Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Research Articles

Development and validation of a predictive model and tool for functional recovery in patients after postero-lateral interbody fusion

ObjectiveThe postoperative recovery of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) requires further study. This study aimed to establish and validate a predictive model for functional recovery in patients with LDH and explore associated risk factors.MethodPatients with LDH undergoing PLIF admitted from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022 were included, and patient data were prospectively collected through follow-up. The training and validation cohorts were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio. To pool data variables LASSO regression was used. The pooled variables were subsequently included in binary logistic regression analyses, construct risk prediction models, and plot nomograms. Additionally, recovery prediction models and interactive web page calculators were developed using R Shiny.ResultsOverall, 1,097 patients with LDH following PLIF were included in this study. Regarding patients’ economic and functional scores, 927 (84.5%) received excellent scores. Key indicators significantly were screened. Multivariate analysis showed that age, season, occupation, HDL-C, smoking, weekly exercise time, and osteoporosis were independent risk factors for postoperative recovery. The C-index of the model was 0.776 (95% CI: 0.7312–0.8208) and 0.804 (95% CI: 0.7408–0.8673) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The H–L test showed good fitting of the model (all P > 0.05). The DCA curve showed the best clinical efficacy when the threshold probability was in the ranges of 0–0.71 and 0.79–0.84. The interactive web calculator is accessed at https://postoperativerecoveryofldh.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/.ConclusionThe predictive tools derived from this study can provide realistic and personalized expectations of postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Disability and pain after lumbar surgery-group-based trajectory analysis.

Previous studies in lumbar spine surgery have mainly studied functioning and pain by comparing average scores from Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) at different time points. Less is known about these changes in different subgroups. It is self-evident that, while most patients may demonstrate trajectories of these changes close to the average one, some groups may follow more or less different trends. Also, it is unclear which preoperative factors may affect the probability of being classified into groups with different development trajectories of surgical outcome. The objective of this study was to identify groups exhibiting distinct trajectories within the broader cohort of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery and to determine whether certain factors may be associated with a probability of being classified into a particular group. This was a register-based study of 1,451 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. The group-based trajectory analysis was used separately for leg pain, for back pain, and for functioning. The probability of group membership was calculated based on sex, age, leg and back pain duration before surgery, and obesity. Two kinds of group-based trajectories were identified for each of three-factor variables: a long-term and a short-term improvement group. Sex and age were not associated with being classified into short-term improvement groups, but obesity was associated for all three-factor variables with relative risk ratios (RRR) varying from 1.26 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.56) to 1.45 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.90). Preoperative leg and back pain duration was significantly associated solely with back pain severity with an RRR of 1.28 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.61). The results of this study suggest that most of the patients may experience pain relief and improved functioning within three months after lumbar surgery, and this effect may last, at least, for two years. Higher BMI and worse preoperative pain and disability were associated with the inferior outcome of surgery. When considering surgery, planning pre- and postoperative rehabilitation, or forecasting the use of pain medications, a higher probability of worse outcome could be expected for overweight and initially more painful patients with higher level of disability.

Impact of contrast administration and CT reconstruction plane on Hounsfield units for assessing underlying bone quality in the lumbar spine.

