades later in adult life. Recombinant chromosomes in offspring result from crossovers—the reciprocal exchange of DNA between homologous chromosomes. Crossover recombination is critical for the fidelity of meiosis. Reshuffling of genes prevents errors in segregation that lead to aneuploidy. Crossovers keep chromosome homologs physically linked during meiosis. Maintenance of the linkage is also helped by cohesion between sister chromatids. To understand the origin of human aneuploidies, it is important to assess all 3 meiotic products in unselected oocytes and embryos. The 3 products of female meiosis include the first and second polar bodies (PB1 and PB2) and the corresponding activated oocytes or fertilized embryos. Extensive population-based studies have examined crossover segregation errors, but the oocyte is the only product of female meiosis that has been analyzed. The inability to study the other products of female meiosis prevents direct identification of the origin of chromosome segregation errors and provides only partial information on crossovers in meiosis I. The investigators generated a more complete view of recombination by analyzing the genome of the oocyte or embryo and both polar bodies—the first polar body being a product of meiosis I and the second a product of meiosis II. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were examined from DNA obtained from polar bodies, oocytes, and embryos from women at fertility clinics, allowing a view of 23 complete meioses. It was originally hypothesized that trisomies occurring at a high rate in the natural population of women of advanced maternal age was the result of meiosis I nondysjunction, where both homologs segregate to the oocyte at meiosis I, followed by a normal second division. However, direct cytological examination of human oocytes that failed to fertilize in in vitro fertilization clinics suggested that the major cause of human age-related trisomies is separation of many sister chromatids during meiosis I, staying paired with their nonsister chromatid—a new chromosome segregation pattern the investigators called “reverse segregation.” Another finding of the investigators suggested that higher genome-wide recombination rates were selected for because they were more likely to give rise to a euploid oocyte. Collectively, these data imply that recombination not only is critical for the accurate segregation of homologs at meiosis I, but also affects the fate of sister chromatid segregation at meiosis II. Events attributed to mistakes in chromosome segregation in meiosis II may have their origin at meiosis I in human female meiosis.

Regulated Formation of an Amyloid-like Translational Repressor Governs Gametogenesis

Message-specific translational control is required for gametogenesis. In yeast, the RNA-binding protein Rim4 mediates translational repression of numerous mRNAs, including the B-type cyclin CLB3, which is essential for establishing the meiotic chromosome segregation pattern. Here, we show that Rim4 forms amyloid-like aggregates and that it is the amyloid-like form of Rim4 that is the active, translationally repressive form of the protein. Our data further show that Rim4 aggregation is a developmentally regulated process. Starvation induces the conversion of monomeric Rim4 into amyloid-like aggregates, thereby activating the protein to bring about repression of translation. At the onset of meiosis II, Rim4 aggregates are abruptly degraded allowing translation to commence. Although amyloids are best known for their role in the etiology of diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and diabetes by forming toxic protein aggregates, our findings show that cells can utilize amyloid-like protein aggregates to function as central regulators of gametogenesis.

Abstract 1403: SOX2 as a marker of oral cancer stem-like cells: Cell division patterns and chromosomal instability

