Primary Prevention Patients Research Articles

Re-Evaluation of Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Primary Prevention Treatments with Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Primary Prevention Patients.

Objective: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is used as a screening tool to identify the presence/absence of subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals. We evaluated the risk categories and medical therapy of asymptomatic individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS > 0) and applied the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score and Framingham risk score (FRS) to assess those at a high risk of subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS ≥ 400). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 218 asymptomatic individuals (65.6% women, and mean age 67.5 ± 10.3 years) who had their CACS evaluated at the cardiovascular department of our hospital between 2016 and 2020. Results: Among the 218 participants, 24.3% were classified as low-risk according to the FRS, and 19.3% had no subclinical atherosclerosis. However, only 12.8% and 27.5% of the study population were taking statins and aspirin, respectively. Furthermore, although more than half of the individuals without subclinical atherosclerosis were in the intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the risk scores, there were no considerable differences in the rates of taking aspirin and statins between the groups. When patients in the very-high-risk group according to the CACS and low-intermediate-risk patients were compared, there was no considerable difference in the rates of risk subgroups and taking statins, whereas high-risk patients took statistically significantly more aspirin. Conclusions: In primary prevention screening, CACS can be used as a reliable marker of subclinical ASCVD and help physicians optimize and improve adherence to medical therapy, including aspirin and statins, particularly for high-risk individuals.

Values and preferences of medication use in patients for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: a mixed-methods exploratory study

BackgroundMedication therapy is a cornerstone for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), yet values and preferences regarding medication use remain unclear. ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the values and preferences of medication use in patients for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD. MethodsThis study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. From November 2021 to January 2022, patients meeting the criteria for primary and secondary prevention of CVD were screened at West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Yulin Community Health Service Center in Wuhou District, Chengdu, using stratified purposive sampling for interviews. Qualitative data were collected through focus group interviews to understand the behavior, values, and preferences related to medication use among the participants. The interview content was coded and categorized using MAXQDA 2020, then further sorted, analyzed, and themes were extracted using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis method. Following the qualitative research, a quantitative questionnaire was developed based on the themes identified from the interviews. From November 2022 to February 2023, patients meeting the criteria for primary and secondary prevention of CVD were conveniently sampled from the cardiology, endocrinology, nephrology, and neurology outpatient clinics at West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Yulin Community Health Service Center in Wuhou District, Chengdu. After signing informed consent, the participants' values and preferences regarding medication use were quantitatively analyzed. ResultsThe qualitative study included 21 participants for focus group interviews, yielding four themes: (1) cognition and behavior towards medication; (2) barriers to medication use; (3) facilitators of medication use; and (4) needs for medical services. In the quantitative study, 186 valid questionnaires were returned, yielding a 93.5% response rate. The results indicated common missed doses, and further confirmed the social stigmatization and the burden of medication use identified in the qualitative study. Despite the heterogeneity in medication preferences, participants generally preferred fewer types of drugs and lower frequencies of medication, and were averse to injectable formulations. ConclusionIn clinical practice for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD, the use of compound preparation could be increased, and medication regimens could be integrated with patients' daily lives and work to reduce the medication burden. Additionally, it is important to actively address patients' misconceptions and inappropriate behaviors regarding diseases and medications to improve medication compliance.

Implementation of risk-based lipid-lowering therapies in older (age ≥ 65 years) and very-old adults (age ≥ 75 years) with ischemic heart disease in the greater Salzburg region.

