Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery Research Articles

A protocolized five strategies in open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Although the medical field has made significant progress, there has been little improvement in the survival rate of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). We implemented a protocol consisting of five strategies in the management of rAAA patients who underwent open repair surgery. The protocol comprised the following strategies: intentional hypotension <70mmHg, lung first and kidney last policy (restricted fluid resuscitation and permissive oligoanuria), immediate postoperative extubation, free-water intake with active ambulation, and open abdomen with the routine second-look operation. The study included 13 patients (11 male) with a mean age of 75.5 ± 7.4 (range: 58-87) years who underwent the procedure from 2016 to 2018, with a mean follow-up of 40.1 ± 9.04 months. Five deteriorating to hemodynamic shock and decreased consciousness requiring intubation and ventilation prior to surgery were observed. Two of these patients required preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). All patients regained consciousness after surgery, including the two patients who required cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Immediate postoperative extubation was performed in nine patients, but two (22.2%) of them needed re-intubation due to ventilation/perfusion mismatch. Four patients underwent continuous renal replacement therapy, with three of them having anuria for up to 48h after surgery. Two of these patients made a full recovery. Daily ambulation was carried out for a mean of 4.77 ± 3.5 (range 1-13) days with an open abdomen, during which no significant events were reported. Four cases of colon ischemia/necrosis were identified in the second-look operation, with two patients requiring Hartman's procedure and the other two undergoing left colon partial resection. There were two in-hospital mortalities (15.4%). A protocol-based approach, through multidisciplinary team consensus and the development of optimal surgical strategies, could improve clinical outcomes for patients undergoing emergency surgery for rAAA. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to refine the protocols.

Preoperative blood urea nitrogen-to-serum albumin ratio for prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

The study aimed to assess the predictive value of blood urea nitrogen (BUN)-to-albumin ratio (BA-R) for in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Patients who were diagnosed with ATAAD and underwent emergency surgery within 48 hours of onset at our hospital between January 2015 and December 2021 were included in this study. The primary endpoint of this study was postoperative in-hospital mortality (POIM). The data of the survivors and non-survivors were retrospectively compared analyses. A total of 557 ATAAD patients were included, with 505 survivors and 52 non-survivors. The preoperative BA-R of the non-survivor group was significantly higher than that of the survivor group (P < 0.001). Univariate regression analysis showed that preoperative BA-R, serum creatinine level, SA level, D-dimer level, age, myocardial ischemia, cerebral ischemia, and aortic clamp time were risk factors for POIM. In addition, multivariable regression analysis showed that preoperative BA-R ≥ 0.155 mmol/g was a risk factor for POIM (odds ratio, 6.815 [3.582–12.964]; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that the cut-off point for preoperative BA-R was ≥0.155 mmol/g (area under the curve =0.874). The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative BA-R in predicting the POIM of patients who underwent emergency surgery for ATAAD were 84.6% and 71.3%, respectively (95% confidence interval, 0.829–0.919; P < 0.001). In conclusion, Preoperative BA-R is a simple, rapid, and potentially useful prognostic indicator of POIM in patients with ATAAD.BAR: Blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio, BUN: Blood urea nitrogen, SA: Serum albumin, REF: Reference. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of BA-R for the prediction of postoperative in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent emergency surgery for ATAAD. A total of 557 patients with ATAAD were enrolled, and 505 survived while 52 did not. The preoperative BA-R of the non-survivor group was significantly higher than that of the survivor group (0.27 [0.18, 0.46] vs. 0.12 [0.10, 0.16]mmol/g; P < 0.001). The study showed that preoperative BA-R ≥ 0.155 mmol/g was a risk factor for POIM (odds ratio, 6.815 [3.582–12.964]; P < 0.001). ROC curve indicated that the cut-off point for preoperative BA-R was ≥0.155 mmol/g (AUC = 0.874) and the sensitivity and specificity were 84.6% and 71.3%, respectively (95% CI, 0.829–0.919; P < 0.001). We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because we found preoperative BA-R to be a simple, rapid, and potentially useful prognostic indicator of postoperative in-hospital mortality in patients with ATAAD.

