Patient-reported Outcome Measures Questionnaires Research Articles

Lateral joint tightness in flexion following cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty decreases patient-reported outcome measures and postoperative range of motion

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to clarify the association between clinical outcomes and the flexion joint gap following rotating concave–convex (Vanguard ROCC) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsThis consecutive retrospective series included 55 knees that underwent ROCC TKA. All the surgical procedures were performed using a spacer-based gap-balancing technique. To evaluate the medial and lateral flexion gaps, axial radiographs of the distal femur were obtained using the epicondylar view with a distraction force to the lower leg at 6 months postoperatively. Lateral joint tightness was defined as the lateral gap being greater than the medial gap. To evaluate clinical outcomes, patients were asked to complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaires preoperatively and during at least 1 year of follow-up postoperatively. ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 24.0 months. Overall, 16.0% of patients had postoperative lateral joint tightness in flexion. The postoperative range of motion and PROMs were lower in patients with lateral joint tightness than in those with a balanced flexion gap or lateral joint laxity. No serious complications, including bearing dislocations, occurred during the observation period. ConclusionLateral joint tightness in flexion following ROCC TKA decreases PROMs and postoperative range of motion. Level of evidence4.

‘It’s just a finger isn’t it…’: patients’ perspectives of recovery following finger fractures and participation in surgical trials – a qualitative interview study

ObjectivesTo (1) generate detailed, person-centred data about the experience of finger injury and treatment and (2) understand the patients’ perspectives of research involvement with a view to informing better designed...

Women’s experiences with using patient-reported outcome and experience measures in routine perinatal care in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

ObjectivesTo gain insight into the experiences of women with completing and discussing patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and tailoring their care based on their outcomes.DesignA mixed-methods...

Progress (patient reported outcomes in genital reconstructive surgeries) a validated patient reported outcome measure questionnaire to assess post operative functional improvement following feminising genital reconstructive surgery

Progress (patient reported outcomes in genital reconstructive surgeries) a validated patient reported outcome measure questionnaire to assess post operative functional improvement following feminising genital reconstructive surgery

Aspects of Patient Experience Associated With Improved Scoliosis Research Society-22 Revised (SRS-22R) and European Quality of Life Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Managed With Observation or Bracing.

Prospective cohort study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) managed nonsurgically with bracing or observation. PREMs and PROMs are increasingly used to assess the effectiveness of patient-centered health care provision. To date, no study has attempted to study the relationship between PREMs and PROMs in AIS. All patients who visited our one-stop, tertiary center for AIS between 2020 and 2021, were asked to complete pairs of PREMs and PROMs questionnaires. PREMs were evaluated using our institution's outpatient experience survey adapted from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. PROMs were determined via the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) and European Quality of Life Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) forms. In total, we included 730 patients who completed pairs of PREMs and PROMs questionnaires. 451 patients were treated by observation and 279 were braced. In the observation group, there was no association between patient experience and SRS-22r or EQ-5D-5L scores. In the brace group, improved SRS-22r were associated with higher PREM scores. In particular, having confidence and trust in treating physicians ( r =0.34), reporting that their worries and concerns were addressed during treatment ( r =0.34) and being taught self-care ( r =0.33, P <0.0001 for all) were most highly correlated with better SRS-22r scores. In patients with AIS treated with bracing, improved patient experience was positively correlated with better patient reported outcomes, especially if patients' concerns were addressed during treatment and they received supportive care and education on self-care. In contrast, patient experience did not correlate with PROMs in children and adolescents with AIS who were under observation.

Black and hispanic women have less support during cancer evaluation and treatment: results from a prospective patient reported outcomes program in gynecologic malignancy

ObjectiveRace remains a significant predictor of poor outcomes in women with gynecologic cancer and minority patients consistently report worse quality of life during cancer treatment. Disparities between patients in strength...

Measuring outcomes of rehabilitation among the elderly-a feasibility study.

