Patient Acceptable Symptom State Research Articles

Neutral to slightly undercorrected mechanical leg alignment provides superior long-term results in patients undergoing matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of leg alignment on long-term clinical outcomeafter matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (M-ACI) and to define an individualized target range to optimize clinical outcome. The present study examined patients who underwent M-ACI of the femoral condyle. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) were used to assess the results. Clinical outcomes were related to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS). For intra- and interobserver reliability of mechanical tibiofemoral angle, mechanical medial proximal tibial angleand mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficientsusing a two-way mixed model with absolute agreement. A regression model and receiver-operating characteristics curve were used to identify an individual range of alignment where a favourable clinical outcome could be expected in the long term. Additional osteotomy was performed in 50% of patients with similar clinical outcomes as physiologically aligned patients (p > 0.05). The curve-fitting regression model identified a target range of -2.5° valgus to 4.5° varus for ideal postoperative alignment (R2 = 0.12, p = 0.01). Patients within this range were more likely to achieve PASS (70% vs. 27%, p = 0.001). In medially treated defects, a refined range of -2.5° valgus to 4° varus alignment was found (R2 = 0.15, p = 0.01). These patients were more likely to achieve PASS (67% vs. 30%, p = 0.01) and showed favourable postoperative KOOS and MOCART scores (p = 0.02). Patients with lateral defects were more likely to achieve PASS within a range of -2° valgus and 0.5° varus (90% vs. 45%, p = 0.03) and showed favourable postoperative KOOS and MOCART scores (p = not significant). An individual range of leg alignment-whether achieved by osteotomy or physiologic alignment-should be respected in M-ACI treatment. A neutral to slightly undercorrected alignment favours the postoperative outcome after M-ACI. When planning surgery for patients with focal cartilage defects of the femoral condyle, these ranges should be recognized as critical factors. Level III.

Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

IntroductionPatient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly assessed with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and there is an increased need to establish clinical relevance within these measures. The purpose of this study was to (1) define minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR, and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each of these threshold values. MethodsData from consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively collected. Baseline data and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. MCID, PASS and SCB were determined using an anchor-based approach, with anchor questions assessing postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfillment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to identify preoperative predictors for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB. ResultsA total of 286 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age of 60.2 ​± ​10.4 and the majority being female (61.2%). The values for the VAS pain score identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year postoperatively were: 5, 2, and 1. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement based on VAS were 60.5%, 63.3%, and 57.2%, respectively. A higher preoperative VAS was predictive for achieving MCID (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P ​< ​0.01). ConclusionThis study identified threshold VAS pain scores of 5, 2, and 1 for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A higher preoperative VAS pain score was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of attaining MCID after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Level of EvidenceII.

Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction

BackgroundMinimally clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) have been established in the literature to gauge shoulder arthroplasty treatment effectiveness. These metrics are established based on anchoring questions that do not account for a patient’s satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This study evaluates if reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS values for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and visual analog scale (VAS) at 2 years following shoulder arthroplasty correlates with overall patient satisfaction. MethodsThis was a single-institution, retrospective, cohort study of all patients who underwent shoulder replacement from 2015 to 2019. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS scores were recorded. Previously established MCID, SCB, and PASS values were used. Patients were contacted and underwent a survey to assess: (1) on a scale of 1 to 10, what is your overall satisfaction with your surgical outcome? (2) if you could go back in time, would you undergo this operation again? (yes/no); and (3) for the same condition, would you recommend this operation to a friend or family member? (yes/no). Spearman correlation coefficients were run to assess the relationship between reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS and the 3 outcome metrics above. ResultsThree hundred fifty two patients were included. Mean preoperative ASES was 42.2 ± 16.4, SANE was 35.5 ± 18.9, SST was 4.5 ± 2.6, and VAS was 5.3 ± 2.4. Mean 2-year ASES was 87.8 ± 16.0, SANE was 87.1 ± 15.7, SST was 9.8 ± 2.4, and VAS was 0.9 ± 1.8. Mean patient satisfaction was 9.0 ± 2.0, 331 (94.0%) patients would undergo surgery again, and 330 (93.8%) patients would recommend surgery. Spearman correlation coefficients were weak or very weak for reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS in ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS and all 3 study outcome metrics. DiscussionPatient overall satisfaction is one of many considerations when indicating a patient for shoulder replacement and evaluating their ultimate long-term outcome. Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS in ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty did not correlate with a patient’s overall satisfaction, willingness to undergo surgery again, or willingness to recommend surgery to a friend or family member. Further investigation into the reliability and clinical value of currently defined MCID, SCB, and PASS metrics is needed.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for IKDC-SKF and KOOS at the 10-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Study From the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort.