Comparison of channelled with non-channelled blade of King Vision videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in patients undergoing emergency surgery: A randomised double blind study

BackgroundPatients undergoing emergency surgery can have both anatomical and physiological difficult airways. There being no consensus on the best strategy to secure such airways, hence the present study evaluated the clinical performance of the two blades of King Vision™ Videolaryngoscope (KVVL). MethodsThis prospective double blind study was done on fifty two patients of 18–80 years aged posted for emergency surgery under general anaesthesia (GA). Patients were randomly assigned to channelled (CH) and non-channelled (NC) group for intubation. The primary outcome was time to tracheal intubation with CH and NC blades. The secondary outcomes among the two groups noted were ease of videolaryngoscope (VL) blade insertion, time to optimal laryngeal view, fremantle score, number of intubation attempts, any manoeuver required to intubate and complications. Haemodynamic parameters were noted before induction, during preoxygenation before laryngoscopy and 5 min after endotracheal intubation. ResultsSignificant shorter time to intubation was noted in NC group (18s) compared with CH group (25s). The NC blade was easier to insert and the time to optimal laryngeal view was also shorter with NC group (7s) as compared to CH group (10s). Fremantle score was comparable among the two groups. Endotracheal tube (ETT) impingment on arytenoids was more common with NC blade. For intubation with CH blade, anticlockwise rotation of ETT was frequently required. ConclusionThe NC blade of KVVL was easier to introduce and resulted in faster intubation, thus favouring its use in patients undergoing emergency surgery under GA. The CH blade of KVVL required anticlockwise rotation to facilitate intubation.

An Exploratory Assessment of Pre-Treatment Inflammatory Profiles in Gastric Cancer Patients.

Gastric cancer ranks as the fifth most common cancer, and the assessment of inflammatory biomarkers in these patients holds significant promise in predicting prognosis. Therefore, data from patients undergoing surgical intervention for gastric cancer over a 7-year period were analyzed. This study was retrospective and involved a preoperative investigation of six inflammatory parameters derived from complete blood counts. Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in the leucocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p = 0.048), along with a significant decrease in the number of lymphocytes and monocytes compared to patients with successful discharge. Taking into consideration patients undergoing emergency surgery, a significant increase in the LMR (p = 0.009), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = 0.004), Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI) (p = 0.01), and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) (p = 0.028) was observed. Regarding relapse, these patients exhibited significant increases in AISI (p = 0.032) and SII (p = 0.047). Inflammatory biomarkers represent a valuable tool in evaluating and predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Rationale and study design for an Individualized PeriopeRative Open lung VEntilatory approach in Emergency Abdominal Laparotomy/scopy: study protocol for a prospective international randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPostoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) are the most frequent postoperative complications, with an estimated prevalence in elective surgery ranging from 20% in observational cohort studies to 40% in randomized clinical trials. However, the prevalence of PPCs in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery is not well defined. Lung-protective ventilation aims to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury and reduce PPCs. The open lung approach (OLA), which combines recruitment manoeuvres (RM) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration, aims to minimize areas of atelectasis and the development of PPCs; however, there is no conclusive evidence in the literature that OLA can prevent PPCs. The purpose of this study is to compare an individualized perioperative OLA with conventional standardized lung-protective ventilation in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery with clinical signs of intraoperative lung collapse. MethodsRandomized international clinical trial to compare an individualized perioperative OLA (RM plus individualized PEEP and individualized postoperative respiratory support) with conventional lung-protective ventilation (standard PEEP of 5 cmH2O and conventional postoperative oxygen therapy) in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery with clinical signs of lung collapse. Patients will be randomised to open-label parallel groups. The primary outcome is any severe PPC during the first 7 postoperative days, including: acute respiratory failure, pneumothorax, weaning failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pulmonary infection. The estimated sample size is 732 patients (366 per group). The final sample size will be readjusted during the interim analysis. DiscussionThe Individualized Perioperative Open-lung Ventilatory Strategy in emergency abdominal laparotomy (iPROVE-EAL) is the first multicentre, randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether an individualized perioperative approach prevents PPCs in patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Associations between postoperative anaemia and unplanned readmission to hospital after major surgery: a retrospective cohort study†.

