Elective Surgery Patients Research Articles

Post-Neutralisation Activated Clotting Time and Postoperative Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery Outcome.

To assess the impact of post-protamine neutralisation activated clotting time (ACT) values on postoperative outcomes including chest drain output, transfusion requirements, and CICU stay, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Observational comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from February to August 2023. Ethical approval was obtained to collect data from elective cardiac surgery patients' charts. A sequential sampling approach analysed the baseline and post-protamine neutralisation ACT values, categorising patients into two groups. Group A maintained ACT within 10% of baseline, while Group B deviated. The outcomes measured included transfusion needs, chest drain output, additional protamine, cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) stay, and postoperative reopening. Statistical analysis included mean, median, frequency, t-test / Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. The study comprised 101 patients (39 in Group A, 62 in Group B), with similar baseline health. No significant differences were found in tranexamic acid use, CICU stay, chest drain output, or transfusion rates between the groups (p >0.05). Maintaining ACT within 10% of baseline post-protamine neutralisation results in similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, suggesting potential benefits in avoiding the aggressive protamine therapy and ensuring haemostasis in cardiac surgery. Coronary Artery bypass grafting, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Activated clotting time (ACT), Heparin, Postoperative bleeding, Blood transfusions.

An interrater reliability analysis of preoperative mortality risk calculators used for elective high-risk noncardiac surgical patients shows poor to moderate reliability

BackgroundMultiple preoperative calculators are available online to predict preoperative mortality risk for noncardiac surgical patients. However, it is currently unknown how these risk calculators perform across different raters. The current study investigated the interrater reliability of three preoperative mortality risk calculators in an elective high-risk noncardiac surgical patient population to evaluate if these calculators can be safely used for identification of high-risk noncardiac surgical patients for a preoperative multidisciplinary team discussion.MethodsFive anesthesiologists assessed the preoperative mortality risk of 34 high-risk patients using the preoperative score to calculate postoperative mortality risks (POSPOM), the American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator (SRC), and the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT). In total, 170 calculations per calculator were gathered.ResultsInterrater reliability was poor for SORT (ICC (C.I. 95%) = 0.46 (0.30–0.63)) and moderate for SRC (ICC = 0.65 (0.51–0.78)) and POSPOM (ICC = 0.63 (0.49–0.77). The absolute range of calculated mortality risk was 0.2–72% for POSPOM, 0–36% for SRC, and 0.4–17% for SORT. The coefficient of variation increased in higher risk classes for POSPOM and SORT. The extended Bland–Altman limits of agreement suggested that all raters contributed to the variation in calculated risks.ConclusionThe current results indicate that the preoperative risk calculators POSPOM, SRC, and SORT exhibit poor to moderate interrater reliability. These calculators are not sufficiently accurate for clinical identification and preoperative counseling of high-risk surgical patients. Clinicians should be trained in using mortality risk calculators. Also, clinicians should be cautious when using predicted mortality estimates from these calculators to identify high-risk noncardiac surgical patients for elective surgery.