Clinicians need thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Treatment Failure to interpret group-based patient-reported outcome measures after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Validated thresholds that are crucial for accurately discerning patient symptom state and facilitating effective interpretation have not been determined for long-term follow-up after ACL injury. To calculate and validate thresholds for PASS and Treatment Failure for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales at the 10-year follow-up after ACL injury. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A total of 163 participants with unilateral ACL injury (treated with reconstruction or rehabilitation alone) from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort were included. Thresholds for PASS were calculated for IKDC-SKF and KOOS subscales using anchor-based predictive modeling and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Too few participants had self-reported Treatment Failure to calculate thresholds for that outcome. Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to derive 95% CIs. The criterion validity of the predictive modeling and ROC-derived thresholds were assessed by comparing actual patient-reported PASS outcome with the calculated PASS outcome for each method of calculation and calculating their positive and negative predictive values with respect to the anchor questions. A total of 127 (78%) participants reported satisfactory symptom state. Predictive modeling PASS thresholds (95% CIs) were 76.2 points (72.1-79.4 points) for IKDC-SKF, 85.4 points (80.9-89.2 points) for KOOS Pain, 76.5 points (67.8-84.7 points) for KOOS Symptoms, 93.8 points (90.1-96.9 points) for KOOS activities of daily living, 71.6 points (63.4-77.7 points) for KOOS Sports, and 59.0 points (53.7-63.9 points) for KOOS quality of life (QoL). Predictive modeling thresholds classified 81% to 93% of the participants as having satisfactory symptom state, whereas ROC-derived thresholds classified >50% as unsatisfied. The thresholds for IKDC-SKF, KOOS Sports, and KOOS QoL resulted in the most accurate percentages of PASS among all identified thresholds and therefore demonstrate the highest validity. Predictive modeling provided valid PASS thresholds for IKDC-SKF and KOOS at the 10-year follow-up after ACL injury. The thresholds for IKDC-SKF, KOOS Sports, and KOOS QoL should be used when determining satisfactory outcomes. ROC-derived thresholds result in substantial misclassification rates of the participants who reported satisfactory symptom state.

Shoulder Instability–Return to Sports After Injury Scale Shows That Lack of Psychological Readiness Predicts Outcomes and Recurrence Following Surgical Stabilization

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of psychological readiness to return to sports on clinical outcomes and recurrences in athletes who return to sports following shoulder instability surgery. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent shoulder instability surgery between September 2020 and October 2021 (arthroscopic Bankart repair or Latarjet procedure) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were grouped according to the achievement of psychological readiness to return to play using the SIRSI scale (≥ 55 points) measured at 6 months following surgery. Recurrences were measured and functional outcomes were evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Rowe, and Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the VAS and Rowe scores was calculated using the distribution-based method of ½ standard deviation of the delta (difference between postoperative and preoperative scores). The patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the VAS scale was set at 2.5 based on previous literature. To evaluate the predictive ability of SIRSI a regression model analysis and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used. ResultsA total of 108 who achieved psychological readiness (PSR) and 41 who did not (NPSR) met the study criteria. PSR achieved significantly higher percentages of MCID and PASS thresholds for VAS than NPSR (MCID: 68.5% vs 48.7%, p=0.026; PASS: 92.5% vs 58.5%, p<0.001). However, there were no differences in the percentage of patients achieving MCID for the Rowe score between groups (98.1% vs 100%, p=0.999). The only strongest independent predictor of postoperative outcomes was being psychologically ready to return to sports. The SIRSI scale had an excellent predictive ability for recurrences (area under curve 0.745, 95% CI 0.5-0.8). Of those who sustained a recurrence, 20% were not psychologically ready compared to 4.3% who were (p= 0.002). A power analysis was not conducted for this study. ConclusionThe SIRSI scale is associated with postoperative clinical outcomes and recurrences in patients who returned to sports following shoulder instability surgery. Patients who were not psychologically ready following shoulder instability surgery had worse clinical outcomes with fewer patients achieving clinically significant outcomes (PASS and MCID) for pain, and a higher risk of recurrence. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Primary and Revision Hip Arthroscopy in Borderline Hip Dysplasia Shows Comparable Outcomes at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

