Facial Fracture Patterns Research Articles

E-Scooter facial fractures: A comparative cohort study

It was the aim of the study to analyze the distribution and pattern of facial fractures following e-scooter trauma.Prospective audit data of facial fractures were retrospectively collected to investigate the impact of e-scooter hire, specifically in the form of facial fractures associated with their use. Data collected included patient demographics, mode of injury, date of injury, facial bones involved, presence of soft tissue injury, and factors associated with injury, including intoxication and helmet use.A total of 849 patients were treated for facial fractures during the study period, of which 34 were attributed to e-scooter use. One-half of those injured riding e-scooters were intoxicated, and one-quarter were wearing helmets. There have been an increasing number of facial fractures associated with e-scooter use following the start of the shared e-scooter trial. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures were the most common pattern of facial fracture seen.Most patients required surgical management of their injuries. Policymakers should consider how to improve the enforcement of current regulations, given the healthcare cost associated with the management of these preventable injuries.

Age-Related Patterns of Traumatic Facial Fractures in the Appalachian Tri-state Area: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.

Introduction Traumatic facial injuries, leading to facial fractures represent a significant subset of traumatic events, with age emerging as a crucial determinant influencing both their etiology and outcomes. Understanding the age-related patterns of traumatic facial fractures is essential for developing targeted prevention and management strategies. In this context, the Appalachian tri-state area stands as an underexplored region concerning this issue, necessitating comprehensive research to elucidate the nuances of age-related traumatic facial fractures within this geographic context. Methods This retrospective study delves into the age-related patterns of traumatic facial fractures within the Appalachian tri-state area, drawing upon patient records from Cabell Huntington Hospital and Saint Mary's Medical Center spanning a five-year period. The study cohort encompasses 623 patients categorized into three age groups: individuals aged <22 years, those aged 22-65 years, and individuals over 65 years. Data analysis involves meticulous examination of mechanisms of injury, injury severity scores (ISSs), hospital length of stay, and the prevalence of surgical interventions across different age cohorts. Results Out of 623 patients, 104 (16.7%) were under 22 years old, 367 (58.9%) were between 22 and 65 years old, and 152 (24.4%) were over 65 years old. The majority were male (70%). Falls were the most common cause of facial fractures in patients over 65 (78%), while assaults were predominant in the 22-65 age group (24%), and motor vehicle collisions (MCVs) in those under 22 (34%). The median ISSand hospital stay durations were similar across age groups.28% of patients underwent surgery, with significant variation among age groups (p<0.001): 38% for <22 years, 33% for 22-65 years, and 11% for >65 years. Mandibular fractures were more prevalent in younger patients, with rates of 12% for <22 years compared to 5.3% for >65 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients aged 22-65 had 4.10 times higher odds (95% CI=2.38, 7.45, p<0.001) of undergoing surgery, while those under 22 had 5.14 times higher odds (95% CI=2.73, 10.0, p<0.001) compared to those over 65. Significant associations were found for mandibular and bilateral mandibular outcomes in patients aged 22-65 years. Discussion These findings underscore the imperative for tailored prevention strategies and age-specific treatment protocols to optimize patient outcomes. Fall prevention initiatives for the elderly and interventions addressing sports-related injuries for younger individuals are paramount. Moreover, the study highlights the necessity of specialized care protocols for elderly patients to minimize hospital stay durations and manage age-related comorbidities effectively. Moving forward, further research should address limitations, validate findings, and explore the efficacy of specific interventions, thereby paving the way for enhanced preventive measures and management strategies tailored to the diverse age cohorts affected by traumatic facial fractures in the Appalachian region.

Pediatric patients with facial fractures: a retrospective study.

Epidemiology of maxillofacial injuries vary depending on geographic location, culture and socioeconomic condition. This study assessed etiology and pattern of facial fractures in children reported at Burdwan Dental College and Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal, India. Clinical files of 206 children with facial fractures were evaluated retrospectively. Diagnosis of fractures were confirmed by radiographic examination. Study period was from July 2018 to June 2022. Data collected were age and sex of the patient, site of fracture, and etiology of trauma. Descriptive statistics were used for statistical analysis with a P-value less than 0.05. There were 127 (61.7%) males and 79 (38.3%) females with a male to female ratio of 1.6:1. Within the study sample, the majority of facial fractures (n= 146, 70.9%) belonged to 6-to-9-year age group. Overall, falls (44.2%) and motor vehicles accidents (31.5%) were the two leading causes of trauma. Mandible fracture was the most common, accounting for 72.8% of cases. 74 patients (35.9%) with facial fracture had dental injuries. Male predominance in facial fracture is seen. With age, frequency of facial fractures tends to increase. Falls are the main cause of facial fracture and mandible is the most common anatomic location.