Factors influencing hospital stay duration in an elective cardiac surgery cohort

Abstract Cardiac surgery has become more complex in recent years, with increases in patient age, complexity, and associated costs. The use of a multidisciplinary strategy to analyze and standardize patient management offers significant benefits. The development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs has proven useful in various types of surgery, recently including cardiac surgery, yielding good results. One of the primary objectives of ERAS programs is the reduction of the Inpatients' length of stay (LOS), with the subsequent improvement in the patient experience and a reduction in costs. The aim of this study is to analyze preoperative and postoperative factors related to the LOS reduction in a cohort of elective cardiac surgery patients included in the Cardiac ERAS program at our hospital. All patients included in the ERAS program, corresponding to elective cardiac surgery, were included in the analysis. 138 patients were divided into four quartiles based on the inpatient’s LOS. An extensive search was conducted in our quality control database, which contains 470 variables on the factors more strongly associated with LOS. The results were analyzed using Chi-Square test for categorical and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, generally of non-normal distribution. The results are summarized in the table. Age, poor mobility, surgery other than coronary bypass, and reoperation were the non-modifiable factors most associated with a prolonged LOS. Lower preoperative hemoglobin and albumin levels were associated with an increase in LOS. A class 3 or 4 NYHA functional class, chronic pulmonary disease, and anticoagulation use were associated with higher LOS. Classic cardiovascular risk factors, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, and tobacco use, were not associated with differences in hospitalization duration. Postoperative and intraoperative factors associated with higher LOS included extubation in the operating room or within six hours, ICU stay duration, mobilization on postoperative days one and two, time to oral food tolerance and gut motility recovery, hyperglycemia on postoperative day one, the duration of arterial, venous, and urinary catheters, the amount of fluids on postoperative day one and the opioid use in POD 2. The complications most associated with a prolonged duration were any infectious complication, any respiratory complication, reoperation, readmission to intensive care, transfusion after 12 hours or at any time during hospitalization, prolonged postoperative sedation, and any rhythmic complication. Conclusion In our cohort of elective patients for cardiac surgery, factors traditionally addressed by ERAS programs were identified as being associated with a longer inpatient’s length of stay. Pre-operative nutritional and anemia optimization, early extubation and mobilization, and the prevention of respiratory and infectious complications should be targeted to improve hospital stay duration.

Defining Postinduction Hemodynamic Instability With an Automated Classification Model.

Postinduction hypotension (PIH) may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In earlier studies, the definition of PIH is solely based on different absolute or relative thresholds. However, the time-course (eg, how fast blood pressure drops during induction) is rarely incorporated, whereas it might represent the hemodynamic instability of a patient. We propose a comprehensive model to distinguish hemodynamically unstable from stable patients by combining blood pressure thresholds with the magnitude and speed of decline. This prospective study included 375 adult elective noncardiac surgery patients. Noninvasive blood pressure was continuously measured between 5 minutes before up to 15 minutes after the first induction agent had been administered. An expert panel rated whether the patient experienced clinically relevant hemodynamic instability or not. Interrater correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation were computed to check for consistency between experts. Next, an automated classification model for clinically relevant hemodynamic instability was developed using mean, maximum, minimum systolic, mean, diastolic arterial blood pressure (SAP, MAP, and DAP, respectively) and their corresponding time course of decline. The model was trained and tested based on the hemodynamic instability labels provided by the experts. In total 78 patients were classified as having experienced hemodynamic instability and 279 as not. The hemodynamically unstable patients were significantly older (7 years, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4-11, P < .001), with a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (3% higher, 95% CI, 1-8, P = .036). Before induction, hemodynamically unstable patients had a higher SAP (median (first-third quartile): 161 (145-175) mm Hg vs 150 (134-166) mm Hg, P < .001) compared to hemodynamic stable patients. Interrater agreement between experts was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). The random forest classifier model showed excellent performance with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.96, a sensitivity of 0.84, and specificity of 0.94. Based on the high sensitivity and specificity, the developed model is able to differentiate between clinically relevant hemodynamic instability and hemodynamic stable patients. This classification model will pave the way for future research concerning hemodynamic instability and its prevention.

Improving quantitative neuromuscular monitoring: an education initiative on stimulating electrode placement.

Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring reduces the incidence of residual neuromuscular block, but broad acceptance of monitoring has been elusive despite recommendations for quantitative monitoring for decades. Acceptance of quantitative monitoring may, in part, be related to the quality of the data from monitoring systems. This evaluation explored proper stimulating electrode positioning for electromyographic (EMG) monitoring, the impact of an educational intervention on electrode positioning and anesthesia provider (anesthesiologist, resident, anesthetist) confidence in the monitoring data from the device. In a single-center, observations of EMG electrode placement by anesthesia technicians, in 55 adult elective surgery patients were made by an independent observer. Separately, the anesthesia provider satisfaction with EMG derived data was recorded after reversal of neuromuscular block. An educational intervention then occurred on proper electrode positioning, including prior observations of electrode positioning, and prior anesthesia provider satisfaction with the EMG derived data. After the intervention, stimulating electrode position was observed with an additional 60 patients and anesthesia provider satisfaction with the data was again ascertained. The educational intervention significantly increased the proportion of ideal ulnar nerve groove electrode positioning from 74.5% to 95% (P < 0.003) and ideal wrist crease positioning (distal electrode within 2cm of crease) from 61.8% to 96.7% (P < 0.001). Anesthesia provider confidence with EMG derived information during anesthesia delivery, increased from 67 to 90% after the education (P = 0.005). There was a significant relationship between correct stimulating electrode placement and anesthesia provider confidence in the EMG derived data on neuromuscular block status. An educational intervention to improve EMG electrode positioning proved meaningful. It increased anesthesia provider confidence in the EMG derived data during anesthesia case management.

Effect of low-dose norepinephrine combined with goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in lung surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Study objectivePostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), the predominant complications following lung surgery, are closely associated with intraoperative fluid therapy. This study investigates whether continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduced the risk of PPCs after lung surgery relative to either GDFT alone or standard fluid treatment. DesignA prospective, randomized controlled trial. SettingThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China. PatientsThe study included 184 patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic lung resection surgery. InterventionsPatients were randomized into three groups based on different fluid treatment regimens: Group C received standard fluid treatment, Group G received GDFT, and Group N received continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with GDFT. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs, including respiratory infection, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural empyema, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism and bronchopleural fistula, during the postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic variables and arterial blood gases. Additional recorded parameters included other postoperative complications such as bleeding, postoperative re-intubation, re-hospitalization within 30 days, and the length of hospital stay. Main resultsGroup N showed a significantly lower PPCs incidence during hospitalization compared to Group C (11.5 % vs 27.9 %; odds ratio, 2.98; 95 % confidence interval, 1.17–8.31; P = 0.023). No significant difference in PPCs was found between Group N and Group G (11.5 % vs 14.5 %; odds ratio, 1.31; 95 % confidence interval, 0.46–3.91; P = 0.616). Additionally, there were no significant differences among the three groups in the components of PPCs. Group N showed higher mean arterial pressure and stroke volume index intraoperatively compared to Group C. ConclusionsContinuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with GDFT reduced PPCs incidence in elective lung surgery patients compared with standard fluid management, but showed no difference compared to GDFT alone. Clinical trial registrationChiCTR2200064081.

Racial-ethnicity group distributions of blood product use in acute trauma care transfusion.

Recent studies suggest Black patients are transfused less often and at lower hemoglobin levels than White patients. In elective surgery, Black and Non-White patients have greater estimated blood loss and transfusion frequency. We asked whether similar transfusion disparities are observable in acute trauma resuscitation. In a single-center retrospective analysis of trauma registry/blood-bank-linked data from a large US trauma center, we identified all acute trauma patients 2011-2022. Our data sources permitted distinction of Race and Ethnicity and therefor binning as Non-White-race/not Hispanic plus any-race/Hispanic or White/not Hispanic. We tallied Injury Severity Scores mild through profound (ISS 1-9, 9-15, 16-25, >25), type (blunt vs. penetrating) and mechanism (firearms, etc.), and associated blood use overall and in the first, first four, and first 24 h, comparing results with chi square, p < .01. Overall, 50,394 (68.41%) acute trauma patients were classified as White and 23,251 (31.7%) as Other than White. White patients were more likely to receive any blood products (17.8% vs. 11.9%), but, for all measures of urgency/quantity, Non-White patients were transfused more often (respectively, first 4 h, 51.9% vs. 42.1%; ≥3u/first hour, 18.5% vs. 11.0%; ≥10u/24 h, 8.1% vs. 3.8%) (all p < .001). White patients were far more likely to have blunt injury than Non-White patients, (77.2% vs. 42.6%), less likely to have penetrating injury (10.1% vs. 14%) and far less likely to be injured by firearms (30.6% vs. 56.9%) (all p < .001). At our center, blood use in acute trauma resuscitation was associated with injury severity and mechanism, not race/ethnicity.