Anaemia following major surgery may be associated with unplanned readmission to hospital. However, the severity-response relationship between the degree of anaemia at discharge and the risk of unplanned readmission is poorly defined. We aimed to describe the severity-response relationship between haemoglobin concentration at the time of discharge and the risk of unplanned readmission in a cohort of patients undergoing different types of major surgery. We performed a retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary health service, including all patients who underwent major surgery (orthopaedic, abdominal, cardiac or thoracic) between 1 May 2011 and 1 February 2022. The primary outcome was unplanned readmission to hospital in the 90 days following discharge after the index surgical procedure. These complex, non-linear relationships were modelled with restricted cubic splines. We identified 22,134 patients and included 14,635 in the primary analysis, of whom 1804 (12%) experienced at least one unplanned readmission. The odds of unplanned readmission rose when the discharge haemoglobin concentration was < 100 g.l-1 (p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, the haemoglobin threshold below which odds of readmission began to increase appeared to be higher in patients undergoing emergency surgery (110 g.l-1; p < 0.001) compared with elective surgery. Declining discharge haemoglobin concentration was associated with increased odds ratios (95%CI) of unplanned readmission in patients undergoing orthopaedic (1.08 (1.01-1.15), p = 0.03), abdominal (1.13 (1.07-1.19), p < 0.001) and thoracic (1.12 (1.01-1.24), p = 0.03) procedures, but not cardiac surgery (1.09 (0.99-1.19), p = 0.07). Our findings suggest that a haemoglobin concentration < 100 g.l-1 following elective procedures and < 110 g.l-1 following emergency procedures, at the time of hospital discharge after major surgery, was associated with unplanned readmission. Future interventional trials that aim to treat postoperative anaemia and reduce unplanned readmission should include patients with discharge haemoglobin below these thresholds.

Determining a multidisciplinary intraoperative strategy in emergency surgery for bowel obstruction and its impact on outcomes.

Bowel obstruction accounts for around 50% of all emergency laparotomies. A multidisciplinary (MDT) standardized intraoperative model was applied (definitive, palliative, or damage control surgery) to identify patients suitable for a one-step, definitive surgical procedure favoring anastomosis over stoma, when undergoing surgery for bowel obstruction. The objective was to present mortality according to the strategy applied and to compare the rate of laparoscopic interventions and stoma creations to a historic cohort in surgery for bowel obstruction. In a retrospective cohort study, we included patients undergoing emergency surgery for bowel obstruction during a 1-year period at two Copenhagen University Hospitals (2019 and 2021). The MDT model consisted of a 30- and 60-min time-out with variables such as functional and hemodynamic status, presence of malignancy, and surgical capabilities (lap/open). Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected to investigate associations to postoperative complications and mortality. Stoma creation rates and laparoscopies were compared to a historic cohort (2009-2013). Three hundred sixty-nine patients underwent surgery for bowel obstruction. Intraoperative surgical strategy was definitive in 77.0%, palliative in 22.5%, and damage control surgery in 0.5%. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in the definitive patient population (4.6%) compared to the palliative population (21.7%) (p < 0.000). Compared to the historic cohort, laparoscopic surgery for bowel obstruction increased from 5.0 to 26.4% during the 10-year time span, the rate of stoma placements was reduced from 12.0 to 6.1%, p 0.014, and the 30-day mortality decreased from 12.9 to 4.6%, p < 0.000. An intraoperative improvement strategy can address the specific surgical interventions in patients undergoing surgery for bowel obstruction, favoring anastomosis over stoma whenever resection was needed, and help adjust specific postoperative interventions and care pathways in cases of palliative need.

Postoperative protocols for older adults undergoing emergency surgery: a scoping review.

