Patient Repositioning Research Articles

Arthroscopic-Assisted Anterior Glenoid Reconstruction Using Nonrigid Fixation With Distal Tibia Osteochondral Allograft

Introduction: Traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability events result in a capsulolabral (Bankart lesion) and/or osseous injury with subsequent attritional bone loss, particularly with recurrence. Up to 88% of patients with recurrent instability experience glenoid bone loss, which predisposes to future dislocations and subluxations, even with arthroscopic capsulolabral repair. The surgical management of glenoid bone loss includes a number of different techniques such as the Latarjet or coracoid transfer as well as other osseous and osteoarticular autografts and allografts. However, operative management of shoulder instability has increasingly shifted toward arthroscopic approaches with preservation of anatomy when possible. Indications: Arthroscopic-assisted allograft distal tibia bone block augmentation to the anterior glenoid is indicated for revision anterior glenohumeral instability procedures with anterior bone loss and in primary cases of anterior instability with critical bone loss. Technique: Our technique for nonrigid arthroscopic anterior glenoid reconstruction with allograft distal tibia and anterior labral repair is performed preferentially in the lateral position without necessitating patient repositioning. The preplanned tibial bone block is prepared on a back table prior to the arthroscopic procedure. After creation of portals and elevation of labral tissue, a guide and drill are used to introduce a retrograde reamer which is deployed to create a perpendicular edge for apposition of the allograft tibia. The bone block is then introduced through a rotator interval portal by pulling sutures retrograde through glenoid bone tunnels and is secured to the prepared surface medial to the liberated labrum. The articular surface of the graft and glenoid are aligned and suture-based fixation is used to compress the bone block against the native glenoid. The anterior labral tissue is then mobilized over the graft and repaired to the native glenoid when possible. Description/Conclusion: The benefits of allograft tibia augmentation for anterior instability with glenoid bone loss include an anatomic joint surface restoration including articular cartilage, lack of donor site morbidity, and a minimally invasive arthroscopic approach. When performed arthroscopically and with nonrigid fixation, this technique permits concurrent anterior labral repair and anatomic reconstruction, safe graft passage without necessity of a far medial portal, and expeditious return to function.

Effect of body mass index on efficacy of the repositioning procedure for horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Objective:To evaluate the effect of body mass index （BMI） on efficacy of the repositioning procedure for horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo （HC-BPPV）. Methods:A total of 172 patients diagnosed with HC-BPPV in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine from Jan 2021 to Oct 2021 were enrolled. The patients were divided into low BMI group（BMI<24 kg/m² ） and high BMI group（BMI≥24 kg/m²）. The two groups underwent manual repositioning procedure and vertigo treatment system procedure by Barbecue method according to their orders of visits. After two circles of repositioning, the influencing factors of repositioning were analyzed according to efficiency. Results:The effective rate of manual repositioning in HC-BPPV patients was 33.64%, and the effective rate of vertigo treatment system was 63.08%,the effective rate of vertigo treatment system repositioning was higher than that of manual repositioning （P<0.05）. The effective rate of manual repositioning in the low BMI group （58.70%） was higher than that in the high BMI group （14.75%）, P<0.05. The effective rate of vertigo treatment system repositioning was higher in the low BMI group （75.00%） than that in the high BMI group （54.05%）, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two BMI groups （P>0.05）. Logistic regression analysis suggested that BMI was the influencing factor of HC-BPPV repositioning efficacy （P<0.05）. Conclusion:BMI can affect the efficacy of HC-BPPV manual repositioning. Vertigo treatment system for HC-BPPV reduction is better than manual reduction, and the efficacy is not affected by BMI.

S644 ColoWrap Real-World Evidence: Colonoscopy Compression Device Mitigates Ergonomic Hazards for Endoscopists and Staff