A profile of facial bone fractures in an Oral and Maxillofacial Unit in Trinidad and Tobago

Objective: Investigate the patterns of facial fractures presenting to an oral and maxillofacial service at a teaching hospital in Trinidad. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to obtain information on traumatic maxillofacial and mandibular fractures from the Oral and Maxillofacial unit at the Eric Williams Medical Complex, Trinidad. Data was collected from February 2019 to February 2020 from 174 patients. For each patient the month of presenting injury, age, sex, ethnicity, mechanism of injury and fracture type was recorded. Results: In the (174) patients that reported fractures, 72% were male and 28% were female patients with a mean age of 34.9 years and mainly from the ethnicity of Afro-Caribbean (63.2%) followed by East Indian (30.5%). Two hundred and thirty-one (231) fractures were reported in this study with the highest number of fractures occurring in the 20-29 years age group (22%) and the most common fracture type was orbital floor fractures (31.6%). The predominant cause of traumatic fracture was physical assault (37.9%) followed by accidental injury (25.9%). Conclusion: The main cause of traumatic maxillofacial injury was physical assault and generally in young adult males. Orbital floor fractures comprised the most common fracture type in this study.

Concomitant head or neck injury increases risk of traumatic brain injury in facial fracture patients

Concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in facial fracture patients and prompt intervention is crucially important to minimise the risk of potential long-term sequalae. In order to achieve rapid diagnosis, clinicians need to be aware of the risk factors associated with concomitant TBI and facial fractures. Previous literature suggests that a facial fracture can be considered a significant indicator of TBI. Nevertheless, a large data gap remains on specific injury patterns of facial fractures and associated TBI. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate and compare the frequency of and risk factors for TBI in patients with and without different types of additional injuries. The retrospective cohort study included 1836 facial fracture patients aged at least 18 years. The outcome variable was TBI with radiological findings in computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The primary predictor variables were associated injury outside the head and neck, associated cranial fracture and associated neck injury. Based on this study, associated cranial fracture increased the risk of TBI 4.7-fold. Patients with associated neck injury had a 2.1-fold risk of TBI. In addition, significant predictors for TBI were increasing age (p = 0.0004), high energy of injury (p < 0.0001) and anticoagulant medication (p = 0.0003). Facial fracture patients with associated injuries in the head and neck region are at significant risk of TBI. In clinical work, multiprofessional evaluation of facial fracture patients should be routine and repeated survey should be targeted especially at high-risk patients to identify TBIs.

Pediatric Facial Fracture in Garhwal Himalayan Region of Uttarakhand State: A Retrospective Study

ABSTRACT Background: Pediatric facial fractures are fairly uncommon injuries and comprise less than 15% of all facial fractures in the literature. Objectives: To analyze the pattern of pediatric facial fractures and compare the results with similar studies performed in India and the rest of the world Materials and Methods: A total of 231 patients were admitted for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures. Data on etiology, anatomical location, mode of treatment, duration of stay, and X-ray advice were recorded. Results: Pediatric trauma comprised 27% of the total population. The most common cause of injury was road traffic accident (RTA), that is, 28 (43.8%) patients Conclusion: The incidence of pediatric facial trauma is high in the hilly Garhwal–Himalayan region of Uttarakhand state in India as compared to other states of India.

