Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Group Research Articles

Effects of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on the incidence of chronic pain after thoracoscopic lung surgery: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveChronic postoperative pain (CPSP) is common after thoracic surgery, even after the less invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study investigated the effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) on the development of CPSP. MaterialsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent VATS at our center between 2020 and 2022. The enrolled patients were divided into the epidural block (EPI) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) groups. A telephone questionnaire was used to collect information regarding CPSP, which was defined as a numerical rating scale (VAS) score ≥1 at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. Additionally, statistical analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for CPSP in the two groups. ResultsOverall, 894 patients completed the follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months, with 325 and 569 patients in the PCIA and EPI groups, respectively. The incidence rates of CPSP in the PCIA group at 3 and 6 months were 16.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 9.3–32.7 %) and 13.5 % (95 % CI: 8.7–33.4 %), and 10.3 % (95 % CI: 8.1–30.5 %) and 3.6 % (95 % CI: 3.5–21.5 %) in EPI group, respectively. The incidence of CPSP at 3 months (P = 0.0048) and 6 months (P < 0.005) was statistically significant in both groups. Age and lymph node dissection were significantly associated with CPSP. ConclusionsCompared to PCIA, TEA was associated with a lower incidence of CPSP after VATS, and should be considered an important part of the analgesia regimen for patients with VATS.

Efficacy of Multimodal Analgesia with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Comparison with Intrathecal Morphine and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.

Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumor treatment provides ergonomic advantages to surgeons and improves surgical outcomes. However, moderate-to-severe pain is unavoidable even after minimally invasive surgery. Despite the growing interest in multimodal analgesia, few studies have directly compared its efficacy with intrathecal morphine, a traditional opioid-based analgesic. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of multimodal analgesia compared with that of intrathecal analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) in patients who underwent transperitoneal RAPN at our institute between 2020 and 2022. Among the 334 patients who met the inclusion criteria, intrathecal analgesia using morphine 200 µg was performed in 131 patients, and multimodal analgesia, including transversus abdominis plane block and intraoperative infusion of paracetamol 1 g and nefopam 20 mg, was administered to 105 patients. The remaining 98 patients received postoperative IV-PCA alone. Results: As the primary outcome, the area under the curve of pain scores over 24 h was significantly lower in the intrathecal analgesia and multimodal analgesia groups than in the IV-PCA group (89 [62-108] vs. 86 [65-115] vs. 108 [87-126] h, p < 0.001). Cumulative opioid requirements were also significantly lower in the intrathecal analgesia and multimodal analgesia groups at 24 h after surgery (p < 0.001). However, postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly increased in the intrathecal analgesia group (27.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Multimodal analgesia with a transversus abdominis plane block is an efficient analgesic method with fewer adverse effects compared to other analgesic methods. Our findings suggest the efficacy and safety of a multimodal approach for opioid-sparing analgesia after RAPN in the current opioid epidemic.

Comparison between the effects of epidural and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative disability-free survival in patients undergoing thoracic and abdominal surgery: A post hoc analysis.

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) are widely used to mitigate immediate postoperative pain; however, their effects on long-term disability-free survival are poorly documented. This study aimed to compare the effects of postoperative TEA and IV-PCA on disability-free survival in patients who underwent thoracic or abdominal surgery. This post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study included 845 inpatients aged ≥55 years that underwent elective thoracic and abdominal surgery between 1 April 2016 and 28 December 2018 in a tertiary care hospital. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) using stabilized inverse propensity scores was adopted to minimize bias. The primary outcome in this study was disability-free survival, defined as survival with a 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 score of <16%, assessed at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. The final analysis included 601 patients who received TEA and 244 who received IV-PCA. After IPTW, the weighted incidence of disability-free survival at 3 months and 1 year was 60.5% and 61.4% in the TEA group and 78.3% and 66.2% in the IV-PCA group, respectively. The adjusted OR for disability-free survival at 3 months and 1 year was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.39) and 1.21 (95% CI: 0.72-2.05), respectively, for the TEA group. No significant differences were observed in the disability-free survival at 3 months and 1 year after elective thoracic and abdominal surgery in patients aged ≥55 years who received TEA or IV-PCA. This study is the first in our setting to document the long-term effects of patient-controlled analgesia. In a post hoc analysis of our prospective cohort study, we show that although differences in chronic postsurgical pain exist at 3 months post-surgery, disability-free survival rates at 1 year do not differ irrespective of the choice of patient-controlled analgesia. The findings of this study highlight the need for shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