As the population of older adults expands, it is becoming increasingly crucial to develop perioperative protocols to meet their physiologic, functional, and cognitive demands after emergency surgery. We sought to identify protocols that improve the disposition, length of stay, and overall health outcomes of older adults undergoing emergency intracavitary, noncardiac surgery. Embase, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases were searched, and results were deduplicated and uploaded to Covidence. We reviewed studies for postoperative interventions that reduced delirium, maintained functional status, and reduced length of stay in older patients undergoing emergency surgery. We included studies involving patients aged 65 years and older undergoing emergency intracavitary, noncardiac surgeries. Abstracts and full texts were reviewed by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted on the postoperative interventions used and the resulting patient outcomes. We included 6 studies, which involved patients undergoing emergency general, urology, and vascular surgery. Interventions included a multidisciplinary approach, early involvement of a geriatrician or hospitalist, targeted geriatric-led ward rounds, unique postoperative order sets, and volunteer-driven activities. Standard care included early removal of lines, early mobility, optimal hydration, and medication review. These interventions were associated with decreased length of stay, decreased postoperative complications, and increased likelihood of disposition to home and previous functional status. Frailty was correlated with worse outcomes. Through multidisciplinary interventions, a successful postoperative protocol for older patients undergoing emergency surgery is helpful for improving patient outcomes. The implications of these findings will help guide our own quality-improvement initiative to improve these outcomes in this patient population at our institution.

Analysing predictors of surgical site infections in patients undergoing emergency surgery for traumatic pulmonary haemorrhage.

Identifying predictors for surgical site infections (SSIs) after emergency surgical treatment for traumatic pulmonary haemorrhage (TPH) is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study aims to ascertain these predictors. In this comprehensive retrospective study, conducted from January 2020 to December 2023 at our institution, 75 patients were analysed, including a case group of 25 patients with SSIs and a control group of 50 without SSIs post-TPH surgery. Inclusion criteria focused on patients aged 18 and above undergoing thoracotomy or minimally invasive thoracic surgery for TPH. Exclusion criteria included compromised immune systems, chronic pulmonary diseases, prior thoracic surgery or active infections at admission. We assessed several predictors: anaemia; operation time over 2 h; hospital stay over 5 days; intraoperative blood loss exceeding 500 mL; body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2; age ≥ 50 years; use of surgical drains; the presence of open wounds; diabetes mellitus and non-prophylactic antibiotic use. Statistical analysis involved univariate and multivariate logistic regression, using SPSS Version 27.0. Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between SSIs and surgical drain placement, diabetes mellitus, open wounds and non-prophylactic antibiotic use (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed these factors as significant predictors of SSIs, with notable odds ratios. Other variables like anaemia, extended hospital stay, excessive intraoperative blood loss, older age and higher BMI did not significantly predict SSIs. Significant predictors for SSIs following TPH surgery include surgical drain placement, diabetes mellitus, open wounds and non-prophylactic antibiotic use. Identifying and managing these risks is crucial in clinical practice to reduce SSIs incidence and improve patient outcomes.

Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery for Complex Colorectal Cancer: Protocol and Piloting of the Surgical Utilization and Recovery Patterns for Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer Study.

Introduction: Globally, cancer is the leading cause of mortality, with colorectal neoplasia ranking third in terms of incidence and mortality worldwide. Patients face disease- and treatment-specific impacts, which can significantly influence their quality of life (QoL). Aim: This study aimed to propose a protocol to measure in-hospital and long-term QoL in patients with complicated colorectal cancer (CRC). Material and Methods: multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Results: QoL is a multidimensional concept that includes criteria for physical, mental, emotional, and social functionality as perceived by the patient. Periodically evaluating QoL offers measurable and objective tools to intervene at the appropriate time to decrease the Years of Life Lost and Years Lived with Disabilities for CRC patients. However, a structured and functional system requires dedicated and common institutional effort. A pilot study using this protocol included 69 patients, 65.12+-10.92 years, M:F ratio = 56.5:43.5%. Surgical procedure was right hemicolectomy, left colectomy, transverse colectomy, sigmoidectomy, total colectomy, rectal resection, and colorectal resection with stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) in 21.7%, 11.6%, 2.9%, 11.6%, 1.4%, 23.2%, and 27.5% of the cases, respectively. The mean Global Health Status Score, Symptom Score, and Functional Score was 82.36+-18.60, 11.89+-10.27, and 86.27, 74.50-94.11, respectively. Conclusions: CRC diagnosis has major effects on patients physical and psychological status, and concentrated efforts should be made by the involved medical team and healthcare systems to improve QoL throughout the treatment pathway.