Pattern of Skull and Facial Bone Fracture in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Analysis at Tertiary Hospital

Abstract: Trauma is one of the primary causes of death during the first four decade. Craniomaxillo-facial (CMF) trauma has become a common presentation in emergency departments of hospitals. The most presentation of CMF trauma includes skull and facial bone fracture and traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to obtain the pattern of skull and facial bone fracture in craniomaxillofacial trauma associated with traumatic brain injury. This was a retrospective study conducted on 501 patients from January 2020 to December 2021. Demographic data included age, sex, length of stay (LOS), and Glasgow coma scale (GCS). The results showed that from the total 501 patients with skull and facial bone fracture with or without traumatic brain injury, 406 (81%) were males and 95 (19%) were females. The age range of the patients was between 2 years and 86 years (mean±SD 33.9±18.2). The most common patient affected age ranged from 21 to 30 years. The average of LOS was 7.2±5.7 days (0-33) and the mean of GCS was 10.2±4.2. Based on types of cases, there were 232 cases (60%) of skull and facial bone fractures accompanied by TBI; 154 cases (40%) of only skull and facial bone fracture; and 339 (59.5%) cases of only TBI. In conclusion, the distribution of TBI increases in those with skull and facial bone fractures. On the other hand, the distribution of TBI is more common without fracture. Hence every skull and facial bone fracture must be carefully evaluated clinically and radiologically to rule out any underlying TBI. Keywords: skull and facial bone fracture; craniomaxillofacial trauma; traumatic brain injury

Age Effects in Facial Fracture Trauma: Disparities in Multisystem Injuries in Non-Fall-Related Trauma.

Background and objective Facial fractures represent a growing concern among an aging population prone to falls. In light of this, this study aimed to investigate differential facial fracture patterns and outcomes based on age effects. Determining the differences between the severity and type of facial fractures in populations of different ages will help guide clinical decision-making when managing patients with facial fractures. Methods This was a single-center study involving trauma registry data, from July 1, 2016, to January 31, 2022. The inclusion criteria were based on theInternational Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis of facial fracture. A linear regression was performed to ascertain the effects of predictor variables on the likelihood that a facial fracture trauma patient would experience various age effects on injury location, mortality, and morbidity. Results A total of 1575 patients were included in the analysis. A significant regression equation was found (F(47,1476)=42.46,p<0.01), with anR2of 0.57. Older facial fracture trauma patients were more likely to be female (β=3.13, p<0.01)with fractures to their zygoma (β=2.57, p=0.02). Higher Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) facial region scores (β=2.21, p=0.03), longer hospital length of stay (β=0.07, p=0.02), and in-hospital mortality (β=10.47, p<0.01) were also associated with older age. Older age was additionally associated with a higher level of several morbidity markers. Younger facial fracture trauma patients were more likely to be African American (β=-5.46, p<0.01) or other, non-Caucasian race (β=-8.66, p<0.01) and to have mandible fracture patterns (β=-3.63, p<0.01). The younger patients were more likely to be fully activated (β=-3.10, p<0.01) with a higher shock index ratio (SIR) (β=-7.36, p<0.01). Injury mechanisms in younger facial fracture patients were more likely to be assault (β=-12.43, p<0.01), four-wheeler/ATV accident (β=-24.80, p<0.01), gunshot (β=-15.18, p<0.01), moped accident (β=-13.50, p<0.01), motorcycleaccident (β=-12.31, p<0.01), motor vehicleaccident (β=-16.52, p<.01), or pedestrian being struck by a motor vehicle (β=-10.69, p=0.02). Conclusions Based on our findings, age effects impact facial fracture patterns and outcomes. Younger patients are more likely to experience multisystem injuries via non-fall trauma. On the other hand, older patients are more likely to experience more severe primary facial injuries. Older patients are also at a higher risk of fall-related trauma. Disparities also exist between genders and races, with male and non-Caucasianpatients being at a higher risk of injury from facial fractures at a younger age. With an aging population, the prevalence of falls is likely to increase. Thus, facial fractures represent a growing healthcare burden and warrant future investments related to care and treatment.

