Radiofrequency Ablation In Patients Research Articles

A comparison of cyanoacrylate closure to radiofrequency ablation techniques for treatment of truncal venous insufficiency

Aim: Cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) has become an alternative to endothermal ablative therapies for chronic venous insufficiency. In this study, we aimed to present our experience with CAC in comparison with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and discuss the application techniques thereof.Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed for adult patients who underwent CAC or RFA for great saphenous vein insufficiency during two years to identify baseline patient and disease characteristics, procedural details and outcomes. The primary outcome was a complete occlusion rate. Secondary outcomes were adverse events/complications and the quality of recovery.Results: In this study, 36 patients (mean age 48.3 ± 11.2 years with 27 women) were treated with either CAC (n =19) or RFA (n = 17) during the defined period. At follow-up, after a mean duration of 8.5 ± 2.2 months, the closure rates were similar at 18/19 vs. 17/17, respectively. Apart from phlebitis and pigmentation, the incidences of bruising, skin burn and paresthesia were lower in the CAC group compared to the RFA group. The mean procedural times were shorter for CAC. In both groups, the Venous Clinical Severity Score significantly improved from baseline to last follow-up, somewhat better in the RFA group. The satisfaction level with the treatment was moderately higher among RFA patients than CAC patients, as well.Conclusion: The findings suggest that while it shortens the procedural time and does not require postoperative stockings, CAC is not a miraculous alternative for those who can duly administer tumescent anesthesia

Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of thyroid follicular neoplasm with low SUV in PET/CT study

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on follicular neoplasm with low standard uptake value (SUV) in a Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) study. Methods From January 2018 to July 2019, 86 consecutive patients were diagnosed with follicular neoplasm. Of the patients, 28 with PET/CT scans were enrolled in this study. All patients received ultrasound, fine/core needle aspiration, and PET/CT scan prior to treatment. In accordance with previous studies, we recommended 6 patients who had follicular neoplasm with SUVmax ≥5 undergo surgical resection due to an elevated suspicion of malignancy. For 22 patients SUVmax <5, RFA was performed using the moving shot technique. Ultrasound was performed 6 to 12 months after each procedure. Results Statistically significant volume reductions during follow-up between values prior to RFA and 12 months post RFA were demonstrated (12.6 ± 20.9 vs. 2.4 ± 3.0 cm3, p < 0.001). Volume reduction ratios at 6–12 months (mean: 10.1 months) after RFA were 73.3% ± 17.7%. One patient presented with vocal cord palsy and recovered within 3 months after RFA. No postprocedural hypothyroidism occurred in the RFA patients. Conclusions By using PET/CT, we can select patients with low SUV follicular neoplasm. RFA offers a safe and feasible alternative treatment option for patients unsuitable or unwilling to undergo surgery. KEY POINTS By using positron emission tomography-computed tomography, we can distinguish low SUV follicular neoplasm for radiofrequency ablation. For low SUV follicular neoplasm, RF ablation offers a safe and effective alternative treatment option for patients unsuitable or unwilling to undergo surgery.