Introduction: European guidelines recommend the implementation of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in adults (≥ 65years) with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and for risk-based primary prevention in older adults (≤ 75years), yet their use in very-old adults (> 75years) is controversial, discretionary, and oriented on the presence of risk factors. The aim of this retrospective study is to assess guideline-directed LLT implementation and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target achievement in high-/very-high-risk older/very-old adults (65-74 and ≥ 75years) at presentation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and also to assess evidence-based care delivery to older adults in our region. Methods: All STEMI patients with available LDL-C and total cholesterol presenting for treatment at a large tertiary center in Salzburg, Austria, 2018-2020, were screened (n = 910). High-risk/very-high-risk patients (n = 369) were classified according to European guidelines criteria and divided into cohorts by age: < 65years (n = 152), 65-74years (n = 104), and ≥ 75years (n = 113). Results: Despite being at high-/very-high-risk, prior LLT use was < 40% in the total cohort, with no significant difference by age. Statin monotherapy predominated; 20%-23% of older/very-old adults in the entire cohort were using low-/moderate-intensity stains, 11%-13% were using high-intensity statins, 4% were on ezetimibe therapy, and none were taking proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. In the secondary prevention cohort, 53% of older/very-old patients used prior LLTs. Significantly higher percentages of older/oldest ASCVD patients (43% and 49%) met LDL-C targets < 70mg/dL compared to patients < 65years (29%; p = 0.033), although just 22% and 30% of these older groups attained stricter LDL-C targets of < 55mg/dL. Low LLT uptake (16%) among older adults aged 64-74years for primary prevention resulted in 17% and 10% attainment of risk-based LDL-C targets < 70mg/dL and < 55mg/dL, respectively. Oldest adults (≥ 75years) in both primary and secondary prevention groups more often met risk-based targets than older and younger adults, despite predominantly receiving low-/moderate-intensity statin monotherapy. Conclusion: Secondary prevention was sub-optimal in our region. Less than half of older/very-old adults with established ASCVD met LDL-C targets at the time of STEMI, suggesting severe care-delivery deficits in LLT implementation. Shortcomings in initiation of risk-based LLTs were also observed among high-/very-high-risk primary prevention patients < 75years, with the achievement of risk-based LDL-C targets in 10%-48% of these patients.

A risk stratification analysis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events post-statin discontinuation in patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass bariatric/metabolic surgeries

BackgroundCardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of mortality globally, and its prevalence is notably elevated in individuals with obesity. Bariatric surgery is an effective intervention to reduce obesity-related health risks. However, the implications of discontinuing statin therapy, particularly post-bariatric surgery, among those with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease have yet to be clarified. We aimed to ascertain the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events following statin cessation after bariatric surgery and to delineate the variance in outcomes between primary and secondary prevention cohorts. MethodsThe TriNetX database, encompassing electronic medical records from 69 United States healthcare institutions, spanning 2012 to 2021. Using a retrospective cohort design, patients aged ≥18 years who underwent bariatric surgery and were concurrently on statin therapy were selected. Discontinuation was defined as a 90-day lapse after the last statin prescription. Patients were categorized as "primary" or "secondary" prevention based on their atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease history. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event post-statin cessation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models discerned factors influencing this outcome. ResultsOf the 453 statin users who underwent bariatric surgery, 332 (73.1%) were in the primary prevention group and 121 (26.7%) in the secondary prevention group. At 1-year post-surgery, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event-free rates were 93% for primary and 68% for secondary prevention groups. Primary prevention patients showed an 82% reduced risk of post-statin cessation atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events than secondary prevention patients (hazard ratio, 0.181; 95% confidence interval, 0.119–0.274). Additionally, Hispanic/Latino patients had heightened post-statin cessation atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks compared to non-Hispanic/Latino peers. ConclusionPost-bariatric surgery statin discontinuation can pose significant risks, especially for those with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease history and certain demographic groups, such as those over age 40 with diabetes. Ethnic disparities in outcomes necessitate individualized, equitable healthcare strategies. Optimal decisions about statin cessation necessitate comprehensive evaluations of cardiovascular determinants, with future research crucial to refine therapeutic approaches based on these insights.

Adherence to the 2018 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol in ambulatory care settings: A cross-sectional study

Background: Dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor for heart disease. Adherence to treatment guidelines can help manage dyslipidaemia and decrease the incidence of complications. Aim: To assess the adherence to the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol by healthcare providers who assessed ambulatory patients for dyslipidaemia in Jordan. Method: This was a multi-centre, prospective cross-sectional study. Adult patients assessed for dyslipidaemia were invited to participate in the study. Each patient’s therapeutic plan was compared to the recommendations in the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline, and adherence to the guideline was documented. Results: Three hundred patients were recruited. Twenty-eight patients (9.3%) were secondary prevention patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Of the 160 primary prevention patients, 83 (51.9%) were excluded from the analysis due to an inability to calculate the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, either due to missing information or the patient’s age being under 40. One-quarter of secondary prevention patients were initiated on therapeutic plans according to the guideline. None of the primary prevention patients that required statin initiation according to the guideline were initiated on statins. Conclusion: Adherence to the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol for ambulatory patients assessed for dyslipidaemia was suboptimal. Missing patient information that hinders the calculation of the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score needs to be addressed to facilitate compliance with the guideline.

Evaluation of Aspirin Prescribing and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults 60 Years of Age and Older in a Large, Academic Health System.