Patterns of Co-occurring Facial Fractures

Patterns of Co-occurring Facial Fractures

Operative Facial Fracture Patterns in Cannabis Users: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Introduction: Cannabis is the third most used recreational substance in the United States. Each year, more and more states pass legislation to legalize it for both medical and recreation use. As the prevalence of cannabis use increases, it is important to study the implications for patient care, not simply the potential interactions with wound healing, and perioperative analgesia. Facial fractures are among the most common traumatic presentations for the plastic surgeon. As such, the present study aims to characterize the operative facial fracture patterns in cannabis users. Methods: The IBM MarketScan Research Databases were queried from the years 2017 to 2021. Cohorts were identified in the inpatient dataset using International Classification for Disease, 10th Revision Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) codes for facial fracture repair procedures. The cannabis cohort was separated based on presence of ICD-10 codes pertaining to cannabis use diagnoses. The cohorts were propensity-score matched using an approximate 4:1 matching ratio. Baseline cohort demographics were reported and compared including age, gender, geographic region, employment status, insurance plan type, and fracture repair type. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between cannabis use and fracture repair patterns. Results: There were 104 patients in the cannabis cohort and 480 in the control cohort after propensity score matching. The cannabis group had a higher proportion of male patients (80.8%vs 69.0%, P = .016) and a lower proportion of the age range from 18 to 34 years (4.8%vs 15.8%, P = .035). Employment types were different between the 2 cohorts, with more patients in the control cohort working full time (82.3%vs 69.2%, P = .045). Cannabis users had significantly less maxillary fracture repairs (1.9%vs 19.4%, P &lt; .001). Cannabis users also had significantly more frontal fracture repairs (1.9%vs 0.2%, P = .027) and mandibular fracture repairs (76.9%vs 63.8%, P = .010). Multivariate regression revealed that cannabis users have 1.8 times greater odds of undergoing mandibular fracture repair ( P = .020) and significantly lower odds of undergoing maxillary (OR 0.07, P = .001). Conclusion: There are significant differences in the fracture patterns for cannabis users undergoing operative management and those who do not use cannabis. While mandibular fractures were the most common fracture repair type overall, cannabis users had significantly higher odds of undergoing mandibular fracture repair. This may indicate that cannabis users are more likely to sustain injuries that require operative intervention. Further study is needed to identify the relative incidences of facial fractures among cannabis users and its implications on operative considerations.

Comment on: Retrospective Analysis on the Incidence and Pattern of Facial Bone Fractures in a Major Trauma Center of Eastern Uttar Pradesh

Comment on: Retrospective Analysis on the Incidence and Pattern of Facial Bone Fractures in a Major Trauma Center of Eastern Uttar Pradesh

Facial Fracture Patterns and Severity of Associated Injuries After Motorcycle Accidents.

Motorcycle injuries remain a significant cause of motor vehicle-related morbidity and mortality in Taiwan. Besides, the facial region is a commonly fractured site under motorcycle accidents. To date, there are no trauma mechanism-based studies of facial fractures. This study aims to determine the facial fracture patterns, the severity of head trauma, and associated injuries by different motorcycle-related trauma mechanisms enabling a greater understanding of its distribution and magnitude. This is a retrospective descriptive analysis conducted over a 2-year period at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. We focused on the population of maxillofacial injury caused by motorcycle accidents. We divided the patient cohort into 3 main trauma mechanisms: single-motorcycle collision (SM group), motorcycle-to-motorcycle collision (MM group), motorcycle-to-vehicle collision (MV group). Data, including demographics, age, fracture patterns of facial bones, and other associated injuries, were collected. A total of 881 cases were identified that involved facial fractures. Most patients were male (71%), young adult (mean age, 32.49 years), and the most common fracture region is the midfacial fracture (79.5%, 700 victims). Among the 3 groups, the MM group was less likely to sustain severe injuries by trauma score system, less head injury and mortality rate. The MV group and SM group have similar mortality rates but different fracture pattern tendencies. Lower facial fractures were more likely in the MV group, but midface fractures in the SM group. Associated injuries were higher in the MV group. Our study presents the different trends of fracture patterns and injury under 3 main mechanisms of motorcycle casualties. We document all these data in the hope of providing insights into trauma doctors dealing with motorcycle accidents.

Non-surgical management of a traumatic mid-palatal suture diastasis by novel use of an orthodontic appliance

Sutures are formed during embryonic development at the sites of approximation of the membranous bones of the craniofacial skeleton. They afford major sites of bone expansion during postnatal craniofacial growth, and also influence facial fracture patterns through offering a path of least resistance to force. There are some studies that have shown that the mid-palatal suture (MPS) fuses at 11–13 years and 14–16 years in females and males, respectively. This means that during childhood, the suture is open; thus force applied to the palate at this time tends to split the bone in the midline between the two unfused palatal shelves. The understanding of this biological process allows orthodontists to correct transverse growth discrepancies of the maxilla. Various appliances, including the hyrax appliance, can be used to allow rapid maxillary expansion (RME) by expanding the suture. Paradoxically, the same appliance can be used to allow rapid maxillary contraction (RMC) by contracting the suture. This method of application using a hyrax appliance is rare. We present a case report where this method of application allowed closure of a traumatic mid-palatal suture diastasis, correction of a traumatic transverse discrepancy of the maxilla and avoided an invasive surgical intervention in a 15-year-old male. CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article highlights the importance of considering a patient's age and anatomical development when exploring treatment options. It is prudent to take advantage of this to enhance the natural biological healing process.