Hounsfield units (HUs) may better predict biomechanical complications of instrumented fusion than conventional bone quality measures. Typically, noncontrast axial slices are used. This study aims to address the influence of reconstruction plane and contrast administration on measured HUs in patients undergoing lumbar spine imaging. Patients without prior spine surgery, infection, or tumor were identified for 3 groups: 1) 150 patients with high-resolution noncontrast lumbar CT, 2) 109 patients with noncontrast and contrast-enhanced lumbar CT, and 3) 100 patients with noncontrast lumbar CT and lumbar CT myelograms. Noncontrast HU measures in group 1 were compared between axial, sagittal, and coronal reconstructions. HU measures for groups 2 and 3 were compared on axial slice averages. HU measures between groups were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to investigate the presence of a statistically significant difference between groups (α = 0.05). Linear regression was also used to determine the degree of correlation between HU measures on noncontrast axial CT slices and HU measures on other sequences. The mean patient age was 58.8 ± 15.9 years for group 1 (54.0% male), 65.5 ± 15.9 years for group 2 (61.5% male), and 65.2 ± 14.2 years (53.5% male) for group 3. Comparison of HU measures in group 1 showed significant differences across measurement modalities with the exception of axial average versus coronal average measures (p = 0.257) and sagittal average versus midsagittal measures (p = 0.726). There were significant differences in average axial HUs for each vertebral body between contrast and noncontrast lumbar CT and between CT myelography and noncontrast CT. Linear regression analysis demonstrated an extremely high correlation between measures for all methodologies (r2 = 0.950-0.986, all p < 0.001), and between contrast-enhanced and noncontrast studies (r2 = 0.870, p < 0.001). Measurements on CT myelography were significantly correlated with those in noncontrast studies, although to a lesser degree (r2 = 0.745, p < 0.001). HU measures on noncontrast CT appear similar across multiple different planes, suggesting that a simpler methodology such as single-slice measurement on midsagittal reconstruction may allow for more rapid assessment of underlying bone quality. Consistent with prior work, contrast-enhanced CT sequences appear to reliably mirror underlying bone quality, although CT myelogram measures may vary in a more unpredictable way that precludes their use to interpret underlying bone quality. HU measures on contrast-enhanced studies are on average greater, suggesting the need for higher cutoff values.

A cost-reducing reimbursement programme? Effects of value-based reimbursement on healthcare costs.

Value-based reimbursement programmes have become increasingly common in attempts to bend the cost curve of healthcare without negative effects on quality. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of introducing a value-based reimbursement programme on the cost to third-party payer. We performed a retrospective observational study with a before and after design based on the introduction of a value-based reimbursement programme in Sweden. We analysed patient level cost data from inpatient and outpatient care of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, 2006-2015. The average 1-year episode cost decreased 11 percent during the first 2 years with the value-based reimbursement. The number of patients increased 22 percent during the same period, causing the total cost to increase by 8 percent. The value to third-party payer increased after the introduction of the value-based reimbursement since more patients were treated and attained a positive outcome. The decreased episode cost may be a result of better coordinated post-discharge care. Another explanation could be that costs previously borne by the third-party payer are shifted onto the healthcare providers. Thus, it is crucial that providers find a sustainable way of delivering care in the long term to retain value. Interlinking patient records facilitates a holistic perspective among healthcare providers raising awareness of health care utilization through the whole care chain.

Longitudinal Trends in the Incidence of Hyperactive Delirium and Its Causes of Change After Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Population-Based Study of 7250 Surgical Patients Over 11 Years.

Delirium is one of the common complications in elderly patients after spinal surgery. Severe delirium can lead to a series of adverse consequences such as drainage tube removal, wound rupture, patient falls, and severe adverse effects. The current research on POD is mostly small sample studies. This study aimed to investigate longitudinal changes in the incidence of hyper-postoperative delirium in patients with lumbar degenerative disease at our institution over the past 11 years and to identify the potential causes of these changes. This is a retrospective cohort study included 7250 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases at a single center from 2011 to 2021. These patients were diagnosed with delirium through the Confusion Assessment Method and then diagnosed with high activity delirium through the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, totaling 130 cases. According to the incidence rate of hyper-postoperative delirium within 11 years, the trend test is divided into three groups: S1 upward trend (2011-2014), S2 downward trend (2015-2016) and S3 upward trend (2016-2021). The study collected variables from patients before, during, and after surgery, including gender, age, laboratory tests, anesthesia risk score, New York Heart Association cardiac function grading, number of surgical segments, surgical time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, anesthesia medication, and supplementary analgesic medication in the ward within 3 days after surgery. Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, or chi-square test are used to evaluate inter group differences. p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. The pooled incidence of hyper-postoperative delirium over the past 11 years was 1.79% (130/7250). The average age of 7250 patients was 54.5 ± 13 years, with a male/female ratio close to 1:1. We statistically analyzed the relevant influencing factors before, during, and after surgery of S1 and S3 in the incidence rate increase group and found no statistical difference between the two groups. Our research results show that the incidence of high activity delirium is correlated with age, number of surgical segments, surgical duration, use of dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, and benzodiazepines, with p < 0.05. The reduced use of dexmedetomidine, increased use of benzodiazepines, and prolonged surgical time are the reasons for the increased incidence of hyper-postoperative delirium. The joint management of orthopedic surgeons and anesthesiologists during the perioperative period is of great significance in reducing the incidence of hyper-postoperative delirium in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Handgrip and its relation to age, fragility fractures, and BMD between sexes in a population aged 50+ years.

A decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) accompanied by muscle weakness during aging significantly increases the probability of low-energy fracture occurrence, but it can also happen in those with a non-osteoporotic score (treatment gap). To improve the identification process of those at risk, the authors proposed using the interconnectivity between bone mineral density and muscle tissue. A total of 20,776 patient records were collected from the database in the period 2008-2021. After applying inclusion criteria, a total of 7159 records were used in the study. Questionnaires regarding patients' history were collected at admission. Patients underwent lumbar spine and/or femoral neck DXA examination and handgrip testing with a handheld dynamometer. Statistical analysis was conducted using tests suitable for the distribution of the data. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in a total of 1914 patients. Depending on the diagnosis there was a significant (p < 0.001) difference in handgrip strength (HGS) between the BMD statuses (norm-osteopenia-osteoporosis). HGS was significantly (p < 0.001) correlated with both BMD neck (r = 0.2) and spine (r = 0.1) in females, and with BMD neck (r = 0.11) in the male population. In our study group HGS was significantly (p < 0.001) higher for all the analysed fractures in the no-fracture group of women. There was no such relationship in reference to the male population. Due to its relationship with BMD, its low cost, and availability, HGS might prove useful in identifying women at risk of a fragility fracture.

Effects of Esketamine Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Early Postoperative Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication after surgery in elderly patients, and its prevalence can be up to 25.6% at one week after noncardiac surgery. This study mainly evaluates the combined effects of esketamine and dexmedetomidine on the incidence of POCD in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery and explores the underlying mechanisms. A total of 162 elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomized into three groups: esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine group (ED group), esketamine group (E group), and dexmedetomidine group (D group). Primary outcome measures included the incidence of POCD on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of POCD on the third postoperative day, first postoperative day serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and calcium-binding protein β (S100β), patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 2, 24, and 48hours postoperatively, and the incidence of adverse events. The incidence of POCD on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in the ED group compared to the E group (P = 0.017), with no significant differences when compared to the D group (P = 0.064). The levels of serum NSE in patients in the ED group on the first postoperative day were significantly lower than those in E group and D group (ED group vs E group, P = 0.028; ED group vs D group, P = 0.048). The results for the S100β were similar to those for the NSE (ED group vs E group, P = 0.005; ED group vs D group, P = 0.011). The combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine effectively reduces the incidence of POCD on the first postoperative day in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Same-day discharge following lumbar spine neural decompression

IntroductionThe concept of same-day discharge following lumbar spine surgery for neural elements decompression, introduced in the 1980 s, represents a significant paradigm shift in postoperative care, offering potential benefits in terms of efficiency, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. However, concerns regarding patient safety and complications have persisted. This study aims to assess same-day discharge rates following lumbar spine decompression surgery, identify preoperative predictors, and compare outcomes between same-day discharge and hospitalization. MethodsA retrospective comparative analysis was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use File spanning 2016 to 2021. A total of 58,430 patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression procedures were included. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, with significance determined at p < 0.05. ResultsSignificant differences were observed in preoperative factors, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes between patients discharged on the same day and those hospitalized. Preoperative comorbidities, operative time, length of stay, utilization of minimally invasive approaches, and 30-day mortality rates differed significantly between the two groups. Notably, same-day discharge demonstrated superior outcomes, with lower rates of unplanned intubation, readmission, and reoperation compared to hospitalization. ConclusionIn conclusion, same-day discharge following lumbar spine decompression procedures holds promise as a safe and effective practice, offering advantages in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. Further research and implementation of standardized protocols are warranted to maximize the benefits of same-day discharge while ensuring patient safety and satisfaction.