Development and Validation of a Preoperative Nursing Consultation Model: A Delphi Study

PurposeThis study aimed to validate the structure and content of a preoperative nursing consultation model for elective general surgery patients. DesignA Delphi study was conducted with experts to validate a five-dimension preoperative nursing consultation model. MethodsA 2-round Delphi study was conducted in 2022 involved 20 experts. The experts were asked to complete an online 48-item questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from totally disagree to totally agree. Participants were ensured anonymity and confidentiality. Consensus was identified as 80% agreement. The experts also made suggestions or comments, based on which the questionnaire was reformulated for round 2. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 25.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics). FindingsThe response rate was 100% in round 1 and 95% in round 2. After round 1, a consensus was reached on 35 items. The experts submitted the following dimensions for analysis: Requirements for the consultation, Patient welcoming and assessment, Information for the patient (and family member or significant person, if applicable), Summary of the consultation, and Documentation of the consultation. ConclusionsThe consensus among the experts allowed for the development of a specific intervention in the form of a preoperative nursing consultation. The validated intervention should be implemented and its impact on the quality of care assessed, particularly in elective general surgery.

Association between length of hospital stay before and after surgery and nutritional risk according to NRE-2017 - A secondary analysis of a cohort study.

to evaluate the predictive ability of the Nutritional Risk Emergency - 2017 (NRE) to predict prolonged length of stay, ICU admission intra-mortality and readmission, severe postoperative complications. a prospective cohort was conducted with surgical patients admitted in a public tertiary hospital. The NRE-2017 tool was applied for detecting malnutrition risk in hospitalized patients. Surgical complications were assessed by Clavien-Dindo. Patients were followed during hospitalization to identify length of stay as well as stay after surgery in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Regression analysis was performed to assess the association between risk of malnutrition and clinical outcomes. we included 162 elective surgery patients; 79 patients were identified with nutritional risk using the NRE-2017 (≥ 1.5) tool and 83 without nutritional risk. Patients with nutritional risk were at higher risk of prolonged hospitalization [18 (10-36) days vs. 13 (7-23 days); p: 0.006] and ICU hospitalization [6 (2-14 days vs. 3.5 (1-7 days; p: 0.020]. There was an association between surgical complications and nutritional risk independently, but the significance was lost when adjusting the analysis. There was no association with mortality and readmission in this sample of patients. the NRE-2017 tool was associated with hospital stay in those patients at nutritional risk, however there was no association with mortality and readmission.

Perioperative Hypothermia in Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis at a Busy District General Hospital.

Introduction Perioperative hypothermia is a common yet underreported complication of surgery. It results from various factors, including cold operating theaters, anesthetic effects, environmental exposure, exposed tissues, and the administration of cold intravenous or irrigation fluids. This study aims to determine the incidence of perioperative hypothermia in a district National Health Service hospital to assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for interventions to prevent hypothermia. Methods This retrospective study included the data of 200 elective surgical patients at North Manchester General Hospital from June 1, 2022, to August 1, 2022. Inclusion criteria were elective general surgery, urology, breast, and gynecology patients aged 18 to 60 years. Exclusion criteria included emergency cases and patients younger than 18 or older than 60. Temperature measurement data were collected from the anesthesia records of the patients at six phases: preoperative, pre-induction, intraoperative, post-procedure, recovery room, and post-recovery. Data collection included specialty, surgery duration, and the use of intraoperative fluid warmers. Statistical analysis was performed using StatsDirect software (StatsDirect Ltd, Wirral, UK). Results Among the 200 patients, the overall incidence of hypothermia was 4% preoperatively, 5% pre-induction, 12% intraoperatively, 11% postoperatively, 8% in recovery, and 6% post-recovery. Intraoperative hypothermia incidence was significant, given that active warming was applied to patients with preoperative hypothermia. Regression analysis showed no correlation between intraoperative temperature and the use of intraoperative fluid warmers. Pre-induction temperature was the most statistically significant predictor of intraoperative hypothermia. Conclusions This study highlights the need for active interventions to recognize and prevent perioperative hypothermia in elective surgical patients. Active pre-warming of patients, regardless of surgery type and duration, is feasible and potentially beneficial. Future research should include an RCT comparing active and passive warming strategies to evaluate their effectiveness in improving perioperative outcomes.

