Postreplication Repair Pathway Research Articles

A novel Rad18 function involved in protection of the vertebrate genome after exposure to camptothecin

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rad18 functions in post-replication repair pathways, such as error-free damage bypass involving Rad30 (Polη) and error-prone damage bypass involving Rev3/7 (Polζ). Chicken DT40 RAD18 −/− cells were found to be hypersensitive to camptothecin (CPT), while RAD30 −/− and REV3 −/− cells, which are defective in translesion DNA synthesis, were not. RAD18 −/− cells also showed higher levels of H2AX phosphorylation and chromosomal aberrations, particularly chromosomal gaps and breaks, upon exposure to CPT. Detailed analysis by alkaline sucrose density gradient centrifugation revealed that RAD18 −/− and wild type cells exhibited similar rates of elongation of newly synthesized DNA in the presence or absence of low concentrations of CPT but that DNA breaks frequently occurred on both parental and nascent strands within 1 h after a brief exposure to an elevated concentration of CPT, with more breaks induced in RAD18 −/− cells than in wild type cells. These data suggest a previously unanticipated role for Rad18 in dealing with replication forks upon encountering DNA lesions induced by CPT.

Effect of DNA Repair Protein Rad18 on Viral Infection

Host factors belonging to the DNA repair machineries are assumed to aid retroviruses in the obligatory step of integration. Here we describe the effect of DNA repair molecule Rad18, a component of the post-replication repair pathway, on viral infection. Contrary to our expectations, cells lacking Rad18 were consistently more permissive to viral transduction as compared to Rad18+/+ controls. Remarkably, such susceptibility was integration independent, since retroviruses devoid of integration activity also showed enhancement of the initial steps of infection. Moreover, the elevated sensitivity of the Rad18−/− cells was also observed with adenovirus. These data indicate that Rad18 suppresses viral infection in a non-specific fashion, probably by targeting incoming DNA. Furthermore, considering data published recently, it appears that the interactions between DNA repair components with incoming viruses, often result in inhibition of the infection rather than cooperation toward its establishment.

Multiple Repair Pathways Mediate Tolerance to Chemotherapeutic Cross-linking Agents in Vertebrate Cells

Cross-linking agents that induce DNA interstrand cross-links (ICL) are widely used in anticancer chemotherapy. Yeast genetic studies show that nucleotide excision repair (NER), Rad6/Rad18-dependent postreplication repair, homologous recombination, and cell cycle checkpoint pathway are involved in ICL repair. To study the contribution of DNA damage response pathways in tolerance to cross-linking agents in vertebrates, we made a panel of gene-disrupted clones from chicken DT40 cells, each defective in a particular DNA repair or checkpoint pathway, and measured the sensitivities to cross-linking agents, including cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (cisplatin), mitomycin C, and melphalan. We found that cells harboring defects in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), Fanconi anemia complementation groups (FANC), or homologous recombination displayed marked hypersensitivity to all the cross-linking agents, whereas NER seemed to play only a minor role. This effect of replication-dependent repair pathways is distinctively different from the situation in yeast, where NER seems to play a major role in dealing with ICL. Cells deficient in Rev3, the catalytic subunit of TLS polymerase Polzeta, showed the highest sensitivity to cisplatin followed by fanc-c. Furthermore, epistasis analysis revealed that these two mutants work in the same pathway. Our genetic comprehensive study reveals a critical role for DNA repair pathways that release DNA replication block at ICLs in cellular tolerance to cross-linking agents and could be directly exploited in designing an effective chemotherapy.

Mating type regulation of cellular tolerance to DNA damage is specific to the DNA post‐replication repair and mutagenesis pathway

In order to help further define DNA post-replication repair (PRR), a conditional synthetic lethal screen was employed to identify new genes involved in the PRR pathway. A synthetic lethal screen with the mms2 mutation resulted in the recovery of two suppressor mutations responsible for regulating PRR. The recovered suppressors are the mating type genes and SIR3. Indeed, controlled expression of both mating type genes or deletion of SIR3 rescued the conditional synthetic lethal mutant phenotypes. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses suggest that mating type heterozygosity confers tolerance to a broad range of DNA damage, and that this effect is limited to all PRR pathway mutations, but does not apply to base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair or recombination repair mutants. In addition, the tolerance conferred to PRR mutants as a result of mating type heterozygosity is dependent on a functional homologous recombination but not the non-homologous end-joining pathway. Thus, mating type status appears to be responsible for signalling DNA content and possibly cell cycle stage, allowing the cell to select the most efficient means to repair the DNA damage.