Immunocyte profiling changes in patients received epidural versus intravenous analgesia after pancreatectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPerioperative immunosuppressants, such as surgical stress and opioid use may downregulate anti-cancer immunocytes for patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) may attenuate these negative effects and provide better anti-cancer immunocyte profile change than intravenous analgesia using opioid. MethodsWe randomly assigned 108 adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy to receive one of two 72-h postoperative analgesia protocols: one was TEA, and the other was intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). The perioperative proportional changes of immunocytes relevant to anticancer immunity—namely natural killer (NK) cells, cytotoxic T cells, helper T cells, mature dendritic cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells were determined at 1 day before surgery, at the end of surgery and on postoperative day 1,4 and 7 using flow cytometry. In addition, the progression-free survival and overall survival between the two groups were compared. ResultsAfter surgery, the proportions of NK cells and cytotoxic T cells were significantly decreased; the proportion of B cells and mature dendritic cells and Treg cells were significantly increased. However, the proportions of helper T cells exhibited no significant change. These results were comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (52.75 [39.96] and 57.48 [43.66] months for patients in the TEA and IV–PCA groups, respectively; p = 0.5600) and overall survival (62.71 [35.48] and 75.11 [33.10] months for patients in the TEA and IV–PCA groups, respectively; p = 0.0644). ConclusionsTEA was neither associated with favorable anticancer immunity nor favorable oncological outcomes for patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia following open hepatectomy: A single-center retrospective study

BackgroundPostoperative analgesia is an essential component of enhanced recovery after surgery following abdominal surgery. Studies comparing the effectiveness of epidural analgesia with that of other analgesic modalities after liver surgery have reported inconsistent results. Consequently, the use of epidural analgesia for open hepatectomy is controversial. ObjectiveThe present single-center retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in adults undergoing open hepatectomy. MethodsPatients who underwent open hepatectomy between January 2018 to December 2019 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to adjust baseline information between the PCEA and PCIA groups. The primary outcome measure was scores of the numeric rating scales (NRSs) for resting, exercise, and nocturnal pain at postoperative 24 h (postoperative day 1 [POD1]) and 48 h (POD2). The secondary outcome indicators included postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), hypotension, pruritus, respiratory depression, functional activity score (FAS), effective analgesic pump compression ratio, analgesic relief rate, discontinuation of the analgesic pump, reasons for discontinuation of the analgesic pump, and patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia. ResultsThe NRS scores of the PCEA group on POD1 were significantly lower than those of the PCIA group (P < 0.05). On POD2, the difference between the two groups was significant only for motion NRS scores (P < 0.05). The PCIA group had significantly more patients with lower FAS functional class than the PCEA group (P < 0.001). The effective analgesic pump compression ratio and the analgesic relief rate at 2 days after the surgery were lower in the PCEA group than in the PCIA group (P < 0.001). The incidence of pump discontinuation was higher in the PCEA group than in the PCIA group on POD2 (P = 0.044). Moreover, on POD1 and POD2, the PCEA group showed a higher incidence of pruritus and hypotension than the PCIA group (P < 0.001). Both groups showed no significant difference in PONV incidence. ConclusionIn patients undergoing open hepatectomy, PCEA was more effective than PCIA in relieving moderate to severe pain on POD1. However, improving the safety and effectiveness of PCEA remains a challenge.

