I'm a staunch supporter of evidence-based design (EBD), but I'm also skeptical about it. That is why I'm delighted and excited about the publication of the Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD). This journal has the potential to make EBD a far more powerful tool, enabling healthcare architects to design better buildings than is now possible.Need for Evidence-Based DesignArchitects are famous for drawing-some might say leaping to- conclusions about the spaces they design. Healthcare architects are no exception. We have long been convinced that the healthcare environments we design can sometimes dramatically affect the outcomes of everything from patient safety to staff turnover to financial results.Our conclusions about the link between design and outcomes, however, have been largely intuitive and so obvious as to be beyond dispute. Provide attractive, single-patient rooms and you promote healing; make work space more functional and attractive and you reduce staff turnover; develop efficient wayfinding and you reduce the cost of staff required to give people directions. Though these conclusions seem obvious, they have not been supported by research until recently when EBD arrived on the scene.I first encountered this term a decade or so ago. The process it represents involves basing design decisions not only on sound design principles, designer knowledge, and client input, but most importantly on scientifically sound research.Properly applied, EBD can significantly impact patient, staff, and institutional outcomes. One example: An older medical center in Florida was replaced by a new facility designed to provide natural light, improve airflow, separate public and patient transport areas, and offer homelike patient room design. A year after the building opened, staff turnover was 13% compared to more than 20% in the old facility. Another example: An Oregon hospital installed ceiling lifts and booms in patient rooms in the intensive care unit. The result: fewer patient injuries and the virtual elimination of staff injuries caused by patient lifting.Evidence-Based Design and the Hospital Building BoomEBD's importance is greater today than ever, given the current hospital building boom, the largest in U.S. history. Fueled by aging baby boomers, new technologies, population shifts, and the need to replace or remodel aging facilities that were built in the 1960s and -70s, by the end of the decade this boom is expected to boost spending for hospital construction to more than $20 billion annually. Because these hospitals will be operating for decades, it is imperative that we design them in ways that yield the best possible outcomes. EBD is a valuable tool for ensuring that we meet this responsibility.As President of the American College of Healthcare Architects (ACHA), I can affirm that our organization understands the importance of EBD. ACHA members are leaders in the industry. Many serve as faculty for EBD seminars and initiate independent research projects with clients. Our membership leads the industry in the number of clients that have been part of the Center for Health Design Pebble projects.But not all healthcare architects have an equal understanding of EBD, so it is not used uniformly across our profession. However, the popularity and acceptance of EBD definitely are growing. As more architects gain sophistication about the impact of EBD on healing, workplace productivity, and safety, more of them will incorporate it into the design process. New simulation models have been developed that enable design hypotheses to be tested before a facility is built. The prestige associated with expertise in this area is rising as well. Architectural firms are hiring people skilled in conducting and interpreting EBD research.Since the term EBD first came into our lexicon, it is estimated that 1,000 articles about healthcare design research have been published. …