Brc1-Mediated DNA Repair and Damage Tolerance

The structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins are key elements in controlling chromosome dynamics. In eukaryotic cells, three essential SMC complexes have been defined: cohesin, condensin, and the Smc5/6 complex. The latter is essential for DNA damage responses; in its absence both repair and checkpoint responses fail. In fission yeast, the UV-C and ionizing radiation (IR) sensitivity of a specific hypomorphic allele encoding the Smc6 subunit, rad18-74 (renamed smc6-74), is suppressed by mild overexpression of a six-BRCT-domain protein, Brc1. Deletion of brc1 does not result in a hypersensitivity to UV-C or IR, and thus the function of Brc1 relative to the Smc5/6 complex has remained unclear. Here we show that brc1Delta cells are hypersensitive to a range of radiomimetic drugs that share the feature of creating lesions that are an impediment to the completion of DNA replication. Through a genetic analysis of brc1Delta epistasis and by defining genes required for Brc1 to suppress smc6-74, we find that Brc1 functions to promote recombination through a novel postreplication repair pathway and the structure-specific nucleases Slx1 and Mus81. Activation of this pathway through overproduction of Brc1 bypasses a repair defect in smc6-74, reestablishing resolution of lesions by recombination.

Kinetochores prevent repair of UV damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres.

Centromeres form specialized chromatin structures termed kinetochores which are required for accurate segregation of chromosomes. DNA lesions might disrupt protein-DNA interactions, thereby compromising segregation and genome stability. We show that yeast centromeres are heavily resistant to removal of UV-induced DNA lesions by two different repair systems, photolyase and nucleotide excision repair. Repair resistance persists in G(1)- and G(2)/M-arrested cells. Efficient repair was obtained only by disruption of the kinetochore structure in a ndc10-1 mutant, but not in cse4-1 and cbf1 Delta mutants. Moreover, UV photofootprinting and DNA repair footprinting showed that centromere proteins cover about 120 bp of the centromere elements CDEII and CDEIII, including 20 bp of flanking CDEIII. Thus, DNA lesions do not appear to disrupt protein-DNA interactions in the centromere. Maintaining a stable kinetochore structure seems to be more important for the cell than immediate removal of DNA lesions. It is conceivable that centromeres are repaired by postreplication repair pathways.

Mrc1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion to aid in recombination repair of spontaneous damage.

The SRS2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a 3'-->5' DNA helicase is part of the postreplication repair pathway and functions to ensure proper repair of DNA damage arising during DNA replication through pathways that do not involve homologous recombination. Through a synthetic gene array analysis, genes that are essential when Srs2 is absent have been identified. Among these are MRC1, TOF1, and CSM3, which mediate the intra-S checkpoint response. srs2 Delta mrc1 Delta synthetic lethality is due to inappropriate recombination, as the lethality can be suppressed by genetic elimination of homologous recombination. srs2 Delta mrc1 Delta synthetic lethality is dependent on the role of Mrc1 in DNA replication but independent of the role of Mrc1 in a DNA damage checkpoint response. mrc1 Delta, tof1 Delta and csm3 Delta mutants have sister chromatid cohesion defects, implicating sister chromatid cohesion established at the replication fork as an important factor in promoting repair of stalled replication forks through gap repair.

The involvement of Srs2 in post-replication repair and homologous recombination in fission yeast

Homologous recombination is important for the repair of double-strand breaks and daughter strand gaps, and also helps restart stalled and collapsed replication forks. However, sometimes recombination is inappropriate and can have deleterious consequences. To temper recombination, cells have employed DNA helicases that unwind joint DNA molecules and/or dissociate recombinases from DNA. Budding yeast Srs2 is one such helicase. It can act by dissociating Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments, and is required for channelling DNA lesions to the post-replication repair (PRR) pathway. Here we have investigated the role of Srs2 in controlling recombination in fission yeast. Similar to budding yeast, deletion of fission yeast srs2 results in hypersensitivity to a range of DNA damaging agents, rhp51-dependent hyper-recombination and synthetic sickness when combined with rqh1- that is suppressed by deleting rhp51, rhp55 or rhp57. Epistasis analysis indicates that Srs2 and the structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 function in a sub-pathway of PRR for the tolerance/repair of UV-induced damage. However, unlike in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Srs2 is not required for channelling lesions to the PRR pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In addition to acting as an antirecombinase, we also show that Srs2 can aid the recombinational repair of camptothecin-induced collapsed replication forks, independently of PRR.