Effect of oral administration of branched-chain amino acids supplementation on the mortality of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Objective: To investigate the effect of oral administration of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) supplementation on the mortality of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after treatment. Methods: Computer searching of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database was conducted to search for clinical controlled trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of oral administration of BCAA on the mortality of patients with HCC. The retrieval time limit was from the time of the establishment of each database to December 30, 2019. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. Another researcher assessed the risk of bias in the included studies and then used RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 14 studies were included with 1 179 patients. The overall results showed that oral administration of BCAA had no significant effect on the mortality of HCC patients at 1 year after treatment (RR=0.85, 95%CI:0.68-1.06, P=0.16), while the mortalities of patients at 3 years (RR=0.73, 95%CI: 0.61-0.88, P=0.000 7) and 5 years (RR=0.57, 95%CI:0.34-0.96, P=0.03) after treatment were significantly lower than those of the control group. The subgroup analysis showed that for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) patients, there was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between the BCAA group and the control group (RR=0.96, 95%CI:0.14-6.5, P=0.97), while 3-year mortality was significantly reduced (RR=0.59, 95%CI:0.43-0.81, P=0.001); for hepatectomy patients, there was no significant differences in 1 -and 3-year mortality between the two groups (RR=0.90, 95%CI:0.44-1.88, P=0.79; RR=0.97, 95%CI:0.71-1.33, P=0.85, respectively). In addition, as for albumin levels, BCAA supplementation significantly increased albumin levels without considering the treatment of HCC (SD=0.45, 95%CI: 0.29-0.90; P=0.000 1), but had no significant effect on hepatectomy patients (SD=0, 95%CI: -0.41-0.41, P=0.99). Conclusion: BCAA supplementation might improve liver reserve function and long-term prognosis of HCC patients, which was related to the surgical method. Supplementing BCAA reduced the long-term mortality of RFA patients, but had no significant effect on hepatectomy patients.

Cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node in patients with His-bundle pacing.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the atrioventricular node (AVN) with His-bundle pacing (HBP) can cause rise in capture thresholds. Cryoablation (CRYO) may offer reversibility in case of threshold rise but has never been tested for AVN ablation in this setting. Our aim was to compare procedural characteristics and outcome of CRYO compared with RFA for AVN ablation in patients with HBP. Forty-four patients with HBP underwent AVN ablation for an 'ablate and pace' indication. Cryoablation was performed in the first 22 patients and RFA in the following 22 patients. Procedural characteristics, success rates, and change in His capture thresholds were compared between groups. Distance from the ablation site to the His lead was measured using biplane fluoroscopy. Acute success was 100% with both strategies. Median procedural duration was significantly longer for CRYO {50 [interquartile range (IQR) 38-63] min} compared with RFA [36 (IQR, 30-41) min; P = 0.027]. An acute threshold rise of ≥1 V was observed in four CRYO (one complete loss of capture) and three RFA patients (P = 0.38), with all of the applications being within 6 mm of the His lead tip. During follow-up, nine patients had AVN re-conduction (six CRYO vs. three RFA; P = 0.58), but only four patients required a redo procedure (all CRYO; P = 0.09). Cryoablation does not offer any advantage over RFA for AVN ablation in patients with HBP and tended to require more redo procedures. If possible, a distance of ≥6 mm should be maintained from the His lead tip to avoid a rise in capture thresholds.

Radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background:Several randomized control trials (RCTs) were conducted to compare microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over the years. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of RFA and MWA for early stage HCC.Methods:Studies were systematically searched on Emabse, Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library until March 20, 2020. Continuous variables and dichotomous variables were compared using weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR), respectively. For the comparison of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted from univariate analysis or survival plots.Results:A total of 26 studies (5 RCTs and 21 cohorts) with 4396 patients (2393 patients in RFA and 2003 patients in MWA) were included in our study. Of these patients, 47% received treatment under general anesthesia in the MWA group and 84% in the RFA group (OR = 0.529, P < .001). The median ablation time was reduced in the MWA group (12 minutes) compared with RFA group (29 minutes) (WMD = –15.674, P < .001). In total, 17.6% patients exhibited progression during follow-up in the MWA group compared with 19.5% in the RFA group (OR = 0.877, P = .225). No statistically significant differences were observed between MWA and RFA groups in terms of OS and DFS (HR = 0.891 and 1.014, P = .222 and .852, respectively).Conclusions:MWA exhibited similar therapeutic effects as RFA in the treatment of early stage HCC. Given the shorter ablation time, MWA can be performed under local anesthesia.

Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Aim: We aimed to compare the survival outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) for patients with small early-stage primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Methods: Patients with small (≤5 cm) and early-stage ICC were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates between the SR and RFA patients were evaluated. The results were verified using an inverse probability-weighting model (IPTW).Results: In total, 184 patients with small T1 stage ICC that received RFA or SR treatment were identified. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.4, 73.3, and 61.5% for patients who underwent SR, respectively, and 89.9, 42.4, and 23.9%, respectively, for patients who received RFA. CSS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.5, 73.8, and 66.1%, respectively, for the SR group and 93.5, 53.4, and 30.0%, respectively, for the RFA group. The OS and CSS rates were evaluated to be significantly better in the SR group than in the RFA group after the multivariate Cox regression and IPTW analysis. Subsequently, the survival benefit of SR was also observed in the subgroup of patients with <4.5 or <4 cm early-stage ICC when compared with RFA.Conclusion: Our results indicated that the SR provided a significantly better prognosis than RFA in patients with small and early-stage ICC. SR as the first-line treatment of primary early-stage ICC is still recommended. However, prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to compare these modalities in the treatment of ICC.

Treatment of Superficial Venous Reflux in CEAP 6 Patients: A Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Glue and Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques

Abstract Objective Venous leg ulcers (CEAP [clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic] class 6) represent the most severe form of chronic venous insufficiency. As closure techniques for superficial venous reflux evolve, direct outcome comparisons of treatments are integral, because many studies have already demonstrated that early endovenous intervention improves wound healing. The present study compared the rates of venous wound healing between two techniques of superficial vein closure: ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and adhesive closure (VenaSeal; both Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). Methods We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of all patients with CEAP class 6 who had undergone closure of their truncal veins from 2015 to 2020. Patients undergoing ClosureFast RFA were compared with those undergoing VenaSeal adhesive closure. The primary endpoint was the interval to wound healing from initial vein closure. The secondary endpoints included ulcer recurrence and infection rates. Bivariate analysis involved the χ2, Fisher exact, t, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine the factors affecting the time to wound healing in the most predictive model. Statistical significance was defined as P Results A total of 119 patients with CEAP 6 were included, with a median follow-up of 105 days (interquartile range, 44-208 days). Of the 119 limbs, 68 were treated with RFA and 51 with VenaSeal. Significantly more patients undergoing RFA had had a history of deep vein thrombosis (29% vs 10%; P = .01) and deep venous reflux (82% vs 51%; P = .003). The VenaSeal patients were older (72 years vs 65 years; P = .02) with a greater rate of coronary artery disease (16% vs 37%; P = .01). The median time to wound healing after the procedure was significantly shorter for VenaSeal than for RFA (43 vs 104 days; P = .001). Two RFA patients developed a postprocedure infection. The ulcer recurrence rate was 19.3% (22.1% for RFA vs 13.7% for VenaSeal; P = .25). On multivariate analysis, the treatment modality was the only significant predictor of the time to wound healing. When stratified by ulcer size as small ( 3 cm2), VenaSeal closure healed the wounds significantly faster for all ulcers. Conclusion ClosureFast and VenaSeal are both safe and effective treatments to eliminate truncal venous insufficiency. VenaSeal showed a superior time to wound healing compared with ClosureFast in both large and small ulcers.

Non-surgical Treatments for Lung Metastases in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA).

Radio-frequency ablation (RFA) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) are two emerging therapies for lung metastases. Aliterature review was performed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of these procedures in patients with lung metastases from soft tissue sarcoma (STS). After selection, seven studies were included for each treatment encompassing a total of 424 patients: 218 in the SBRT group and 206 in the RFA group. The mean age ranged from 47.9 to 64 years in the SBRT group and from 48 to 62.7 years in the RFA group. The most common histologic subtype was, in both groups, leiomyosarcoma. In the SBRT group, median overall survival ranged from 25.2 to 69 months and median disease- free interval was from 8.4 to 45 months. Two out of seven studies reported G3 and one G3 toxicity, respectively. In RFA patients, overall survival ranged from 15 to 50 months. The most frequent complication was pneumothorax. Local control showed a high percentage for both procedures. SBRT is recommended in patients unsuitable to surgery, in synchronous bilateral pulmonary metastases, in case of deep lesions and patients receiving high-risk systemic therapies. RFA is indicated in case of a long disease-free interval, in oligometastatic disease, when only the lung is involved, in small size lesions far from large vessels. Further large randomized studies are necessary to establish whether these treatments may also represent a reliable alternative to surgery.

Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful osseous metastases: A comparative correlation meta-analysis of pain relief.

e24156 Background: Osseous metastases (OMs), a common cause of cancer pain, are only partially palliated by analgesics. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are increasingly used, but the comparative effectiveness of SBRT vs. RFA for OMs has not been adequately evaluated. Herein we analyzed palliative benefits of SBRT and RFA in terms of pain relief from OMs. Methods: A systematic review was performed for all studies reporting palliative outcomes of SBRT (defined as five or fewer fractions of radiation) or RFA for palliation of OMs. Studies not reporting pain palliation were excluded. Random effects model determined the net Pearson correlation (R2) for post-SBRT and post-RFA pain reduction over time. The pooled correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval were calculated using Fisher r-to- z transformation. Risk of bias was assessed using sunset plots; heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and meta-regression. Results: Seven full-text articles assessed a total of 1100 SBRT patients and 22 full-text articles assessed a total of 557 RFA patients. No studies directly compared SBRT to RFA. All included studies collected data on pain related to OM disease pre- and post-therapy. The scales used included the visual analog scale (2 SBRT, 15 RFA), brief pain inventory (4 SBRT, 4 RFA), numeric rating scale (0 SBRT, 2 RFA), QLQ-15 (1 SBRT, 0 RFA), or the memorial pain index card (0 SBRT, 1 RFA). Mean SBRT dose and fractions were 17.3 gy and 2.6. Median follow-up was 24 weeks for SBRT and 18 weeks for RFA, with median pain reduction of 59% (R2=0.83, 95%CI:0.80-0.87, I2=58.63%) and 64% (R2=0.52, 95%CI:0.41-0.62, I2=48.16%) respectively. Meta-regression by number of fractions and reporting metric fully accounted for heterogeneity in the SBRT and RFA data respectively. Sunset plots did not indicate significant publication bias. Conclusions: The published literature is predominately non-randomized, limiting the evidence level. Pain reduction and durability post-SBRT or post-RFA are comparable. Pre-SBRT or RFA therapies may obscure the full effect of either treatment modality. SBRT and RFA for painful OMs are associated with pain relief in a majority of patients, but the durability of this relief and the comparative efficacy of SBRT vs. RFA for this purpose has been inadequately reported in the literature. Future, combinatorial therapies as opposed to single-modality approaches may help to increase overall pain relief and durability as well as efficaciously palliating treatment-resistant patients.

Paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes with the pulmonary vein ablation catheter GOLD duty-cycled phased radiofrequency ablation catheter: quality of life and 12-month efficacy results from the GOLD Atrial Fibrillation Registry.

AimsThe GOLD AF Registry has been designed to prospectively assess the population, indications, and outcomes using second-generation phased radiofrequency (RF) ablation (pulmonary vein ablation catheter GOLD) in a global examination of standard-of-care use for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods and resultsGOLD AF (NCT02433613) is a prospective, observational, multi-centre registry designed to characterize efficacy and safety of phased RF ablation in patients with AF. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF recurrence at 12-month follow-up after a 90-day blanking period. Ancillary objectives include safety, procedural efficiency, and quality of life (QoL). The QoL assessment using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Score of AF-related symptoms was collected at baseline and 12 months. In total, 1054 patients were included in this analysis (age 60.6, 67.6% male, 26.5% PersAF). Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from AF recurrence was 77.7% at 12 months. Peri-procedural device or procedure-related complications were observed in 26 (2.5%) patients, with a low stroke rate of 0.3%. One-year post-ablation, the EHRA AF Symptom score decreased in 68% of patients. The AFEQT score improvement was observed in 88.4% and 90.4% of patients who completed the questionnaire in-person or interviewed by phone at 12 month follow-up, respectively.ConclusionPhased RF ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF demonstrated a 77.7% freedom from AF recurrence at 12 months in addition to a significant reduction in arrhythmia symptoms and clinically meaningful improved QoL. Low peri-procedural complication rate of <3% was reported.

