Pattern Reversal Visual Evoked Response Research Articles

Pattern reversal visual evoked response in retinitis pigmentosa.

To determine if the pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) can objectively evaluate visual function in retinitis pigmentosa (RP). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 29 patients (29 eyes) with RP, a visual acuity (VA) better than 20/100, and for whom an electroretinogram (ERG) and a PVER had been recorded. A steady-state PVER was measured using five check sizes: 160, 80, 40, 20 and 10 min of arc. The best-corrected VA was measured using the ETDRS chart. Visual fields (VFs) were measured using standard Goldmann perimetry. To quantify the VFs, we measured the field size (isopter IV-2) in four meridians and averaged them. Twenty-five eyes of 25 normal subjects served as controls. The mean and median VAs were 20/40 (logMAR = 0.30 +/- 0.20). The average VF (isopter IV-2 ) was 20 degrees (median, 9 degrees: range. 2 degrees to 62 degrees). All patients had a recordable PVER. Only 12 (41 %) patients had a recordable ERGs, all subnormal. The PVER amplitudes showed a relatively good correlation with VA in the intermediate check sizes (40 min of arc, r = 0.611. P = 0.0004: 20 min of arc, r = 0.596. P = 0.0007). The PVER amplitude-check size function had a flattened inverted V shape in the RP patients and an inverted U shape in the normal subjects, with the mean amplitudes for the RP patients significantly smaller than the normals at all check sizes. The PVER is a useful method for objectively evaluating the visual function in RP patients whose central vision is still preserved.

Treatment with ac pulsed electromagnetic fields normalizes the latency of the visual evoked response in a multiple sclerosis patient with optic atrophy

Visual evoked response (VER) studies have been utilized as supportive information for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and may be useful in objectively monitoring the effects of various therapeutic modalities. Delayed latency of the VER, which reflects slowed impulse transmission in the optic pathways, is the most characteristic abnormality associated with the disease. Brief transcranial applications of AC pulsed electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in the picotesla flux density are efficacious in the symptomatic treatment of MS and may also reestablish impulse transmission in the optic pathways. A 36 year old man developed an attack of right sided optic neuritis at the age of 30. On presentation he had blurring of vision with reduced acuity on the right and fundoscopic examination revealed pallor of the optic disc. A checkerboard pattern reversal VER showed a delayed latency to right eye stimulation (P100 = 132 ms; normal range: 95-115 ms). After he received two successive applications of AC pulsed EMFs of 7.5 picotesla flux density each of 20 minutes duration administered transcra-nially, there was a dramatic improvement in vision and the VER latency reverted to normal (P100 = 107 ms). The rapid improvement in vision coupled with the normalization of the VER latency despite the presence of optic atrophy, which reflects chronic demyelination of the optic nerve, cannot be explained on the basis of partial or full reformation of myelin. It is proposed that in MS synaptic neurotransmitter deficiency is associated with the visual impairment and delayed VER latency following optic neuritis and that the recovery of the VER latency by treatment with pulsed EMFs is related to enhancement of synaptic neurotransmitter functions in the retina and central optic pathways. Recovery of the VER latency in MS patients may have important implications with respect to the treatment of visual impairment and prevention of visual loss. Specifically, repeated pulsed applications of EMFs may maintain impulse transmission in the optic nerve and thus potentially sustain its viability.

Pattern-reversal visual-evoked response in bull's eye maculopathy associated with Stargardt's disease.

Using steady-state pattern-reversal visual-evoked response (PVER), we studied the macular function in patients with bull's eye maculopathy. The results were correlated with fluorescein angiography. Study patients with an established (25 eyes of 14 patients) and a suspected (8 eyes of 4 patients) diagnosis of Stargardt's disease with bull's eye maculopathy were divided into group G (good vision group: 15 eyes with visual acuity of 20/40 or better) and group P (poor vision group: 18 eyes with visual acuity of 20/50 or worse). The diameters of the atrophic area and the normal or less affected central area of the bull's eye were measured form the fluorescein angiograms. The mean diameter of the central area in group G (2.0 degrees) was significantly larger than that in group P (0.6 degrees; d.f. = 17, p = 0.0227). The PVER amplitudes were reduced in the patient groups with all check sizes and the amplitude-check size functions were flat. Amplitude differences were observed between the patient groups with the 20' checks (d.f. = 17, p = 0.0638), probably due to the difference in the mean central diameters (2.0 degrees vs. 0.6 degrees). Patients with a perifoveal abnormality can have an abnormal PVER despite relatively good visual acuity. We also recorded the PVER in 7 normal controls tested with simulated ring-shaped scotomas, the sizes of which matched the mean diameters of the scotomas in the patient groups (7.0 degrees x 0.6 degrees and 7.0 degrees x 2.0 degrees). The controls also showed markedly reduced responses with all check sizes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of light scatter, defocusing, mean luminosity, contrast, and central scotoma on the PVER amplitude-check size function curve.