Introduction: Looping during colonoscopy increases scope forces and torquing which are causes of ergonomic injury among endoscopists. In addition, manual abdominal pressure and patient repositioning, used to address looping in 52% and 34% of colonoscopies, respectively, are known causes of musculoskeletal injuries among endoscopy staff. ColoWrap (ColoWrap, LLC, Durham, NC) is an anti-looping abdominal compression device applied during colonoscopy to decrease looping and limit the need for manual pressure and patient repositioning. We aimed to determine extent to which ColoWrap reduces ergonomic hazards associated with colonoscopy by performing a chart review and obtaining physician and staff feedback following use of the device. Methods: This retrospective, multi-center, observational chart review included patients that underwent colonoscopy with the ColoWrap device between September 25, 2016, and June 15, 2022. Demographics and procedural information were abstracted from patient records. Physician and staff experiences were captured using a survey instrument. Results: 849 procedures were included in the review. The population was majority male (53%), over 60 (mean age: 60.8 ± 11.6), and obese (mean BMI: 33.6 ± 7.2). 49 patients (5.7%) had an abdominal hernia, 139 (16.3%) had at least one prior abdominal surgery, and 52 (6.1%) had a history of difficult or incomplete colonoscopy. Cecal intubation was achieved in 841 cases (99.1%). Mean cecal intubation time was 6.8 ± 6.2 (min). Manual pressure was used in 109 cases (12.8%); significant manual pressure ( > 3 min) was needed in only 21 procedures (2.5%). Patient repositioning was used in 48 cases (5.6%). No significant adverse events were reported. 84% of physicians indicated that ColoWrap use mitigated looping, shortened cecal intubation time, and reduced physical strain associated with advancing the scope. 90% of endoscopy staff reported reduced manual pressure and patient repositioning, and alleviation of musculoskeletal pain (Figure). Conclusion: ColoWrap is safe and significantly reduces manual pressure and patient repositioning during colonoscopy relative to published rates. Physicians using ColoWrap experience less looping and physical strain and endoscopy staff suffer less musculoskeletal pain. The device is a viable tool among solutions to improve the safety and efficiency of colonoscopy. Further studies to identify circumstances in which ColoWrap use offers the greatest benefit to patients, physicians, and staff are warranted.Figure 1.: Endoscopist and Endoscopy Staff Experience with ColoWrap Device

Clinical Pearls

Rates of post–intensive care syndrome have increased with time for critically ill patients after discharge. Intensive care unit recovery clinics (ICU-RCs) were developed to improve post-ICU care for patients and families; however, little evidence to date supports the use of such clinics.Kovaleva and colleagues interviewed patients and caregivers following a telehealth ICU-RC visit to understand their hospital and recovery experiences. They found Perception of hospitalization (this coincided with COVID-19 protocols for many): responses ranged from praise to criticism, with isolation considered a traumatic experience.Perception of recovery: Very positive about receiving physical therapy and many wanted more. Many valued having a mental health component with the telehealth visit. Participants wanted to know more about their post-ICU care trajectory.The findings highlight components of post-ICU care that should be considered in the design and delivery of ICU-RCs to improve patients’ recovery.See Article, pp 319-323Newborns hospitalized in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) face multiple stressors that can adversely affect their neurodevelopment. Music therapy has been effectively used in NICU care to relax newborns and improve their experience. However, little research has addressed the impact of music therapy on newborns who require cardiac surgery.Sorensen and colleagues studied the feasibility of using music therapy with newborns receiving mechanical ventilation who recently underwent cardiac surgery. They found All participating newborns’ physiological status was stable with no adverse events during the music therapy.All participating nurses and parents were positive about the therapy.Although further study to explore neurodevelopmental outcomes is warranted, music therapy is feasible for use with hemodynamically stable newborns after cardiac surgery.See Article, pp 315-318As most adult patients now survive critical illness, the rate of cognitive disabilities has increased, reducing overall quality of life. Although neuropsychological testing is recommended, little research has been done on the effectiveness of early screening for cognitive impairment.Eman and colleagues examined the use of an adapted version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-Blind; designed for phone use) at hospital discharge and found Approximately 30% of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors could not complete the MoCA at hospital discharge owing to physical and/or cognitive impairment.Almost half (47%) who did complete the tool scored at the severe level of cognitive impairment.Characteristics such as prolonged mechanical ventilation, body mass index, age, and receiving blood transfusions were related to level of cognitive impairment.Level of impairment at time of discharge was not associated with mortality at 6 months after discharge.Although the findings support use of screening at the time of discharge, the authors recommend development of a post-ICU–specific cognitive assessment tool for use with a diverse group of ICU survivors for a long period.See Article, pp 306-314Prolonged pressure or pressure with shear can injure the skin and underlying tissues, especially over bony prominences. Routine repositioning of patients decreases the incidence of pressure injuries; however, nursing compliance with frequent repositioning in intensive care units is low.Turmell and colleagues explored the effects of using patient sensors to cue nursing staff about repositioning needs. They found During phase 1: nursing staff were not cued about patients’ needs for repositioning. Compliance with every-2-hour repositioning was 55%, with a mean repositioning interval of 3.8 hours.Obese/overweight patients and those receiving mechanical ventilation were repositioned less often than healthy-weight and patients who did not require ventilatory support.During phase 2: nursing staff were notified with visual cues from the patient sensors. Repositioning compliance improved to 89% with a mean repositioning interval of 2.3 hours.All patients were appropriately repositioned regardless of clinical characteristics.Real-time cueing about patients’ needs improved compliance with the repositioning protocol and gave nurses a sense of improved teamwork.See Article, pp 295-305

Spinal exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and technical considerations.