Comparison of Intravenous Acetaminophen and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Fentanyl after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Opioids often need to be discontinued because they cause nausea, whereas the administration of intravenous acetaminophen (APAP) causes less nausea and vomiting. This study aimed to compare the effects of fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and intravenous APAP on pain and nausea after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: We prospectively investigated primary THA patients who underwent the anterolateral supine approach at four centers between October 2021 and October 2022. The patients (n = 178) were divided randomly into IV-PCA (n = 88) and APAP groups (n = 90). Rest pain, motion pain, and nausea were assessed using NRS scores. Results: Compared with the APAP group, the IV-PCA group experienced significantly greater resting pain and nausea on postoperative day 1. A correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative pain. Postoperative nausea at 8 h was significantly correlated with pain at rest at 4 h (r = 0.193), 8 h (r = 0.194), day 1 (r = 0.245), and day 2 (r = 0.188) after surgery. Early postoperative pain and nausea correlated with subsequent pain and nausea. Conclusions: Intravenous APAP is associated with less pain and nausea and is superior to IV-PCA.

Evaluating Modified Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Enhanced Postoperative Recovery in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Patients

Evaluating Modified Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Enhanced Postoperative Recovery in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Patients

An alternative to opioid-based intravenous patient controlled analgesia in severe burn patients undergoing full thickness split graft in upper limbs.

Opioids provide good analgesic effect in burn patients during acute phase, but these patients may develop tolerance after prolonged exposure. Alternative analgesic strategies such as peripheral nerve blocks appear to provide adequate pain control while sparing opioid-related side effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB-PCA) in severe burn patients with relatively young age undergoing repeated debridement and large-area full thickness skin graft (FTSG). The records of victims in dust explosion in Taiwan in 2016 from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Pain Service Database between 2016 June and 2017 December were evaluated. The patients' demographic data including age, gender, weight, burn area, degree of burn, type of PCA regimen (IV-PCA versus CPNB-PCA), size of FTSG, and adverse effects were collected. The total in-hospital morphine consumption was significantly lower in CPNB-PCA than IV-PCA group. A trend of decrease in numerical rating scores (NRS) was observed for both groups and CPNB group had comparable NRS than IV-PCA group at rest. On movement, CPNB grouped had significantly lower NRS than IV-PCA on post-operative day 3. Our study demonstrated that in patients requiring high dosage of opioid, CPNB may be a suitable alternative for pain control.

Comparison of three analgesic regimens in women undergoing cervical brachytherapy

PURPOSEEffective periprocedural analgesia is an important aspect of cervical brachytherapy delivery, with implications for patient comfort and attendance for subsequent fractions. We compared the efficacy and safety of three analgesic modalities: intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and programmed-intermittent epidural bolus with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PIEB-PCEA). METHODS AND MATERIALSNinety-seven brachytherapy episodes involving 36 patients between July 2016 and June 2019 in a single tertiary center were retrospectively reviewed. Episodes were divided into two key phases: Phase 1 (while applicator remained in situ) and Phase 2 (following applicator removal until discharge or 4 h). For the primary endpoint, pain scores were retrieved and analyzed by analgesic modality with respect to median score and an internally defined “unacceptable” pain experience (>20% of scores being ≥4/10; i.e., moderate or greater). Total nonepidural oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) and toxicity/complication events were reported as secondary endpoints. RESULTSIn Phase 1, there was a significantly higher median pain score (p < 0.001) and more episodes with unacceptable pain scores (46%) in the IV-PCA group compared with either epidural modality (6–14%; p < 0.001).In Phase 2, we observed a greater median pain score (p = 0.007) and higher proportion of patient episodes with unacceptable pain scores (38%) in the CEI group compared with both the IV-PCA (13%) and PIEB-PCEA (14%) groups (p = 0.001).There was a significant difference in median OMED used throughout all phases across the PIEB-PCEA (0 mg), IV-PCA (70 mg), and CEI (15 mg) groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONSPIEB-PCEA is safe and offers superior analgesia compared to IV-PCA or CEI for pain control after applicator placement in cervical brachytherapy.