Abstract Introduction: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a serious public health problem, caused primarily by smoking and alcohol consumption. The prognosis remains poor due in part to therapeutic resistance. The cancer stem cell (CSC) theory posits that oral cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) show unique characteristics, including self-renewal by symmetric cell division and tumor recapitulation by asymmetric cell division. Identifying markers of CSLCs is an important step in better understanding the biology of these cells. Chromosomal instability is a feature of cancer cells that leads to altered gene copy numbers; some of which is caused by chromosome segregation defects (CSDs). We observed previously that chromosomal instability occurs in colon CSLCs. Here, we compare instability between OSCC CSLCs and non-CSLCs from the same tumors. Methods: We assessed CSLCs in two OSCC cell lines (UPCI:SCC040 and UPCI:SCC131) using spheroid enrichment assays. We examined the marker, SOX2 in our cell lines using double antibody staining with division and other stemness markers. We then evaluated the cell division patterns of CSLCs marked by SOX2 to test the hypothesis that cell division patterns change from asymmetric to symmetric after ionizing radiation (IR) treatment. Finally, we analyzed the CSDs after IR in CSLCs marked by SOX2 compared to non-CSLCs. Results: Both cell lines formed spheroids. Strongly SOX2-positive cells were a rare population (∼3%) in our OSCC cell lines. SOX2 positivity was highly correlated with other CSLC markers, including CD44, CD133 and BMI1. A cluster plot of the mitotic pair analysis revealed that SOX2-positive cells divide both symmetrically and asymmetrically (p<0.05) at a ratio of ∼4:1 with a percentage difference cut-off of 20%. Phospho-histone H3 and alpha-tubulin co-staining with SOX2 confirmed the occurrence of both division patterns. Short-term and long-term IR treatment did not change this proportion. CSLCs showed fewer and different CSDs after IR treatment than non-CSLCs. Conclusions: Our results show that therapeutic intervention does not change the ratio of symmetric to asymmetric cell division in CSLCs. These results suggest that only therapies that target the self-renewal potential of CSLCs might effectively eradicate these cells. CSLCs showed less chromosomal instability as assessed by CSDs, possibly due either to the relative quiescence of these cells or enhanced checkpoints that result in cell death when CSDs are present. Cell division and chromosome segregation patterns in CSLCs may provide insight into the biology of therapeutic resistance in CSLCs and reveal strategies to eradicate these cells. Keywords: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), Cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs), ionizing radiation (IR), chromosome segregation defects (CSDs). Citation Format: Hatem Kaseb, Dale Lewis, Sussane Gollin. SOX2 as a marker of oral cancer stem-like cells: Cell division patterns and chromosomal instability. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1403. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1403

Genome-wide maps of recombination and chromosome segregation in human oocytes and embryos show selection for maternal recombination rates.

Crossover recombination reshuffles genes and prevents errors in segregation that lead to extra or missing chromosomes (aneuploidy) in human eggs, a major cause of pregnancy failure and congenital disorders. Here, we generate genome-wide maps of crossovers and chromosome segregation patterns by recovering all three products of single female meioses. Genotyping > 4 million informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 23 complete meioses allowed us to map 2,032 maternal and 1,342 paternal crossovers and to infer the segregation patterns of 529 chromosome pairs. We uncover a novel reverse chromosome segregation pattern in which both homologs separate their sister chromatids at meiosis I; detect selection for higher recombination rates in the female germline by the elimination of aneuploid embryos; and report chromosomal drive against non-recombinant chromatids at meiosis II. Collectively, our findings reveal that recombination not only affects homolog segregation at meiosis I but also the fate of sister chromatids at meiosis II.

Pre-implantation and polar body diagnosis in cases of parental chromosomal translocations applying array-CGH.

Parents with a balanced chromosomal translocation show an increased risk of reduced fertility including spontaneous abortions and chromosomally unbalanced offspring. In the course of genetic counseling the parents frequently decide to seek artificial reproductive techniques. In vitro fertilization (IVF) offers the chance to perform Polar Body Diagnosis (PBD) or Preimplantation Diagnosis (PID). Female translocation carriers can opt for analysis of polar body, blastomeres or trophectoderm cells while male translocation carriers have only a choice between blastomere and trophectoderm diagnostic. In Germany, up to the year 2010 a restrictive “Embryo Protection Law” did allow only PBD excluding male translocation carriers from diagnostics. Thus, experience with PBD applying FISH or array-CGH was collected in cases of maternal translocations. For such cases, advantages and limits of array analysis as compared to the FISH approach will be presented. Furthermore, the resolution power of the BlueGnome 24sure and 24sure+ arrays will be shown. In particular we report here on the segregation pattern of maternal translocation chromosomes in 16 cases including 24 cycles and analyzing 97 first polar bodies. In addition to the distribution of the translocation chromosomes the number of segregation errors leading to aneuploidy in the 1st. polar body will be presented. Since a German high court ruled that PID of trophectoderm cells should be legal under very stringent conditions, the Embryo Protection Law had been slightly modified in 2011. In future this will allow the application of array analysis also in cases of paternal translocation.