Single position surgery has demonstrated to reduce hospital length of stay, operative times, blood loss, postoperative pain, ileus, and complications. ALIF and LLIF surgeries offer advantages of placing large interbody devices under direct compression and can be performed by a minimally invasive approach in the lateral position. Furthermore, simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column is possible in the lateral position without the need for patient repositioning. The purpose of this study is to outline the anatomical and technical considerations for performing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position. Surgical technique and technical considerations for reconstruction of the anterior column in the lateral position by ALIF at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. Topics outlined in this review include: Operating room layout and patient positioning; surgical anatomy and approach; vessel mobilization and retractor placement for L4-5 and L5-S1 lateral ALIF exposure, in addition to comparative technique of disc space preparation, trialing and implant placement compared to the supine ALIF procedure. Anterior exposure performed in the lateral decubitus position allows safe-, minimally invasive access and implant placement in ALIF. The approach requires less peritoneal and vessel retraction than in a supine position, in addition to allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns when performing 360° Anterior-Posterior fusion.

Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy with only three trocars: Results of a prospective single centre study.

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with full bladder cuff excision is the gold standard for treatment of non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). We describe our technique of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) with bladder cuff excision technique with modified port placement, reporting our long-term follow-up outcomes. Patients affected by UTUC were prospectively enrolled and undergone to LNU. Perioperative outcomes, oncological data at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery, and all the surgical complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification were evaluated in all subjects. A total of 50 patients with UTUC underwent LNU, using this new technique without patient and port repositioning. The mean operative time was 168 minutes, estimated blood loss was 75 mL, mean length of hospital stay was 3 days. There were no intraoperative complications while four late complications occurred (two grade IIIb and two grade II according to Clavien-Dindo classification, incisional hernias and fever, respectively). Postoperative pathology was T1 in 12 patients, T2 in 17 patients, and T3 in 21 patients. Tumor grade was low in 12 patients and high in 38 patients. In our study the described LNU technique was related to a significant reduction in terms of operative time and length of hospital stay, with a faster patients' recovery and no peri and postoperative complications. The long-term oncological outcomes were similar to data reported in literature.

Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5–S1 for Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position

Many surgical options exist for multilevel lumbar interbody fusion, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). While current technique of repositioning patients between supine ALIF and lateral decubitus LLIF offers many benefits, intraoperative repositioning can be cumbersome. We present a novel approach that accomplishes both multilevel LLIF and L5-S1 ALIF in a lateral decubitus position. This case series retrospectively enrolled 12 consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 ALIF in the lateral decubitus position and anterior-to-psoas LLIF at more cranial levels as part of a multilevel lumbar interbody fusion surgery between September 2020 and December 2021. All surgeries were performed by a single spine-focused neurosurgeon at an urban academic hospital. Radiographic imaging analysis demonstrated significant changes in coronal Cobb angle (-5.43°±3.81°; P=0.0029), global lumbar lordosis (6.77°±12.04°; P=0.0049), segmental lumbar lordosis (8.91°±10.21°; P=0.0005), spinopelvic mismatch (-7.93°±7.91°; P=0.0010), average disc height (5.30±1.64mm; P=0.0005), and L5-S1 disc height (6.68±2.10mm; P=0.0005). Two patients developed postoperative complications including wound dehiscence and grade I graft subsidence at L4-L5. This case series demonstrated that a combined lateral decubitus L5-S1 ALIF and LLIF at more cranial levels is a safe, efficient approach to multilevel lumbar interbody fusions. This technique significantly restored spinopelvic alignments with a low complication rate and no patient repositioning. Efficacy of this minimally invasive deformity correction technique should be further investigated through a multicenter trial.

Anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and patient-related considerations for ALIF, anterior-to-psoas, and transpsoas LLIF approaches.

