Patient-centered Contraceptive Counseling Research Articles

“It’s a very nuanced discussion with every woman”: Health care providers’ communication practices during contraceptive counseling for patients with substance use disorders

ObjectiveTo explore health care providers’ communication practices during contraceptive counseling for women with substance use disorders (SUDs). Study DesignIn 2019, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews with a purposive sample of medical doctors and advanced practice nurses (n = 24). A two-member team analyzed these interviews for themes using deductive and inductive techniques and ATLAS.ti to manage the data. ResultsProviders discussed that developing strong interpersonal relationships and trust is critically important to provide effective contraceptive counseling to women with SUDs. Providers reported exchanging information with patients by asking open-ended questions, tailoring discussions to patients’ responses, and being direct but not judgmental. To facilitate contraceptive decision-making, providers described eliciting patients’ preferences for contraceptive methods while simultaneously using their own clinical judgment and professional experience to identify which methods would be most effective and appropriate for their patients. Most often these were long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, and providers emphasized the benefits of these methods for women with SUDs. ConclusionProviders used a variety of communication strategies, some of which were grounded in the principles of patient-centered care and others that were directive, to discuss contraception with women with SUDs. ImplicationsBecause of past and ongoing stigma and discrimination by health care professionals and the general public, women with SUDs may be distrustful of contraceptive providers. Patient-centered contraceptive counseling may be an effective approach to increase trust and improve relationships and communication between women with SUDs and their providers. Additional research with women with SUDs is needed to understand women’s experiences with and preferences for patient-provider communication during contraceptive counseling.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Attitudes and Acceptability in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Key to Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.

To examine the attitudes of adolescent and young adults (AYA) toward long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), and to assess how attitudes are associated with acceptability. Survey. Children's Hospital Colorado Adolescent Family Planning Clinic in Aurora, Colorado. Young persons 14-24years of age presenting for any type of visit between March and August2018. A total of 332 participants were enrolled; the majority (62.3%) had high LARC acceptability. We found 5 "attitude" factors: 77.7% of the sample endorsed "Effective" attitudes (eg, wants most effective method), 37.3% endorsed "Good attributes" (eg, discreet, convenient), 23.1% endorsed "Scary" (eg, fears device will move), 16.1% endorsed "Bad for health," (eg, too many side effects), and 9% endorsed "Not for me" (eg, concerns about pain). Although participants who endorsed "Effective" (OR 6.60, 95% CI 3.01-14.49) and "Good attributes" (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.51-6.66) were more likely to have high LARC acceptability than those who endorsed "Scary" (OR 0.28, 95% CI: (0.13-0.61)) and "Not for me" (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.41) factors, approximately 10% of participants with high LARC acceptability endorsed "Scary" or "Bad for health" attitudes, whereas 54% of those with low LARC acceptability endorsed "Effective" attitudes. Although most participants had high LARC acceptability and valued contraceptive effectiveness, the association between LARC attitudes and acceptability is nuanced. Providers should identify and discuss young people's contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Peripartum Contraceptive Care Quality [29I

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes are underutilized in peripartum populations. Little is known about the patient experience of care, and some studies raise concern that care is not always respectful nor patient-centered. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes of peripartum contraceptive care to guide future quality improvement efforts. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey at a tertiary care center in September/October 2018 using two convenience samples: pregnant women (32+ weeks gestation) and postpartum women (4-8 weeks postpartum). We evaluated patient contraceptive care experiences at prenatal visits (pregnant sample) and during childbirth hospitalizations and postpartum visits (postpartum sample). We used the validated, 4-item Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling [PCCC] measure (positive score, all items rated excellent), analyzing data with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We included 117 pregnant patients (response rate 49.5%) and 84 postpartum patients (response rate 43.8%). Participants were largely white (87.1%), aged 25-35 years (66.7%), college graduates (77.6%), and wanting to avoid pregnancy for 2 or more years (63.2%). Positive PCCC scores varied across practice settings (prenatal visit, 66.7%, childbirth hospitalization, 45.2%, postpartum visit, 68.8%). On individual PCCC items, “Excellent” ratings were least common for “my provider gave me enough information to make the best decision about my birth control method” (prenatal visit, 68.9%, childbirth hospitalization, 50.6%, postpartum visit, 69.1%), and “my provider let me say what mattered to me about my birth control method” (prenatal visit, 78.8%, childbirth hospitalization, 63.1%, postpartum visit, 76.3%). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest opportunities to improve patient-centeredness in peripartum contraceptive care, with a goal of providing adequate information and respecting patient preferences and priorities.