PurposeTo compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and reoperation-free survivorship between primary and revision hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in propensity-matched borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) patients at minimum 5-year follow-up. MethodsPatients with BHD, characterized by a lateral center-edge angle 18°-25°, who underwent HA for FAIS with capsular repair by a single surgeon between 01/2012-06/2018 with minimum 5-year follow-up were identified. Cases of revision HA were propensity-matched 1:2 to cases of primary HA, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). A 1:2 ratio was chosen to maximize the number of included patients. Collected PROs included: Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living and Sport Subscales, International Hip Outcome Score 12, modified Harris Hip Score, and Visual Analog Scale for Pain. Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for any measured PRO were compared between groups along with reoperation-free survivorship using Kaplan-Meier analysis. ResultsThirty-six revision HA hips (34 patients) were propensity-matched to 72 primary HA hips (70 patients). The groups were similar in age (31.5±10.3 years vs. 30.5±11.2,P=0.669), sex (69.4% female vs. 70.8%,P=0.656), and BMI (25.7±4.0 kg/m2 vs. 25.5±3.7,P=0.849). The revision group showed a greater prevalence of prolonged preoperative pain (50.0% vs. 27.8%,P=0.032) compared to the primary group. A significant improvement in all PROs was observed for both groups with comparable PROs preoperatively and at 5-year follow-up between groups (P≥0.086). The revision and primary groups showed comparable MCID (95.0% vs. 95.7%,P=1.000), PASS (80.0% vs. 83.6%,P=0.757), and SCB (62.5% vs. 70.7%,P=0.603) achievement for any PRO. Comparable reoperation-free survivorship was observed (P=0.151). ConclusionPropensity-matched patients with BHD undergoing primary and revision hip arthroscopy for FAIS achieved similar minimum 5-year PROs, CSOs, and reoperation-free survivorship. Level of EvidenceLevel III, Retrospective Comparative Case Series

Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Slower and Non-Improvement Following Surgical Treatment of L4-5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Preliminary Results.

Retrospective cohort. To identify the predictors of slower and non-improvement following surgical treatment of L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). There is limited evidence regarding clinical and radiological predictors of slower and non-improvement following surgery for L4-5 DLS. Patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression or fusion for L4-5 DLS and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Outcome measures were: (1) minimal clinically important difference (MCID), (2) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and (3) global rating change (GRC). Clinical variables analyzed for predictors were age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgery type, comorbidities, anxiety, depression, smoking, osteoporosis, and preoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI; Visual Analog Scale, VAS back and leg; 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score, SF-12 PCS). Radiological variables analyzed were slip percentage, translational and angular motion, facet diastasis/cyst/orientation, laterolisthesis, disc height, scoliosis, main and fractional curve Cobb angles, and spinopelvic parameters. 233 patients (37% decompression, 63% fusion) were included. At <3 months, high pelvic tilt (PT) (OR 0.92, P 0.02) and depression (OR 0.28, P 0.02) were predictors of MCID non-achievement and GRC non-betterment, respectively. Neither retained significance at >6 months and hence, were identified as predictors of slower improvement. At >6 months, low preoperative VAS leg (OR 1.26, P 0.01) and high facet orientation (OR 0.95, P 0.03) were predictors of MCID non-achievement, high L4-5 slip percentage (OR 0.86, P 0.03) and L5-S1 angular motion (OR 0.78, P 0.01) were predictors of GRC non-betterment, and high preoperative ODI (OR 0.96, P 0.04) was a predictor of PASS non-achievement. High PT and depression were predictors of slower improvement and low preoperative leg pain, high disability, high facet orientation, high slip percentage, and L5-S1 angular motion were predictors of non-improvement. However, these are preliminary findings and further studies with homogeneous cohorts are required to establish these findings.

Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction.

Purpose: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) serve as metrics to gauge orthopedic treatment efficacy based on anchoring questions that do not account for a patient's satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This study evaluates if reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS values for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Alpha Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) correlates with overall patient satisfaction. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent RCR from 2015 to 2019. Pre-operative and 2 year postoperative ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS scores were recorded. Patients underwent a survey to assess: (1) what is your overall satisfaction with your surgical outcome? (scale 1 to 10); (2) if you could go back in time, would you undergo this operation again? (yes/no); (3) for the same condition, would you recommend this operation to a friend or family member? (yes/no). Spearman correlation coefficients were run to assess relationship between reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS and satisfaction. Results: Ninety-two patients were included. Mean preoperative ASES was 51.1 ± 16.9, SANE was 43.3 ± 20.9, SST was 5.4 ± 2.9, and VAS was 4.6 ± 2.1. Mean 2 year ASES was 83.9 ± 18.5, SANE was 81.7 ± 27.0, SST was 9.8 ± 3.2, and VAS was 1.4 ± 1.9. Mean patient satisfaction was 9.0 ± 1.9; 89 (96.7%) patients would undergo surgery again and recommend surgery. Correlation for reaching PASS for SANE and satisfaction was moderate. Correlation coefficients were very weak for all other outcome metrics. Conclusions: Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS in ASES, SANE, SST, or VAS following RCR did not correlate with a patient's overall satisfaction or willingness to undergo surgery again or recommend surgery. Further investigation into the statistical credibility and overall clinical value of MCID, SCB, and PASS is necessary.