Circumferential (AP) lumbar fusion surgery is an effective treatment for degenerative and deformity conditions of the spine. The lateral decubitus position allows for simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior aspects of the spine, enabling instrumentation of both columns without the need for patient repositioning. This paper seeks to outline the anatomical and patient-related considerations in anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine from L1-S1 in the lateral decubitus position. We detail the anatomic considerations of the lateral ALIF, transpsoas, and anterior-to-psoas surgical approaches from surgeon experience and comprehensive literature review. Single-position AP surgery allows simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column and may combine ALIF, LLIF, and minimally invasive posterior instrumentation techniques from L1-S1 without patient repositioning. Careful history, physical examination, and imaging review optimize safety and efficacy of lateral ALIF or LLIF surgery. An excellent understanding of patient spinal and abdominal anatomy is necessary. Each approach has relative advantages and disadvantages according to the disc level, skeletal, vascular, and psoas anatomy. A development of a framework to analyze these factors will result in improved patient outcomes and a reduction in complications for lateral ALIF, transpsoas, and anterior-to-psoas surgeries.

Single-position prone lateral transpsoas approach: early experience and outcomes.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) via a transpsoas approach is a workhorse minimally invasive approach for lumbar arthrodesis that is often combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. There has been increasing interest in performing single-position surgery, allowing access to the anterolateral and posterior spine without requiring patient repositioning. The feasibility of the transpsoas approach in patients in the prone position has been reported. Herein, the authors present a consecutive case series of all patients who underwent single-position prone transpsoas LLIF performed by an individual surgeon since adopting this approach. A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive case series of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent single-position prone LLIF for any indication between October 2019 and November 2020. Pertinent operative details (levels, cage use, surgery duration, estimated blood loss, complications) and 3-month clinical outcomes were recorded. Intraoperative and 3-month postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess for interbody subsidence. Twenty-eight of 29 patients (97%) underwent successful treatment with the prone lateral approach over the study interval; the approach was aborted in 1 patient, whose data were excluded. The mean (SD) age of patients was 67.9 (9.3) years; 75% (21) were women. Thirty-nine levels were treated: 18 patients (64%) had single-level fusion, 9 (32%) had 2-level fusion, and 1 (4%) had 3-level fusion. The most commonly treated levels were L3-4 (n = 15), L2-3 (n = 12), and L4-5 (n = 11). L1-2 was fused in 1 patient. The mean operative time was 286.5 (100.6) minutes, and the mean retractor time was 29.2 (13.5) minutes per level. The mean fluoroscopy duration was 215.5 (99.6) seconds, and the mean intraoperative radiation dose was 170.1 (94.8) mGy. Intraoperative subsidence was noted in 1 patient (4% of patients, 3% of levels). Intraoperative lateral access complications occurred in 11% of patients (1 cage repositioning, 2 inadvertent ruptures of anterior longitudinal ligament). Subsidence occurred in 5 of 22 patients (23%) with radiographic follow-up, affecting 6 of 33 levels (18%). Postoperative functional testing (Oswestry Disability Index, SF-36, visual analog scale-back and leg pain) identified significant improvement. This single-surgeon consecutive case series demonstrates that this novel technique is well tolerated and has acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Larger patient series with longer follow-up are needed to further elucidate the safety profile and long-term outcomes of single-position prone LLIF.

Late venous air embolism following insertion of Mayfield head pins.

Dear Editor, Venous air embolism (VAE) is not an uncommon event during neurosurgical procedures. It is an iatrogenic complication that occurs when air from the atmosphere enters into the systemic circulation specifically when the surgical site is above the level of heart producing a sub-atmospheric pressure in the open veins. A 27-year-old male diagnosed as a case of fronto-temporo-parietal meningioma was posted for craniotomy and excision under general anesthesia. His Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] was 15, and no neurological deficit was present. All laboratory investigations were within normal limits. His magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of large well-defined lesion in left Sylvian fissure, extending into left basal cistern with mass effect. Following anesthesia induction, a Mayfield pin was used to stabilize the head of the patient in a supine position. The pin was removed and reinserted by the surgeon to improve the surgical access. Half an hour later, the surgeon repositioned the patient with head end elevated by 30 degree. We observe a sudden fall in end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration [EtCO2] from 30 to 19 mmHg with a drop of oxygen saturation from 100% to 95%. Rest of the vital parameters including heart rate and blood pressure demonstrated no change from baseline. We started the management with administration of 100% oxygen and intravenous fluids. We could aspirate 4–5 ml of air through the central venous line catheter [Arrow triple lumen central venous catheter, 7 French sizes, and 16-centimeter length]. We confirmed the central venous line position with electrocardiogram as a guide. The superior vena cava – right atrium junction positioning of the central venous line was confirmed with a tall P wave, which was equal to R wave height. The time frame between the event and air aspiration was one and half minutes. Within 1–2 min of air aspiration, oxygen saturation returned back to normal and EtCO2 rose up to 25 mmHg from 19 mmHg. No further episodes of VAE occurred during surgery. Mayfield head pin is commonly used in neurosurgical patients to keep the head stable during surgery. The literature is scarce in case reports showing an association of VAE and Mayfield head pins in adult patients.[12] Ture H et al. observed that the rate and severity of VAE were significantly lower in patients with 30-degree head elevation than in patients with 45-degree head elevation undergoing craniotomy in semi-sitting position.[3] This was a case of late VAE during repositioning of patient possibly following air entrainment through diploic veins injured at first attempt of pin insertion. In our case, we could not find any other possible explanation for this sudden decrease in EtCO2 except for the traumatized initial skull pin site being culprit for air entrainment after a change in position. At this time point, the surgery was not started and anesthetic depth was well maintained. The proper scanning of the surgical site by a surgeon before pin insertion, avoidance of sudden change in patient positioning, and proper suturing of the initial traumatized pin insertion site could avert this iatrogenic complication. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