RAD6B overexpression confers chemoresistance: RAD6 expression during cell cycle and its redistribution to chromatin during DNA damage-induced response.

The HR6A and HR6B genes, homologs of the yeast RAD6 gene, encode ubiquitin conjugating enzymes that are required for postreplication repair (PRR) of DNA and damage-induced mutagenesis. We show here that consistent with its role as a PRR protein, HR6 protein (referred as RAD6) expression is cell cycle regulated, with maximal levels expressed in late S/G2 phases of the cell cycle. Exposure of MCF10A cells to adriamycin (ADR) causes enhancement in the levels of RAD6B mRNA and protein. Inclusion of actinomycin D abolishes both basal and ADR-induced RAD6B transcription indicating that ADR-induced effects on RAD6B transcription result from an increase in transcriptional activity rather than from regulation of RAD6B mRNA stability. The increase in RAD6 protein expression observed in ADR-treated cells is dependent upon transcription and de novo protein synthesis, as addition of actinomycin D and cycloheximide eliminated the induction effects. Using in vivo crosslinking experiments, we demonstrate that only a small proportion of RAD6 is associated with chromatin in untreated MCF10A cells. However, treatment with ADR or cisplatin is accompanied by a significant increase and redistribution of RAD6 to DNA, and RAD6, RAD18, PCNA, phosphohistone H3, as well as p53 proteins are all found in the DNA fractions. These findings suggest that although RAD6 protein is present in the nucleus, its recruitment to the chromatin appears to be modulated by DNA damage. Whereas MCF10A cells engineered to overexpress ectopic RAD6B are significantly more resistant to ADR and cisplatin as compared to empty vector-transfected cells, MCF10A cells stably transfected with antisense RAD6B display hypersensitivity to these damage-inducing drugs. Analysis of PRR capacities in cisplatin-treated MCF10A cells stably transfected with empty vector, RAD6B or antisense RAD6B showed that whereas RAD6B-overexpressing and vector control MCF10A cells possessed the ability to convert newly synthesized DNA to higher molecular weight species, MCF10A cells depleted of RAD6B are PRR-compromised. Although no human diseases have been linked to mutations in the PRR pathway genes, these data suggest that RAD6 may play an essential role in DNA damage tolerance and recovery via modulation of PRR, and that imbalances in the levels of RAD6 could lead to changes in drug sensitivity and damage-induced mutagenesis.

Post-replication repair in DT40 cells: translesion polymerases versus recombinases.

Replication forks inevitably stall at damaged DNA in every cell cycle. The ability to overcome DNA lesions is an essential feature of the replication machinery. A variety of specialized polymerases have recently been discovered, which enable cells to replicate past various forms of damage by a process termed translesion synthesis. Alternatively, homologous recombination can be used to restart DNA replication across the lesion. Genetic and biochemical studies have shed light on the impact of these two post-replication repair pathways in bacteria and yeast. In vertebrates, however, a genetic approach to study post-replication repair has been compromised because many of the genes involved appear to be essential for embryonic development. We have taken advantage of the chicken cell line DT40 to perform a genetic analysis of translesion synthesis and homologous recombination and to characterize genetic interactions between these two pathways in vertebrates. In this article, we aim to summarize our current understanding of post-replication repair in DT40 in the perspective of bacterial, yeast and mammalian genetics.

Role of the error-free damage bypass postreplication repair pathway in the maintenance of genomic stability

The postreplication repair pathway (PRR) is composed of error-free and error-prone sub-pathways that allow bypass of DNA damage-induced replication-blocking lesions. The error-free sub-pathway is also used for bypass of spontaneous DNA damage and functions in cooperation with recombination pathways. In diploid yeast cells, error-free PRR is needed to prevent genomic instability, which is manifest as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events of increased chromosome loss and recombination. Homologous recombination acts synergistically with the error-free damage avoidance branch of PRR to prevent chromosome loss. The DNA damage checkpoint gene MEC1 acts synergistically with the PRR pathway in maintaining genomic stability. Integration of the PRR pathway with other cellular pathways for preventing genomic instability is discussed. In diploid strains, the most dramatic increase is in the abnormality of chromosome loss when a repair or damage detection pathway is defective.