Five-year extension study of patients from a randomized clinical trial (VeClose) comparing cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins

ObjectiveThe proprietary cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) system vs radiofrequency ablation (RFA) trial (VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System Pivotal Study [VeClose]) showed that CAC, a nontumescent, nonthermal, nonsclerosant ablation technique, was effective and noninferior to RFA in vein closure with good 36-month outcomes. Conducted under a separate protocol, the aim of this extended follow-up was to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of CAC and RFA for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) at 5 years (60 months) of follow-up. MethodsThis 60-month extension study was conducted for all patients who completed the randomized VeClose study and who were willing to participate. The pivotal VeClose study included patients with symptomatic moderate to severe varicosities (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] class C2-C4b) and symptomatic GSV incompetence who were randomly assigned (1:1) to either CAC or RFA. The primary outcome measure of this 60-month extension study was complete closure of the target vein, with planned exploratory analysis of noninferiority. Secondary outcomes included CEAP class; completion of the Venous Clinical Severity Score, EuroQol-Five Dimension survey, and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire; patient satisfaction with treatment; adverse events (AEs) related to target GSV; and details of adjunctive procedures. ResultsA total of 89 patients completed the 60-month visit, which included 47 from the CAC group, 33 from the RFA group, and 9 CAC roll-in patients. No new recanalization events have been observed in the groups between 36 and 60 months of follow-up. At 60 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from recanalization in the randomized CAC and RFA groups were 91.4% and 85.2%, respectively, demonstrating noninferiority of CAC compared with RFA. Both groups demonstrated sustained improvements in EuroQol-Five Dimension and quality of life measures through 60 months. Whereas patients assigned to C0 or C1 clinical class were excluded from the original study, more than half of all returning patients (64% [57/89]) were now assigned to C0 or C1, suggesting an improved clinical class from baseline. Furthermore, 41.1% of returning CAC patients and 39.4% of returning RFA patients are presently at least two CEAP clinical classes lower than at baseline. No long-term device- or procedure-related serious AEs occurred in either group between 36- and 60-month follow-up. ConclusionsCAC and RFA were effective in achieving complete target vein closure of the GSV at long-term follow-up, with CAC demonstrating continued noninferiority to RFA. CAC was also associated with sustained improvements in symptoms and quality of life, lower CEAP class, and high level of patient satisfaction without serious AEs between 36 and 60 months.

A multicenter study comparing the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation in patients with heart failure (CRABL-HF): Study design.

BackgroundCatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly performed worldwide in patients with heart failure (HF). However, it has been recently emphasized that AF ablation in patients with HF is associated with increased risks of procedure‐related complications and mortality. There are little data about the differences in the efficacy and safety between cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation of AF in patients with HF.MethodsThe CRABL‐HF study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, open‐label, controlled, and randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of AF ablation between CB and RF ablation in patients with HF (LVEF ≤40%) (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000032433). The CRABL‐HF study will consist of 110 patients at multicenter in Japan. The patients will be registered and randomly assigned to either the CB ablation or RF ablation group with a 1:1 allocation. The primary endpoint of this study is the occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) at 1 year with a blanking period of 90 days after ablation. Key secondary endpoints are the success rate of the pulmonary vein isolation, total procedural time, left atrial dwelling time, total fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, complication rate, composite of all‐cause mortality or HF hospitalizations, cardiovascular events, change in left ventricular ejection fraction, and change in quality of life.ResultsThe results of this study are currently under investigation.ConclusionThe CRABL‐HF study is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of AF between CB and RF ablation in patients with HF.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Few studies have been conducted to compare the efficacies of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Thus, in this multinational study, we compared the effectiveness of SBRT and RFA in patients with unresectable HCC. The retrospective study cohort included 2,064 patients treated in 7 hospitals: 1,568 and 496 in the RFA and SBRT groups, respectively. More than half of the patients (56.5%) developed recurrent tumors, mainly after transarterial chemoembolization (44.8%). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for clinical factors (n= 313 in each group). At baseline, the SBRT group had unfavorable clinical features compared to the RFA group, including BCLC stage (B-C 65% vs. 16%), tumor size (median 3.0 cm vs. 1.9 cm), and frequent history of liver-directed treatment (81% vs. 49%, all p <0.001). With a median follow-up of 27.7 months, the 3-year cumulative local recurrence rates in the SBRT and RFA groups were 21.2% and 27.9%, respectively (p <0.001). After adjusting for clinical factors, SBRT was related to a significantly lower risk of local recurrence than RFA in both the entire (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, p <0.001) and matched (HR 0.36, p <0.001) cohorts. In subgroup analysis, SBRT was associated with superior local control in small tumors (≤3 cm) irrespective of location, large tumors located in the subphrenic region, and those that progressed after transarterial chemoembolization. Acute grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 1.6% and 2.6% of the SBRT and RFA patients, respectively (p= 0.268). SBRT could be an effective alternative to RFA for unresectable HCC, particularly for larger tumors (>3 cm) in a subphrenic location and tumors that have progressed after transarterial chemoembolization. It is currently not known what the best treatment option is for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we show that stereotactic body radiation therapy provides better local control than radiofrequency ablation, with comparable toxicities. Stereotactic body radiation therapy appears to be an effective alternative to radiofrequency ablation that should be considered when there is a higher risk of local recurrence or toxicity after radiofrequency ablation.

Effect of Perfluorobutane Microbubbles on Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Suppression of Steam Popping and Its Clinical Implication.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid®, GE Healthcare) on steam popping during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to assess whether popping affects treatment outcomes.Materials and MethodsThe institutional review board approved this retrospective study, which included 90 consecutive patients with single HCC, who received percutaneous RF ablation as the first-line treatment. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the presence or absence of the popping phenomenon, which was defined as an audible sound with a simultaneous sudden explosion within the ablation zone as detected via ultrasonography during the procedure. The factors contributing to the popping phenomenon were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Local tumor progression (LTP) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test for performing comparisons between the two groups.ResultsThe overall incidence of the popping phenomenon was 25.8% (24/93). Sonazoid® was used in 1 patient (4.2%) in the popping group (n = 24), while it was used in 15 patients (21.7%) in the non-popping group (n = 69). Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of Sonazoid® was the only significant factor for absence of the popping phenomenon (odds ratio = 0.10, p = 0.048). There were no significant differences in cumulative LTP and DFS between the two groups (p = 0.479 and p = 0.424, respectively).ConclusionThe use of Sonazoid® has a suppressive effect on the popping phenomenon during RF ablation in patients with HCC. However, the presence of the popping phenomenon may not affect clinical outcomes.