We analyzed the effects of various stimulus parameters, ie, light scatter, defocusing, mean luminosity, contrast, and central scotoma, on the normal pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER), amplitude-check size function curve in six normal subjects. The steady-state PVER was recorded with five check sizes ranging from 160 to 10 min in 1-octave increments. The PVER amplitude, especially with the smaller check sizes, was markedly decreased by light scatter induced by acrylic sheets. The function curve quickly changed to a low pass filter shape when +2.0 diopters of defocus were added, with the decrease most marked in the small check sizes. When the mean luminosity was decreased, the function curve maintained its normal inverted-U shape up to 5 cd/m2, but the shape flattened with lower luminosity. Amplitude decreases were seen with all check sizes in low luminosity. With contrast changes from 95 to 24%, the function curve maintained its normal shape, but with slightly reduced amplitudes. The amplitude decrease was moderate even with the lowest contrast. With a two-degree central scotoma, the PVER amplitude was reduced more with the smaller than the larger check sizes. The function curve became somewhat flatter, with its peak shifting to the larger check sizes. Results indicated that the shape of the PVER amplitude-check size function curve changes in response to different modes of stimulation.

Effect of light scatter on the pattern reversal visual evoked response: Comparison with psychophysical results

The effect of light scatter on the pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) was studied in 6 normal subjects. The results were compared with contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity function, and glare disability. Light scatter was induced by translucent acrylic sheets. Visual acuity measured with the low-contrast charts decreased significantly ( P < 0.0001) even with a small degree of light scatter. Contrast sensitivity decreased with a small degree of light scatter especially for high spatial frequencies. PVER amplitudes decreased especially at the smaller checks with its peak shifted to larger checks. PVER was equally sensitive to light scatter compared to psychophysical tests.

Effect of stimulus contrast on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.

We studied the effect of stimulus pattern contrast on the simultaneously recorded pattern reversal electroretinogram (PERG) and pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) at 5 check sizes. The stimulus contrast ranged from 24 to 95% in 6 steps of 0.1- or 0.15-log unit increments. PERG amplitude showed a linear increase with an increase in pattern contrast at all check sizes. PVER amplitude showed an increase up to a certain pattern contrast, but was saturated upon further increase in stimulus contrast at all check sizes. The PERG amplitude-check size function curve showed a flattened, inverted-U shape only with the highest contrast and low-pass filter shape or flat shape with lower contrasts. The PVER amplitude-check size function curve showed an inverted-U shape (bandpass filter shape) at all contrasts. These characteristics to the changes in contrast and the spatial frequency tuning suggest that PVER is processed in a different location of visual pathway than PERG.

Pattern Reversal Visual-evoked Response as a Prognostic Indicator in Macular Gliosis

We recorded the preoperative pattern reversal visual-evoked responses in 16 subjects (16 eyes) with macular gliosis who underwent membrane-peeling operations. A postoperative visual improvement of one octave or more was observed in 11 of 16 eyes (68.8%). Preoperatively, ten eyes had peak amplitudes greater than or equal to 2 microV, all 11 eyes had either lowpass or bandpass curve shapes, and ten eyes had recordable responses to 20- or 10-minutes of an arc check sizes. Each of the three preoperative criteria was significantly associated with a postoperative visual improvement of one octave or more (P = .01, .02, and .02, respectively). These results demonstrate that the preoperative pattern reversal visual-evoked response can objectively assess the function of the underlying macula in patients with macular gliosis and, consequently, is helpful in determining which patient would most likely benefit from a membrane-peeling operation.