A developmentally regulated translational control pathway establishes the meiotic chromosome segregation pattern

Production of haploid gametes from diploid progenitor cells is mediated by a specialized cell division, meiosis, where two divisions, meiosis I and II, follow a single S phase. Errors in progression from meiosis I to meiosis II lead to aneuploid and polyploid gametes, but the regulatory mechanisms controlling this transition are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the conserved kinase Ime2 regulates the timing and order of the meiotic divisions by controlling translation. Ime2 coordinates translational activation of a cluster of genes at the meiosis I-meiosis II transition, including the critical determinant of the meiotic chromosome segregation pattern CLB3. We further show that Ime2 mediates translational control through the meiosis-specific RNA-binding protein Rim4. Rim4 inhibits translation of CLB3 during meiosis I by interacting with the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of CLB3. At the onset of meiosis II, Ime2 kinase activity rises and triggers a decrease in Rim4 protein levels, thereby alleviating translational repression. Our results elucidate a novel developmentally regulated translational control pathway that establishes the meiotic chromosome segregation pattern.

Polo kinase Cdc5 is a central regulator of meiosis I

During meiosis, two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation yield four haploid gametes from one diploid cell. The Polo kinase Cdc5 is required for meiotic progression, but how Cdc5 coordinates multiple cell-cycle events during meiosis I is not understood. Here we show that CDC5-dependent phosphorylation of Rec8, a subunit of the cohesin complex that links sister chromatids, is required for efficient cohesin removal from chromosome arms, which is a prerequisite for meiosis I chromosome segregation. CDC5 also establishes conditions for centromeric cohesin removal during meiosis II by promoting the degradation of Spo13, a protein that protects centromeric cohesin during meiosis I. Despite CDC5's central role in meiosis I, the protein kinase is dispensable during meiosis II and does not even phosphorylate its meiosis I targets during the second meiotic division. We conclude that Cdc5 has evolved into a master regulator of the unique meiosis I chromosome segregation pattern.

Discontinuous gradient centrifugation (DGC) decreases the proportion of chromosomally unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal rearrangement carriers

Can the proportion of unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal rearrangement carriers be decreased through the use of discontinuous gradient centrifugation (DGC)? DGC significantly decreases the proportion of genetically unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Chromosomal rearrangement carriers present with a certain proportion of unbalanced gametes, which can lead to miscarriages or malformations in the offspring. There is presently no known way to select the balanced spermatozoa and use them for IVF. The proportion of unbalanced spermatozoa after DGC was compared with that before DGC in 21 patients with a chromosomal rearrangement. At least 500 spermatozoa were analysed per observation. Twenty-one male patients with a chromosomal rearrangement were included in this prospective study. They initially consulted for infertility, recurrent miscarriages or a history of abnormal pregnancy. The samples were split into two, with one part undergoing DGC and the other being immediately fixed. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed to establish the chromosome segregation pattern of each spermatozoon. DGC significantly decreased the proportion of unbalanced spermatozoa in all but 1 of the 21 chromosomal rearrangement carriers (P < 0.05). Although DGC reduces the proportion of unbalanced spermatozoa in ejaculates from patients with chromosome rearrangements this elimination is only partial and some abnormal spermatozoa remain. Means to exclude these spermatozoa to ensure that only balanced ones are used in IVF remain to be discovered. The motility and morphology of the sperm before and after DGC were not measured. Used in IVF or intrauterine insemination, DGC could decrease the chance that a man carrying a chromosomal rearrangement will father an abnormal fetus.