THE ONE-STAGE PREMAXILLARY REPOSITIONING AND BONE GRAFT ALVEOLOPLASTY IN BILATERAL ALVEOLAR CLEFT; A PRELIMINARY STUDY

Background: The bilateral alveolar cleft associated with markedly prominent premaxillary segment always possessed a surgical challenge because of the paucity of local flaps for watertight closure and high bone graft alveoloplasty failure rate. The orthodontic workup alone to mold unrestricted growing premaxillary segment could not optimize its position with the unfavorable functional and aesthetic outcome. In addition, the repeated surgical intervention may add burden on patient suffering and affect maxillary growth rate.Objective: Evaluation of the premaxillary viability, position, bone graft stability, and early growth after simultaneous premaxillary repositioning and alveolar bone grafting in alveolar cleft patients. Patients & Methods: Seven patients aged between 6 and 11 years were subjected to perioperative orthodontic workups to optimize the position of the premaxilla for its surgical correction before bone grafting. Then, the simultaneous premaxillary repositioning and bone graft alveoloplasty technique was done. Surgical indications, contraindications with orthodontic role were evaluated and discussed. Results: This prospective clinical study presents the outcome of seven consecutive pediatric patients who complained of alveolar clefts with severe premaxillary segment protrusion. It was conducted during the period between 2014 and 2020 in the Plastic Surgery Department-Aswan University Hospitals. The results were assessed by clinical examination and cephalometric tracing for at least two years for evaluating the premaxillary position, functional outcome, upper jaw stability, and early growth affection. Conclusion This technique proved to be a safe procedure in appropriately selected patients. It can produce an early stable maxillary arch with good aesthetic results besides less surgical interventions. No relapse or significant complications were documented. Clinical relevance The treatment of wide bilateral cleft alveolus patients is still based on experience and expert opinions. This preliminary study deals with markedly protruded premaxilla with bilateral alveolar cleft by combined orthodontic and one-stage premaxillary repositioning with bone graft alveoloplasty. An extended study period assessment for midfacial and maxillary growth is necessary to continue until adulthood or beyond.

Prone Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Grade II Spondylolisthesis: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) provides indirect decompression without disruption of the posterior elements. It involves a larger implant footprint than that of posterior approaches. LLIF is typically performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. When a posterior fixation is indicated, a second-stage procedure is performed with the patient in the prone position. Single-position surgery provides the potential advantage of decreased operative time because both procedures can be performed without patient repositioning. Single-position LLIF and posterior fixation in the prone position have not been well validated to date. Herein, techniques for LLIF, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, and facetectomy in the prone position are shown. A 76-yr-old woman with osteoporosis presented with severe back and bilateral leg pain refractory to conservative management and imaging findings of grade 2 dynamic anterolisthesis at L4-L5 with severe stenosis. She underwent LLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and facetectomy. She was placed on a Jackson table in the prone position for the entire procedure, which was performed in a single stage. Percutaneous pedicle screws were placed, followed by a left-sided minimally invasive facetectomy. A left-sided retroperitoneal transpsoas approach was used to perform the LLIF in standard fashion. Finally, the rods were locked into place. Postoperatively, the patient was neurologically stable, and imaging confirmed good hardware placement. At the 6-wk follow-up, the patient was doing well. This case demonstrates the feasibility of performing LLIF and posterior fixation in a single stage in the prone position. The patient provided informed consent. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute.