Return to Sports in Patients Aged 50 Years or Younger After Robotic-Assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Experience Reporting High Clinical Benefits and High Patient Satisfaction With Return to an Active Lifestyle

Background: Limited data are available on return to sports and patient psychometric ratings of success after patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in younger patients with high expectations to return to an active lifestyle. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this article was to determine the role of PFA and its success in meeting patient expectations regarding the return to low-impact recreational sports and an active lifestyle in younger, active patients. It was hypothesized that PFA would allow younger patients to return to low-impact sports and an active lifestyle and achieve high patient psychometric ratings. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: In this 10-year prospective study (2009-2018), robotic-assisted PFA was performed on 44 patients (32 women and 12 men; n = 51 consecutive knees), with a mean age of 37.2 years (range, 21-50 years). The follow-up rate was 98%, with a mean of 5.3 years (range, 2-9.3 years). Primary clinical outcomes were as follows: the validated Cincinnati Knee Rating System sports activity and symptom rating scales, patient psychometric ratings of the substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Secondary outcomes were the Cincinnati Knee Rating System occupational rating, visual analog pain scale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Survivorship was defined by conversion to total knee replacement (TKR). Results: Before PFA, 78% of patients (35/45 knees) were symptomatic and unable to perform recreational sports, with only 20% of patients (9/45 knees) performing some low-impact sports. After PFA, 80% of patients (36/45 knees) were able to perform low-impact sports, and 7% (3/45 knees) performed jumping-pivoting sports (P < .001). The SCB scored by the patient showed 87% of knees as good, very good, or normal. On the PASS analysis, 89% of patients (95% CI, 76%-96%) were “pleased,” and 93% (95% CI, 82%-99%) would undergo surgery again. There were clinically relevant improvements in symptoms of pain, swelling, and giving way (P = .0001). Preoperatively, 91% of knees had moderate to severe pain with activities of daily living, and only 11% of knees had pain at the follow-up. Five of the 50 knees (10%) underwent TKR conversion with one patient lost to follow-up. Conclusion: PFA resulted in a high return of patients to low-impact sports with high SCB and PASS psychometric ratings. The robotic-assisted 3-dimensional preoperative planning allowed precise intraoperative trochlear implant alignment in knees with severe trochlear dysplasia. PFA is recommended as an alternative treatment in younger patients with end-stage symptomatic patellofemoral arthritis. Registration: NCT02738476 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Minimum 5-Year Clinical and Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Arthroscopic Scapulothoracic Bursectomy and Partial Scapulectomy for Snapping Scapula Syndrome

Background: Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is a rare condition that is oftentimes debilitating. For patients whose symptoms are resistant to nonoperative treatment, arthroscopic surgery may offer relief. Because of the rarity of SSS, reports of clinical outcomes after arthroscopic SSS surgery are primarily limited to small case series and short-term follow-up studies. Purpose: To report minimum 5-year clinical and sport-specific outcomes after arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS and to identify demographic and clinical factors at baseline associated with clinical outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS between October 2005 and February 2016 with a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this single-center study. Clinical outcome scores, including the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, were collected at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Additionally, it was determined which patients reached the minimal clinically important difference. Bivariate analysis was used to determine whether baseline demographic and clinical factors had any association with the outcome scores. Results: Of 81 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, follow-up was obtained for 66 patients (age 33.6 ± 13.3 years; 31 female). At a mean follow-up of 8.9 ± 2.5 years (range, 5.0-15.4 years), all of the outcome scores significantly improved compared with baseline. These included the ASES (from 56.7 ± 14.5 at baseline to 87.2 ± 13.9 at follow-up; P < .001), QuickDASH (from 38.7 ± 17.6 to 13.1 ± 14.6; P < .001), SANE (from 52.4 ± 21.2 to 82.7 ± 19.9; P < .001), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (from 39.7 ± 8.3 to 50.3 ± 8.2; P < .001), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (from 48.2 ± 11.7 to 52.0 ± 9.0; P = 0.014) and VAS pain (from 5.2 ± 2.1 to 1.4 ± 2.0; P < .001). The minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score was reached by 77.6% of the patients. Median postoperative satisfaction was 8 out of 10. It was found that 90.5% of the patients returned to sport, with 73.8% of the patients able to return to their preinjury level. At the time of final follow-up, 8 (12.1%) patients had undergone revision surgery for recurrent SSS symptoms. Older age at surgery (P = .044), lower preoperative SF-12 Mental Component Summary score (P = .008), lower preoperative ASES score (P = .019), and increased preoperative VAS pain score (P = .016) were significantly associated with not achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State on the ASES score. Conclusion: Patients undergoing arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS experienced clinically significant improvements in functional scores, pain, and quality of life, which were sustained at a minimum of 5 years and a mean follow-up of 8.9 years postoperatively. Higher patient age, inferior mental health status, increased shoulder pain, and lower ASES scores at baseline were significantly associated with worse postoperative outcomes.

