Abstract
We studied the effect of stimulus pattern contrast on the simultaneously recorded pattern reversal electroretinogram (PERG) and pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) at 5 check sizes. The stimulus contrast ranged from 24 to 95% in 6 steps of 0.1- or 0.15-log unit increments. PERG amplitude showed a linear increase with an increase in pattern contrast at all check sizes. PVER amplitude showed an increase up to a certain pattern contrast, but was saturated upon further increase in stimulus contrast at all check sizes. The PERG amplitude-check size function curve showed a flattened, inverted-U shape only with the highest contrast and low-pass filter shape or flat shape with lower contrasts. The PVER amplitude-check size function curve showed an inverted-U shape (bandpass filter shape) at all contrasts. These characteristics to the changes in contrast and the spatial frequency tuning suggest that PVER is processed in a different location of visual pathway than PERG.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
