Although there has long been an idea that heredity plays an important role in the determination of life span, this concept has been "more taken for granted than supported by exact scientific investigation." Since one cannot extrapolate directly from experimental organisms to man nor carry out studies of a similar nature in man, it is necessary to use the direct epidemiological approach, determining first of all whether the observed differences in mortality follow family patterns. Some of the very early, more recently published, and current family studies of life span are summarized and reviewed critically. The results of the genealogy studies, (including both large individual kinships, e.g. the Hyde family, Peirce family, etc., and the collections of genealogies, e.g. Foster's Peerage Burke's Landed Gentry, Society of Friends records, Finnish and Swedish noble and middle class families), as well as studies involving samples from special subgroups of the population (families of workingmen, nonagenarians, senescent twins, insurance applicants, etc.) appear to show various family patterns. However, the suggested positive relationships, as well as any lack of relationships, are all explicable by one bias or another involved in the selection, completeness, source, or validity of the data. The apparent explanation for the paucity of investigations of family patterns of causes of death probably resides in the fact that the same difficulties present in the longevity studies also apply to the investigation of causes of death. In addition, problems arise from the variability in diagnostic criteria and the interpretation of competing causes. Moreover, all except the current studies involve deaths occurring in the pre-antibiotic, even in the pre-public health, era. The influence of sanitary and nutritional factors and epidemic diseases in altering the life span, despite the biological potential, might be considerable. Therefore, although many data are available on family patterns of longevity and a few on causal relationships, any attempt to interpret the findings in terms of a current population is hardly feasible. In view of this situation, two studies of patterns of mortality and aging have been initiated at Johns Hopkins University. The major investigation is a Community-Based Population Study comparing the mortality experience of corresponding relatives of a sample of deaths which occured in Baltimore in 1960 and of living matched controls, in order to determine whether there are family patterns of mortality and, if so, their nature in respect to age at death and causes of death. The second and smaller investigation, designed to identify in living subjects possible indicators of family patterns of mortality, involves a special group of 500 living males who are participating in a longitudinal study of aging. Some preliminary findings of both the Community-Based Population Investigation and the Special Group Study are Presented. It is concluded that at present, despite all the recorded information and presumptive evidence, the problem of the genetic aspects of mortality and life span remains to be resolved. Large, collaborative projects both for retrospective family data analysis and for longitudinal follow-up of subjects are recommended for future study.
Read full abstract