Breaking the silence in the primary care office: patients' attitudes toward discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling

ObjectivesAbortions are common health experiences in the United States, yet they are siloed from mainstream health care. To provide guidance on how clinicians could break down these silos, normalize conversations about abortion, and potentially improve patient experience and contraceptive decision-making, we sought to understand patient attitudes regarding discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling. Study designIn 2018, we completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women recruited from primary care clinics of two politically disparate regions within California. We elicited acceptability, preferences, and implications of clinicians mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling. Using directed content analysis, we coded transcripts for inductive and deductive themes. ResultsWe achieved thematic saturation after 49 interviews. Interviewees were diverse in reproductive history, race/ethnicity, religiosity, and abortion attitudes. Participants with diverse attitudes about abortion reported that having abortion mentioned during contraceptive counseling was generally viewed as acceptable, and even helpful, when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making. Careful attention to a non-judgmental communication style is critical to safeguard against potential contraceptive coercion. ConclusionsDiscussing abortion during contraceptive counseling was acceptable among this diverse population, and our findings suggest ways to best structure such counseling. Coupled with research on clinician perspectives, our findings can inform development of patient-centered contraceptive counseling approaches that integrate abortion in an attempt to facilitate patient care and reduce stigma. ImplicationsMentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling can be acceptable, and even helpful, to patients when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision, even among patients who believed abortion should be illegal in all or most cases. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making.

A mixed-methods study of provider perspectives on My Birth Control: a contraceptive decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision making

ObjectivesBarriers to the provision of patient-centered contraceptive counseling include time limitations, frequent misconceptions and misinformation about methods among patients, and the availability of numerous contraceptive options, which increases the complexity of contraceptive decision making. Decision support tools are interventions designed to facilitate quality decision making in preference-sensitive decisions. We evaluated the impact of a contraceptive decision support tool, My Birth Control, on providers' experience with contraceptive counseling. Study designWe interviewed 15 providers who participated in the intervention arm of a cluster randomized controlled trial of My Birth Control to obtain their impressions of their patients' interactions with the tool. We analyzed the interviews using thematic analysis, compared appointment lengths of patients in each arm (n=749) and assessed provider burnout in each arm (n=28). ResultsProviders reported that incorporating My Birth Control into their practice helped them allocate time more efficiently, enabling them to hone in on patients' areas of interest. They also reported that patients who interacted with the tool appeared more informed about contraception options and features, and took a more active role in method selection. All providers described using the tool as acceptable and feasible, and indicated they would like to incorporate it into their practice. There was no difference in provider burnout scores comparing before and after the trial of My Birth Control. ConclusionProviders had a positive impression of the impact of My Birth Control on contraceptive counseling, including the quality of counseling, and perceived the tool to be a feasible intervention to use in the clinical setting. ImplicationsFamily planning clinics should consider incorporating My Birth Control into their clinical services as a means of improving contraceptive care and provider experience of counseling.

Increase in Contraceptive Counseling by Primary Care Clinicians After Implementation of One Key Question® at an Urban Community Health Center.

Introduction To provide quality family planning services and reduce racial and socioeconomic disparities in unintended pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, primary care clinicians should routinely assess women's reproductive health needs and provide patient-centered contraceptive and preconception counseling. One Key Question® asks women if they would like to become pregnant in the next year and prompts clinicians to provide counseling appropriate to each patient. We conducted a pilot study to assess if implementing One Key Question® in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) of an urban community health center, coupled with brief clinician training, would increase rates of contraceptive and preconception counseling. Methods We incorporated One Key Question® into a new EMR form and provided a brief training to primary care clinicians on reproductive life plan assessment, preconception counseling, and contraception. We surveyed women patients, ages 18-49, after their visit and compared pre- vsersus post-intervention rates of patient-reported contraceptive and preconception counseling. Results After One Key Question® was introduced in the clinic EMR and clinicians underwent brief training on its use, patients reported significantly higher rates of their clinician counseling them about contraception (52% vs. 76%, p = 0.040) and recommending a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method (10% vs. 32%, p = 0.035). There were no significant changes in preconception counseling. Discussion After EMR integration of One Key Question® coupled with brief clinician training, rates of contraceptive counseling and LARC recommendations increased in this community health center pilot study. Future research should compare One Key Question® to standard care in a prospective randomized trial.