Meiosis I chromosome segregation is established through regulation of microtubule–kinetochore interactions

During meiosis, a single round of DNA replication is followed by two consecutive rounds of nuclear divisions called meiosis I and meiosis II. In meiosis I, homologous chromosomes segregate, while sister chromatids remain together. Determining how this unusual chromosome segregation behavior is established is central to understanding germ cell development. Here we show that preventing microtubule-kinetochore interactions during premeiotic S phase and prophase I is essential for establishing the meiosis I chromosome segregation pattern. Premature interactions of kinetochores with microtubules transform meiosis I into a mitosis-like division by disrupting two key meiosis I events: coorientation of sister kinetochores and protection of centromeric cohesin removal from chromosomes. Furthermore we find that restricting outer kinetochore assembly contributes to preventing premature engagement of microtubules with kinetochores. We propose that inhibition of microtubule-kinetochore interactions during premeiotic S phase and prophase I is central to establishing the unique meiosis I chromosome segregation pattern.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00117.001.

Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development

What is the optimal stage from oocyte through preimplantation embryo development for biopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to detect abnormal chromosome segregation patterns in eggs or embryos from advanced maternal age (AMA) patients? Testing at the polar body (PB) stage was the least accurate mainly due to the high incidence of post-zygotic events. This suggests that postponing the time of biopsy to the blastocyst stage of preimplantation embryo development may provide the most reliable results for PGS. In the PGS field there is an ongoing debate about the optimal biopsy stage for PGS. This is a result of the lack of understanding of how aneuploidy arises in the human embryo. To date, most of the cytogenetic data obtained during PGS investigations have been derived through the analysis of cells at isolated points in the preimplantation window, thus potentially missing critical information on chromosomal segregation. Understanding the chromosome segregation patterns during preimplantation development holds the potential to significantly increase the success rates of IVF. In this study, a sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis of both the PBs and the corresponding embryos at both the cleavage and the blastocyst stages is presented. This is a prospective longitudinal cohort study performed between October 2009 and August 2011 involving 9 infertile couples and 21 sets of complete comprehensive chromosomal screening data, including PB1, PB2, corresponding blastomeres and trophectoderm (TE) samples. Infertile couples undergoing IVF cycles with PGS where the female partner was older than 40 years and with a good response to controlled ovarian stimulation (>10 MII oocytes retrieved) were enrolled into the study. The exclusion criteria were (i) patients presenting with abnormal karyotype; (ii) specific ovarian pathologies including polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis grade III or higher and premature ovarian failure and (iii) severe male factor infertility (motile sperm count of <500 000/ml after preparation of a fresh ejaculate). The PBs, blastomere and TE samples were sequentially biopsied and analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The analysis of chromosome segregation patterns was performed to infer the origin of aneuploidy and to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of both PB and cleavage-stage PGS strategies. Twenty-one sets of complete data (PB1/PB2/blastomere/TE) including 84 aCGH experiments showed a pattern of multiple meiotic errors typically caused by sister chromatid separation errors and predominantly arising in the second meiotic division. Twenty-two of the 24 (91.7%) errors in the first meiotic division arose as a consequence of premature sister chromatid predivision. In half of these cases, the second meiotic division resulted in a balancing chromosome segregation event producing a normal female complement for that chromosome in the resulting embryo. Overall, only 62 out of 78 (79.5%) of the abnormal meiotic segregations had errors in the either one or both PBs consistent with the aneuploidies observed in their resulting embryos. Ten of the 21 (47.6%) embryos had aneuploidies other than female meiotic-derived ones, most of which detected on Day 3 and confirmed on Day 5 or 6 of embryo development (20/25) with chromosomal loss being three times more frequent than gains. Notably, as high as 20% of female-derived aneuploidies detected on PBs and confirmed on Day 3 were rescued at the blastocyst stage, mainly as a result of diploidization of trisomic chromosomes. On a per chromosome basis, the sensitivity in predicting blastocyst chromosomal complement was significantly lower for PB approach, 61.7%, compared with blastomeres analysis, 86.4% (P < 0.01). The study was limited to the analysis of oocytes and embryos from AMA patients. Thus, these findings apply only to this patient group. Comparisons with other patient populations including patients with different indications for PGS should be made in future research. In addition, higher resolution and/or more accurate chromosomal screening tests could be used in future studies to corroborate the current findings. These findings provide critical insights into the mechanisms causing errors during female meiosis and the preimplantation embryo development period to improve the design and treatment outcome of PGS.