Acil Abdominal Cerrahi Yapılan COVID-19 Hastalarında Postoperatif Komplikasyonların Öngördürücüleri

Amaç: COVID-19 dünya çapında hızla yayılması ve pandemi haline gelmesi, cerrahi hastalarda postoperatif komplikasyonların insidansında da artışa neden oldu. Acil ameliyata alınan hastalarda COVID-19 pozitifliğinin ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonları etkileyebileceği açıktır. Bu çalışmada acil abdominal cerrahi uygulanan COVID-19 hastalarında postoperatif komplikasyonlar için öngördürücü faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.&#x0D; Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada acil abdominal cerrahi uygulanan ve perioperatif 72 saat içerisinde COVID-19 Polimeraz Zincir Reaksiyonu (PCR) testi pozitif sonuçlanan 52 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi.&#x0D; Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların medyan yaşı 50.5’di (aralık: 18-83). 30 günlük mortalite oranı %15.4 olarak saptandı. Postoperatif komplikasyon oranı %23.1’di. Postoperatif komplikasyon durumu ile yaş (p=0.003) ve preoperatif hemoglobin değeri (p=0.001) arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptandı. Yaş ve hemoglobinin birlikte değerlendirilmesinin postoperatif komplikasyonlar için sensivitesinin %91.7, spesifitesinin %87.5 olduğu görüldü (p

Petersen's hernia after gastric cancer surgery: Unravelling clinical characteristics and optimal management approaches.

Petersen's hernia is a rare and serious complication that can occur after radical gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction for gastric cancer. This article summarises the symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of Petersen's hernia after surgery for gastric cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 11 male patients who were diagnosed with Petersen's hernia and underwent surgical treatment at our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. Their clinical manifestations, perioperative conditions and follow-up after treatment were collected. The median age was 58.5 years (range: 45-73), and the median time since gastrectomy was 24 months (range: 4-125). Open distal gastrectomy (45.5%) and open total gastrectomy (27.3%) were the most common procedures. Roux-en-Y (81.8%) was the predominant anastomosis method. All patients underwent emergency surgery within a median time of 30 h (range: 4-45). Intestine necrosis occurred in 36.4% of cases, with a perioperative death rate of 27.3%. Petersen's hernia after gastric cancer surgery can quickly lead to necrotising intestinal obstruction and poor prognosis. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography should be performed as soon as possible, and early exploratory laparotomy should be done to avoid intestinal necrosis. Routine closure of the mesenteric defect after gastric cancer resection can prevent the occurrence of Petersen's hernia. This article highlights the need for increased awareness and preventive measures to minimise the occurrence of Petersen's hernia in gastric cancer patients. It emphasises the importance of early detection and appropriate management strategies for improved patient outcomes.

Association Of Opioid Prescribing And Consumption With Patient-Reported Experiences And Satisfaction Following Emergency Surgery In Michigan.

To investigate the relationships between opioid prescribing, consumption, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in emergency surgery patients. Overprescribing of opioids for pain management after surgery has become a public health concern and major contributor to opioid misuse and dependency. Current guidelines do not address opioid prescribing following emergency surgical procedures, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationship between opioid prescribing and consumption in this setting. Retrospective analysis of the quantity of opioids prescribed and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a population-based setting. The sample included adults 18 years and older undergoing emergency surgery across 69 hospitals in Michigan. Patients were included if they received a discharge opioid prescription and had valid data for opioid consumption and PROs. Surgical procedures took place between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. During the study period, a total of 3,742 patients underwent an emergency operation. The mean number of opioid pills prescribed was 9.6 and the mean number of opioid pills consumed was 4.6. In a two-model with logit in the first part and a linear regression in the second, prescription size was significantly associated with both the probability of consumption (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04) and the amount of consumption conditional on any consumption (coefficient 0.70 95% CI 0.54-0.86). Patients only consumed half of the opioids they were prescribed after undergoing emergency surgery. Additionally, patients who were given larger prescriptions consumed more opioids, but did not experience less pain, higher satisfaction, better quality of life, or less regret to undergo surgery. Overall, this suggests that opioids may be excessively prescribed to patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures, and that larger prescriptions do not improve the patient experience after surgery.