The cross-sectional area of gluteal muscle on multiaxial CT scan as a predictor for diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with degenerative lumbar disease.

This study examined the predictive value of the gluteal muscle index (GMI) for diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with degenerative lumbar disease (DLD), highlighting the need for effective diagnostic markers in this population. This prospective observational study included 202 elderly patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery. Muscle indices for psoas, paraspinal, and gluteal muscles were measured using multiaxial computed tomography. Sarcopenia was diagnosed per the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria. Statistical analysis comprised univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of sarcopenia. Of patients, 77% were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The GMI and psoas muscle index (PMI) were identified as significant predictors of sarcopenia in the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed their predictive value, with higher indices correlating with a reduced risk of sarcopenia (GMI odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.92-0.97; PMI OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92-0.98, both P < .001). The GMI serves as a reliable predictor of sarcopenia in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for DLD, suggesting a significant role of gluteal muscles in diagnosing sarcopenia. Incorporating GMI into clinical assessments is critical to better manage and diagnose sarcopenia in this population.

Mindfulness vs. Physiotherapy vs. Medical Therapy: Uncovering the Best Postoperative Recovery Method for Low Back Surgery Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Single Institution's Experience.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness therapy compared to traditional physiotherapy and usual care in alleviating postoperative pain and improving functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ninety patients undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF) who presented persistent low back pain after surgery were prospectively followed for one year. They were randomly divided into three groups: mindfulness therapy, physiotherapy, and medical therapy. The primary outcome was the improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score postoperatively and at six months follow-up. Both mindfulness and physiotherapy groups showed significant improvement in ODI scores compared to the control group, with mean variations of 10.6 and 11.6 points, respectively, versus 4.9 points in the control group. There was no significant difference between mindfulness and physiotherapy (p = 0.52), but both were superior to medical care (p < 0.0001 for physiotherapy and p = 0.0007 for mindfulness). This study demonstrated that mindfulness therapy is more effective than usual care in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. In our cohort, its efficacy was comparable to that of physiotherapy, making it a viable alternative, especially when access to healthcare services is restricted, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should validate the findings of this study and examine the long-term effects on surgical patient populations.

P84. Transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

P84. Transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis.

Existing literature does not establish the superiority of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block or the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block in pain relief and reducing opioid consumption in lumbar spine surgeries. This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to discern their relative efficacy and safety. This meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESP and TLIP blocks in lumbar spine surgeries. The primary outcome was 24-h opioid consumption, and secondary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1 h and 24 h and various complications. PubMed, Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, EMBASE databases and cross-references were electronically searched. Two authors extracted data independently, cross-checked, and analysed them using RevMan 5.4. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR), while continuous outcomes were presented as standardised mean differences (SMDs) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Among 1107 articles, six RCTs (492 patients) were finally included. The ESP block demonstrated lower 24-h opioid consumption compared to TLIP [SMD -0.32 (95% CI: -0.50, -0.14); P < 0.001, I 2 = 83%]. At 1 and 24 h, ESPB yielded significantly lower VAS scores compared to TLIP [1 h: SMD -0.38 (95% CI: -0.57, -0.18); P < 0.001, I 2 = 83%; 24 h: SMD -0.57 (95% CI: -0.76, -0.37); P < 0.001, I 2 = 73%]. No significant difference was noted in adverse events. In comparison to the TLIP block, the ESP block has significantly lower 24-h opioid consumption and VAS scores at 1 and 24 h in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Using Multimodal Assessments to Reevaluate Depression Designations for Spine Surgery Candidates.