Comparison of Changes in Chest Wall Mechanics and Respiratory Timing Between Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Upper abdominal surgery is associated with postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction. Whether patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is superior to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) in preventing postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction is still unclear in laparoscopic gastric surgery. Sixteen patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy randomly received either PCEA or IV-PCA. The primary outcomes were the change in chest wall mechanics and respiratory timing, measured by respiratory inductive plethysmography(Respitrace; Ambulatory Monitoring Inc., Ardsley, New York, United States) before and after surgery, and analyzed by a data acquisition system (PowerLab; ADInstruments, Dunedin, New Zealand). Inspiratory time (Ti), expiratory time (Te), total respiratory cycle time (Ttot), proportion of inspiratory time over total respiratory cycle time (Ti/Ttot), respiratory rate (RR), and abdominal contribution to tidal volume (AB/VT [%]) were calculated from the stored data. AB/VT, relative volume contribution of diaphragm to tidal breathing, represents an index of diaphragmatic function.Because the diaphragm is the main contributor to tidal volume, decreases in AB/VT indicate diaphragm dysfunction. Changes in outcomes over time between the two groups were analyzed using a linear mixed model, and two-sided p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain score(visual analog scale (VAS)), bowel function recovery, and hospital stay duration. Postoperative AB/VT in the IV-PCA group was significantly decreased compared to preoperative levels. AB/VT in the PCEA group was significantly higher than the IV-PCA group on postoperative day (POD) 1. Change in AB/VT over time between the PCEA group and the IV-PCA group differed significantly (p = 0.01). A decrease of AB/VT during POD 1 to 3 was observed in the IV-PCA group but not in the PCEA group. As for respiratory timing, there were significant increases in RR with a reduction of Te and Ttot compared to preoperative levels on POD 1 in the PCEA group. There were significant decreases in RR and Ti/Ttot with an increase of Te and Ttot compared to preoperative levels on POD 1 in the IV-PCA group. There was a significant difference in the change of the Ttot over time between the two groups (p = 0.046). There were no significant differences in the changes of Te, Ti/Ttot, Ti, and RR over time between the two groups. There was no significant difference in VAS over time at rest and mobilization, recovery of bowel function, and hospital stay between the two groups. Continuous ropivacaine infusion with PCEA partially attenuated diaphragmatic dysfunction after laparoscopic gastrectomy, while pain relief by continuous intravenous administration of fentanyl could not attenuate diaphragmatic dysfunction. This suggests that PCEA might ameliorate postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction after laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Efficacy and safety of Extrapleural block in patients with coronary artery disease after thoracoscopic surgery.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of extrapleural block (EPB) application in patients with coronary artery disease after thoracoscopic surgery. Patients with typical symptoms of angina and myocardial ischemia who underwent thoracoscopic surgery at our institution between December 2018 and December 2020 were screened for eligibility and they received paravertebral blocking (PVB), EPB, and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to assess the analgesic effect and safety outcomes included heart rate, incidence of postoperative rescue analgesics, cardiac complications, and adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting. In total, 76 patients (age: 66.5 [61.3, 71] years; male: 63.2%) were eligible, including the PVB group (n=22), EPB group (n=25), and PVIA group (n=29) with comparable baseline characteristics. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients with a VAS score of 1 in the EPB group compared with the other groups at 4 h (88.0% vs. 10.3% for PCIA and 45.5% for PVB; p < .001) and 6h after the surgery (32.0% vs. 3.4% for PCIA and 13.6% for PVB; p=.012). The preoperative heart rate in the EPB group (81 [71, 94] beats/min) was slightly higher than those in the PVB (76 [70, 85] beats/min) and PCIA groups (76 [69, 84 beats/min]) but without significant difference (p=.193). There was no significant difference in the incidence of rescue analgesia, adverse events, and cardiac complications among the three groups (p=.296, .808, and .669, respectively.) CONCLUSION: Compared with PVB and PCIA, the EPB could more effectively relieve acute pain after thoracoscopic surgery in patients with coronary artery disease and offer comparable safety benefits in the management of postoperative heart rate, adverse events, and cardiac complications.

A Retrospective Comparison of Three Patient-Controlled Analgesic Strategies: Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Plus Abdominal Wall Nerve Blocks versus Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Alone in Open Liver Surgery.

