Patient Self-reported Adherence Research Articles

Brief provider communication skills training fails to impact patient hypertension outcomes

ObjectivesHypertension remains a prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and improved medication adherence leads to better blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to improve medication adherence and hypertension outcomes among patients with uncontrolled BP through communication skills training targeting providers. MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of a communication skills intervention for primary care doctors compared to usual care controls, on the outcomes of BP (systolic, diastolic), patient self-reported medication adherence, and provider counseling, assessed at baseline and post-intervention. We enrolled 379 patients with uncontrolled BP; 203 (54%) with follow-up data comprised our final sample. We performed random effects least squares regression analyses to examine whether the provider training improved outcomes, using clinics as the unit of randomization. ResultsIn neither unadjusted nor multivariate analyses were significant differences in change detected from baseline to follow-up in provider counseling, medication adherence or BP, for the intervention versus control groups. ConclusionThe intervention did not improve the outcomes; it may have been too brief and lacked sufficient practice level changes to impact counseling, adherence or BP. Practice ImplicationsFuture intervention efforts may require more extensive provider training, along with broader systematic changes, to improve patient outcomes.

Adherence among rural HIV-infected patients in the deep south: a comparison between single-tablet and multi-tablet once-daily regimens.

Once-daily (QD), combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) can impact the willingness and ability of patients to take medications as directed. The impact of antiretroviral (ARV) drug adherence influenced by single-tablet (STR) versus multi-tablet regimens (MTR) among patients enrolled in the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) in a rural environment has not yet been assessed. A retrospective chart review evaluated adherence and outcomes in adult HIV-infected patients enrolled in the ADAP at 2 ambulatory clinics in the Southeast, taking either a QD STR (efavirenz [EFV]/emtricitabine/tenofovir [TDF]) or a QD protease inhibitor (PI)-based, MTR (atazanavir [ATV], ritonavir [RTV], and emtricitabine/TDF) by evaluating pharmacy refill records, patient self-reported adherence, and virologic response. A total of 389 patient records were analyzed (STR, n = 165 versus MTR, n = 224). There were more males, a higher percentage of treatment-naive patients, and more patients with a baseline CD4 count of >200 cells/mm(3) in the MTR group. Based on refill records, more patients on MTR were >90% adherent (61.6% versus 51.5%, P = .047). In a multivariable analysis, being treatment experienced was a negative predictor (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48, 0.29-0.78) for adherence. Regimen choice was not associated with adherence. More patients taking MTR were virologically suppressed at the end of the observation period. Regardless of the regimen, being >90% adherent was a significant predictor of virologic suppression (OR = 3.51, 1.98-6.23). Treatment-experienced patients enrolled in ADAP are less likely to be adherent. A QD PI-based MTR may result in comparable adherence to an STR in a rural HIV-infected population.

Improving the economic and humanistic outcomes for diabetic patients: making a case for employer-sponsored medication therapy management

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the cost savings of a pharmacist-led, employer-sponsored medication therapy management (MTM) program for diabetic patients and to assess for any changes in patient satisfaction and self-reported medication adherence for enrollees.MethodsParticipants in this study were enrollees of an employer-sponsored MTM program. They were included if their primary medical insurance and prescription coverage was from the City of Toledo, they had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, and whether or not they had been on medication or had been given a new prescription for diabetes treatment. The data were analyzed on a prospective, pre-post longitudinal basis, and tracked for one year following enrollment. Outcomes included economic costs, patient satisfaction, and self-reported patient adherence. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the population, calculate the number of visits, and determine the mean costs for each visit. Friedman’s test was used to determine changes in outcomes due to the nonparametric nature of the data.ResultsThe mean number of visits to a physician’s office decreased from 10.22 to 7.07. The mean cost of these visits for patients increased from $47.70 to $66.41, but use of the emergency room and inpatient visits decreased by at least 50%. Employer spending on emergency room visits decreased by $24,214.17 and inpatient visit costs decreased by $166,610.84. Office visit spending increased by $11,776.41. A total cost savings of $179,047.80 was realized by the employer at the end of the program. Significant improvements in patient satisfaction and adherence were observed.ConclusionPharmacist interventions provided through the employer-sponsored MTM program led to substantial cost savings to the employer with improved patient satisfaction and adherence on the part of employees at the conclusion of the program.