Depression is common in spine surgery candidates and may influence postoperative outcomes. Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) can overcome limitations of existing depression screening methods (e.g., recall bias, inaccuracy of historical diagnoses) by longitudinally monitoring depression symptoms in daily life. In this study, we compared EMA-based depression assessment with retrospective self-report (a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) and chart-based depression diagnosis in lumbar spine surgery candidates. We further examined the associations of each depression assessment method with surgical outcomes. Adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery (n = 122) completed EMAs quantifying depressive symptoms up to 5 times daily for 3 weeks preoperatively. Correlations (rank-biserial or Spearman) among EMA means, a chart-based depression history, and 1-time preoperative depression surveys (PHQ-9 and Psychache Scale) were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to categorize PHQ-9 questions as somatic or non-somatic; subscores were compared with a propensity score-matched general population cohort. The associations of each screening modality with 6-month surgical outcomes (pain, disability, physical function, pain interference) were analyzed with multivariable regression. The association between EMA Depression scores and a depression history was weak (rrb = 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14 to 0.52]). Moderate correlations with EMA-measured depression symptoms were observed for the PHQ-9 (rs = 0.51 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.63]) and the Psychache Scale (rs = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.76]). Compared with the matched general population cohort, spine surgery candidates endorsed similar non-somatic symptoms but significantly greater somatic symptoms on the PHQ-9. EMA Depression scores had a stronger association with 6-month surgical outcomes than the other depression screening modalities did. A history of depression in the medical record is not a reliable indication of preoperative depression symptom severity. Cross-sectional depression assessments such as PHQ-9 have stronger associations with daily depression symptoms but may conflate somatic depression symptoms with spine-related disability. As an alternative to these methods, mobile health technology and EMAs provide an opportunity to collect real-time, longitudinal data on depression symptom severity, potentially improving prognostic accuracy. Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block Using Bupivacaine – Magnesium Sulphate versus Bupivacaine – Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgeries

Abstract Purpose Lumbar spine surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain. Erector Spinae Plain Block (ESPB) is a new ultra-sound guided block technique for such surgeries . We aimed to explore the analgesic effect of adding dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ESP. Patients and Methods Fifty two patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery were randomly allocated into two groups to receive an ESP block., A total volume of 25 ml, [10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine diluted in normal saline (NS) and 2 mg/kg MgSO4 in group (MG group) and 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine in NS with 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine in group (DEX group)] were injected. The block was administered preoperatively before anesthesia induction. Postoperatively, hemodynamics, visual analog scale scores, the first request for analgesia, total analgesic consumption, and side effects were observed for 12 hours. Results The demographic data including age, gender, height, weight and BMI showed no difference between both groups, also, ASA classification and duration of surgeries done showed no difference between the studied groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). There were no recorded complications in both groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference among both groups regarding basal, and follow up period at 15 min values of heart rate, and basal value of mean arterial pressure (P &amp;gt; 0.05), but for the intraoperative hemodynamic parameters including MAP and HR, both parameters decreased significantly in the group which received dexmedetomidine in comparison to the other group except follow up values at 180 and 210 min, as no significant differences were recorded among both groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). Regarding postoperative pain, the visual analogue score (VAS) was used to record it postoperatively every 2 hours while we found a statistically significant difference regarding the VAS from 4 to 6 hours postoperatively as P &amp;lt; 0.005, but, we found no difference regarding the postoperative total consumption of nalbuphine (P &amp;lt; 0.005) . As for patient satisfaction in the studied groups, an anaesthesia satisfaction questionnaire was developed, validated (Kappa coefficient). Dexmedetomidine group was associated with a significant increase in satisfaction compared to MG group (P &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusion Magnesium sulphate and dexmedetomidine seem to be both effective adjuvants to bupivacaine in ESP blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries, with slightly better analgesia provided by dexmedetomidine.