Prehabilitation to Enhance Vascular Surgery Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Prehabilitation, an emerging strategy, prepares patients for elective surgery by encouraging healthy behaviors, including physical exercise and healthy nutrition, while providing psychological support, to improve postoperative outcomes and foster healthier lifestyles. Despite growing interest, there is little research on prehabilitation. Specifically, studies involving prehabilitation in vascular surgery are heterogeneous with small sample sizes. This review aimed to investigate the reported positive impact of prehabilitation on vascular surgery patients, discuss prehabilitation models, highlight prehabilitation program-associated challenges, and suggest appropriate interventions. Prehabilitation improves physical fitness, reduces postoperative complications, and enhances overall recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation programs can positively impact vascular surgery patients, with benefits including improved cardiovascular fitness, reduced postoperative complications, shorter postoperative hospital stays, enhanced overall recovery, and improved quality of life. The currently reported prehabilitation programs are heterogeneous, with limitations regarding patient adherence and lack of long-term outcomes, posing challenges to their widespread adoption. Overall, prehabilitation shows promise for improving vascular surgery outcomes and fostering long-term healthy behaviors. The systematic implementation of prehabilitation in vascular surgery care pathways, overcoming reported limitations, and integrating multimodal prehabilitation into routine preoperative care holdpotential benefits. This review underscores the need for high-quality research to establish best practices in prehabilitation and integrate them into the standard of care for vascular surgery patients.

Comparison of the ClearSight™ finger cuff monitor versus invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in elective cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational study.

To determine the acceptability of the ClearSight™ system (Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) for continuous blood pressure monitoring during elective cardiac surgery compared with arterial catheterization. We enrolled 30 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery in a prospective observational study. Blood pressure measurements were recorded every 10 sec intraoperatively. We determined agreement based on the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) recommendations. Statistical analysis included fixed bias (difference of measurements between methods), percentage error (accuracy between ClearSight measurement and expected measurement from arterial line), and interchangeability (ability to substitute ClearSight monitor without effecting overall outcome of analysis). We used a paired samples t test to compare the time required for placing each monitor. We found fixed bias in the differences between the ClearSight monitor and invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in systolic blood pressure (SBP; mean difference, 8.7; P < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; mean difference, -2.2; P < 0.001), but not in mean arterial pressure (MAP; mean difference, -0.5; P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed that the means of the limits of agreement were greater than 5mm Hg for SBP, DBP, and MAP. The percentage errors for SBP, DBP, and MAP were lower than the cutoff we calculated from the invasive arterial blood pressure measurements. Average interchangeability rates were 38% for SBP, 50% for DBP, and 50% for MAP. Placement of the ClearSight finger cuff was significantly faster compared with arterial catheterization (mean [standard deviation], 1.7 [0.6] min vs 5.6 [4.1] min; P < 0.001). In this prospective observational study, we did not find the ClearSight system to be an acceptable substitute for invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in elective cardiac surgery patients according to AAMI guidelines. Nevertheless, based on statistical standards, there is evidence to suggest otherwise. ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT05825937 ); first submitted 11 April 2023.