Patterns of adherence behaviour for patients with glaucoma

Adherence to long-term treatment regimens for primary open-angle glaucoma holds a challenge for both clinicians and patients. The study aims were to (i) establish the magnitude of travoprost non-adherence using an Electronic Adherence Monitor (EAM), (ii) compare electronic with patient self-reported adherence, and (iii) explore the application of a previously reported method of graphically presenting adherence data to a larger cohort over a longer monitoring period. A cohort study of patients using travoprost for glaucoma or ocular hypertension was conducted. All participants used an EAM and adherence data were collected prospectively for 2 months. Self-reported adherence was obtained using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS); patients also reported frequency of missed doses. Potential predictors of adherence were collected via a structured interview. EAM-recorded interdose intervals were plotted graphically. Of 100 patients invited to participate, 98 consented and EAM data were collected successfully from 88 participants. The median EAM adherence score for the cohort was 88.9% (interquartile range: 71.2, 92.2). When dichotomised (≥80%: adherent; <80%: non-adherent), EAM identified 36.7% as non-adherent and MMAS 12.2%. EAM data were used to classify five types of adherence behaviour including a category representing levels of ≥97% maintained by 21% of participants. EAM revealed good adherence to glaucoma monotherapy but poor agreement with patient self-reported adherence. An adherence category of persistent and exceptionally high adherence to travoprost over a 2-month period was identified.

Patient self-reported adherence for the most common chronic medication therapy

The aims of this study was to determine adherence to chronic disease medication measured by self-reported questionnaire. The survey was conducted at 106 Zagreb pharmacies, and the questionnaire was filled out by the study subjects. A total 1,357 diagnoses were reported by survey respondents (i.e., an average of 2.1 diagnoses per respondent). The most common diagnoses were diseases of the circulatory system (n = 500; 36.8%). The great majority of study subjects reported forgetfulness ('I just forgot') as the main reason for skipping drug doses. Among the many reasons people give for not adhering to drug treatment, forgetfulness was the most common. Common barriers to adherence are under the patient's control, so that attention to them is a necessary and important step in improving adherence. The existence of more than one cause of risk considerably increases the non-adherence risk of a patient.

Describing Adherence to Recommended Preventative Care Behaviors Among Adults with Sickle Cell Disease

AbstractAbstract 2058 Background:Healthcare professionals caring for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) anxiously await the release in late 2012 of evidence-based guidelines for primary care physicians. These guidelines are anticipated to include a number of recommendations for health care strategies designed to improve outcomes for SCD patients. As these guidelines become widely disseminated, the evaluation of patient adherence to recommended preventative care will be an essential component of efforts to monitor the quality of health and health care for the SCD population. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of baseline information regarding current levels of SCD patient adherence to recommended therapies. The objective of our study was to describe current levels of self-reported adherence to recommended therapies among a large sample of adults with SCD. Methods:We used data collected as part of a large cohort study of sickle cell patient experiences with care to describe sickle cell patient's self-reported adherence to a number of currently recommended preventative care behaviors. We also examined the association of different levels of adherence with self-reported levels of acute emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital utilization over the prior 12 months. Results:292 individuals completed baseline study questionnaires and had completed chart abstractions. The average age of participants was 34.5 (95% CI 33.1–36.), 97% were black or African American and 54% were female. 70% had either SS or SB0thal (sickle cell anemia-SCA), 21% were SC and 9% had Sb+thal. Of the 252 respondents who provided info on income, 50% reported an annual income less than $30k/yr. Those with SCA were significantly younger than those with other genotypes (33 yrs v 37 yrs p=0.02). 91% of patients reported seeing a sickle provider every year, while 73% reported seeing a primary care provider once a year. 45% of patients reported seeing a dentist in the prior year, 58% of all patients reported seeing an eye doctor in the last year. However among the 24% of patients with documented retinopathy, only 65% had seen an eye doctor in the prior year. 82% of patients had received both an influenza vaccine in the prior year and a pneumococcal vaccine within 5 years. Those with low income were less likely to report seeing a SCD provider in the prior 12 months than those with higher incomes (87% v 94% p=0.049). A significant majority of patients (88%) reported high levels (i.e. a self-report of often/very often) of adherence to taking medications as prescribed. 79% reported high-levels of adherence to keeping their clinic appointments. 87% reported high-levels of adherence in following their doctor’s directions. In bivariate analyses examining those preventative care behaviors with a significant impact on outcomes, we found that those patients reporting high-levels of adherence to their medical appointments reported fewer ED visits (p=0.015) and fewer inpatient hospitalizations (p=0.005) over the prior 12 months than those with lower levels of adherence. High self-reported levels of compliance with doctor’s instructions was associated with fewer ED visits, but not fewer inpatient visits, over the same 12-month period. There was no bivariate correlation between seeing a sickle cell provider or primary care provider annually with outcomes, though this may be due to the overall high levels of adherence to these behaviors that we observed in our sample. In ordinal logistic regression analyses controlling for age, education, and poverty levels, high self-reported levels of compliance with doctor’s instructions exhibited an independent association with lower levels of ED visits (OR = 0.44, 95%CI [0.21, 0.90]). Conclusions:We report relatively high levels of self-reported adherence to some, but not all, recommended preventative care behaviors among a sample of adults with SCD. The relatively low levels of adherence to dental and eye care recommendations should be noted as areas of focus for future interventions. Relationships between providers and SCD patients are notoriously rife with conflict. The association of high levels of compliance with doctor's instructions with lower levels of acute care utilization observed here suggests a need to identify the specific factors and mechanisms within provider-SCD patient relationships that successfully lead to improved clinical outcomes. Disclosures:Lanzkron:Hemaquest: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHLBI: Research Funding. Haywood:NHLBI: Research Funding. Strouse:NHLBI: Research Funding. Beach:NHLBI, NIMH: Research Funding; Merck: Speakers Bureau.