Background National guidelines no longer recommend adults 60 years of age and older to begin treatment with low-dose daily aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a lack of proven net benefit and a higher risk of bleeding. Objective The objective of this cross-sectional retrospective analysis was to evaluate the appropriateness of low-dose aspirin prescribing and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in older persons receiving primary care in a large academic health system. Setting Large, academic health system within Colorado. Patients Patients with an active order for daily low-dose aspirin as of July 1, 2021, were assessed for appropriateness based on indication (primary vs secondary prevention) and use of a concomitant proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Incident gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs) in the subsequent 12 months and GIB risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 19,525 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine percent of patients identified as White and 54% identified as male. Of the total cohort, 44% had CVD and 19% were co-prescribed a PPI. GIB occurred in 247 patients (1.27%) within the subsequent year. Risk factors significantly associated with a GIB within 1 year included: history of GIB, history of peptic ulcer disease, other esophageal issue (esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Mallory Weiss tears, etc.), 75 years of age or older, and history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Conclusion This evaluation found that many older persons at this institution may be inappropriately prescribed aspirin, providing opportunities for pharmacists to improve medication safety by deprescribing aspirin among primary prevention patients or potentially co-prescribing a PPI in secondary prevention patients.

Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Levels on Cardiovascular Risk Estimation.

A new cardiovascular risk (CVR) calculator that incorporates Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels has recently been designed. To estimate CVR using the new score and to identify the reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or systolic blood pressure (SBP) necessary to balance the risk attributable to Lp(a). CVR throughout life and at 10 years was estimated with the new score in patients in primary prevention, both considering and not considering the value of Lp(a). When the estimated risk considering Lp(a) levels exceeded the baseline risk, the reduction in LDL-C levels or SBP necessary to balance the risk attributable to Lp(a) was calculated. In total, 671 patients (mean age 54.2 years, 47.2% women) were included. Globally, 22.7% of the population had high Lp(a) values (>50 mg/dL or >125 nmol/L). When calculating CVR throughout life and considering the Lp(a) value, the global risk increased in 66.7% of cases (median 19.3%). Similar results were observed when we assessed the 10-year risk. The risk associated with Lp(a) could be completely compensated by decreasing LDL-C (average 21 mg/dL) or SBP (average 6.3 mmHg) in 79.2% and 74.7% of cases, respectively. When calculating the CVR with the new score, two-thirds and one-third of the population were bidirectionally recategorized as 'up' or 'down,' respectively. The decrease in LDL-C or SBP mitigated the increased risk caused by Lp(a) levels across a substantial proportion of patients.

ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PRIMARY PREVENTION. OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AND SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK PATIENTS.

Objective: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries. This was a retrospective observational study, evaluating clinical outcomes, metabolic consequences and survival rate resulting from prolonged antiplatelet therapy for primary prevention in patients with high CVR. Design and method: Overall, 516 patients were randomly selected from cardiovascular risk and metabolism consultations in a single center in Porto (Portugal). Sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline, including biochemical parameters, vascular risk scores and tests for heart and cardiovascular evaluation. In this follow-up with a median of 11 years, 287 patients received adjuvant antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention. Association between sex, observation time and treatments with LDLc and HDLc variations were assessed. Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate which factors could explain the differences in HDLc and LDLc levels. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also conducted. Results: Therapy with statins was initiated early for metabolic compensation of dyslipidemia, according to clinical practice. Statistically significant reductions were found for almost all biochemical parameters, mean carotid intima-media thickness and lipid metabolism parameters, including triglycerides, total cholesterol and the respective fractions. Patients taking statins showed greater increased HDLc values and reduced LDLc values than those who were not. Additionally, women showed a more favorable evolution regarding HDLc increase compared to men. Survival rate was estimated at 77.5% with 22 years as the maximum observed time. The median time of survival was not computed, since more than half of the patients (77.5%) were alive after 22 years. No bleeding episodes were recorded during this long period of observation.In fact, 99.0% of patients were alive after 10 years and the percentage of patients alive remained over 90% at 17 years. After 18 years of observation, 88.6% of patients were alive, and at 20 years 77.5% were alive without major cardiovascular events (MACE). Conclusions: Antiplatelet therapy should always be considered in primary prevention in patients with high CVR. There were no cases of hemorrhage or MACE. The survival rate estimated for the study population was 77.5% over 22 years.

Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion.

Primary prevention patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome's components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7 ± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.94; P = 0.037]. Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P = 0.039) and the electrical storms (Log-rank: P = 0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P = 0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P = 0.151). Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.

Validation of the Novel Web-Based Application HUMTELEMED for a Comprehensive Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Based on the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines.