Prevalence of Penetrating Cerebrovascular Injuries in Craniofacial Ballistic Trauma

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 114,000 people in the US experience trauma by gunshot every year. Approximately 50% of those who survive will experience functional deficits. Although traumatic cerebrovascular injuries have been described, their association with ballistic injuries to the head and neck region have not been investigated. The goal of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of traumatic cerebrovascular injuries in patients who experienced ballistic trauma in the craniofacial region. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed on patients who sustained ballistic trauma to the head and face at a level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. Clinical characteristics collected included demographics, injury characteristics, GCS scores, facial fracture location and pattern, details of the cerebrovascular injuries, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients sustained ballistic injury to the face and head. Among them n = 6 (9%) had radiographic evidence of cerebrovascular injuries. The presence of cerebrovascular injuries was associated with facial fracture (OR 5.74), especially mandible fractures (OR 14.57; Table). Two patients required additional invasive endovascular procedures. Three patients sustained major neurologic deficits as result of their vascular injuries. Table. - Odds Ratio of Vascular Injury Among Patients with or Without Facial Fractures Facial fracture type Number of patients with fracture type Number of cases with major head and neck vascular injuries Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) All facial fractures 32 5 5.74 (0.39-32.98) Mid facial fractures 19 2 1.21 (0.61-21.69) Mandible fractures 11 4 14.57 (0.55-23.57) Upper facial fractures 21 0 0 GCS below 15 22 3 2 (0.66-19.69) CONCLUSION: In our cohort, major cerebrovascular trauma was present in 9% of patients who sustained ballistic injury to the head and facial region. These devastating vascular injuries are associated with the presence of facial fractures, especially those with mandible fractures. Thus, CT angiogram should be considered in all patients who sustained ballistic injuries to the head and facial region.

E-Scooters and Craniofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review.

Systematic review. Standing electric scooters (e-scooters) provide a cheap and environmentally friendly transport alternative, but also elicit substantial concern regarding their volume of associated injuries especially in the craniofacial region. This review aims to explore the demographics, risk factors, types of injury and surgical management of craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Exclusion criteria were duplicates; non-English publications; non-full-text publications; studies with insufficient data. Of the 73 articles identified, 10 eligible articles representing 539 patients were included. The mean age was 31.5 years. Most cases were male (63.7%). Common risk factors were alcohol/drug intoxication, absence of distal extremity injuries and lack of helmet use. The most common mechanism of injury was mechanical falls (72.4%). The most common facial fracture pattern was middle third fractures (58.3%). Surgical management was required for 43.3% of fractures. Other types of injuries reported were traumatic brain injuries (17.6%), soft tissue injuries (58.3%), dental injuries (32.9%) and ophthalmological injuries (20.6%). The findings of this review suggest common presentations for craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Robust longitudinal evaluations with standardised descriptions of types of injuries are required. Gaps in knowledge relate to surgical management, post-operative complications and associated risk factors.

Pattern of Facial Fractures and Its Association with a Cervical Spine Injury in a Tertiary Hospital in Jordan.

Background Facial fractures can be accompanied by serious and life-threatening injuries such as cervical spine injury (CSI), which can lead to serious consequences if misdiagnosed. Objective To assess the patterns of maxillofacial fractures and to explore the association between these fractures and cervical spine injuries (CSIs) in patients with a traumatic facial injury. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of the subjects who were admitted to the King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) and had a maxillofacial fracture in the period from January 2017 through December 2020. Stepwise binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to find the variables which are significantly and independently associated with CSIs. Results A total of 394 maxillofacial fractures were reported for a total of 221 subjects. The mandible was the most common site of the reported fractures (41.88%). The majority of the subjects had associated injuries (70.6%), of which 82.7% were CSIs. The most common type of the CSIs was the vertebral fracture (52%). Increased age (OR = 1.543, P < 0.05), having a mandibular fracture (OR = 4.382, P < 0.01), and having a maxillary fracture (OR = 3.269, P < 0.05) were significantly associated with the presence of CSI. Conclusion The current study revealed that the most common type of facial fracture occurred in the mandible area, and CSI was the most common fracture-associated injury (82.7%). Increased age and having mandibular or maxillary fracture were associated with an increased risk of developing CSI. Therefore, it is necessary to rule out the presence of concomitant CSI during the emergency management of maxillofacial fractures, particularly for elderly patients and those with mandibular or maxillary fractures.