Postoperative Outcomes After Emergency Surgery in COVID-19 Patients: An Ambispective Matched Cohort Study.

Purpose There is limited data from the Indian subcontinent regarding the surgical outcomes of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomesafter emergency surgery in COVID-19 patients compared to concurrent age and gender-matched controls. We also sought to analyze the possible predictors of postoperative mortality in COVID-19 patients. Methods This matched cohort study was conductedin a tertiary care teaching hospital in central India, between 1st July 2021 and 30th June 2022. COVID-19-positive patients undergoing emergency surgery under anesthesia were recruited as cases. Age and gender-matched COVID-19-negative patients undergoing a similar nature of surgery in the same period served as concurrent controls. The cases and controls were compared for the 30-day mortality and perioperative complications. Results The COVID-19-positive surgical cohort had a 12.3 times greater 30-day postoperative overall mortality risk as compared to a matched cohort of patients with a negative COVID-19 test. A positive COVID-19 status was associated with more postoperative complications of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, shock, and persistent hyperglycemia. On analysis of predictors of mortality, the presence of preoperative dyspnea, ARDS, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Class IIIE/IVE, increase in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, Quick SOFA>1, higher creatinine, bilirubin, and lower albumin were observed to be associated with increased mortality. Conclusions Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in patients undergoing emergency surgery is significantly associated with higher postoperative complications and increased 30-day postoperative mortality.

Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) scoring system in predicting postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: A retrospective study.

There is paucity of studies on preoperative risk assessment tools in patients undergoing emergency surgery. The present study evaluated the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification system in patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy. This retrospective study included 60 adult patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy for perforation peritonitis. The clinical details, ASA PS classification, laboratory investigations and postoperative course of patients were retrieved from their medical records. Based on these details, APACHE II and ACS-NSQIP were calculated for the patients. The study's primary outcome was the accuracy of the preoperative APACHE II, ACS-NSQIP risk calculator and ASA PS class in predicting the postoperative 30-day mortality of patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of APACHE II, ACS-NSQIP score, and ASA PS classification for mortality 30 days after surgery was 0.737, 0.694 and 0.601, respectively. The P value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test of scoring systems was 0.05, 0.25 and 0.05, respectively. AUC for postoperative complications was 0.799 for APACHE II, 0.683 for ACS-NSQIP and 0.601 for ASA PS classification. H-L test of these scoring systems for complications after surgery revealed P values of 0.62, 0.36 and 0.53, respectively. Compared to the ACS-NSQIP and ASA PS classification system, the APACHE II score has a better discriminative ability for postoperative complications and mortality in adult patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy.

Disparities in prehospital and emergency surgical care among patients with perforated ulcers and a history of mental illness: a nationwide cohort study

PurposeTo compare patients with and without a history of mental illness on process and outcome measures in relation to prehospital and emergency surgical care for patients with perforated ulcer.MethodsA nationwide registry-based cohort study of patients undergoing emergency surgery for perforated ulcer. We used data from the Danish Prehospital Database 2016–2017 and the Danish Emergency Surgery Registry 2004–2018 combined with data from other Danish databases. Patients were categorized according to severity of mental health history.ResultsWe identified 4.767 patients undergoing emergency surgery for perforated ulcer. Among patients calling the EMS with no history of mental illness, 51% were identified with abdominal pain when calling the EMS compared to 31% and 25% among patients with a history of moderate and major mental illness, respectively. Median time from hospital arrival to surgery was 6.0 h (IQR: 3.6;10.7). Adjusting for age, sex and comorbidity, patients with a history of major mental illness underwent surgery 46 min (95% CI: 4;88) later compared to patients with no history of mental illness. Median number of days-alive-and-out-of-hospital at 90-day follow-up was 67 days (IQR: 0;83). Adjusting for age, sex and comorbidity, patients with a history of major mental illness had 9 days (95% CI: 4;14) less alive and out-of-hospital at 90-day follow-up.ConclusionOne-third of the population had a history of mental illness or vulnerability. Patients with a history of major mental illness were less likely to be identified with abdominal pain if calling the EMS prior to arrival. They had longer delays from hospital arrival to surgery and higher mortality.

Risk prediction models in emergency surgery: Protocol for a scoping review.