Carriage and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of rectal ESBL E. coli in surgical patients at the University Teaching Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are on the rise and are a global concern as they complicate the recovery of patients postoperatively. Bacterial colonization of the patient's skin and alimentary tract are known to be major contributing sources to SSIs. However, Zambia lacks data relating to carriage rates of antibiotic-resistant rectal Escherichia coli among surgical patients. This was a cross-sectional study aimed at determining the preoperative (preop) and postoperative (postop) carriage and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of rectal ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-Ec) in elective surgery patients at the highest tertiary hospital in Lusaka, Zambia. Phenotypic methods were used in the identification of E. coli. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns and identification of ESBL-Ec was determined by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion. A total of 120 study participants were recruited, of which 75 were followed up at least 72 h after surgery. From 195 rectal swabs cultured, 177 (90.8%) were positive for E. coli, of which 53 (29.9%) were ESBL-Ec, with a significantly (P < 0.0001) higher proportion in postop (47.9%) than preop (17.3%) participants. Overall, ESBL-Ec isolates showed higher resistance in postop than preop to cefotaxime (100% versus 88.9%, respectively), ampicillin (100% versus 94.4%), ciprofloxacin (88.3% versus 83.3%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (80% versus 66.7%) and cefepime (80% versus 77.8%). MDR ESBL-Ec strains were more frequent in postop than in preop participants (91.4% versus 88.9%). The study showed a significantly higher rate of antimicrobial-resistant rectal E. coli in postop than preop participants. There is a need to ascertain the source of the resistance and to institute robust infection control measures, preop screening of surgical patients for ESBL-Ec, and to raise awareness on prudent use of antibiotics.

Preoperative Echocardiographic Assessment in Elective Surgery Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study From Duhok, Iraqi Kurdistan.

Background and aim Echocardiography plays a pivotal role in the preoperative risk assessment of patients undergoing various surgical procedures. Therefore, we conducted this study to detect various cardiac abnormalities through a preoperative echocardiographic study for cases undergoing elective surgeries in Duhok, Iraqi Kurdistan. Methods This cross-sectional study assessed echocardiographic findings in preoperative patients at Azadi Teaching Hospital, Duhok, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, from 2023 to 2024. The study encompasses 468 adult patients. We gathered clinicodemographic characteristics, indications of referral to a preoperative echo study, and the echocardiographic findings, particularly regional wall motion abnormalities, valvular heart diseases, and heart failure (systolic or diastolic/left ventricular hypertrophy). Results In a cohort of 468 patients, 205 (43.80%) were aged 35-54 years, and 269 (57.48%) were female. Most patients (366; 78.21%) resided in Duhok. Nearly only half of the cases 219 (46.79%) had clear preoperative echostudy indications. A total of 289 (61.74%) had no remarkable echocardiographic findings. Diastolic heart failure was most prevalent at 65 (13.89%). Older cases had more prevalent echo findings in terms of valve dysfunctions and heart failure. Notable associations were found between echocardiographic abnormalities and surgical types, particularly higher regional wall motion abnormalities in genito-urinary system operations (4; 8.16%) and valvular heart disease in orthopedic surgeries (13; 15.85%). Conclusions Echocardiographic abnormalities were remarkably observed in patients aged 65 and older. Many cases had no clear indications for preoperative echo study and hence unremarkable echo findings. More scrutiny is indicated during referral, and focusing on older adults' preoperative cardiac screening is recommended.