A feasible system for measuring patient outcomes of rehabilitation is required for assessing the real-world cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation. This study aims to assess the feasibility of measuring outcomes of rehabilitation among elderly individuals with early-stage Alzheimer's. We used the principles of Design Science to construct a set of metrics consisting of standardized PROM (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure) questionnaires, clinician-reported measures, and observational measures of functioning. We used standardized questionnaires whenever possible to ensure the validity and reliability of the questionnaires. The set of metrics was piloted on 16 individuals living at home with regular home care services. After the pilot, we further refined the set of metrics based on relevance, sensitivity to change, and applicability. We found that measurement was feasible and we propose the final set of metrics as a minimum set, which could be further improved upon by addition of metrics relevant to each subgroup of elderly individuals. We also found that using self-reported questionnaires in this population is not without difficulties. We therefore suggest that the role of informal caregivers be considered, and that accessibility of outcome questionnaires be improved.

Long-Term COVID-19 Smell and Taste Disorders Differ Significantly from Other Post-Infectious Cases.

COVID-19 is causing a wide range of clinical manifestations. Severe complications and long-lasting sequelae have been identified. Thus, olfactory disorders are reported in up to 86% of cases in mild and moderate COVID-19 infections. We present the first study comparing simple and complex post-COVID-19 cases with matched non-COVID-19 post-infectious smell and taste disorders. A total of 328 patients were recruited from the University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep, Ear-nose-throat Department, Goedstrup Hospital, Denmark. A non-COVID -19 post-infectious population of 148 individuals was identified from the Redcap database, and was matched by duration of smell and taste disorders. Post-COVID-19 patients were divided into 99 patients with simple smell and taste disorders (only suffering from smell and taste disorders after COVID-19); and (81 patients with complex smell and taste disorder plus several other post-COVID-19 complaints). Besides patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) questionnaires and quality of life score (QoL), ear-nose-throat examination, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), orthonasal smell test (Sniffing's sticks), retronasal quick test, and taste screening were performed. Cases with post-COVID-19-related smell and taste disorders deviated from non-COVID-19 post-infectious cases; the patients were younger, had a lower occurrence of anosmia/ageusia, and had higher overall smell test scores. In contrast, patients with post-COVID-19-related smell and taste disorders more frequently complained of distorted senses. Parosmia and phantosmia were more prevalent among patients with simple post-COVID-19 complaints than among complex cases and their QoL were more negatively affected. Smell and taste function differ significantly between post-COVID-19 and other non-COVID-19 post-viral cases. 3 Laryngoscope, 133:169-174, 2023.

EQ-5D-3L and quality of life in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients: beyond the index scores

BackgroundMany patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) generate single number index scores that summarise responses to different questions within a questionnaire. Although these are valuable as unambiguous indicators of ill-health and changes in health, further information can be gained from examining the questionnaire responses themselves. This has additional importance since the patients’ reports are those responses and not the index scores. This paper reanalyses data from two prospective multicentre clinical studies assessing patients’ quality of life before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the EQ-5D-3L. Patients who completed EQ-5D-3L questionnaires at 3 time periods were included from 4 countries (USA, UK, Australia, New Zealand) operated on by the same surgeons using two different knee replacement systems. Descriptive analyses included levels within EQ-5D dimensions and profiles (combinations of dimensions and levels) at baseline and follow-up, including changes over time and differences between implants. Regression analysis quantified the relationship between the profiles and the EQ VAS.ResultsProblems with mobility, usual activities and pain & discomfort, in that order, were most frequent for pre-operative patients. There were large improvements in every dimension after surgery, but the time that this was observed differed: for mobility, self-care and anxiety & depression, most of the improvement occurred during the first 10 months; for usual activities and pain & discomfort, over 11–22 months. Analysing profiles, 85% of patients experienced an unequivocal improvement, 5.9% had no change, 3.5% worsened and 5.5% a mixed change at 11–22 months follow-up. Anxiety & depression had the greatest impact on EQ VAS scores; while mobility and usual activities were also important; usual activities was particularly important post-surgery.ConclusionsThe value of analysing patients’ responses to PROMs questionnaires without using summary scores was confirmed. The results add further detail to existing knowledge about the health problems that TKA patients experience before surgery, improvements after surgery, residual problems that some have, and the time at which improvements are experienced. This was a small study, but its methods may be easily replicated in other studies that use the EQ-5D-3L. It may also be possible to adapt them for other PROMs.

Impact of capsular preservation on patient-reported outcomes and complication rates in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach.