Chromosome Segregation Analysis in Human Embryos Obtained from Couples Involving Male Carriers of Reciprocal or Robertsonian Translocation

The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency and type of chromosome segregation patterns in cleavage stage embryos obtained from male carriers of Robertsonian (ROB) and reciprocal (REC) translocations undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) at our reproductive center. We used FISH to analyze chromosome segregation in 308 day 3 cleavage stage embryos obtained from 26 patients. The percentage of embryos consistent with normal or balanced segregation (55.1% vs. 27.1%) and clinical pregnancy (62.5% vs. 19.2%) rates were higher in ROB than the REC translocation carriers. Involvement of non-acrocentric chromosome(s) or terminal breakpoint(s) in reciprocal translocations was associated with an increase in the percent of embryos consistent with adjacent 1 but with a decrease in 3∶1 segregation. Similar results were obtained in the analysis of nontransferred embryos donated for research. 3∶1 segregation was the most frequent segregation type in both day 3 (31%) and spare (35%) embryos obtained from carriers of t(11;22)(q23;q11), the only non-random REC with the same breakpoint reported in a large number of unrelated families mainly identified by the birth of a child with derivative chromosome 22. These results suggest that chromosome segregation patterns in day 3 and nontransferred embryos obtained from male translocation carriers vary with the type of translocation and involvement of acrocentric chromosome(s) or terminal breakpoint(s). These results should be helpful in estimating reproductive success in translocation carriers undergoing PGD.

Reciprocal uniparental disomy in yeast

In the diploid cells of most organisms, including humans, each chromosome is usually distinguishable from its partner homolog by multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms. One common type of genetic alteration observed in tumor cells is uniparental disomy (UPD), in which a pair of homologous chromosomes are derived from a single parent, resulting in loss of heterozygosity for all single-nucleotide polymorphisms while maintaining diploidy. Somatic UPD events are usually explained as reflecting two consecutive nondisjunction events. Here we report a previously undescribed mode of chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in which one cell division produces daughter cells with reciprocal UPD for the same pair of chromosomes without an aneuploid intermediate. One pair of sister chromatids is segregated into one daughter cell and the other pair is segregated into the other daughter cell, mimicking a meiotic chromosome segregation pattern. We term this process "reciprocal uniparental disomy."

Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was first applied on in vitro fertilisation (IVF) embryos for the preimplantation genetic diagnosis of sex, then chromosome translocations and later for chromosome copy number (PGS). Because of the controversy surrounding PGS diagnostically, it has been replaced by array-based approaches; however, FISH remains a powerful tool for investigating mechanisms of both post-zygotic segregation error and nuclear organisation, especially if most or all of the chromosomes in the karyotype can be analysed. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a 24 chromosome FISH assay to investigate chromosome-specific rates of gain and loss, nuclear organisation patterns and the veracity of the original PGS result in days 5-6 human embryos. Analysis of 17 embryos by this newly developed approach gave strong signals for all chromosomes; it revealed chromosome copy number for each human chromosome per cell for each embryo and the nuclear address of the (mostly centromeric) loci probed. As all embryos were surplus to IVF requirements for both transfer and freezing (and many had an abnormal PGS indication) expected high levels of chromosome abnormalities were seen and no single nucleus displayed a normal complement; all were mosaic. Certain patterns emerged, however, namely that chromosome loss was more common than gain and apparent mitotic non-disjunction. Moreover, the centromeric probes tended preferentially to occupy the nuclear centre. Where we had a prior day 3 biopsy PGS result, it was confirmed, in part, by 24 colour FISH in most but not all cases.

Molecular genetic features of polyploidization and aneuploidization reveal unique patterns for genome duplication in diploid Malus.