No significant association between patient self‐reported non‐adherence to antiretrovirals and HIV‐tropism: a preliminary analysis

Nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) may cause virologic failure and disease progression has been associated with switch of viral coreceptor usage from CCR5 to CXCR4. We aimed to assess the association between patient-reported non-adherence and HIV tropism. This is a cross-sectional analysis. HIV-tropism was performed within routine clinical practice either at start of ART or at virological failure. Adherence questionnaire includes: how many times ART has been taken during the last month, missed doses in the last week, timing deviation, refill interruption, drug holidays. Demographics, epidemiological data, HIV and ART history, CD4 and HIVRNA were collected. To assess co-receptor tropism, env V3 genotyping from viremic plasma HIVRNA was performed. For the analysis, dual/mixed viruses were considered as X4. We included 102 individuals: 76% males; median age 42 y (IQR, 37–46); transmission was heterosexual 37%, homosexual 31%, intravenous drug use 29%. Median nadir of CD4 154/mmc (IQR, 53–274), median zenith of HIVRNA 5.26 (4.72–5.70), 46% had AIDS. 124 tropism tests were: 78% R5, 17% X4, 5% dual/mixed. In cases with previous ART, mono/dual ART was found in 26%, median number of regimens was 5 (IQR, 2–10), median time on triple-ART was 54 months (IQR, 0–123) with median time of HIVRNA <50 c/ml of 16 months (IQR, 6.5–34.9). At HIV-tropism, median CD4 and HIV RNA were 321/mmc (IQR, 210–436) and 2.65 (IQR, 2.65–4.91), respectively. Median time between adherence questionnaire and HIV-tropism was 68 days (IQR, 23–116). At adherence questionnaire, median percentage of ART taken during the last month was 100% (IQR, 90–100), 39% reported missed doses in the last week, 40% timing deviation, 7% refill interruption, 17% drug holidays. At univariate analysis, no statistically significant association between non-adherence and dual/mixed-X4 viruses was found (p>0.1). Also gender, age, HIV transmission, AIDS, CD4 nadir, HIVRNA zenith, mono/dual ART, and number of ART regimens were not associated with type of tropism. Only longer time with undetectable HIVRNA before tropism test showed a lower probability of dual/mixed-X4 viruses (OR for each month 0.95; 95% CI 0.90–1.00; p=0.06). No significant association between adherence and HIV-tropism was found in this preliminary analysis. It is possible that patient self-reported adherence is not able to capture nonadherence behaviors that underlie more pronounced viral replication which may be necessary for tropism switch.