Arthroscopic Distal Tibial Allograft for Posterior Glenoid Reconstruction

Background: Posterior glenoid bone loss occurs in more than two-thirds of patients with posterior glenohumeral instability, with 14% to 22% having greater than subcritical bone loss (13.5%), a marker for potential need for bony augmentation versus soft tissue-only procedures. Several techniques are described to augment either the version or volume of the glenoid surface including osteotomies, autograft transfers, and allograft tibia transfers. Indications: Arthroscopic-assisted allograft distal tibia bone block augmentation to the posterior glenoid is indicated for revision posterior instability procedures with posterior bone loss and in primary cases of posterior instability with critical bone loss. Technique Description: Arthroscopic posterior glenoid reconstruction with allograft distal tibia and posterior labral repair in the lateral position is presented. This technique uses standard instrument sets and requires no patient repositioning. The preplanned tibial bone block is prepared on a back table either prior to, or concurrently with, arthroscopic procedure. After creation of high posterior portal and standard anterior portal, a sucker-shaver and burr are used to create a perpendicular edge for apposition of the allograft tibia. The bone block is introduced through a longitudinal incision and underdelivered to the prepared surface under the liberated labrum. The articular surface of the graft and glenoid are aligned and cannulated screws are used to compress the bone block against the native glenoid. The posterior labral tissue is then mobilized over the graft and repaired to the native glenoid. Results: Arthroscopic distal tibial allograft augmentation for posterior bone loss restored stability and function in a small cohort of patients. Patients reported improved stability in the immediate postoperative course, with restoration of motion by 2 months. Push-ups, pull-ups, and return to full active duty without restrictions is allowed at 6 months postoperatively. Imaging at 3 months postoperatively has shown excellent graft healing. Discussion: The benefits of allograft tibia augmentation for posterior instability with glenoid bone loss include an anatomic joint surface restoration including articular cartilage, lack of donor site morbidity, and a minimally invasive approach. When performed arthroscopically, this technique permits concurrent posterior labral repair and anatomic reconstruction.

Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy requiring no robot redocking or patient repositioning: experience from a single center with 62 cases

Objective: To examine a new technique of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy without robot reldocking or patient repositioning. Methods: Patients diagnosed as upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with this modality between November 2015 and January 2019 at Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were included in this analysis. Data collection including patient demographics, operative procedure and postoperative morbidities were conducted by retrospective charts review, after receiving the institutional review board's approval. There were 35 males and 27 females with a median age of 70 years (range: 30 to 91 years) underwent single docking robot-assisted nephroureterectomy without repositioning. Among the 62 cases, 37 patients had pelvic carcinoma while 25 patients had ureteral carcinoma (with proximal portion 12 cases, middle portion 5 cases and distal portion 8 cases). The patient was placed in a 60 to 80-degree, modified flank position with a 15-degree Trendelenburg tilt. The contralateral arm was positioned perpendicular to the torso on an arm board while the ipsilateral arm was taped to the patient's side with ample padding. The robot cart was then docked at a 90-degree angle, perpendicular to the patient. A "W"-shape, three robotic-arm configurations was used for port placement. Results: The surgical procedures were performed successfully in all the 62 patients. The operation time was (171.6±54.7) minutes (range: 60 to 370 minutes). The estimated blood loss during the operation was 50(50) ml (range: 20 to 400 ml) with 4 patients had transfusion. No perioperative death was encountered. Eleven patients had post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 2) including 3 cases of hemorrhage and 8 cases of chylous leakage. All cases were regularly followed up with a median time of 37 months (range: 17 to 55 months). There were 8, 30, 19, 4 and 1 case followed up for 48, 36, 24, 18 and less than 18 months, respectively. Three patients had reginal recurrences and 11 cases of distant metastasis occurred, with 5 patients died for cancer. The survival rate within 24 months was estimated as 75.4%(43/57). Conclusion: Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy without robot redocking or patient repositioning could be safely reproduced, with surgical outcomes comparable to other established techniques.

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Useful Technique That Continues to Evolve.

Colorectal cancer remains the 3rd most common cancer diagnosed among men and women in the United States. With improved screening, premalignant rectal lesions and rectal cancers are being detected at earlier stages. In addition, the use of neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy has led to downstaging of larger lesions. There is growing interest among colorectal surgeons in local excision with organ preservation for patients with rectal cancer. There are multiple platforms for local excision of rectal cancers, including transanal excision (TAE), transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). TAMIS was developed as an affordable platform that uses conventional laparoscopic equipment familiar to many colorectal surgeons. TAMIS allows for full-thickness benign or malignant lesion excision in any quadrant without the need for patient repositioning. The literature has shown that, for appropriately selected patients, TAMIS provides superior excision quality compared to TAE. Furthermore, TAMIS has oncologic outcomes equivalent to TEM at a fraction of the cost. Recently, robotic TAMIS has been introduced, which takes advantage of the articulating instruments of the robotic platform without the need for a skilled assistant. This article will cover multiple technical aspects for TAMIS including patient selection and preparation, technical tips for successful excision and defect closure, and recent advances, including robotic TAMIS.

