Comparison of three analgesic regimens in women undergoing cervical brachytherapy

Abstract

PURPOSEEffective periprocedural analgesia is an important aspect of cervical brachytherapy delivery, with implications for patient comfort and attendance for subsequent fractions. We compared the efficacy and safety of three analgesic modalities: intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and programmed-intermittent epidural bolus with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PIEB-PCEA). METHODS AND MATERIALSNinety-seven brachytherapy episodes involving 36 patients between July 2016 and June 2019 in a single tertiary center were retrospectively reviewed. Episodes were divided into two key phases: Phase 1 (while applicator remained in situ) and Phase 2 (following applicator removal until discharge or 4 h). For the primary endpoint, pain scores were retrieved and analyzed by analgesic modality with respect to median score and an internally defined “unacceptable” pain experience (>20% of scores being ≥4/10; i.e., moderate or greater). Total nonepidural oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) and toxicity/complication events were reported as secondary endpoints. RESULTSIn Phase 1, there was a significantly higher median pain score (p < 0.001) and more episodes with unacceptable pain scores (46%) in the IV-PCA group compared with either epidural modality (6–14%; p < 0.001).In Phase 2, we observed a greater median pain score (p = 0.007) and higher proportion of patient episodes with unacceptable pain scores (38%) in the CEI group compared with both the IV-PCA (13%) and PIEB-PCEA (14%) groups (p = 0.001).There was a significant difference in median OMED used throughout all phases across the PIEB-PCEA (0 mg), IV-PCA (70 mg), and CEI (15 mg) groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONSPIEB-PCEA is safe and offers superior analgesia compared to IV-PCA or CEI for pain control after applicator placement in cervical brachytherapy.