Background: Adequate pain control is of crucial importance to patient recovery and satisfaction following abdominal surgeries. The optimal analgesia regimen remains controversial in liver resections. Methods: Three groups of patients undergoing open hepatectomies were retrospectively analyzed, reviewing intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) versus IV-PCA in addition to bilateral rectus sheath and subcostal transversus abdominis plane nerve blocks (IV-PCA + NBs) versus patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). Patient-reported pain scores and clinical data were extracted and correlated with the method of analgesia. Outcomes included total morphine consumption and numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement over the first three postoperative days, time to remove the nasogastric tube and urinary catheter, time to commence on fluid and soft diet, and length of hospital stay. Results: The TEA group required less morphine over the first three postoperative days than IV-PCA and IV-PCA + NBs groups (9.21 ± 4.91 mg, 83.53 ± 49.51 mg, and 64.17 ± 31.96 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Even though no statistical difference was demonstrated in NRS scores on the first three postoperative days at rest and on movement, the IV-PCA group showed delayed removal of urinary catheter (removal on postoperative day 4.93 ± 5.08, 3.87 ± 1.31, and 3.70 ± 1.30, respectively) and prolonged length of hospital stay (discharged on postoperative day 12.71 ± 7.26, 11.79 ± 5.71, and 10.02 ± 4.52, respectively) as compared to IV-PCA + NBs and TEA groups. Conclusions: For postoperative pain management, it is expected that the TEA group required the least amount of opioid; however, IV-PCA + NBs and TEA demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes, namely, the time to remove nasogastric tube/urinary catheter, to start the diet, and the length of hospital stay. IV-PCA with NBs could thus be a reliable analgesic modality for patients undergoing open liver resections.

Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

PurposeTo compare the effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) and PCIA alone on analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsIn this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 160 patients undergoing LC were randomized into the TAPB group (n = 80) and PCIA group (n = 80). Bilateral ultrasound-guided TAPB was performed with 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and the PCIA pump was given after LC in the TAPB group. The PCIA group received the PCIA pump alone as a control group. The primary outcome was postoperative pain, assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). ResultsVAS pain (including abdominal wall pain or visceral pain) scores at rest and coughing were significantly lower in the TAPB group at 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after LC (P < 0.05). Postoperative additional analgesic needs, analgesic pump compressions, and PCIA analgesic dosages, and total morphine equivalents were significantly reduced in the TAPB group, and postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization expenses, expenses within 24 h or 48 h (from analgesia and adverse reactions), and patient satisfaction were significantly higher in the TAPB group than the PCIA group (all P < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, unplugging the analgesic pump due to adverse reactions, first exhaust time, and postoperative adverse events between the two groups. ConclusionsUltrasound-guided TAPB combined with PCIA was an effective and safe perioperative analgesic technique for patients undergoing LC compared to PCIA only.

Single shot adductor canal block combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia can be effective as continuous adductor canal block in reducing opioid consumption and breakthrough pain after total knee arthroplasty

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the following three analgesic methods after Total knee arthroplasty (TKA): intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), continuous adductor canal block (C-ACB), and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia combined with single shot adductor canal block (PCA + sACB).MethodsRecords of 482 patients undergoing primary TKA from September 2019 to September 2020 were analyzed. Patients were divided into three pain control groups: IV-PCA (n = 180), C-ACB (n = 173) and PCA + sACB (n = 129). Single shot adductor canal block was performed 24 h after surgery in the PCA + sACB group. Rescue opioid consumption, breakthrough pain, pain numerical rating scale (NRS), and anti-emetics administration were measured from postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 5.ResultsRescue opioid consumption was less in C-ACB or PCA + sACB group than in the IV-PCA group at POD1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Patients in C-ACB and PCA + sACB groups had less breakthrough pain (NRS > 5) than the IV-PCA group at POD1 (p = 0.007). On POD2, C-ACB was statistically superior to IV-PCA (p = 0.011) in terms of breakthrough pain. Postoperative pain NRS was lower in the C-ACB and PCA + sACB groups than in the IV-PCA group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.019, respectively). The total number of anti-emetics consumption was lower in C-ACB and PCA + sACB groups than in the IV-PCA group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively).ConclusionPCA + sACB not only reduced patients’ need for rescue opioids, but also decreased the number of breakthrough pain and anti-emetics compared to IV-PCA in early postoperative days after TKA. However, C-ACB and PCA + sACB did not differ significantly in analgesic efficacy or opioid-related side effects. PCA + sACB can be as effective as C-ACB for patients undergoing TKA.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort study, level III.