Greater changes in self-reported activity level are associated with decreased quality of life in patients following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ObjectiveTo determine the association between change in physical activity level, as defined as the change from pre-to post-operative Tegner Activity Scale, and quality of life (QOL) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), before patients are cleared for return to sport. Participants1198 participants (42.9% male; 18.7 ± 3.6 years; 7.1 ± 3.7 months post-ACLR). Main outcome measuresSurveys included Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score QOL (KOOS-QOL) subscale and Tegner Activity Scale. KOOS-QOL score ≥62.5 is considered as meeting a previously established patient acceptable symptom state. ResultsThe acceptable KOOS-QOL group reported a significantly smaller decrease in activity level from pre-injury to time of data collection (median: 2.00, IQR: 2.00) than the unacceptable KOOS-QOL group (median: 3.00, IQR: 3.00). Across the full cohort, for every one-point larger decrease in Tegner score from pre-to post-ACLR, there is a 52% increase in the odds of having an unacceptable KOOS-QOL score. For adolescents, the odds increase to 60% while the odds for adults were lower at 39%. ConclusionsFollowing ACLR, greater decreases in physical activity level are associated with poorer QOL for both adolescents and adults at short-term follow-up, and this effect is larger amongst adolescents.

Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) Scores > 55 at 6 Months Postoperative Predict Ability to Achieve Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State at Minimum 1 Year Postoperative Following Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Grade IV Chondral Defects About the Patellofemoral Joint.

The primary aim is to evaluate the relationship between MOCART scores and patient satisfaction, as evaluated by achievement of (1) the Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) and (2) the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Quality of Life (KOOS QoL), for patients undergoing autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for focal Grade IV patellofemoral chondral defects. The secondary aim is to determine the threshold MOCART score which predicts the ability to meet the PASS and the MCID for KOOS QoL. Patients undergoing ACI for grade IV patellofemoral chondral defects by a single surgeon from 2017 to 2020 were identified by search of the EMR. To determine PASS status, patients were asked, "Do you consider your current level of symptoms to be acceptable?" KOOS QoL scores were also collected. Patients with 6-month postoperative knee MRI, PASS scores, and minimum 2-year follow-up data were included. Paired t tests and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests were used to evaluate the relationship between MOCART scores and (1) PASS achievement and (2) achievement of the MCID for KOOS QoL (12.8). Thirty-four patients were included, with a median age of 35.1 years [IQR: 24.6, 37.1], and BMI of 24.0 kg/m2 [IQR: 21.5, 28.1]. The median time to postoperative MRI was 6.7 months [IQR: 5.8, 7.9], and average follow-up time was 3.7 ± 1.2 years. Twenty-five patients (74%) achieved PASS, and 18 patients (out of 27 who had postop KOOS QoL Scores, 67%) achieved the MCID for KOOS QoL. Patients who achieved PASS had higher average MOCART scores (61.8 ± 16.0) than those who did not achieve PASS (45.0 ± 12.8, p=0.011), whereas patients who achieved the MCID for KOOS QoL did not have higher MOCART scores than those who did not achieve the MCID (61.9 ± 18.3 versus 53.3 ± 17.1, P = 0.25). There was no relationship between age, sex, lesion size, and lesion location and ability to achieve PASS or MCID for KOOS QoL (p>0.05). A threshold MOCART value of 55 was associated with the highest AUC on ROC analysis for likelihood of achieving PASS (0.778) and MCID for KOOS QoL (0.667). Higher MOCART scores are associated with an increased likelihood of achieving PASS following patellofemoral ACI. Moreover, MOCART scores > 55 predict the ability to achieve PASS and the MCID for KOOS QoL following patellofemoral ACI. IV.

Clinical Significance Thresholds in Primary and Revision Latarjet Procedures With Comparable Outcome Achievements

Background: Given the variability across populations and settings, defining the MCID and the PASS for the Rowe and ASOSS scores and patients undergoing primary and revision Latarjet it is essential to have accurate benchmarks relevant to these groups when interpreting clinical results. Purpose: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during sports, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS), and Rowe scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treatment of shoulder instability. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between January 2018 and January 2020, a retrospective review of 149 patients undergoing primary Latarjet (n = 82) and revision Latarjet (n = 67) to treat shoulder instability was performed in a single institution. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The delta was defined as the change between the pre- and postoperative scores. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID and the PASS, respectively. The optimal cutoff point and the percentage of patients achieving those thresholds were also calculated. Results: The distribution-based MCIDs after primary Latarjet were 1.1, 7.5, and 9.6 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the MCID thresholds were 93.9%, 98.7%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds after primary Latarjet were ≤1, ≥90, and ≥85 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The percentages of patients who achieved PASS thresholds were 82.9%, 89%, and 86.5% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The distribution-based MCIDs after revision Latarjet were 0.6, 6.2, and 3.4 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved MCID thresholds were 89.3%, 100%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds were ≤3, ≥87, and ≥86 after revision Latarjet for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the PASS thresholds were 88%, 88%, and 91% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS, respectively. Conclusion: This study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds in VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treating shoulder instability. Most patients achieved MCID and PASS benchmarks, indicating successful primary and revision Latarjet procedure outcomes. These metrics can serve as valuable parameters when analyzing parameters in future studies and have the potential to enhance patient care by optimizing treatment strategies and surgical decision making.

Clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy in acetabular dysplastic patients, previously treated with periacetabular osteotomy: a minimum of two-year follow-up data from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry

ABSTRACT Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the treatment of choice in dysplastic acetabulum. Due to continued symptoms, 2–11% of these patients require an additional hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcome after a minimum of 2-year follow-up of additional hip arthroscopy after PAO with data from Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry. Inclusion criteria in the study cohort were PAO surgery resulting in an additional hip arthroscopy procedure. The cohort was evaluated according to the surgical findings and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) pre-operatively and at 2-year follow-up. A total of 287 patients were included in the study cohort. PROMs improved significantly in all subscales from pre-operatively to 2-year follow-up in the study cohort. According to PROM subscales, 47.8–57.6% and 25.2–38.2% achieved Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State, respectively. This study demonstrates, in PAO-treated patients, significant PROM improvements after additional hip arthroscopy. Unfortunately, only ∼50% and 30% achieved Minimal Clinical Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State, respectively.

Outcomes of Flexibility Sport Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Background: Hip arthroscopy has proved successful in treating femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with and without borderline hip dysplasia (BHD). Despite a high prevalence of BHD in patients who participate in sports with high flexibility requirements, a paucity of literature evaluates the efficacy of hip arthroscopy in treating FAIS in flexibility sport athletes with BHD. Purpose: To compare minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and achievement of clinically significant outcomes in flexibility sport athletes with BHD undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with capsular plication with results in flexibility sport athletes without dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were prospectively collected for patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with BHD, defined as a lateral center-edge angle of 18° to 25°, who reported participation in a sport with a high flexibility requirement, including dance, gymnastics, figure skating, yoga, cheerleading, and martial arts, according to previous literature. These patients were matched 1:2 to flexibility sport athletes without dysplasia, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROs were collected and compared between groups. Cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state achievement was compared between groups. Results: In total, 52 flexibility sport athletes with BHD were matched to 104 flexibility sport athletes without BHD. Both groups showed similar sport participation (P = .874) and a similar level of competition (P = .877). Preoperative lateral center-edge angle (22.2°± 1.6° vs 31.5°± 3.9°; P < .001) and Tönnis angle (10.9°± 3.7° vs 5.8°± 4.4°; P < .001) differed between groups. Capsular plication was performed in all cases. Both groups achieved significant improvement in all PROs (P < .001) with no differences in postoperative PROs between groups (P≥ .147). High minimal clinically important difference (BHD group: 95.7%; control group: 94.8%) and patient acceptable symptom state (BHD group: 71.7%; control group: 72.2%) achievement for any PRO was observed with no differences between groups (P≥ .835). Conclusion: Flexibility sport athletes with BHD achieved similar outcomes as those of flexibility sport athletes without BHD after hip arthroscopy for FAIS with capsular plication.

Comparison of Pain Scores and Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair and Concomitant Capsular Repair or Plication Versus No Closure.

The need for capsular closure during arthroscopic hip labral repair is debated. To compare pain and functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip labral repair with concomitant repair or plication of the capsule versus no closure. Cohort study. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing arthroscopic hip labral repair with concomitant repair or plication of the capsule versus no closure at up to 2 years postoperatively and with stratification by age and sex. Patients with lateral center-edge angle <20°, a history of instability, a history of prior arthroscopic surgery in the ipsilateral hip, or a history of labral debridement only were excluded. Subanalysis was performed between patients undergoing no capsular closure who were propensity score matched 1:1 with patients undergoing repair or plication based on age, sex, and preoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS). We compared patients who underwent T-capsulotomy with concomitant capsular closure matched 1:5 with patients who underwent an interportal capsulotomy with concomitant capsular repair based on age, sex, and preoperative MHHS. Patients undergoing capsular closure (n = 1069), compared with the no-closure group (n = 230), were more often female (68.6% vs 53.0%, respectively; P < .001), were younger (36.4 ± 13.3 vs 47.9 ± 14.7 years; P < .001), and had superior MHHS scores at 2 years postoperatively (85.8 ± 14.5 vs 81.8 ± 18.4, respectively; P = .020). In the matched analysis, no difference was found in outcome measures between patients in the capsular closure group (n = 215) and the no-closure group (n = 215) at any follow-up timepoint. No significant difference was seen between the 2 closure techniques at any follow-up timepoint. Patients with closure of the capsule achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the 1-year MHHS at a similar rate as those without closure (MCID, 50.3% vs 44.9%, P = .288; PASS, 56.8% vs 51.1%, P = .287, respectively). Patients with T-capsulotomy achieved the MCID and the PASS for the 1-year MHHS at a similar rate compared with those with interportal capsulotomy (MCID, 50.1% vs 44.9%, P = .531; PASS, 65.7% vs 61.2%, P = .518, respectively). When sex, age, and preoperative MHHS were controlled, capsular closure and no capsular closure after arthroscopic hip labral repair were associated with similar pain and functional outcomes for patients up to 2 years postoperatively.