Hepatectomy with concomitant ablation: Comparison of radiofrequency and microwave techniques

Presenter: Elizabeth Gleeson MD, MPH | Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Hospital Background: Hepatectomy with concomitant ablation expands the pool of patients who otherwise would be relegated to systemic chemotherapy alone. Most analyses of hepatic ablation have focused on patients managed without concomitant hepatectomy and/or have not compared ablative techniques. For the past decade, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been utilized most often. However, in recent years microwave ablation (MA) has been gaining popularity. The aims of this study were to compare the utilization over time and the outcomes of RFA and MA in North American patients undergoing hepatectomy. Methods: Patients undergoing hepatectomy with concomitant ablation were identified in the 2014-17 ACS-NSQIP procedure targeted database. Patients having concomitant biliary enteric anastomoses or colectomy were excluded. Patients having radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MA) were compared over time by control charts. RFA and MA patients were propensity score matched based on their age, race, disseminated cancer, operative approach, hepatectomy extent and perioperative transfusions. Outcomes were compared by chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Of 1,589 patients undergoing concomitant hepatectomy and ablation, 964 (60%) had RFA and 635 (40%) receive MA. Control chart analysis over 16 quarters demonstrated no change in the frequency of RFA with an average of 60 procedures per quarter. In comparison, the quarterly frequency of MA increased from a low of 21 to a high of 79 (p<0.05). After matching, RFA and MA patients had similar mortality, serious morbidity, bile leaks, post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), organ space infections (OSI), reoperations and length of stay (Table). However, MA was associated with lower rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and sepsis (each p<0.05). Conclusion: In recent years microwave ablation (MA) is being utilized more frequently in patients undergoing hepatectomy while concomitant radiofrequency ablation (RFA) rates have not changed. MA is associated with fewer postoperative deep vein thrombosis and lower rates of procedure related sepsis.

Deep Learning Radiomics Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Might Optimize Curative Treatments for Very-Early or Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Background: We aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL)-based Radiomics strategy designed for analyzing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to not only predict the progression-free survival (PFS) of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) but also optimize the treatment selection between them for patients with very-early or early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 419 patients examined by CEUS within 1 week before receiving RFA or SR (RFA: 214, SR: 205) from January 2008 to 2016. Two Radiomics signatures were constructed by the Radiomics model R-RFA and R-SR to stratify PFS of different treatment groups. Then, RFA and SR nomograms were built by incorporating Radiomics signatures and significant clinical variables to achieve individualized 2-year PFS prediction. Finally, we applied both Radiomics models and both nomograms to each enrolled patient to investigate whether there were space for treatment optimization and how much prognostic improvement could be expected. Results: R-RFA and R-SR showed remarkable discrimination (C-index: 0.726 for RFA, 0.741 for SR). RFA and SR nomograms provided good 2-year PFS prediction accuracy and good calibrations. We identified 17.3% RFA patients and 27.3% SR patients should swap their treatment, so their average probability of 2-year PFS would increase 12 and 15%, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed Radiomics models and nomograms achieved accurate preoperative prediction of PFS for RFA and SR, and they could facilitate the optimized treatment selection between them for patients with very-early or early-stage HCC.

Comparison of foam sclerotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary varicose veins due to incompetent great saphenous vein: Randomized clinical trial

Minimally invasive procedures such as foam sclerotherapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have gained attention for treatment of incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV). The objective of this study was to compare recurrence rate and quality of life between foam sclerotherapy and RFA in patients with incompetent GSV varicose veins. In this parallel single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 60 adult patients with primary varicose veins due to incompetent GSV (CEAP classes C2-4EPAsPr) were included and randomly divided to receive RFA or foam sclerotherapy. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed by the Short Form 36, and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) was applied to assess the impact of varicose veins on quality of life of the patients. In addition, pain severity after the procedures was investigated by a visual analog scale (VAS) (range, 0 to 10). The patients were followed at 1week, 1month, 3months, and 6 months postoperation. GSV reflux and recurrence was assessed by color Doppler ultrasound examination after 6 months. Twenty-eight patients in RFA and 27 patients in foam sclerotherapy remained for the final analyses. The time interval from the procedure and recovery to daily normal activities was 1 day in both groups. Mean (±SD) pain VAS score in RFA group decreased from preintervention score of 7.35 (±3.28) to 1.21 (±0.68); P<.0001. Likewise, this score decreased from 6.64 (±2.04) to 1.29 (±0.91) in foam sclerotherapy group. HRQOL scores increased gradually at 1, 3, and 6months after the intervention. AVVQ scores decreased significantly 1 week postintervention in both groups. After 6 months, 17.9% (5 patients) in RFA group and 14.8% (4 patients) in foam sclerotherapy group had recurrence of GSV reflux (P=.52). Both foam sclerotherapy and RFA were effective in treatment of GSV reflux. Comparable findings were observed between the 2 groups regarding postoperative pain, recovery time, HRQOL, and AVVQ scores.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: a Comprehensive Literature Review