Intra-Fraction Motion Management for Radiosurgical Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical Experience, Imaging Frequency, and Motion Analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the patient positioning and intra-fraction motion management performance of an image-guidance protocol established for radiosurgical treatments of trigeminal neuralgia patients. Specifically, it also aims to analyze patient motion data for the evaluation of current motion tolerance levels and imaging frequency utilized for repositioning patients.MethodsA linear accelerator equipped with ExacTrac is used for patient positioning with stereoscopic imaging and treatments. Treatments are delivered with 4-mm conical collimators using seven equally spaced arcs. Arcs are 20 degrees apart and span 100 arc degrees each. Following initial ExacTrac positioning, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is obtained for independent confirmation of patient position. Patients are then stereoscopically imaged prior to the delivery of each arc and repositioned when 0.5-mm translational tolerance in any direction is exceeded. After the patient has been repositioned, verification stereoscopic images are obtained. Data from 48 patients with 607 image pairs were analyzed for this study.ResultsOver the course of 48 patient treatments, the mean magnitude of mean 3D deviations was 0.64 mm ± 0.12 mm (range: 0.07-2.74 mm). With the current 0.50-mm tolerance level for repositioning, patients exceeded the tolerance 51.4% of the time considering only images following an arc segment. For those instances, patients were repositioned with a mean magnitude of 0.85 mm ± 0.15 mm (1 SD). For a 0.25-mm tolerance level, 86.1% of arc segments would have required repositioning following the delivery of an arc segment, with a mean magnitude of 0.68 mm ± 0.12 mm. Conversely, for 0.75-mm and 1.00-mm tolerance levels, the tolerance would have been exceeded only 21.5% and 6.6% of instances following the delivery of an arc segment, with a mean magnitude of 1.08 mm ± 0.21 mm and 1.34 mm ± 0.24 mm, respectively. Each repositioning adds approximately 2 minutes to treatment time, which accounts for parts of the variability in patient treatment times. Following the initial ExacTrac and CBCT, the mean treatment time from first arc to treatment end was 57 minutes (range: 33-63 minutes).DiscussionsThe current 0.50-mm tolerance level results in a clinically manageable but significant number of patient repositions during trigeminal neuralgia treatments. Frequent patient repositioning can result from actual patient motion convolved with the accuracy and precision limitations of the image analysis. Increasing the repositioning tolerance could more selectively correct for actual patient motion and shorten the treatment time at the expense of more variations in patient position. A more lenient tolerance level of 0.75 mm would decrease the repositioning rate by approximately a factor of 2; however, the permissible magnitude of motion will increase, leading to possible dosimetric consequences. Once treatment begins, there was no trend as to when patients exceeded the tolerance.ConclusionsCurrent imaging protocol for patient positioning and intra-fraction motion management fits the clinical workflow with clinically acceptable residual patient motion. The next important step would be to assess how the number of repositions and magnitude of residual movements affect treatment outcomes.

Comparison of Effect of Norepinephrine Versus Phenylephrine Prophylactic Boluses on Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Study

Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) onset induces maternal hypotension, which can be managed by vasopressors like phenylephrine (PE). However, PE (α-adrenergic agonist) tends to reflexively decrease the heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO). Norepinephrine (NE), being an α-agonist with weak β-adrenergic activity, maintains the blood pressure (BP) with less tendency to decrease the HR and CO, and hence, may be a more useful alternative to PE. Objectives: To compare the effects of prophylactic boluses of NE and PE on SA-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section, as well as assess the neonatal outcomes and adverse reactions. Methods: Sixty parturient belonging to ASA class I and II, scheduled for elective cesarean section, were randomly allocated between 2 groups: (i) Group NE (n=30) which received 5 µg intravenous (IV) NE, and (ii) Group PE (n=30) which received 50 µg IV PE as prophylactic boluses immediately after patient repositioning. Rescue bolus interventions using 5 µg NE or 25 µg PE were given for hypotension, respectively. Maternal hemodynamic variables were measured non-invasively. Neonatal outcomes and adverse effects, if any, were also noted and compared. Results: Pre-operative and post-operative hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, SpO2), adverse incidences (of hypotension, bradycardia, and nausea) as well as neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P&gt;0.05). However, the number of patients who required additional rescue vasopressor boluses was significantly greater in Group PE than in Group NE (OR for 2 vs 0 bolus = 9.75; OR for 2 vs. 1 bolus = 11.1428). Conclusion: NE was more efficacious in preventing SA-induced hypotension with better preservation of maternal HR than PE, and hence, can be considered as an alternative to PE.