It is not known whether preservation of the capsule of the hip positively affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach (DAA-THA). A recent randomized controlled trial found no clinically significant difference at one year postoperatively. This study aimed to determine whether preservation of the anterolateral capsule and anatomical closure improve the outcome and revision rate, when compared with resection of the anterolateral capsule, at two years postoperatively. Two consecutive groups of patients whose operations were performed by the senior author were compared. The anterolateral capsule was resected in the first group of 430 patients between January 2012 and December 2014, and preserved and anatomically closed in the second group of 450 patients between July 2015 and December 2017. There were no other technical changes between the two groups. Patient characteristics, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and surgical data were collected from our database. PROM questionnaires, consisting of the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI-Hip), were collected two years postoperatively. Data were analyzed with generalized multiple regression analysis. The characteristics, CCI, operating time, and length of stay were similar in both groups. There was significantly less blood loss in the capsular preservation group (p = 0.037). The revision rate (n = 3, (0.6%) in the resected group, and 1 (0.2%) in the preserved group) did not differ significantly (p = 0.295). Once adjusted for demographic and surgical factors, the preserved group had significantly worse PROMs: + 0.24 COMI-Hip (p < 0.001) and -1.6 OHS points (p = 0.017). However, the effect sizes were much smaller than the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of 0.95 and 5, respectively). The date of surgery (influencing, for instance, the surgeon's age) was not a significant factor. Based on the MCID, the lower PROMs in the capsular preservation group do not seem to have clinical relevance. They do not, however, confirm the expected benefit of capsular preservation reported for the posterolateral approach. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(7):826-832.

Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty : a multicentre study.

AimsThe aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up.MethodsThis was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants.ResultsThere were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and > two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%).ConclusionRA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.

Patient-reported outcome measures for children and adolescents having dental bleaching in the UK

PurposeDental bleaching in paediatric patients can be used to address discolouration of teeth due to trauma, endodontic treatment, or enamel and dentine defects. Despite being a minimally invasive and successful treatment, the use of bleaching products in children and young people remains controversial. This evaluation was designed to provide insight into the child’s perspective on dental bleaching and the influence that this treatment has upon their life.MethodA dental bleaching patient reported outcome measure (PROM) was developed and piloted in 2019. Data were collected from 3 UK units (January–March 2020). Children attending these units for bleaching reviews were invited to complete the PROM.ResultsTwenty seven PROM questionnaires were completed including 19 courses of external bleaching and 8 courses of internal/external bleaching. The average age was 14 years old (9–17 years). The common indications for bleaching were Amelogenesis Imperfecta, dental trauma and Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation. Patients reported improvements in their appearance (89%) and self-confidence (81%). Sensitivity was the most common side effect, reported in 63% of cases.ConclusionThis PROM supports the use of dental bleaching in children and young people when treating dental disease that causes discolouration. Bleaching not only improved the appearance of teeth, but also patients’ self-confidence. Sensitivity is a common side effect and clinicians should discuss this common risk and its management with patients and their families.

Sexual and urinary function after organ sparing surgery for penile cancer: A questionnaire study of consecutive patients over a 3-year period in a single region

Objective:The European Association of Urology recommends organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for localised penile cancer. We aimed to assess the impact of OSS including glans reconstruction on erectile, sexual and urinary function.Method:Local ethics approval was obtained. Patients coded for glans resurfacing, glansectomy and partial penectomy from 2015 to 2018 were identified across two trusts. Background characteristics, histology, staging and follow-up were recorded. Two questionnaires were used to assess function: a custom questionnaire on patient reported outcomes and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire. Anonymised questionnaires were sent to each patient with prepaid return envelopes included.Results:A total of 28/64 (44%) questionnaires were returned complete. The mean age of participants was 71(35–93) and body mass index (BMI) 28(20–38). There was 1 glans resurfacing, 1 circumcision and wide local excision, 8 glansectomy and 18 partial-penectomy patients (of which 4 and 13 declined reconstruction, respectively). Sexual satisfaction (SS) and erectile function (EF) declined postoperatively while sexual desire was preserved. Subjective glans sensitivity reduced independent of technique. Glans reconstruction reduced the impact on IIEF in glansectomy (13.5 versus 25.3, p &lt; 0.05) but not partial-penectomy (13.4 versus 13.8). SS was worse in partial-penectomy patients undergoing glans reconstruction on patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) (SS change: −4.0/10 with reconstruction versus −0.9/10 without, p &lt; 0.05). Urinary symptoms appear limited to spraying and change of flow of urine, with some patients reporting the need to pass urine sitting down.Conclusion:Sexual and erectile function is impaired post-OSS in penile cancer while sexual desire is preserved. Simultaneous glans reconstruction appears to minimise this impact in glansectomy patients when assessed by IIEF. A validated PROM questionnaire could improve preoperative counselling, and guide postoperative sexual recovery.