Polyploidization results in genome duplication and is an important step in evolution and speciation. The Malus genome confirmed that this genus was derived through auto-polyploidization, yet the genetic and meiotic mechanisms for polyploidization, particularly for aneuploidization, are unclear in this genus or other woody perennials. In fact the contribution of aneuploidization remains poorly understood throughout Plantae. We add to this knowledge by characterization of eupolyploidization and aneuploidization in 27,542 F1 seedlings from seven diploid Malus populations using cytology and microsatellite markers. We provide the first evidence that aneuploidy exceeds eupolyploidy in the diploid crosses, suggesting aneuploidization is a leading cause of genome duplication. Gametes from diploid Malus had a unique combinational pattern; ova preserved euploidy exclusively, while spermatozoa presented both euploidy and aneuploidy. All non-reduced gametes were genetically heterozygous, indicating first-division restitution was the exclusive mode for Malus eupolyploidization and aneuploidization. Chromosome segregation pattern among aneuploids was non-uniform, however, certain chromosomes were associated for aneuploidization. This study is the first to provide molecular evidence for the contribution of heterozygous non-reduced gametes to fitness in polyploids and aneuploids. Aneuploidization can increase, while eupolyploidization may decrease genetic diversity in their newly established populations. Auto-triploidization is important for speciation in the extant Malus. The features of Malus polyploidization confer genetic stability and diversity, and present heterozygosity, heterosis and adaptability for evolutionary selection. A protocol using co-dominant markers was proposed for accelerating apple triploid breeding program. A path was postulated for evolution of numerically odd basic chromosomes. The model for Malus derivation was considerably revised. Impacts of aneuploidization on speciation and evolution, and potential applications of aneuploids and polyploids in breeding and genetics for other species were evaluated in depth. This study greatly improves our understanding of evolution, speciation, and adaptation of the Malus genus, and provides strategies to exploit polyploidization in other species.

Regulatory Control of the Resolution of DNA Recombination Intermediates during Meiosis and Mitosis

The efficient and timely resolution of DNA recombination intermediates is essential for bipolar chromosome segregation. Here, we show that the specialized chromosome segregation patterns of meiosis and mitosis, which require the coordination of recombination with cell-cycle progression, are achieved by regulating the timing of activation of two crossover-promoting endonucleases. In yeast meiosis, Mus81-Mms4 and Yen1 are controlled by phosphorylation events that lead to their sequential activation. Mus81-Mms4 is hyperactivated by Cdc5-mediated phosphorylation in meiosis I, generating the crossovers necessary for chromosome segregation. Yen1 is also tightly regulated and is activated in meiosis II to resolve persistent Holliday junctions. In yeast and human mitotic cells, a similar regulatory network restrains these nuclease activities until mitosis, biasing the outcome of recombination toward noncrossover products while also ensuring the elimination of any persistent joint molecules. Mitotic regulation thereby facilitates chromosome segregation while limiting the potential for loss of heterozygosity and sister-chromatid exchanges.

Analysis of Polo-like kinase Cdc5 in the meiosis recombination checkpoint

In meiosis, accumulation of recombination intermediates or defects in chromosome synapsis trigger checkpoint-mediated arrest in prophase I. Such 'checkpoints' are important surveillance mechanisms that ensure temporal dependence of cell cycle events. The budding yeast Polo-like kinase, Cdc5, has been identified as a key regulator of the meiosis I chromosome segregation pattern. Here we have analysed the role of Cdc5 in the recombination checkpoint and observed that Polo-like kinase is not required for checkpoint activation in yeast meiosis. Surprisingly, depletion of CDC5 in the Drad17 checkpoint-defective background resulted in nuclear fragmentation to levels even higher than that observed inDdmc1 Drad17 cells that bypass the checkpoint arrest despite accumulating DNA double-strand breaks. The spindle morphology of Cdc5-depleted cells included short, thick metaphase I spindles in mononucleate cells and disassembled spindles in binucleate and tetranucleate cells, although this phenotype does not appear to be the cause of the nuclear fragmentation. An exaggeration of chromosome synapsis defects occurred in Cdc5-depleted Drad17 cells and may contribute to the nuclear fragmentation phenotype. The analysis also uncovered a role for Cdc5 in maintaining spindle integrity in Ddmc1 Drad17 cells. Further analysis confirmed that adaptation to DNA damage does occur in meiosis and that CDC5 is required for this process. The cdc5-ad mutation that renders cells unable to adapt to DNA damage in mitosis did not affect checkpoint adaptation in meiosis, indicating that the mechanisms of checkpoint adaptation in mitosis and meiosis are not fully conserved.