Ultrasound-Controlled Manual Magnet Repositioning in Magnet Dislocation of Cochlear Implants.

To investigate whether ultrasound is a helpful and reliable diagnostic tool to survey the status of the magnet previous and after manual repositioning in patients with partially dislocated cochlear implant (CI) magnets and to assess the success rate of a manual repositioning maneuver. A prospective cohort study. A tertiary referral medical center. Patients with a cochlear implant who presented with magnet dislocation after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between June 1, 2019 and July 15, 2020. Manual repositioning of the partially dislocated CI magnet surveyed by pre- and post-interventional ultrasound. Rate of successfully diagnosed and manually repositioned magnets; complication rate and recurrence rate after initial manual repositioning maneuver. Nine patients presented with a partial magnet dislocation diagnosed by pre-interventional ultrasound following MRI (n = 9 magnets; three ♀; eight right-sided implants; 65.4 ± 21.7 yr). All magnets were repositioned manually. The magnets were successfully repositioned at the first attempt in six out of eight patients. Two patients required a second and one patient a third attempt of manual repositioning. Post-interventional ultrasound confirmed the entirely restored magnet position in all cases. During the mean follow-up period of 7.3 months (±5.4 mo) no patient experienced any complication or recurrent dislocation of the respective magnet. Manual magnet repositioning is a feasible and reliable method with a high success rate for partially dislocated CI magnets. The pre-interventional diagnosis as well as the post-interventional confirmation of the magnet status can be effectively determined by ultrasound. Thus, manual magnet repositioning and ultrasound investigation can be advocated as first-line therapeutic and diagnostic instruments when dealing with partial magnet dislocation.

Supine extraperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy without patient repositioning.

To describe a novel technique allowing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and lymphadenectomy, in a complete supine position, without patient repositioning. Between January 2016 and October 2018, 20 consecutive patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma underwent supine extraperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. The patients were placed in the complete supine position. A 4-cm pararectal skin incision was made and the extraperitoneal space was developed. We used a unique port placement that permits complete access for nephroureterectomy, bladder cuff excision and concomitant lymphadenectomy. Operative parameters and pathological data were analyzed. The median age was 70years (range 49-88years), the mean operative time was 234min (range 175-293min) and the mean estimated blood loss was 67mL (range 50-200mL). There were no intraoperative complications, and no patients required transfusion or open conversion. The median number of removed lymph nodes was 10; only one patient had node metastasis. The total operative time and time for nephroureterectomy were significantly longer in the first 10 patients (first group) than in the second 10 patients (second group). Times required for bladder cuff excision and lymphadenectomy did not differ between the two groups. Our novel technique, which enables completion of the entire procedure of nephrouretectomy with bladder cuff excision and lymphadenectomy in the supine position without patient repositioning, is safe and minimizes operative time while maintaining oncological efficacy. We believe this approach might become a standard option for patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Critical Care Guidance for Tracheostomy Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global, Multidisciplinary Approach.

Critical care nurses caring for patients with a tracheostomy are at high risk because of the predilection of SARS-CoV-2 for respiratory and mucosal surfaces. This review identifies patient-centered practices that ensure safety and reduce risk of infection transmission to health care workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Consensus statements, guidelines, institutional recommendations, and scientific literature on COVID-19 and previous outbreaks were reviewed. A global interdisciplinary team analyzed and prioritized findings via electronic communications and video conferences to develop consensus recommendations. Aerosol-generating procedures are commonly performed by nurses and other health care workers, most notably during suctioning, tracheostomy tube changes, and stoma care. Patient repositioning, readjusting circuits, administering nebulized medications, and patient transport also present risks. Standard personal protective equipment includes an N95/FFP3 mask with or without surgical masks, gloves, goggles, and gown when performing aerosol-generating procedures for patients with known or suspected COVID-19. Viral testing of bronchial aspirate via tracheostomy may inform care providers when determining the protective equipment required. The need for protocols to reduce risk of transmission of infection to nurses and other health care workers is evident. Critical care nurses and multidisciplinary teams often care for patients with a tracheostomy who are known or suspected to have COVID-19. Appropriate care of these patients relies on safeguarding the health care team. The practices described in this review may greatly reduce risk of infectious transmission.