Measurement complexity of adherence to medication

Measurement complexity of adherence to medication Dayani Galato, Fabiana Schuelter-Trevisol, Anna Paula PiovezanMaster Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina (Unisul) Tubar&atilde;o, Santa Catarina, BrazilAdherence to pharmacologic therapy is a major challenge for the rational use of medicines, particularly when it comes to antiretroviral drugs that require adherence to at least 95% of prescribed doses.1 Studies in this area are always important and contribute to medication adherence understanding, even though there is no reference test for measuring this. Recently, an article was published in this journal that proposes the determination of lamivudine plasma concentration to validate patient self-reported adherence to antiretroviral treatment.2 In that study, serum levels obtained after 3 hours of ingestion of the last dose of the drug were compared with patient reports that were classified into different levels of adherence, based on their recall of missed doses in the previous 7 days.It was hypothesized by the authors that the use of a biological marker for drug adherence was extremely important, given the relevance of the topic. However, we would like to draw attention to some points that may determine the success of the use of similar methods for this purpose. The formation of groups with similar anthropometric characteristics is relevant since the dose of lamivudine may have to be changed, depending, for example, on sex, weight, and age.3 Even information considered important by the authors of that study was not provided. There is a need for greater clarity on the eligibility criteria, especially with regard to the clinical stage of the disease, CD4 counts and viral load, associated diseases, and comorbidity, as well as the evaluation of kidney function and other medications used that can affect lamivudine pharmacokinetics.3View original paper by Minzi and colleagues

Optimal recall period in assessing the adherence to antihypertensive therapy: a pilot study

To evaluate the validity of patient self-reported adherence, and to find the optimal length of recall period which best reflects the long-term adherence pattern of the patient. Patients were recruited from a general practitioner's practice in a Hungarian town. In this prospective study 30 patients, who had already been on antihypertensive treatment, were involved. The study was designed to monitor one antihypertensive medication per patient for 3 months. Patients received a 3-month supply of one antihypertensive medication in an electronic Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). At the end of the study period patients completed a structured questionnaire regarding their medication taking behavior during the last 7, 14 and 30 days. The results measured with MEMS were considered as the reference value, and other measures were compared using the Bland-Altman method. Self-reported adherence, length of recall period, taking adherence and timing adherence measured by MEMS. Of the 30 patients included, 29 patients (13 males and 16 females) completed the study. The mean age of the patients was 60.6 years, ranging between 36 and 86 years. Patients were monitored for an average of 89 days (ranging between 49 and 106 days). Fifteen patients were on once daily, 9 patients were on twice daily, and 5 patients were on 3 times daily dosing schedule. The total expected number of medication taking events was 4,281. The MEMS caps recorded a total of 4,071 openings, which showed only a 3.56% deviation from the pill counts of the remaining tablets. The overall taking adherence was 95.1%, timing adherence was 75.2%. Patients' adherence report using a visual analog scale and reporting the number of missed doses became more accurate as the length of the recall period increased. Increased number of chronically taken medications was associated with better adherence. Increased dosing frequency of the observed antihypertensive medication resulted in decreased adherence. The results showed that the length of the recall period influences the accuracy of self-reported adherence. Patients seem to be able to report more precisely their medication taking behavior regarding a 30 day period than a 7 day period.

Correlation between lamivudine plasma concentrations and patient self-reported adherence to antiretroviral treatment in experienced HIV patients

BackgroundAdherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART) is important to achieve treatment success in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Most HIV clinics apply the patient self-report (PSR) method. However, the reliability of this method in experienced HIV patients remains questionable.PurposeTo validate the PSR method for measuring adherence to ART using lamivudine (3TC) plasma concentrations in experienced HIV patients.MethodsThe study was conducted in Dar Es Salaam and involved 220 patients who were receiving ART services at HIV clinics for more than 12 months. Self-reported adherence information to ART was obtained on the day of HIV clinic visit. The patients were asked to mention the number of doses missed within the past 7 days. In addition, blood samples (2 mL) were collected from each patient on the same day. The blood samples were determined for 3TC plasma concentrations. The target 3TC plasma concentration as indicator concentration for adherent patients was determined in 20 patients who took their evening dose of antiretrovirals under supervision. The blood from these patients was drawn 3 hours after drug administration.ResultsComplete drug levels of 3TC and self-reported adherence data was obtained in 200 treatment-experienced HIV patients. Lamivudine plasma concentrations obtained in these patients ranged between 0.02–17.36 μg/mL. The mean time from dose administration to blood drawing was 3.1 ± 1.2 hours with coefficient of variation >39%. The mean 3TC plasma concentration obtained in 20 patients who took their antiretroviral dose under supervision was found to be 0.67 ± 0.46 μg/mL, range 0.25–2.33 μg/mL. As many as 82.5% of experienced HIV patients had PSRs in agreement with their 3TC plasma concentrations.ConclusionPSR adherence is still a valid method for ascertaining adherence to ART in treatment-experienced HIV patients.