Effect of different priming fluids on extravascular lung water, cell integrity and oxidative stress in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Discussions continue on the ideal priming fluid in adult cardiac surgery. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effects of different types of priming fluids on extravascular lung water, cell integrity and oxidative stress status. Thirty elective coronary artery bypass surgery patients were randomised prospectively into two groups. The first group received colloid priming fluid, while the second group received crystalloid priming fluid. Extravascular lung water index, advanced oxidative protein products, total thiol, free haemoglobin, ischaemic modified albumin and sialic acid levels were measured. Moreover, intra-operative and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to extravascular lung water index, oxidative stress parameters or cell integrity (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between the patients with regard to intra-operative and postoperative outcomes (p > 0.05). The presumed superiority of colloidal priming for cardiopulmonary bypass could not be confirmed in our study.

Multidisciplinary approach to repair of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius in a complicated setting (prehabilitation)

Introduction Treatment of malunited periarticular fracture of the distal metaepiphysis of the radius in a complicated setting is challenging and involved orthopaedic care and related specialties of neurologists, neurosurgeons and rehabilitation specialists. New methods are offered for repair of the distal radius fractures but the results obtained to date cannot be considered satisfactory, since the treatment is aimed at the restoration of the anatomical relationships and the hand function.The objective was to demonstrate the role of prehabilitation preparing patients for elective reconstructive surgery, to present a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of malunited radius fracture complicated by posttraumatic compression ischemic multineuropathy.Material and methods The medical history of a 56-year-old patient with distal radius malunion complicated by posttraumatic compression ischemic multineuropathy was reviewed. Outcome criteria included absence of complaints and restored function of the hand and the wrist.Results A positive functional outcome was recorded after prehabilitation and surgery. Early postop, the DASH scored 35, palmar flexion measured 64° with dorsiflexion of 61° and dynamometry of 30 kg seen with the left involved hand. A faster recovery of the hand function occurred due to regression of neurological disorders.Discussion Treatment of the distal radius malunion in a complicated setting suggests the involvement of related specialists including neurologists, neurosurgeons, professionals in functional and diagnostic radiology, rehabilitation specialists so that the approach must be multidisciplinary. A preoperative course of prehabilitation supervised by a neurologist and a rehabilitation specialist is essential for the patient to achieve a higher basic level of functionality. Surgical treatment must be a stage of multi-stage multidisciplinary treatment of distal radius malunion in a complicated setting.Conclusion The clinical case showed an effective multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of distal radius malunion in a complicated setting. Preoperative preparation (prehabilitation) had a positive effect on the postoperative recovery and functional results.

A Machine Learning Approach for Prediction of Surgical Outcomes in Elective Surgery

The aim of this research was to design a Machine Learning (ML) approaches to predict surgical outcome associated with perioperative risks factors among patients undergoing elective surgery. The research employed descriptive cross-sectional survey and a sample size of 292 patients. Only adult patients undergoing elective surgery were considered. Machine Learning (ML) Algorithm such as Logistic regression, Support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors and random forest were used to provide insights into how different factors such as patient related perioperative risk, procedure related perioperative risk and health system related perioperative risk influence the likelihood of successful surgical outcome. The study found that Random Forest model achieved the highest cross validation accuracy of 100%, which means it correctly classified all data points in the test set. It implies that the random Forest model was the most suitable for classifying surgical outcome among elective surgery patient at Chuka County Referral Hospital. It had a Kappa of 1 indicating a perfect agreement between its predictions and the ground truth in comparison with other algorithms. In addition, Random Forest model achieves a perfect score (1.0) for sensitivity, precision, F1-Score, and balanced accuracy. This suggests that the model is doing extremely well at correctly classifying both positive and negative cases. Availability of main surgical supplies (health system related perioperative risk factors) had the highest score indicating that it was more important factor for the models predictions than other perioperative risk factors. In this study, the Machine Learning analysis identified unknown parameters associated with successful surgical outcome. An application of Machine Learning algorithms as a decision support tool could enable the medical health practitioners to predict the surgical outcome of patients undergoing elective surgery and consequently optimize and personalize clinical management of patient.

The effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in renal surgery.