Background and aims: SCORE2/SCORE2-OP cardiovascular risk (CVR) charts and online calculators do not apply to patients with comorbidities, target organ damage, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, for whom the assessment relies on the conventional consultation of the 2021 ESC guidelines (qualitative approach). To simplify the CVR evaluation, we developed an integrated multi-language and free-to-use web application. This study assessed the agreement between the conventional method versus our web app. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 1306 consecutive patients aged 40+ years referred to our center for the diagnosis and management of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Two double-blind operators performed the CVR assessment and classified each patient into low-moderate-, high-, and very-high-risk categories by using the conventional method (SCORE2/SCORE2-OP charts and consultation of the 2021 ESC guidelines) and the web app. The Kappa statistics were used to compare the two methods. Results: The mean age was 60.3 ± 11.9 years, with male prevalence (51.4%). Patients in primary prevention were 77.0%. According to the SCORE2/SCORE2-OP charts and 2021 ESC guideline consultation, the CVR was low-moderate in 18.6% (n° 243), high in 36.8% (n° 480), and very high in 44.6% (n° 583). According to the web app, individual CVR was low-moderate in 19.5% (n° 255), high in 35.4% (n° 462), and very high in 45.1% (n° 589). The two methods strongly agreed (Kappa = 0.960, p < 0.001), with a 97.5% concordance. Conclusions: our application has excellent reliability in a broad "real life" population and may help non-expert users and busy clinicians to assess individual CVR appropriately, representing a free-to-use, simple, time-sparing and widely available alternative to the conventional CVR evaluation using SCORE2/SCORE2-OP and 2021 ESC guideline charts.

Primary and secondary prevention of stroke and cardiovascular events using evolocumab and alirocumab: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Although the clinical role of protein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for cholesterol management is increasing, the post-marketing period of use is short compared to other lipid-lowering drugs, so there is still insufficient evidence for their efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated preventive effects of stroke and cardiovascular (CV) events using evolocumab and alirocumab. We assessed the relative risk of stroke and CV events after alirocumab or evolocumab treatment in individuals with or without clinical CV diseases compared with that in controls. In addition, we evaluated the relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke. A total of 25 articles were included (median of study duration = 52 weeks). The risk of stroke was significantly decreased after treatment with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention in patients without CV diseases: RR = 0.733; 95% CI, 0.618-0.870; secondary prevention in patients with CV diseases: RR = 0.703; 95% CI, 0.562-0.880). The risk of CV events also significantly decreased in patients treated with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention: RR = 0.818; 95% CI, 0.777-0.861; secondary prevention: RR = 0.725; 95% CI, 0.578-0.910). The relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly different between PCSK9 inhibitor-treated patients and controls (RR=1.041; 95% CI, 0.690-1.573). Our findings indicate that evolocumab and alirocumab are significantly effective without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Based on this, the PCSK9 inhibitors can be highly recommended for cholesterol management.

Regional disparities and risk factors of mortality among patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death in emerging countries: a nonrandomized controlled trial

BackgroundComprehensive data on patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in emerging countries are lacking. The aim was to deepen our understanding of the SCD phenotype and identify risk factors for death among patients at high risk of SCD in emerging countries.MethodsPatients who met the class I indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to guideline recommendations in 17 countries and regions underrepresented in previous trials were enrolled. Countries were stratified by the WHO regional classification. Patients were or were not implanted with an ICD at their discretion. The outcomes were all-cause mortality and SCD.ResultsWe enrolled 4222 patients, and 3889 patients were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up period was 21.6 ± 10.2 months. There were 433 (11.1%) instances of all-cause mortality and 117 (3.0%) cases of SCD. All-cause mortality was highest in primary prevention (PP) patients from Southeast Asia and secondary prevention (SP) patients from the Middle East and Africa. The SCD rates among PP and SP patients were both highest in South Asia. Multivariate Cox regression modelling demonstrated that in addition to the independent predictors identified in previous studies, both geographic region and ICD use were associated with all-cause mortality in patients with high SCD risk. Primary prophylactic ICD implantation was associated with a 36% (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.531–0.802, p < 0.0001) lower all-cause mortality risk and an 80% (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.116–0.343, p < 0.0001) lower SCD risk.ConclusionsThere was significant heterogeneity among patients with high SCD risk in emerging countries. The influences of geographic regions on patient characteristics and outcomes were significant. Improvement in increasing ICD utilization and uptake of guideline-directed medical therapy in emerging countries is urgent.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02099721.