Does Reducing Physician Uncertainty Improve Hypertension Control?

Hypertension affects nearly one third of the US population overall, and the prevalence rises sharply with age. In spite of public educational campaigns and professional education programs to encourage blood pressure measurement and control of both systolic and diastolic control to <140/90 mm Hg (or 130/80 mm Hg if diabetic), 43% of treated hypertensives do not achieve the recommended Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure target. Among blacks, 48% are uncontrolled on treatment. The majority of persons classified as poorly controlled hypertensives have mild systolic blood pressure elevation (in the range of 140 to 160 mm Hg). We hypothesized that physician uncertainty regarding the patient's usual blood pressure, as well as uncertainty regarding the extent of medication nonadherence, represent an important barrier to further reductions in the proportion of uncontrolled hypertensives in the United States. Using cluster randomization, 10 primary care clinics (6 from a public health care system and 4 from a private clinic system) were randomized to either the uncertainty reduction intervention condition or to usual care. An average of 68 patients per clinic were recruited to serve as units of observation. Physicians in the 5 intervention clinics were provided with a specially designed study form that included a graph of recent blood pressure measurements in their study patients, a check box to indicate their assessment of the adequacy of the patient's blood pressure control, and a menu of services they could order to aid in patient management. These menu options included 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; electronic bottle cap assessment of medication adherence, followed by medication adherence counseling in patients found to be nonadherent; and lifestyle assessment and counseling followed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Physicians in the 5 usual practice clinics did not have access to these services but were informed of which patients had been enrolled in the study. Substudies carried out to further characterize the study population and interpret intervention results included ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and electronic bottle cap monitoring in a random subsample of patients at baseline, and audio recording of patient-physician encounters after intervention implementation. The primary study end point was defined as the proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg if diabetic). Secondary end points include actual measured clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressure, patient physician communication patterns, physician prescribing patient self-reported lifestyle and medication adherence, physician knowledge, attitude and beliefs regarding the utility of intervention tools to achieve blood pressure control, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Six-hundred eighty patients have been randomized, and 675 remain in active follow-up after 1.5 years. Patient closeout will be complete in March 2009. Analyses of the baseline data are in progress. Office-based blood pressure measurement error and bias, as well as physician and patient beliefs about the need for treatment intensification, may be important factors that limit further progress in blood pressure control. This trial will provide data on the extent to which available technologies not widely used in primary care will change physician prescribing behavior and patient adherence to prescribed treatment.

Significant improvements in self-reported gastrointestinal tolerability, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and adherence with lopinavir/ritonavir tablet formulation compared with soft gel capsules.

BackgroundThe tablet formulation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r; Kaletra®) has many advantages over the soft gel capsule (SGC) formulation, including lower pill count, no refrigeration requirement, and no dietary restrictions. These advantages may help improve patient compliance and therefore increase adherence to treatment. However, there are limited data regarding patient preferences and only recently was the comparative efficacy and tolerability data of LPV/r SGC versus tablet formulation presented at an international conference. To address this deficit, we conducted a market research survey to assess potential tolerability benefits, patient satisfaction, changes in adherence, and formulation preference in patients switching from SGCs to the tablet formulation. Data from 332 patients who switched from LPV/r SGCs twice-daily (BID) to tablets BID and 41 patients who switched from LPV/r SGCs BID or once daily (QD) to tablets QD were analyzed.ResultsSwitching from SGCs to a tablet formulation of LPV/r was associated with increased patient satisfaction, tolerability and self-reported adherence to treatment; gastrointestinal side effects were reduced. In addition, respondents indicated that they preferred the tablet formulation to the SGC.ConclusionThe LPV/r tablet formulation provides HIV-infected patients with multiple benefits over the SGC in terms of tolerability and convenience. Additional assessments to further define the tolerability profile of the LPV/r tablet, including studies using once-daily dosing, are warranted.