Integration of Onsite Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Services Into School-Based Health Centers.

With recent recommendations from professional organizations, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods are considered appropriate first-line contraception for adolescents. Many school-based health centers (SBHCs) in New York City (NYC) have recently added onsite LARC insertion and management to their contraceptive options. We aimed to explore key elements needed to implement LARC training and services into the SBHC setting and to identify successful factors for program implementation. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 19 providers and staff at 7 SBHCs in high schools in the Bronx and analyzed using Dedoose. Support and leadership from administration; comprehensive onsite training of providers and staff; developing an effective staffing model for procedure sessions; and patient-centered contraceptive counseling were 4 key themes named by respondents as crucial to the program implementation process. Integrating LARC services onsite at SBHCs is feasible and positively received by providers and staff. With good leadership, staffing, training, and appropriate contraceptive counseling, both SBHCs and other primary clinics that serve adolescents can integrate LARC insertion, removal, and management into routine contraceptive care. This in turn can increase youth access to these methods.

Patient-centered Contraceptive Counseling and Prescribing.

Learning how to best meet a patient's contraceptive needs improves her chances of using her birth control consistently and is crucial to providing patient-centered care. The best contraceptive method for an individual patient is the one that is safe and that she is most comfortable using. Women's health care providers must be equipped to talk to each patient about her needs and options. The shared decision-making model in contraceptive counseling allows the patient and provider to work together in order to meet a patient's needs while remaining medically safe.

Racial/ethnic differences in contraceptive preferences, beliefs, and self-efficacy among women veterans

Significant racial/ethnic disparities in unintended pregnancy persist in the United States, with the highest rates observed among low-income black and Hispanic women. Differences in contraceptive preferences, beliefs, and self-efficacy may be instrumental in understanding contraceptive behaviors that underlie higher rates of unintended pregnancy among racial/ethnic minorities. Our objective was to understand how contraceptive preferences, beliefs, and self-efficacy vary by race and ethnicity among women veterans. We analyzed data from the Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need Study, a national telephone survey of women veterans aged 18-44 years who had received primary care at the Veterans Administration in the prior 12 months. Participants rated the importance of various contraceptive characteristics and described their level of agreement with contraceptive beliefs using Likert scales. Contraceptive self-efficacy was assessed by asking participants to rate their certainty that they could use contraception consistently and as indicated over time using a Likert scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between race/ethnicity and contraceptive attitudes, controlling for age, marital status, education, income, religion, parity, deployment history, and history of medical and mental health conditions. Among the 2302 women veterans who completed a survey, 52% were non-Hispanic white, 29% were non-Hispanic black, and 12% were Hispanic. In adjusted analyses, compared with whites, blacks had lower odds of considering contraceptive effectiveness extremely important (adjusted odds ratio; 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.74) and higher odds of considering the categories of does not contain any hormones and prevents sexually transmitted infections extremely important (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94, 95% confidence interval, 1.56-2.41, and adjusted odds ratio; 1.99, 95% confidence interval, 1.57-2.51, respectively). Hispanics also had higher odds than whites of considering the category of does not contain any hormones and prevents sexually transmitted infections extremely important (adjusted odds ratio, 1.72, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.28, and adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.19, respectively). Compared with whites, blacks and Hispanics had higher odds of expressing fatalistic beliefs about pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.79, 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.39, and adjusted odds ratio, 1.48, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.17, respectively); higher odds of viewing contraception as primarily a woman's responsibility (adjusted odds ratio, 1.92, 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.55, and adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.54, respectively); and lower odds of being very sure that they could use a contraceptive method as indicated over the course of a year (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73, 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.98, and adjusted odds ratio, 0.66, 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.96, respectively). Women veterans' contraceptive preferences, beliefs, and self-efficacy varied by race/ethnicity, which may help explain observed racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. These differences underscore the need to elicit women's individual values and preferences when providing patient-centered contraceptive counseling.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers.