203. Epidural pain catheter improves postoperative pain control following lumbar fusion compared to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Postoperative pain control for patients in the hospital after lumbar spinal fusion can be quite challenging. Reliance on opioids postoperatively can predispose patients to tolerance and abuse. Multimodal pain control regimens have become the standard of postoperative care, though protocols tend to vary by surgeon and institution. The mainstay of pain control following lumbar spinal fusion surgery involves narcotic pain medication administered by patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA), which is typically supplemented by oral pain medications. One potential alternative to PCA is patient-controlled analgesia via epidural catheter. Surgeon-placed epidural catheters under direct visualization have previously been described for their simplicity, efficacy and time efficiency. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> After experiencing clinical success with the use of epidural catheters placed via the loss of resistance technique one- to three- levels above the proximal lumbar fusion level in postoperative care regimens,the senior author (TFA) embarked upon this prospective, randomized trial to assess the relative utility and complication rate of the epidural catheter method of pain management when compared to standard PCA narcotic administration for pain control after one- or two-level circumferential lumbar fusion surgery. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> The surgeries in the trial were performed by three surgeons in a university spinal surgery practice. Patients who enrolled agreed to be randomized to either the epidural catheter (EC) or the commonly practiced PCA arm of the study. A power analysis demonstrated that a sample size of 50 patients, using a level of significance of 0.05, would have a power of 0.97 to detect a 2-point difference in pain scores. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Fifty patients from the University spinal surgery practice were recruited to enter the study. Candidates for the study were patients undergoing one- or two-level instrumented lumbar fusion. Patients were randomized over a 10-month period into either the epidural (EA) or IV analgesia (PCA) groups, 27 to EA and 23 to PCA. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Preoperative pain scores, as well as daily postoperative pain scores were recorded. <h3>METHODS</h3> If randomized to the EC arm, an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon just prior to wound closure, 1-3 levels above the most proximal level of the fusion. A 17-gauge Tuohy epidural needle was used with a loss-of-resistance syringe to locate the epidural space under fluoroscopy if deemed appropriate by the surgeon, and then the catheter was inserted through it. A bolus of 5cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was typically given at the time of catheter placement. Postoperatively, a continuous infusion was begun of 0.125% bupivacaine at 6 cc/hr combined with hydromorphone at 0.2 mg/hr. A patient controlled epidural demand dose of 25mcg of fentanyl with a 10-minute lockout period was also started. If randomized to the PCA group, patients were placed on a patient-controlled analgesia pump administering intravenous hydromorphone with a demand dose of 0.2-0.4 mg with a 10-15-minute lockout <h3>RESULTS</h3> Postoperative pain scores were statistically lower in the EC group on Days 1, 2 and 3: 2.13 vs 4.92 (day 1); 2.71 vs 4.52 (day 2); 3.13 vs 4.52 (day 3). Postoperative complications were similar between the EC and PCA groups. The incidence of nausea/vomiting were 56% and 74% (p=0.43) in EC and PCA groups, respectively, while postoperative symptomatic hypotension was seen in 8% of EC patients and 12% of PCA patients (p=0.67). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> In this prospective, randomized study comparing the use of EC to PCA narcotic for pain control after one- and two-level lumbar fusions, a significant improvement in pain control was noted in the EC group with differences in minor side effects that did not reach statistical significance. Epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain control should be considered for patients undergoing lumbar fusion. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Effect of ultrasound-guided serratus plane block combined with pectoral nerve block I on postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy

Objective: To study the effect of ultrasonic-guided serratus plane block combined with pectoral nerve block Ⅰ on postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy. Methods: A total of 30 patients, all female, aged [M (Q1, Q3)] 53 (43, 62) years old, who underwent radical mastectomy in Beijing Tongren Hospital from May to August 2021 were selected. The patients were divided into two groups (n=15 in each group) using a random number table: general anesthesia alone+patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group (control group) and serratus plane block combined with pectoral nerve block Ⅰ before general anesthesia+PCIA group (combined group). Numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest in both groups were detected in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after operation. The time of first pain, the time of first pressing of the automatic analgesic device after the operation, the dosage of remifentanil during operation, cumulative dosages of sufentanil at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively, and the incidence of adverse effects were all recorded. Results: The NRS scores in combined group in the PACU and 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery were (2.1±1.7), (1.7±1.5), (1.5±1.4), (1.5±1.3) and (1.7±1.3), respectively, while the NRS scores in control group at each time points were (4.5±2.0), (3.2±1.4), (2.7±0.9), (2.8±0.9) and (2.4±0.8), respectively, and the NRS scores in combined group were significantly lower than those in control group (all P<0.05). The NRS scores in combined group at 36 and 48 h after surgery were (1.8±1.6) and (1.6±1.2), while the NRS scores in control group were (2.2±0.9) and (2.1±0.8), and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (both P>0.05). The time of first pain and the time of the first pressing of the automatic analgesic device in combined group were (573±174) min and (962±313) min, which were significantly longer than those of control group [(13±6) min and (135±41) min] (both P<0.05). The dosage of remifentanil during operation and cumulative dosage of sufentanil at 24 h postoperatively in combined group were (410±129) μg and (14±4) μg, which were lower than those in control group [(580±225) μg and (21±11) μg] (both P<0.05). Cumulative dosage of sufentanil at 48 h postoperatively in combined group was (29±11) μg, while in control group was (36±14) μg, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P=0.131). The incidence of postoperative dizziness in combined group was 6.7% (1/15), which was lower than that of control group [40.0% (6/15)] (P=0.031). The incidence of nausea and pruritus was 6.7% (1/15) and 0 in combined group, while 20.0% (3/15) and 6.7% (1/15) in control group, with no statistical significance (both P>0.05). Conclusion: Serratus plane block combined with pectoral nerve block Ⅰ can effectively relieve postoperative pain, decrease the need for opioids, and reduce the incidence of adverse effects.

Randomized controlled study comparing the analgesic effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia after open major surgery for pancreatobiliary cancer.

This randomized clinical trial was performed to compare pain scales between intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in patients undergoing open surgical resection of major pancreatobiliary malignancies. One hundred ten patients were randomly assigned to the PCEA or IV-PCA group. We compared the numeric rating scale pain score during ambulation on postoperative day (PD) 2 and at rest (at 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00) from PD 1 to 7, the serum level of troponin I on PD 1, and the incidence of postoperative complicationsbetween the two groups. There were no significant differences in the pain scores during ambulation on PD 2, at rest up to PD 7, serum troponin I level, and postoperative complication rates. The incidences of nausea (20.4% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.039) and drowsiness (20.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.001) were higher in the IV-PCA group and the rate of dysuria (0% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.004) was higher in the PCEA group. PCEA showed no superiority over IV-PCA in terms of postoperative pain relief or morbidity after major open surgery for pancreatobiliary malignancies. The method of analgesia should be considered based the characteristics of the patient, surgeon, anesthesiologist, and institute.