Self-reported medication and lifestyle adherence in Hungarian patients with Type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is a complex disorder that requires the patient to pay constant attention to diet, physical activity, glucose monitoring and medication. To evaluate the medication, lifestyle adherence and factors associated to these in Type 2 diabetes in Hungarian patients. Fourteen community pharmacies in Hungary between March and May 2004. A questionnaire was given to every tenth Type 2 diabetic patient who presented to one of the 14 pharmacies included in this study with a prescription for oral antidiabetics, oral antidiabetics and insulin or exclusively insulin. For the latter two groups, the prerequisite for inclusion in the study was also that their diabetes had developed after the age of 35 and that at some in their treatment regimen they had taken only oral antidiabetics. These latter two criteria were controlled in the patient's general practitioners' (GP) database. General and diabetes-related data were collected in the questionnaire, and the adherence and lifestyle of the participant were assessed. An adapted and validated Hungarian version of the EQ-5D (EuroQol Group, 1993) quality-of-life questionnaire was also included. Descriptive and chi(2) test statistical methods and two sample t-test were used. A significance level of P<0.05 was considered to be significant. Patient self-reported adherence to diet, physical activity, self monitoring of blood glucose, purchasing of drug(s), drug regimen, association of demographic factors, treatment, lifestyle and quality of life on adherence. Of the 220 questionnaires distributed to diabetic patients, 151 were returned, of which 142 were evaluated (nine did not satisfy the above-mentioned inclusion criteria). With respect to the factors assessed, sub-optimal adherence was assessed for: diet (76.8%), physical activity (33.8%), self-monitoring of blood glucose (81%), drug purchasing (20.4%) and drug taking (52.1%). Smokers comprised 14.8% of the respondents, while 8.5% were heavy drinkers. Fewer than five meals a day were eaten by 46.5% of the patients, and about 43.6% of the patients did not self-monitor blood glucose. The results indicate few significant associations between at least one of the four main areas of adherence (diet, physical activity, purchasing of drug(s), drug regimen) and body mass index, GP consultation frequency, quality-of-life parameters and EQ-5D index. The adherence of Hungarian Type 2 diabetics in some areas does not reach optimal levels, especially for diet, self-monitoring, drug purchasing and adherence to drug taking.

Literacy, self-efficacy, and HIV medication adherence

Objective We examined the relationship between patient literacy level and self-reported HIV medication adherence, while estimating the mediating roles of treatment knowledge and self-efficacy on this relationship. Methods Structured patient interviews with a literacy assessment, supplemented by medical chart review, were conducted among 204 consecutive patients receiving care at infectious disease clinics in Shreveport, Louisiana and Chicago, Illinois. Literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), while the Patient Medication Adherence Questionnaire (PMAQ) was used to assess medication self-efficacy and adherence to antiretroviral regimens in the past 4 days. Results Approximately one-third of patients (30.4%) were less than 100% adherent to their regimen, and 31.4% had marginal to low literacy skills. In multivariate analyses, low literate patients were 3.3 times more likely to be non-adherent to their antiretroviral regimen ( p < 0.001). Patients’ self-efficacy, but not knowledge, mediated the impact of low literacy on medication adherence (AOR 7.4, 95% CI 2.7–12.5). Conclusion While low literacy was a significant risk factor for improper adherence to HIV medication regimens in our study, self-efficacy mediated this relationship. Practice implications Comprehensive intervention strategies that go beyond knowledge transfer may be needed to address self-efficacy among patients across all literacy levels to be successful in the management of difficult medication schedules.

A Practical Method to Calibrate Self-Reported Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy

Self-report of antiretroviral medications adherence is inexpensive and simple to use in clinical settings but grossly overestimates adherence. We investigated methods to calibrate patients' self-reported adherence to match objectively measured adherence more closely for the purpose of developing a practical and more accurate self-reported adherence measure. Longitudinal cohort design. Using data from 2 prospective longitudinal clinical investigations conducted at 5 HIV clinics, we examined the discrepancy between self-reported adherence and objectively measured adherence. We evaluated the relation between attitudinal measures and the degree of discrepancy and used a cross-validation approach to propose candidate items to improve adherence survey methodology. Among 330 patients, self-reported adherence was consistently higher than objectively measured adherence. The best calibration models included the patient's self-reported adherence, duration of the antiretroviral regimen, and attitudinal measures (ability to take medication as instructed, believing medication can help one to live longer, whether or not it is too troublesome to take antiretrovirals, and feeling things are going the right way). The method efficiently identified survey items to improve self-reported adherence measurement. The calibrated measure more closely approximates objectively measured adherence and is more sensitive for detecting nonadherence. These models merit evaluation in other settings.

Patient self-reported adherence levels with joint protection advice

Joint protection advice is a routine part of occupational therapy intervention for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. This study set out to establish both the levels of adherence to joint protection techniques that were reported by patients 6 months following intervention from their occupational therapist, and the factors that patients identified as affecting this adherence.