Review the effectiveness and safety of current treatment protocols for fluoroscopically guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) used for recalcitrant knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA). Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies of fluoroscopically guided RFA of the genicular nerves demonstrate variability in responder rates from 59% at 3 months to as high as 74% at 6 month follow-up. Studies that investigated the prognostic value of genicular nerve blocks to select patients for RFA demonstrate no difference in outcomes with current treatment protocols. Other factors that may influence the success rate of this procedure include radiologic severity of osteoarthritis, longer duration of knee pain, smoking, and bilateral knee pain. Relative safety of this procedure has been shown with no adverse events reported in reviewed trials, but several case reports demonstrate there are risks associated with this procedure. Recent neuroanatomical studies show additional genicular nerves that could likely be safely targeted by RFA, yet are not included in current treatment protocols. RFA provides an effective treatment option for patients with recalcitrant chronic knee pain secondary to OA with up to 74% of patients experiencing greater than 50% pain relief at 6 months. The procedure is relatively safe, but risks should be weighed against potential benefits. Further research is needed to determine need for prognostic blocks, determine prognostic radiologic factors, and determine changes in effectiveness with updated treatment protocols that target more genicular nerves.

Resectable recurrent colorectal liver metastasis: can radiofrequency ablation replace repeated metastasectomy?

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used as a first-line treatment for colorectal liver metastases that recur after first liver resection in our institution. We aim to evaluate its therapeutic efficacy compared to repeated surgical resection. A retrospective review was performed in 104 patients treated with curative intent for resectable recurrent colorectal liver metastases. Sixty-one patients underwent RFA and 43 patients underwent surgery. The overall recurrence rates were 82% in the RFA group and 65.1% in the resection group (P = 0.05). The local recurrence rate on a lesion-basis was markedly higher after RFA than that after resection (16.7% versus 7.3%, P = 0.04). The difference remained significant in patients with a maximum lesion diameter >3 cm (24.5% versus 7.6%, P = 0.01). RFA treatment was independently associated with recurrence on multivariate analyses (P = 0.01). 69.7% of RFA patients and 42.6% of surgery patients with intrahepatic recurrence were amenable to repeated local treatment (P = 0.05), leading to the equivalent actuarial 3-year progression free survival rates (RFA: 29.1% versus Resection: 33.1%, P = 0.48) and 5-year overall survival rates in the two treatment groups (RFA: 33% versus Resection: 28.4%, P = 0.36). Surgery remains the treatment of choice for resectable recurrence. RFA may offer similar benefit in selected patients.

Radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules: “Good Clinical Practice Recommendations” for Austria

The present "Good Clinical Practice Recommendations" relate to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) training, execution, and quality control, as well as to pre- and postinterventional standards of care. They are aimed at all physicians who intend to learn to perform, or who are already conducting RFA interventions as well as at thyroid specialists providing pre- and postoperative care to RFA patients in Austria. Adoption of these recommendations is strongly encouraged by the afore-listed professional associations.All RFA interventionists who adhere to these standards shall be listed on ahomepage linked to these professional associations entitled "RFA centers in compliance with the GCP recommendations of the ÖSDG/OGNMB/ÖGES/OEGCH-ACE." This will ensure harmonization of RFA training and quality control in the performance of the treatment in Austria.