What Are the Risks and Functional Outcomes Associated With Bilateral Humeral Lengthening Using a Monolateral External Fixator in Patients With Achondroplasia?

What Are the Risks and Functional Outcomes Associated With Bilateral Humeral Lengthening Using a Monolateral External Fixator in Patients With Achondroplasia?

Liquid biopsies and patient-reported outcome measures for integrative monitoring of patients with early-stage breast cancer: a study protocol for the longitudinal observational Prospective Breast Cancer Biobanking (PBCB) study

IntroductionBreast cancer is still the most common malignancy among women worldwide. The Prospective Breast Cancer Biobank (PBCB) collects blood and urine from patients with breast cancer every 6 or 12...

Evaluating Symptomatic and Psychosocial Well-being After Keloid Treatment With SCAR-Q.

Many patients with keloids experience symptoms, such as pain and pruritus, and may present with significant psychosocial burdens. However, no single therapeutic regimen has been firmly established for treatment of keloids. The aim of this study was to assess patients' perspectives on their keloids after treatment by comparing preoperative and postoperative surveys. All patients seen at the keloid clinic, both preoperatively and postoperatively, were contacted by telephone call. Information about demographics, keloid characteristics, and levels of pain and pruritus were recorded. Participants also completed all 3 parts (appearance, symptoms, and psychosocial impact) of the SCAR-Q, a validated patient-reported outcome measure questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Of the 60 patients who participated in the study, 35 preoperative and 34 postoperative surveys were completed. Patients experienced significant reductions in mean [standard deviation] pain levels (from 5.6 [4.0] to 0.1 [0.4], P < 0.001) and pruritus (from 6.5 [3.0] to 0.8 [1.5], P < 0.001) postintervention. Significant improvements in all 3 parts of the SCAR-Q were noted. Appearance improved from 26.5 [22.3] to 73.4 [23.0] (P < 0.001); symptoms from 44.0 [15.7] to 81.4 [16.7] (P < 0.001); and psychosocial impact from 27.7 [30.7] to 82.6 [26.3] (P < 0.001). Patients with keloids experience significant improvement in their symptomatic and psychosocial burden after treatment. Although management modalities are not well established, it is essential that plastic surgeons do not overlook the therapeutic benefits for their patients' well-being.

Active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC): study protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial

IntroductionThe active-fluidics system is a new irrigation system of phacoemulsification that automatically detects and maintains stable intraocular pressure at the set value. This trial is designed to compare the efficacy,...

Sociodemographic Factors Are Associated with Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery

Background:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and, specifically, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), are increasingly utilized for clinical research, clinical care, and health-care policy. However, completion of these outcome measures can be inconsistent and challenging. We hypothesized that sociodemographic variables are associated with the completion of PROM questionnaires. The purposes of the present study were to calculate the completion rate of assigned PROM forms and to identify sociodemographic and other variables associated with completion to help guide improved collection efforts.Methods:All new orthopaedic patients at a single academic medical center were identified from 2016 to 2020. On the basis of subspecialty and presenting condition, patients were assigned certain PROMIS forms and legacy PROMs. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the electronic medical record. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare characteristics among those who completed assigned PROMs and those who did not. A multivariable logistic regression model was created to determine which variables were associated with successful completion of assigned PROMs.Results:Of the 219,891 new patients, 88,052 (40%) completed all assigned PROMs. Patients who did not activate their internet-based patient portal had a 62% increased likelihood of not completing assigned PROMs (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58 to 1.66; p < 0.001). Non-English-speaking patients had a 90% (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.82 to 2.00; p < 0.001) increased likelihood of not completing assigned PROMs at presentation. Older patients (≥65 years of age) and patients of Black race had a 23% (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.27; p < 0.001) and 24% (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.30; p < 0.001) increased likelihood of not completing assigned PROMs, respectively.Conclusions:The rate of completion of PROMs varies according to sociodemographic variables. This variability could bias clinical outcomes research in orthopaedic surgery. The present study highlights the need to uniformly increase completion rates so that outcomes research incorporates truly representative cohorts of patients treated. Furthermore, the use of these PROMs to guide health-care policy decisions necessitates a representative patient distribution to avoid bias in the health-care system.Level of Evidence:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Standardising the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Localised Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review