BackgroundThe Contraceptive CHOICE Project developed a patient-centered model for contraceptive provision including: (1) structured, evidence-based counseling; (2) staff and health care provider education; and (3) removal of barriers such as cost and multiple appointments to initiate contraception. In preparation for conducting a research study of the CHOICE model in three community health settings, we sought to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation.MethodsUsing a semi-structured interview guide guided by a framework of implementation research, we conducted 31 qualitative interviews with female patients, staff, and health care providers assessing attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to receiving contraception. We also asked about current contraceptive provision and explored organizational practices relevant to implementing the CHOICE model. We used a grounded theory approach to identify major themes.ResultsMany participants felt that current contraceptive provision could be improved by the CHOICE model. Potential facilitators included agreement about the necessity for improved contraceptive knowledge among patients and staff; importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling; and benefits to same-day insertion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Potential barriers included misconceptions about contraception held by staff and providers; resistance to new practices; costs associated with LARC; and scheduling challenges required for same-day insertion of LARC.ConclusionsIn addition to staff and provider training, implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision needs to be supplemented by strategies to manage patient and system-level barriers. Community health center staff, providers, and patients support patient-centered contraceptive counseling to improve contraception provision if organizations can address these barriers.

Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling: Evidence to Inform Practice

Patient centeredness is an increasingly recognized aspect of quality health care. The application of this framework to contraceptive counseling and care has not been well described. We propose a definition of patient-centered contraceptive counseling that focuses on and prioritizes each patient’s individual needs and preferences regarding contraceptive methods and the counseling experience. Guided by this definition, we review recent research that has advanced our understanding of how patient-centered contraceptive counseling can be delivered in practice, focusing on how women decide on a contraceptive method, their preferences for counseling, and their experiences with counseling. This research provides evidence that women have diverse preferences around attributes of their contraceptive methods and value personal, supportive relationships with their family planning providers that focus on their individual preferences. We discuss the implications of this research for practice and review recent interventions that incorporate patient centeredness to varying degrees.

What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making

Objective(s)The objective of this study was to identify women's and health care providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making and counseling, respectively. Study DesignCross-sectional surveys were administered online to convenience samples of 417 women and 188 contraceptive care providers residing in the United States. Participants were provided with a list of 34 questions related to the features of contraceptive options and rated the importance of each. Participants also ranked the questions in descending order of importance. For both women and providers, we calculated the mean importance rating for each question and the proportion that ranked each question in their three most important questions. ResultsThe average importance ratings given by women and providers were similar for 18 questions, but dissimilar for the remaining 16 questions. The question rated most important for women was “How does it work to prevent pregnancy?” whereas, for providers, “How often does a patient need to remember to use it?” and “How is it used?” were rated equally. The eight questions most frequently selected in the top three by women and/or providers were related to the safety of the method, mechanism of action, mode of use, side effects, typical- and perfect-use effectiveness, frequency of administration and when it begins to prevent pregnancy. Conclusion(s)Although we found considerable concordance between women's and provider's information priorities, the presence of some inconsistencies highlights the importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling and, in particular, shared contraceptive decision making. ImplicationsThis study provides insights into the information priorities of women for their contraceptive decision making and health care providers for contraceptive counseling. These insights are critical both to inform the development of decision support tools for implementation in contraceptive care and to guide the delivery of patient-centered care.

The effect of patient-centered contraceptive counseling in women who undergo a voluntary termination of pregnancy

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate, by means of a randomized controlled trial, whether a patient-centered contraceptive counseling intervention increased the use of contraception, and the knowledge and positive attitudes towards contraception, in women who undergo a termination of pregnancy (TOP). Methods The study was carried out at the San Paolo Hospital of Milan between the 1st of February and the 31st of May 2004. Participants (41 women; ages 20–44 years) were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group ( n = 20), who received patient-centered contraceptive counseling, and a control group ( n = 21), who received the routine treatment in use at the San Paolo Hospital and were referred to the community health centers after the TOP. Both groups were administered a questionnaire at two points in time (before the counseling and 1 month later) which evaluated participants’ knowledge, attitudes and use of contraception (the latter was also followed up 3 months later). The counseling intervention lasted 30 min and was carried out by a psychologist and a gynaecologist. Results It was found that knowledge, favorable attitudes and use of effective contraception increased significantly for the experimental group, whereas there was no significant change for the control group. Conclusion The counseling intervention was therefore found to be efficacious in improving understanding and use of contraception in women who have undergone a TOP. The hope is that this will contribute to increased use of effective contraception in the future. Practice implications Following the principles of patient-centered medicine, this study provides evidence for the importance of exploring woman's feelings, beliefs, wishes and expectations regarding contraception within a contraceptive counseling intervention.