Hip Arthroscopy Patients With Lower Back Pain Show Delayed Clinical Improvement and Inferior Time-Dependent Survivorship: A Propensity Matched Study at Mid-Term Follow-Up

PurposeTo evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at mid-term follow-up after hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with and without preoperative lower back pain (LBP). MethodsPatients with self-endorsed preoperative LBP who underwent HA for FAIS with mid-term follow-up were identified and propensity matched 1:1 to patients without back pain by age, sex, and body mass index. PROs collected preoperatively and at postoperative years 1, 2, and 5 included: Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), International Hip Outcome Score 12 (iHOT-12), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain. Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were compared. Survivorship was compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results119 patients with LBP were matched to 119 patients without LBP. Group demographic factors were as follows, age (37.4±11.9 years vs 37.6±12.6, p=0.880), sex (64.4% female vs 67.7%, p=0.796), and BMI (25.3±5.1 kg/m2 vs 25.3±5.4, p=0.930). Average follow-up duration was 6.0 ± 1.9 years. LBP patients showed similar preoperative PROs, yet lower 1-year scores for all PROs (p ≤ 0.044). At final follow-up, similar PROs were shown between groups (p ≥ 0.196). LBP and non-LBP patients had similar MCID achievement for HOS-ADL (59.3%vs.63.1%,p=0.640), HOS-SS (73.9%vs.70.8%,p=0.710), mHHS (66.7%vs.73.4%, p=-.544), iHOT-12 (85.1%vs.79.4%,p=0.500), and VAS-Pain (75.6%vs.69.9%,p=0.490). Groups also had similar PASS achievement for HOS-ADL (63.5%vs.61.3%,p=0.777), HOS-SS (57.0%vs.62.5%,p=0.461), mHHS (81.9%vs.79.1%, p=0.692), iHOT-12 (54.6%vs.61.2%,p=0.570), and VAS-Pain (51.0%vs.55.4%,p=0.570).with similar MCID (p ≥ 0.490) and PASS (p ≥ 0.386) achievement. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty occurred in 3.4% of hips with LBP and 0.8% of hips without LBP (p=0.370), Back pain patients demonstrated inferior time-dependent survivorship compared to patients without back pain on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.023). ConclusionsPatients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with LBP achieve comparable PROs and CSOs to patients without back pain at mid-term, despite lower 1-year PRO scores. LBP patients show inferior reoperation-free time-dependent survivorship compared to those without LBP.

Six-Month Outcomes Correlate With 10-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

To identify whether 6-month outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) correlate with outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS from 2012 to 2013 were reviewed and included if they had 6-month and minimum 10-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) subscale, Hip Outcome Score Sports-Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and VAS for satisfaction. We compared 6-month and 10-year outcome scores and analyzed the relations between 6-month and 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year outcome scores using Pearson correlation coefficients (r). Six-month scores and clinically significant outcome achievement were then compared with 10-year clinically significant outcome achievement and reoperations, including revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), using logistic regressions and the Fisher exact test. This study included 60 patients (60.0% female sex; mean age, 36.0 ± 12.2 years). The mHHS, VAS pain score, and VAS satisfaction score significantly improved from 6-month to 10-year follow-up (P ≤ .021), whereas the HOS-ADL and HOS-SS did not (P ≥ .072). There were significant correlations between 6-month and 10-year scores for the HOS-ADL (r= 0.505), HOS-SS (r= 0.592), and mHHS (r= 0.362) (P ≤ .022 for all), as well as significant correlations between 6-month and 1-, 2-, and 5-year scores (P ≤ .014 for all). The 6-month HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS were all significantly associated with their respective 10-year achievement of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) (P ≤ .044). Furthermore, 6-month HOS-ADL and mHHS were significantly associated with THA conversion (P ≤ .041). Comparable 6-month and 10-year achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (96.5% vs 97.8%, P > .999) and PASS (85.2% vs 87.5%, P > .999) for any PRO was observed. After hip arthroscopy for FAIS, patients' 6-month HOS-ADL and mHHS were significantly associated with their 10-year PROs, PASS achievement, and THA conversion, although correlation strengths decreased with increasing time from surgery. Level IV, case series.