Discussion on: Characteristics and Patterns of Facial Fractures in the Elderly Population in the United States Based on Trauma Quality Improvement Project (TQIP) Data.

Discussion on: Characteristics and Patterns of Facial Fractures in the Elderly Population in the United States Based on Trauma Quality Improvement Project (TQIP) Data.

Characteristics and Patterns of Facial Fractures in the Elderly Population in the United States Based on Trauma Quality Improvement Project Data.

With the increase in the elderly population in the United States, the number of people seeking care for trauma injuries is expected to increase. However, nationwide studies on epidemiological profile of elderly facial fractures remain sparse. The authors present the epidemiological measures of elderly facial fractures on national scale. Characteristics of facial fractures among younger adults (18-64 years old) and the elderly population (65-74 years old, 75-84 years old and 85 years and above) have been examined using the 2016 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program databank. Variables studied included facial fracture patterns, mechanisms of injury, treatment variables, and demographic descriptive data. Of 104,183 elderly trauma patients, 3415 presented with facial fractures, making up 3.3% (versus 6.5% in younger adults). Majority of facial fractures in 85 and over group (60.7%) were experienced by females, compared to only 19.5% in the younger adult group. Most common mechanism of injury in the elderly was falls, versus motor vehicle trauma in younger adults. The most common type of facial fractures among both groups were nasal fractures. Elderly patients presented with fewer zygoma, mandibular and nasal fractures when compared to younger adults, whereas showing more maxillary/malar and orbital bone fractures. Elderly patients experienced less operative management (4.3%-8.2%) compared to younger adults (15.6%). Concurrently, mortality rates were higher in the elderly patients (9.9%-11.8%) when compared to the younger adults (8.0%). Elderly patients presented with different causes of injury, distribution of fractures, and rates of operative management compared to younger adults.

HOW ETIOLOGY AFFECTS PATTERN OF MAXILLOFACIAL FRACTURES. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY AT TERTIARY CARE CENTER IN NORTH INDIA

Pattern and etiology of maxillofacial injures varies from one country to another and even within the same country depending on prevailing socio-economic, cultural and environmental factors. Aim and objective of this study was to analyse retrospectively how various factors and etiology affects pattern of facial fractures and management at maxillofacial department and research center of tertiary care college and hospital. Out of 8715 patients who were reported to our center between years 2017 to 2021. 82% had mandibular fracture, 17% mid third fracture and around 1% had facial fractures involving cranial bones. Most patients with mid face fracture had fractures of zygomaticomaxillary region78%, while fracture of parasymphysis region were more common in mandible39%. Most patients were in the 21–30 year old age group, Road trafc accidents were more common around 76%.

The patterns of facial fractures in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients using ordinal regression: a retrospective study of five years.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), traumatic brain injury (TBI) will mainly contribute to disability and death by 2020. Facial fractures associated with TBI are a significant public health concern worldwide. The main etiological factors are road traffic accidents, violence, and falls. Neurological injury associated with facial fractures has been reported to be as high as 76%. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated facial fracture patterns in patients with a traumatic brain injury in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and evaluated their associations in our study. Ordinal regression was used to examine the facial fracture patterns in patients with traumatic brain injuries. The confounding variables were controlled using ordinal regression analysis, and probabilities of p < 0.1 were considered significant associations. The results found that zygomatic arch fracture -1.141 (95% CI, -2.487 to 0.204, p-value = 0.096), Le Fort II fracture -1.080 (95% CI, -2.138 to -0.022, p-value = 0.045), maxillary bone fracture 2.924 (95% CI, 1.784 to 4.063, p-value .001), nasal bone fracture 4.047 (95% CI, 1.243 to 6.851, p-value = 0.005), and mandibular bone fracture 1.501 (95% CI, 0.711 to 2.291, p-value .001) were the most common facial fracture types associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study provides valuable data for creating prevention plans and gives a chance to discover the epidemiology, prevalence, and connection between TBI and facial fracture.