ContextProstate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer among men worldwide. Urinary, bowel, and sexual function, as well as hormonal symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), were prioritised by patients and professionals as part of a core outcome set for localised PCa regardless of treatment type. ObjectiveTo systematically review the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in localised PCa and recommend PROMs for use in routine practice and research settings. Evidence acquisitionThe psychometric properties of PROMs measuring functional and HRQoL domains used in randomised controlled trials including patients with localised PCa were assessed according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology. MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify publications evaluating psychometric properties of the PROMs. The characteristics and methodological quality of the studies included were extracted, tabulated, and assessed according to the COSMIN criteria. Evidence synthesisOverall, 27 studies evaluating psychometric properties of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life core 30 (QLQ-C30) and prostate cancer 25 (QLQ-PR25) modules, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and the 36-item (SF-36) and 12-item Short-Form health survey (SF-12) PROMs were identified and included in the systematic review. EPIC and EORTC QLQ-C30, a general module that assesses patients’ physical, psychological, and social functions, were characterised by high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.46–0.96 and 0.68–0.94 respectively) but low content validity. EORTC QLQ-PR25, which is primarily designed to assess PCa-specific HRQoL, had moderate content validity and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.39–0.87). UCLA-PCI was characterised by moderate content validity and high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.21–0.94). However, it does not directly assess hormonal symptoms, whereas EORTC QLQ-PR25 does. ConclusionThe tools with the best evidence for psychometric properties and feasibility for use in routine practice and research settings to assess PROMs in patients with localised PCa were EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25. Since EORTC QLQ-C30 is a general module that does not directly assess PCa-specific issues, it should be adopted in conjunction with the QLQ-PR25 module. Patient summaryWe reviewed and appraised the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires used for patients with localised prostate cancer. We found good evidence to suggest that two questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25) can be used to measure urinary, bowel, and sexual functions and health-related quality of life.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing digital and conventional workflows for treatment with posterior single-unit implant restorations: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to analyze patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of prosthetic therapy with monolithic implant crowns in completely digital workflows (test) with intraoral optical scanning (IOS) and conventional workflows (control) with conventional impressions. Secondary, an objective evaluation of the final implant restorations was performed using the Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score (FIPS). Materials and MethodsForty patients who required an implant-supported single crown on posterior regions were randomly divided into test (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups for impression taking. Each group was then equally separated into two subgroups according to the restorative material used: lithium disilicate (LS2, N!CE®, Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICN, Enamic®, Vita, Bad Säckingen, Germany). Patient satisfaction was evaluated using PROM questionnaires with visual analog scales (VAS) after impression-taking and 1 week after prosthetic delivery. Patient satisfaction with the impression technique was assessed in six domains: length, comfort, anxiety, taste, nausea, and pain, whereas patient satisfaction with the final restoration was assessed in four domains: overall treatment outcome, functionality, esthetics, and cleanability. In addition, the final implant restorations were objectively assessed by an independent prosthodontist using the FIPS. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the defined outcomes. Statistical analysis was completed with a level of significance set at α=0.05. ResultsPROMs focusing on the impression technique demonstrated higher levels of patient satisfaction for IOS compared to conventional impressions, especially in terms of “taste irritation” (p = 0.036); whereas no significant differences were found between both restorative CAD/CAM-materials. Mean FIPS values demonstrated similar results among subgroups. ConclusionsWithin the limitation of this study, both completely digital and conventional protocols provided great levels of patient satisfaction in implant rehabilitation of single-tooth gaps in posterior sites with monolithic implant crowns. The restorative material, LS2 versus PICN, does not impact patient satisfaction with their treatment. However, a long-term follow up is needed to draw more specific conclusions on patient satisfaction with the restorations.