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for PROMIS After Hallux Rigidus Correction Surgery

Introduction/Purpose: In an ever-changing healthcare landscape, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming more important for reimbursement and evaluating the success of surgical procedures. Unfortunately, it is unclear which PROs correlate best with clinical improvement. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) asks the patient whether or not their outcome is acceptable at a particular post-operative time point. Recently, the use of this metric has gained traction within the foot and ankle literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study that aims to establish PASS thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in patients who underwent operative intervention for hallux rigidus. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data within an institutional registry was performed. We identified 174 patients treated for hallux rigidus between February 2019 and March 2021 with at least 2-year post-operative PROMIS scores. Chart review was performed to obtain demographic information and to confirm the surgical procedures that were completed. Two-years post-operatively, patients answered two PASS anchor questions (Satisfaction, Delighted-Terrible scale) with Likert- scale responses, which was collected along with pre-operative and 2-year post-operative PROMIS scores via the registry. After patient’s answers to the Satisfaction and Delighted-Terrible scales were recategorized into binary responses, PASS thresholds were determined using the maximum Youden Index and a 95% confidence interval was quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Differences in patient and surgical characteristics between patients who met or did not meet the PASS threshold were compared using independent samples t-test and Pearson chi square. Statistical significance was established at an alpha of 0.05. Results: There was excellent association between PASS thresholds and the PROMIS domains of Physical Function (48.6, AUC=0.82) and Pain Interference (52.1, AUC =0.86). Overall, 125/174 (71.8%) and 105/174 (60.3%) patients met the threshold for Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI), respectively. For the PF and PI domains, age, BMI, method of cheilectomy and use of Akin/Moberg osteotomy did not impact a patient’s likelihood of meeting the PASS threshold. For the PF domain and the PI domain stratified by the Delighted-Terrible scale, women were more likely to meet the PASS threshold than men (63.2% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.057 and 73% vs. 45%, p =0.023, respectively). Lastly, patients with a higher pre-operative PF score had a higher chance of meeting the PASS threshold (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Following operative intervention to treat hallux rigidus, pre-operative PROMIS scores were strongly associated with a patient’s likelihood of meeting the PASS threshold. After surgical intervention for hallux rigidus, less than 75% of the patients felt their outcome was acceptable; however, the PASS threshold for PF was lower than population average, so it may not be necessary for patients to reach normal physical function levels post-operatively in order to have an acceptable outcome.

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Using PROMIS Following Reconstruction of the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Introduction/Purpose: Although reconstruction of the flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), there is limited data describing postoperative success as defined by patient satisfaction following surgery. Distinct from the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a novel PRO measurement that represents the symptom threshold beyond which patients are satisfied with their postoperative outcome. The primary aim of this study was to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores in combination with anchor questions to define PASS thresholds following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD. A secondary aim was to analyze how patient-specific variables and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures may impact the probability of reaching PASS thresholds. Methods: Using data collected from a foot and ankle orthopedic registry at a large academic institution, 109 patients who underwent reconstruction of a flexible PCFD between February 2019 and March 2021, had preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores, and 2-year postoperative responses to two PASS anchor questions (the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale) were included in the study. Patients who underwent either a double or triple arthrodesis were excluded. Patient responses to the anchor questions were dichotomized and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Using the Youden Index to balance sensitivity and specificity and maximize the area under the curve (AUC), PASS thresholds with 95% confidence intervals were quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Lastly, multivariable logistic regressions were performed to analyze the influence of patient demographics, preoperative PROMIS scores, and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures on the probability of reaching the PASS thresholds. Results: The PASS threshold for PROMIS PF was found to be 42.6 using both the delighted-terrible and the satisfied scale and 73.4% of patients (80/109) reached the threshold (both AUCs: 0.91) (Table 1). The PASS thresholds for PROMIS PI defined using the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale were 54.5 (AUC: 0.90) and 57.5 (AUC: 0.91), respectively, with 72.5% of patients (79/109) and 81.7% of patients (89/109) meeting the respective thresholds. Neither patient demographics nor specific PCFD reconstruction procedures affected the probability of meeting the PASS thresholds. However, a lower preoperative PROMIS PF score or a higher preoperative PROMIS PI score significantly decreased the probability of achieving the PASS thresholds. Conclusion: Following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD, PASS thresholds for the PROMIS PF and PI domains were found to be lower and higher, respectively, than population norms. This suggests that patients may be satisfied with the outcome of their surgery despite not returning to the population mean. The probability of achieving the PASS thresholds was influenced by both preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores but not by patient demographics or certain PCFD reconstruction procedures. In addition to guiding future outcomes research, these results may help foot and ankle surgeons optimize treatment for the flexible PCFD and better manage patient expectations.