Patient-controlled intravenous versus on-demand oral, intramuscular or mcs intravenous administration of oxycodone during medical induced abortion from 64 to 128 days of Gestation: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo compare oxycodone administration via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) vs on-demand administration during late-first- and second-trimester medically induced abortion. Study designA prospective randomized controlled study. We enrolled women between 64 to 128 days of gestation in the study between June 2016 and August 2018. Participants were randomized to receive oxycodone either via IVPCA or given on-demand orally, intramuscularly, or intravenously. Pain intensity and satisfaction with care were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0–100mm). ResultsAltogether 99 participants were randomized: 48 in IVPCA group and 51 in on-demand group. Median gestational age was similar between groups (74 days [Interquartile range, IQR 69–81] in the IVPCA group vs 72 [69–80] in the control group, p = 0.587). Peak maximal pain was severe in both groups (median pain VAS was 62 [IQR 44–84] and 71 [IQR 56–90], p = 0.52). The odds for severe pain (highest pain VAS≥70) were similar between the groups (IVPCA group OR 0.51 [95% Confidence Interval 0.22–1.18], p = 0.118). In contrast, the odds for mild or tolerable pain (highest pain VAS≤40) were higher in the IVPCA group (OR 4.06 [95% CI 1.05–16.04], p = 0.043). Nevertheless, satisfaction with care was high (VAS 94 [89–100]) in both groups. Of those experiencing severe pain, 94.0% declared pain medication as adequate. ConclusionWomen often experience severe pain during medical abortion irrespective of the mode of opiate administration. Oxycodone administration via IVPCA permits women to self-administer analgesics when experiencing pain, raising the odds for mild or tolerable pain during abortion care. Satisfaction with care was high. ImplicationsMedical abortion in late-first- and second-trimester is often painful experience. IVPCA offers a good method of choice for analgesia and raises the odds for tolerable pain (pain VAS less than 40) experience when compared to on-demand administration of analgesics.

Comparison of Patient-Controlled Caudal Epidural Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Perianal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IntroductionThis study aimed to compare the efficacy between patient-controlled caudal epidural analgesia (PCCA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after perianal surgery, to provide a feasible solution to postoperative pain.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comprising 100 patients who underwent caudal epidural block on perianal surgery at Chengdu Shang Jin Nan Fu Hospital of West China Hospital at Sichuan University between April and August 2020. Patients were randomly divided into the PCCA and PCIA groups. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery, and at the first dressing change and first defecation. The lower limb mobility in the post-anesthetic recovery room (PACU) was determined. The analgesic effect, usage amount of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), usage amount and frequency of remedial analgesic measures, number of individuals who must be catheterized, and incidence of adverse reactions were recorded. Satisfaction of postoperative analgesic effect and convenience of PCA were also assessed.ResultsThe patients in the PCCA group had significantly lower VAS scores at 4, 6, 24, 48, 72 h, the first dressing change, and the first defecation compared with the PCIA group. There were more patients receiving postoperative remedial analgesics in the PCIA group than in the PCCA group. The outcome of the number of PCA and catheterization rates did not differ significantly between the groups. There were two cases of sensory numbness below the S3 plane. The major postoperative complications in the PCIA group were pruritus (3/47, 6.4%), nausea, and vomiting (6/47, 12.8%) (one case combined with pruritus). Patients in the PCCA group were more satisfied with the analgesic effect, while those in the PCIA group were more satisfied with the convenience.ConclusionIn the postoperative analgesia program of perianal surgery, PCCA may provide a better analgesic effect without increasing the incidence of complications.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier, ChiCTR2000038425, September 2020, retrospectively registered.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-022-00411-y.

Effects of Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on Early Quality of Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PurposeIn recent years, patient-centered postoperative quality of recovery has gained attention. This study aimed to assess the influence of ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliaca compartment block (CFICB) on early quality of recovery in elderly patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the QoR-15 score.Patients and MethodsIn this single-center, randomized, prospective study, 60 patients scheduled for unilateral THA were randomized to the CFICB or patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group. The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score. The secondary outcomes were pain score, number of patients requiring rescue analgesics, time of first postoperative ambulation, incidence of postoperative complications, Bromage score, and length of hospital stay.ResultsThe QoR-15 score was significantly higher in the CFICB group than in the PCIA group at 24 h (P < 0.001) after surgery. However, the QoR-15 score was not significantly different at 48 h (P = 0.074) between the two groups. Pain scores at rest and during movement were lower in the CFICB group than in the PCIA group at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics, time of first postoperative ambulation, incidence of postoperative complications apart from dizziness, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. In addition, Bromage score of 1 point was reported by four patients in the CFICB group at 24 h (P = 0.048) after THA.ConclusionIn elderly patients following THA, CFICB improved the quality of recovery at 24 h and reduced pain scores compared with PCIA. The time of first postoperative ambulation and length of hospital stay were not significantly affected.