Topographical analysis of peripheral vs central retina with pattern reversal visual evoked response and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope

The contribution of the central and the surrounding peripheral retina to the pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) was analyzed simultaneously using double frequency stimulation and the Fast Fourier transform (FFT) method. The Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO) was used to project the pattern stimulus, a square subtending 10 degrees on a side, on a specific location in the fundus and to monitor accurately the stimulus' position during PVER testing. When the stimulus area on the central retina was less than or equal to 50 min of arc on a side, or 0.69% of the total area was stimulated (a square of 10 degrees on a side), the contribution from the central retina was negligible, and the PVER was dominated by surrounding peripheral retinal activity. When the stimulus area of the central retina was greater than or equal to 100 min of arc on a side, or 2.78% of the whole area was stimulated, activity from the central retina became more evident. When the stimulus area projected on the central retina became 150 min on a side (6.25% of the area or greater), activity from the central retina showed an increase and exceeded that of the peripheral retina. When the central area became larger, its activity dominated the PVER, and the contribution from the peripheral retina became negligible at this stage. The PVER was highly dependent upon the activity of the central retina, and activity levels from the central and surrounding peripheral retina were correlated.

Effect of Optical Defocus on the Steady State Pattern Reversal Visual-Evoked Response

The effects of optical defocusing with convex lenses on the amplitudes of pattern reversal visual-evoked response (PVER) were investigated. With the large check size and high-contrast pattern, PVER amplitudes showed a linear decrease in response to initial defocusing up to +5 to +6 dptr. As the degree of defocus increased, the PVER amplitude, though irregular, continued to show reliable, definite responses up to +25 dptr. With the intermediate check size and pattern contrast, PVER amplitudes displayed a linear decrease, but unlike the large-check/high-contrast condition, diminished to noise level after a defocus of greater than +4 to +5 dptr. From these results, we speculate that two phases in this function curve derive from the large-check/high-contrast condition: first, the contrast- or contour-dependent phase, and, second, the luminosity/movement-dependent phase.

Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. IV. Effect of spatial and temporal frequency.

The effects of changing spatial and temporal frequencies on the amplitude of pattern reversal monocular and binocular visual evoked response (VER) were investigated. The pattern reversal VER and the degree of binocular summation (binocular VER amplitude/monocular VER amplitude) were lowest at the spatial frequency (check size) of 0.3 cycles per degree (CPD) and highest at the spatial frequency of 4.0 CPD. The largest VER amplitudes were observed at 1.2 CPD under both the binocular and monocular recording conditions. Regarding the effects of changing temporal frequency (alteration or reversal rate) on the pattern reversal VER, the transient condition (1.5 to 3.0 Hz) did not produce significant binocular summation. At the higher temporal frequencies (6 to 12 Hz), significant binocular summation was produced compared with the transient stimulus condition. At very high temporal frequencies, the degree of the binocular summation showed a decrease. From these results, we selected a pattern with an element around 1.2 CPD with a relatively swift temporal frequency for evaluating binocular function with the pattern reversal VER.

Measurement of contrast sensitivity function using pattern-reversal visual evoked responses.

In order to determine whether pattern-reversal visual evoked response (VER) can be used to measure contrast sensitivity function (CSF), we investigated the effect of change of contrast upon pattern-reversal VER. Contrast thresholds for VER were extrapolated in five spatial frequencies. The CSF curve obtained from the VER showed the inverted U-shape as the psychophysical CSF curve. However, the low frequency fall-off that is usually seen in psychophysical CSF was less evident in the electrophysiological CSF. The difference between the electrophysiological CSF and the psychophysical CSF increased along with the spatial frequency. Proper stimulus conditions would make this method of evaluation of CSF by pattern reversal VER useful in relatively young children in whom psychophysical tests cannot be performed.

A survey of the pattern reversal visual evoked response (PRVER) in 1428 consecutive patients referred to a clinical neurophysiology department

The records of 1428 neurological patients referred to a department of Clinical Neurophysiology for PRVER testing have been reviewed. Half field studies with multichannel recordings were carried out in the majority. 1186 of these patients had a provisional diagnosis of MS; 42% had abnormal PRVERs compared with 25% for those patients who did not have MS. Symmetrical latency increases from stimulation of either eye, interocular latency abnormalities and amplitude abnormalities were as frequent in the non-MS patients as the group with a provisional diagnosis of MS. A small proportion of patients had neurophysiological evidence of field defects; homonymous hemianopias occurred as frequently as “central” defects in the MS group. The PRVER abnormalities are considered in relation to the current models of conduction in demyelinated fibres.