To study the effect of ERAS on a textbook outcome (TO) after elective renal surgery. Retrospective study of all patients who underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomy or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST), Enschede, the Netherlands. In total, 277 patients were included. 66 patients from 2018 to 2021 (pre-ERAS group) and 211 patients from 2021 to 2023 (ERAS group). TO is a maximum of two nights in the hospital after surgery, no severe complications during or after surgery ≥ grade IIIb, no blood transfusions, no intensive care, no readmissions, and no mortality within 30days after surgery. Comparisons were made between the pre-ERAS and ERAS groups using unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for possible confounding. TO was significantly (p = 0.005) better in the ERAS group (TO = 76.8%) compared to the pre-ERAS group (TO = 59.1%). Compared to a pre-ERAS patient, the adjusted odds ratio for achieving a TO as an ERAS patient is 2.1 (95% CI 1.15-3.78). The implementation of ERAS showed a positive effect on the TO of elective renal surgery patients.

The impact of SARS-Cov-2 Omicron infection on short-term outcomes after elective surgery in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

With the emergence of novel variants, Omicron variant caused a different clinical picture than the previous variants and little evidence was reported regarding perioperative outcomesafter Omicron variants. The aim of the study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of gastrointestinal cancer patients following Omicron variants infection and also to determine the timing of surgery after infection recovery. A total of 124 patients who underwent gastrointestinal cancer surgery with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 2022 and February 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. 174 cases underwent the same operation during December 2018 and February 2019 as control group. SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were further categorized into three groups based on infected time (1-3weeks; 4-6weeks; and ≥ 7weeks). 90.3% of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients had mild symptoms. The COVID-19 vaccination rate was 71.0%, with a full vaccination rate of 48.4%. There were no significant differences in 30-day morbidity and mortality. There was also no significant difference in pulmonary complications, cardiovascular complications, and surgical complications between the three different diagnosis time groups. In conclusion, reducing waiting time for elective surgery was safe for gastrointestinal cancer patients in the context of an increasedtransmissibility and milder illness severity with Omicron variant.

Preoperative Modified Frailty Index-11 versus EuroSCORE II in Predicting Postoperative Mortality and Complications in Elderly Patients Who Underwent Elective Open Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and area under the curve (AUC) using modified frailty index (mFI), EuroSCORE II, and combined mFI-11 and EuroSCORE II to predict in-hospital mortality and composite morbidities. DesignRetrospective cohort study SettingSongklanagarind Hospital, a tertiary care center in the Southern of Thailand. ParticipantsElderly patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent elective open-heart surgical procedures on a pump between January 2017 and December 2022 were included. InterventionsROC curves were constructed to evaluate the discriminatory power of EuroSCORE II and mFI-11 for predicting in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications. Measurements and Main ResultsThe actual in-hospital mortality was 2.5 % for all patients. The discriminative accuracy of mFI-11, EuroSCORE II, and combined mFI-11 with EuroSCORE II for predicting in-hospital mortality was good, with respective AUCs of 0.733 (95% CI 0.6157–0.8499), 0.793 (0.6826–0.9026), and 0.78 (0.6686–0.893). The AUC of mFI-11 for predicting postoperative cardiac, respiratory, neurological, and renal complications was 0.558 (95% CI 0.5101–0.6063), 0.606 (0.5542–0.6581), 0.543 (0.4533–0.6337), and 0.652 (0.5859–0.7179), respectively, and that of EuroSCORE II was 0.553 (0.5038–0.6013), 0.631 (0.578–0.6836), 0.619 (0.5306–0.7076) and 0.702 (0.6378–0.7657), respectively. ConclusionFrailty (mFI-11) and EuroSCORE II demonstrated good discrimination in ROC analysis, with EuroSCORE II showing superior predictive accuracy for in-hospital mortality in elderly elective cardiac surgery patients. However, neither score independently predicted mortality in multiple logistic regression, nor did combining them enhance predictive power significantly. Furthermore, both scores were less effective in predicting postoperative complications.