Comparison of Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) Mode and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) Mode in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery in the Prone Position

Abstract Background The prone position is commonly required to enable surgical access during lumbar spine surgery. When a patient moves into the prone position, inferior vena cava obstruction causes reduced venous return and increase thoracic pressure results in reduced left ventricular compliance, leading to a decreased cardiac index (CI). Aim of the Work The aim of this study, we will compare the effects of the VCV and PCV on peak airway pressure (P peak), ETCO2 as a primary outcome ABG, SPO2, and hemodynamics as MAP, HR and as a secondary outcome in the prone position. Patients and Methods This prospective, single blinded study included 60 patients who assigned randomly into two equal groups: group A: patients on volume-controlled ventilation mode VCV and group B: patients on pressure-controlled ventilation mode PCV. Results Baseline characteristics (age, sex, BMI, ASA physical status, duration of anesthesia and surgery) were insignificantly different between both groups. Heart rate and MAP at supine and prone positions at all time measurements were insignificantly different between both groups. P peak and SpO2 at supine and prone positions at all time measurements were insignificantly different between both groups. Respiratory rate and ETCO2 at supine and prone positions at all time measurements were insignificantly different between both groups. Conclusion No significant difference between two modes of ventilation VCV and PCV in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position as regard P peak, ETCO2, SPO2, and hemodynamics.

Discrepancy between global- and disease-specific outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery.

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between patient-perceived changes in health and commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in lumbar spine surgery. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar decompression, or lumbar fusion at a single academic institution from 2017 to 2023. Correlation between the global rating of change (GRC) questionnaire, a 5-item Likert scale (much better, slightly better, about the same, slightly worse, and much worse), and PROMs (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale for back and leg pain, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary, and PROMIS physical function) was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. A total of 1871 patients (397 microdiscectomies, 965 decompressions, and 509 fusions) were included. A majority of patients in each group rated their lumbar condition as much better at each postoperative time point compared with preoperatively and reported improved health status at each postoperative time point compared with the previous follow-up visit. Statistically significant but weak to moderate correlations were found between GRC and change in PROM scores from the preoperative time point. Correlation between GRC and change in PROM scores from the prior visit showed some statistically significant correlations, but the strengths ranged from very weak to weak. A majority of patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy, decompression, or fusion endorsed notable improvements in health status in the early postoperative period and continued to improve at late follow-up. However, commonly used PROMs demonstrated very weak to moderate correlations with patient-perceived changes in overall lumbar spine-related health status as determined by GRC. Therefore, currently used PROMs may not be as sensitive at detecting these changes or may not be adequately reflecting changes in health conditions that are meaningful to patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

Lumbar spine surgery is associated with a significant degree of moderate-to-severe perioperative pain which can be alleviated by using different pain-relieving modalities; of these, erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine have promise. To compare the analgesic efficacy between intrathecal morphine (ITM) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. A total of 74 patients aged between 20 and 65 years of either sex were posted for elective lumbar spine surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients received 0.3 mg intrathecal morphine andGroup B received bilateral erector spinae plane block at L3 level by using 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine before starting the surgery for perioperative analgesia. In the perioperative period, pain was assessed by hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), numeric rating scale (NRS), and patient satisfaction score. Result: The difference in heart rate and mean arterial pressure was found to be statistically significant between groups at three, six, 12, and 24 hours (p<0.05). The patients who required rescue analgesia in Group A and Group B were 23 (62.2%) and 37 (100%) patients in the first 24 hours. The rate of complication was higher in Group A than in Group B (45% vs 5.4%). The patient satisfaction score was found to be better in Group A than in Group B. Intrathecal morphineprovides more substantial and extended analgesia up to 48 hours postoperatively as compared to erector spinae plane block.

Validity of the I‑FEED classification in assessing postoperative gastrointestinal impairment in patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery with general anesthesia: a prospective observational study