Cost effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for 1.5 primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest in China: an analysis from the Improve SCA study

Objectives Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs) for primary prevention (PP) of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is underutilized in developing countries. The Improve SCA study has identified a subset of 1.5 primary prevention (1.5PP) patients with a higher risk of SCA and a significant mortality benefit from ICD therapy. From the perspective of China’s healthcare system, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy vs. no ICD therapy among 1.5PP patients with a view to informing clinical and policy decisions. Methods A published Markov model was adjusted and verified to simulate the course of the disease and describe different health states of 1.5PP patients. The patient characteristics, mortality, utility and complication estimates were obtained from the Improve SCA study and other literature. Cost inputs were sourced from government tender prices, medical service prices and clinical experts’ surveys in 9 Chinese public hospitals. For both ICD and no ICD therapy, the total medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were modelled over a lifetime horizon and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model parameters. We used the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold recommended by China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations, one to three times China’s GDP per capita (CNY85,698–CNY257,094) in 2022 Chinese Yuan. Results The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is 139,652 CNY/QALY, which is about 1–2 times China’s GDP per capita. The probability that ICD therapy is cost effective was 92.1%. Results from sensitivity analysis supported the findings of the base case. Conclusions ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is cost-effective for the 1.5PP patients in China.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in cardiomyopathies

BackgroundImplantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are often used as primary prevention strategy for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young individuals. This study analyzed appropriate therapies, complications and inappropriate shocks in the real-world Indian population. MethodsAll patients in the cardiomyopathy cohort under follow up who had ICD implanted as a primary prevention strategy were studied. The objective was to assess the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, inappropriate therapies and complications. ICD was interrogated and stored electrograms analyzed. Underlying arrhythmia or conditions resulting in appropriate or inappropriate ICD therapy were studied. Correlation and regression studies was done to assess for the predictors of appropriate therapy. ResultsFifty patients were followed up for a mean follow-up duration of 4.4 ± 3.1 years with total follow up of 220.2 patient years. Appropriate ICD therapy was delivered in 16 out of 50 (32%) patients, with 65 appropriate therapies (median 2 per patient, range: 0–20). Inappropriate therapy delivered in 7 of the 50 (14%) patients, with 44 inappropriate therapies (median 5 per patient, range: 0–20). Complications occurred in 8 of the 50 (16%) patients. Overall, the rate of appropriate therapy was 29.5 per 100 patient years, that of inappropriate therapy was 19.9 per 100 patient years and the rate of complications was 3.6 per 100 patient years. ConclusionsWhen implanted for primary prevention in patients with cardiomyopathies over a mean period of 4.4 ± 3.1 years, appropriate ICD therapy was delivered in 32% patients. However, inappropriate therapy (14% patients) and complications (16% patients) were also common.

Factors Associated with Statin Discontinuation Following Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 2012–2021 Electronic Medical Records Network Data

BackgroundBariatric surgery has been shown to improve hyperlipidemia, decreasing the need for statin medications. Although maintaining statin therapy post-surgery for those with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is advised, it is uncertain if discontinuation risks differ between those with and without ASCVD history.AimThe study aims to analyze the rate and reasons for statin cessation post-bariatric surgery in the US using real-world data.MethodsUsing the TriNetX electronic medical records network from 2012 to 2021, the study involved patients aged 18 or older on statins at the time of bariatric surgery. They were categorized into primary and secondary prevention groups based on prior ASCVD. Statin discontinuation was defined as a 90-day gap post the last statin dosage. The Cox model assessed factors influencing statin cessation.ResultsSeven hundred and thirty-three statin users undergoing bariatric surgery were identified, with 564 (77%) in primary prevention. Six months post-surgery, 48% of primary prevention patients and 34.5% of secondary ones stopped statins. Primary prevention patients had a 30% higher likelihood of cessation compared to secondary prevention (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06–1.60) as shown by multivariable analysis.ConclusionsPost-bariatric surgery, primary prevention patients are more likely to discontinue statins than secondary prevention patients.Graphical

The impact of supraventricular arrhythmias on the outcomes of guideline-compliant implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming.