Risk prediction models are used for many purposes in emergency surgery, including critical care triage and benchmarking. Several risk prediction models have been developed, and some are used for purposes other than those for which they were developed. We aim to provide an overview of the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps. We will conduct a scoping review on risk prediction models used for patients undergoing emergency surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and include all study designs. We aim to answer the following questions: (1) What risk prediction models are used in emergency surgery? (2) Which variables are used in these models? (3) Which surgical specialties are the models used for? (4) Have the models been externally validated? (5) Where have the models been externally validated? (6) What purposes were the models developed for? (7) What are the strengths and limitations of the included models? We will summarize the results descriptively. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The outlined scoping review will summarize the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps.

Clinical Characteristics, Surgical Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Emergency Surgery in Patients With Spinal Metastases: A Prospective Cohort Study.

To elucidate the patient characteristics and outcomes of emergency surgery for spinal metastases and identify risk factors for emergency surgery. We prospectively analyzed 216 patients with spinal metastases who underwent palliative surgery from 2015 to 2020. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Barthel index, EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ5D), and neurological function were assessed at surgery and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for emergency surgery. In total, 146 patients underwent nonemergency surgery and 70 patients underwent emergency surgery within 48 hours of diagnosis of a surgical indication. After propensity score matching, we compared 61 patients each who underwent nonemergency and emergency surgery. Regardless of matching, the median performance status and the mean Barthel index and EQ5D score showed a tendency toward worse outcomes in the emergency than nonemergency group both preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively, although the surgery greatly improved these values in both groups. The median survival time tended to be shorter in the emergency than nonemergency group. The multivariate analysis showed that lesions located at T3-10 (p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-5.75) and Frankel grades A-C (p < 0.001; OR, 4.91; 95% CI, 2.45-9.86) were independent risk factors for emergency surgery. Among patients with spinal metastases, preoperative and postoperative subjective health values and postoperative survival are poorer in emergency than nonemergency surgery. Close attention to patients with T3-10 metastases is required to avoid poor outcomes after emergency surgery.

Multifaceted surgical approach of combined thoracoretroperitoneal incision and midline abdominal incision for a secondary aortoenteric fistula

BackgroundWe report a one-stage surgery to the case of secondary aortoenteric fistula (sAEF) after prosthetic reconstruction of abdominal aortic aneurysm, by multifaceted approach.Case presentationA 63-year-old male was admitted to our unit under diagnosed of sAEF after prosthetic reconstruction of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and a pseudoaneurysm of thoracoabdominal aorta due to infection. The patient underwent emergency operation. Firstly, we placed the patient in a modified right lateral decubitus position and performed thoracoabdominal aortic replacement with retroperitoneal approach by thoracoretroperitoneal incision which combined thoracotomy and pararectal incision, and secondly, we changed to a supine position and performed closure of the duodenal fistula and omental flap transposition by midline abdominal incision. The patient was doing well without complications.ConclusionsA one-stage, multifaceted surgical approach covering both prosthetic reconstruction of thoracoabdominal aorta and closure of sAEF with omentopexy is reasonable and useful strategy.

Improving access to patient information leaflets in patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy

Background&#x0D; Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical surgical practise. Patients undergoing emergency surgery have reduced time to consider their options when compared to the elective setting. Therefore, improving informed consent in this setting is critical. We aim to increase the provision of a pre-operative patient information leaflet (PIL) for patients undergoing an emergency appendicectomy by 50% over two audit cycles.&#x0D; Methods&#x0D; The same methodology were used for both cycles of this audit. Patients were identified through histopathology lists over a two week period. Medical notes were reviewed for documentation of provision of trust approved patient information leaflets. A QR code for an electronic version of the information leaflet was added to emergency clinic rooms, doctors handover rooms and the SHO on call bleep between audit periods.&#x0D; Results&#x0D; Empirical results from two audit cycles revealed that introduction of a QR code increased uptake from 0% of patients receiving the recommended appendicectomy leaflet, to 58%, achieving our aim.&#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; The QR code provided a useful transportable resource, which was utilised by doctors. This provides scope for progression in provision of leaflet for other surgical issues, both in inpatient and outpatient settings, through utilisation of a QR code.