BackgroundThe I-FEED classification, scored 0–8, was reported to accurately describe the clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal impairment after colorectal surgery. Therefore, it is interesting to determine whether the I-FEED scoring system is also applicable to patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.MethodsAdult patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery were enrolled, and the I-FEED score was measured for 4 days after surgery. The I-FEED scoring system incorporates five elements: intake (score: 0, 1, 3), feeling nauseated (score: 0, 1, 3), emesis (score: 0, 1, 3), results of physical exam (score: 0, 1, 3), and duration of symptoms (score: 0, 1, 2). Daily I-FEED scores were summed, and the highest overall score is used to categorize patients into one of three categories: normal (0–2 points), postoperative gastrointestinal intolerance (POGI; 3–5 points), and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD; 6 + points). The construct validity hypothesis testing determines whether the I-FEED category is consistent with objective clinical findings relevant to gastrointestinal impairment, namely, the longer length of hospital stay (LOS), higher inhospital medical cost, more postoperative gastrointestinal medical treatment, and more postoperative non-gastrointestinal complications.ResultsA total of 156 patients were enrolled, and 25.0% of patients were categorized as normal, 49.4% POGI, and 25.6% POGD. Patients with higher I-FEED scores agreed with the four validity hypotheses. Patients with POGD had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (1 day longer median stay; p = 0.049) and more inhospital medical costs (approximately 500 Taiwanese dollars; p = 0.037), and more patients with POGD required rectal laxatives (10.3% vs. 32.5% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.026). In addition, more patients with POGD had non-gastrointestinal complications (5.1% vs. 11.7% vs. 30.0%; p = 0.034).ConclusionThis study contributes preliminary validity evidence for the I-FEED score as a measure for postoperative gastrointestinal impairment after elective lumbar spine surgery.

A Comparative Study of Wound Infections Following Wound Closure Using Staples and Absorbable Sutures Among Obese Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Background Infections of the wounds, organs, or spaces that develop following surgery are known as surgical site infections (SSIs). Theincidence of wound infections in obese patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery with the use of absorbable sutures versus staples for skin closurehas not been studied previously. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective observational study in our hospital where cases of lumbar spine surgery meeting the inclusion criteria were chosen retrospectively from March 2021 to March 2023. A total of 40patients aged >18 years and <75 years who underwent lumbar spine surgery were covered by this investigation. Two cohorts with 20 patients in each were chosen from thepopulation. Group A used a skin stapler to close wounds, whereas group B used absorbable sutures. The number of wound infections was the main result. Using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY), all data were analyzed after being entered into an Excel sheet (MicrosoftCorp., Redmond, WA). Results A total of 40 participants were included in this study, and it revealed that there was no discernible variation in the groups' mean age or gender distribution. There is a significantly higher incidence of SSI in the absorbable suture group (35%) compared to the staplegroup (15%). The mean duration in days for the development of SSI in the absorbable suture group (9.86±2.12) was early compared to the staple group (12.67±2.08), which was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion Compared to absorbable sutures, the current study showed a decreased incidence of surgical site infection in obese individuals receiving skin staples for wound closure.

Hemodynamic changes in the prone position according to fluid loading after anaesthesia induction in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a randomized, assessor-blind, prospective study

Introduction A change from the supine to prone position causes hemodynamic alterations. We aimed to evaluate the effect of fluid preloading in the supine position, the subsequent hemodynamic changes in the prone position and postoperative outcomes. Patients and methods This prospective, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted between March and June 2023. Adults scheduled for elective orthopaedic lumbar surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. In total, 80 participants were randomly assigned to fluid maintenance (M) or loading (L) groups. Both groups were administered intravenous fluid at a rate of 2 ml/kg/h until surgical incision; Group L was loaded with an additional 5 ml/kg intravenous fluid for 10 min after anaesthesia induction. The primary outcome was incidence of hypotension before surgical incision. Secondary outcomes included differences in the mean blood pressure (mBP), heart rate, pleth variability index (PVi), stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume index and cardiac index before surgical incision between the two groups. Additionally, postoperative complications until postoperative day 2 and postoperative hospital length of stay were investigated. Results Hypotension was prevalent in Group M before surgical incision and could be predicted by a baseline PVi >16. The mBP was significantly higher in Group L immediately after fluid loading. The PVi, SVV and PPV were lower in Group L after fluid loading, with continued differences at 2–3 time points for SVV and PPV. Other outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion Fluid loading after inducing general anaesthesia could reduce the occurrence of hypotension until surgical incision in patients scheduled for surgery in the prone position. Additionally, hypotension could be predicted in patients with a baseline PVi >16. Therefore, intravenous fluid loading is strongly recommended in patients with high baseline PVi to prevent hypotension after anaesthesia induction and in the prone position. Trial number KCT0008294 (date of registration: 16 March 2023)