Several implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) programming strategies are applied to minimize ICD therapy, especially unnecessary therapies from supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA). However, it remains unknown whether these optimal programming recommendations only benefit those with SVAs or have any detrimental effects from delayed therapy on those without SVAs. This study aims to assess the impact of SVA on the outcomes of ICD programming based on 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement and 2019 focused update on optimal ICD programming and testing guidelines. Consecutive patients who underwent ICD insertion for primary prevention were classified into four groups based on SVA status and ICD programming: (1) guideline-concordant group (GC) with SVA, (2)GC without SVA, (3) nonguideline concordant group (NGC) with SVA, and (4)NGC without SVA. Cox proportional hazard models were analyzed for freedom from ICD therapies, shock, and mortality. Seven hundred and seventy-two patients (median age, 64 years) were enrolled. ICD therapies were the most frequent in NGC with SVA (24.0%), followed by NGC without SVA (19.9%), GC without SVA (11.6%), and GC with SVA (8.1%). Guideline concordant programming was associated with 68% ICD therapy reduction (HR 0.32, p = .007) and 67% ICD shock reduction (HR 0.33, p = .030) in SVA patients and 44% ICD therapy reduction in those without SVA (HR 0.56, p = .030). Programming ICDs in primary prevention patients based on current guidelines reduces therapy burden without increasing mortality in both SVA and non-SVA patients. A greater magnitude of reduced ICD therapy was found in those with supraventricular arrhythmias.

Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in People With Diabetic Retinopathy : Study Using Framingham Risk Score

Introduction: People with type 2 diabetes have an increase risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Framingham risk score is used to determine 10 years the risk of CVD in asymptomatic patients for primary prevention. Up to now, there have been no similar studies regarding the risk of CVD in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients in Indonesia. Therefore, we would like to investigate the corelation between DR and CVD risk through the population using Framingham risk score.&#x0D; Methods: This research is a Population-Based Cross-sectional Study. The data was taken from the villages in Malang Regency. Participant with diabetes aged &gt; 40 was recruited. The available data was then processed according to the variables and assessed using Framingham Risk Score. The scores were classified as high, intermediate, and low risk.&#x0D; Results: From 953 samples there were 155 respondents with Diabetes Mellitus (DM), 23 of them experience DR. There were more female participants than men in DM group without DR (73.9%) and DR group (73.9%). A significant correlation between diabetic retinopathy and CVD risk was found (r=0.407, p=0.001). The risk of CVD in 10 years is low in diabetic patients without retinopathy ( p=0.001), but in patients with diabetic retinopathy, the risk of CVD in 10 years is intermediate-high (p=0.001).&#x0D; Conclusion: There is corelation between Diabetic Retinopathy and risk for cardiovascular disease in intermediate-high category using Framingham risk score.

Low-dose aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: A real-world nationwide cohort study.

Cardiovascular mortality risk is elevated among patients with diabetes and concurrent chronic kidney disease. However, controversy surrounds the use of aspirin for primary prevention within this population. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention in patients with diabetes and pre-end-stage renal disease. This was a retrospective population-based cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. The study included adults with type 2 diabetes who were enrolled in the pre-end-stage renal disease pay-for-performance program and had no atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We used propensity score analysis to control baseline characteristics between the two groups. Clinical outcomes including cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and renal disease progression were compared between patients who first received aspirin and those who did not. Between January 2012 and December 2015, a total of 2,155 low-dose aspirin users and 6,737 nonaspirin users were identified. Following propensity score adjustment, aspirin use exhibited a comparable risk of cardiovascular death compared with nonaspirin users (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.95; P = 0.681). The risk of all-cause mortality was similar between the two groups (aHR 1.07; 95% CI 0.92-1.24; P = 0.385). Similar risks were observed in terms of major bleeding and renal disease progression. In patients with diabetes and pre-end-stage renal disease who lacked atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, low-dose aspirin did not demonstrate a reduction in mortality. These findings do not support the use of aspirin for primary prevention in this high-risk population.

Do We Still Need Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease?

Aspirin has for some time been used as a first-line treatment for acute coronary syndromes, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction, for secondary prevention of established coronary disease, and for primary prevention in patients at risk of coronary artery disease. Although aspirin has been in use for decades, the available evidence for its efficacy largely predates the introduction of other drugs, such as statins and P2Y12 inhibitors. Based on recent trials, the recommendation for aspirin use as primary prevention has been downgraded. In addition, P2Y12 inhibitors given as a single antiplatelet therapy have been associated with a lower incidence of bleeding than dual antiplatelet therapy in combination with aspirin in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of aspirin considering the available evidence for primary prevention, secondary prevention for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, and after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass revascularization.

EE163 Cost Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy Versus Drug Therapy in Patients for Primary Prevention in China

EE163 Cost Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy Versus Drug Therapy in Patients for Primary Prevention in China