The FEAR network

Mitosis is governed by the oscillation of cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) activity and ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Entry into mitosis is initiated by mitotic cyclin-CDK activation. Anaphase onset occurs upon activation of the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), a ubiquitin ligase that promotes the destruction of the anaphase inhibitor Securin. Destruction of Securin initiates chromosome segregation by activation of the protease Separase, allowing it to cleave a subunit of the cohesin complexes that hold the duplicated sister chromatids together. Upon completion of nuclear division cells exit from mitosis, a process defined by the inactivation of CDKs, disassembly of the mitotic spindle, and cytokinesis. In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, a signaling network known as the FEAR network is critical to ensure accurate anaphase chromosome segregation and the integration of this process with other anaphase events. Here, we summarize what is known about the regulation and function of the FEAR network in budding yeast and discuss the potential for conserved FEAR network functions in other eukaryotes.

Sperm-fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in patients with pericentric inversions of Y chromosome

To analyze the sex chromosome meiotic segregation in inv(Y) patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Conventional cytogenetic procedures (GTG and CBG banding) and FISH were performed on metaphase chromosome. Three-color FISH was performed on sperm samples using a probe mixture containing CEPX, Tel Xp/Yp and Tel Xq/Yq to investigate the sex chromosome segregation of five inv(Y) (p11.1q11.2) carriers. A healthy man with normal semen parameters was used as control. There was no statistical difference in the abnormal sex chromosome number and recombination frequencies in each spermatozoon from the patient in comparison with that in the control. There was no apparent sex chromosome abnormality in the sperm of the inv(Y) (p11.1q11.2) carriers. Sperm-FISH allows further understanding of the sex chromosome segregation pattern and an accurate genetic counseling.

Non-random segregation of sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli

It has long been known that the 5' to 3' polarity of DNA synthesis results in both a leading and lagging strand at all replication forks. Until now, however, there has been no evidence that leading or lagging strands are spatially organized in any way within a cell. Here we show that chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli is not random but is driven in a manner that results in the leading and lagging strands being addressed to particular cellular destinations. These destinations are consistent with the known patterns of chromosome segregation. Our work demonstrates a new level of organization relating to the replication and segregation of the E. coli chromosome.

Promoter-driven splicing regulation in fission yeast

The meiotic cell cycle is modified from the mitotic cell cycle by having a pre-meiotic S phase that leads to high levels of recombination, two rounds of nuclear division with no intervening DNA synthesis and a reductional pattern of chromosome segregation. Rem1 is a cyclin that is only expressed during meiosis in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cells in which rem1 has been deleted show decreased intragenic meiotic recombination and a delay at the onset of meiosis I (ref. 1). When ectopically expressed in mitotically growing cells, Rem1 induces a G1 arrest followed by severe mitotic catastrophes. Here we show that rem1 expression is regulated at the level of both transcription and splicing, encoding two proteins with different functions depending on the intron retention. We have determined that the regulation of rem1 splicing is not dependent on any transcribed region of the gene. Furthermore, when the rem1 promoter is fused to other intron-containing genes, the chimaeras show a meiotic-specific regulation of splicing, exactly the same as endogenous rem1. This regulation is dependent on two transcription factors of the forkhead family, Mei4 (ref. 2) and Fkh2 (ref. 3). Whereas Mei4 induces both transcription and splicing of rem1, Fkh2 is responsible for the intron retention of the transcript during vegetative growth and the pre-meiotic S phase.