The Neurospora crassa mus-19 gene is identical to the qde-3 gene, which encodes a RecQ homologue and is involved in recombination repair and postreplication repair.

An allele called mus-19 was identified by screening temperature-sensitive and mutagen-sensitive mutants of Neurospora crassa. The mus-19 gene was genetically mapped to a region near the end of the right arm of linkage group I, where a RecQ homologue called qde-3 had been physically mapped in the Neurospora database. Complementation tests between the mus-19 mutant and the qde-3(RIP) mutant showed that mus-19 and qde-3 were the same gene. The qde-3 genes of both mutants were cloned and sequenced; and the results showed that they have mutation(s) in their qde-3 genes. The original mus-19 and qde-3(RIP) mutants are defective in quelling, as reported for other qde-3 mutants. The mutants show high sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, N-methyl- N'-nitro- N-nitrosoguanidine, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, hydroxyurea and histidine. Epistasis analysis indicated that the qde-3 gene belongs both to the uvs-6 recombination repair pathway and the uvs-2 postreplication repair pathway. The qde-3 mutation has no effect on the integration of a plasmid carrying the mtr gene by homologous recombination. In homozygous crosses, the qde-3 mutant is defective in ascospore production.

Human MutY: gene structure, protein functions and interactions, and role in carcinogenesis.

Faithful maintenance of the genome is crucial to the individual and the species. Oxidative DNA damage, such as 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), poses a major threat to genomic integrity. 8-OxoG can mispair with 2'-deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate or with 2'-deoxyadenosine triphosphate during DNA replication, forming C*8-oxoG and A*8-oxoG mispairs. Human MutY is responsible for recognition and removal of the inappropriately inserted adenine in an A*8-oxoG mispair. If unrepaired, the A*8-oxoG mispairs can result in deleterious C:G to A:T transversions. Human MutY functions in a postreplication repair pathway and is targeted to the newly synthesized daughter strand of DNA for removal of the adenine base. The human MutY protein is targeted to both the mitochondria and the nucleus and associates with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen, apurinic/ apyrimidinic endonuclease 1, replication protein A and mutS homolog 6 proteins. Mutations in the human MutY gene and defective activity of the human MutY protein have been detected in cancer. A direct correlation between defective A*8-oxoG repair and increased levels of genomic 8-oxoG has now been established.

Delineating the requirements for spontaneous DNA damage resistance pathways in genome maintenance and viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Cellular metabolic processes constantly generate reactive species that damage DNA. To counteract this relentless assault, cells have developed multiple pathways to resist damage. The base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways remove damage whereas the recombination (REC) and postreplication repair (PRR) pathways bypass the damage, allowing deferred removal. Genetic studies in yeast indicate that these pathways can process a common spontaneous lesion(s), with mutational inactivation of any pathway increasing the burden on the remaining pathways. In this study, we examine the consequences of simultaneously compromising three or more of these pathways. Although the presence of a functional BER pathway alone is able to support haploid growth, retention of the NER, REC, or PRR pathway alone is not, indicating that BER is the key damage resistance pathway in yeast and may be responsible for the removal of the majority of either spontaneous DNA damage or specifically those lesions that are potentially lethal. In the diploid state, functional BER, NER, or REC alone can support growth, while PRR alone is insufficient for growth. In diploids, the presence of PRR alone may confer a lethal mutation load or, alternatively, PRR alone may be insufficient to deal with potentially lethal, replication-blocking lesions.

Structural and functional conservation of error-free DNA postreplication repair in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

DNA postreplication repair (PRR) is a cellular process by which cells survive replication-blocking lesions without removing the lesion. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, MMS2 plays a key role in the error-free PRR pathway: the mms2 null mutant displays an increased spontaneous mutation rate and sensitivity to a variety of DNA damaging agents. In contrast, its human homologs appear to play a different role. In order to address whether the MMS2-mediated PRR pathway is conserved in eukaryotes, we isolated a Schizosaccharomyces pombe cDNA homologous to MMS2, which we named spm2 + . Using spm2 + as a bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, we identified a fission yeast cDNA homologous to UBC13 from various species and named it spu13 + . Two-hybrid analysis confirmed physical interaction between Spm2 and Spu13, and between Spm2 and budding yeast Ubc13. Genetic analysis shows that both spm2 + and spu13 + are able to functionally complement the corresponding budding yeast mutants. Furthermore, deletion of either spm2 + , spu13 + or both genes from fission yeast results in an increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, suggesting that spm2 + and spu13 + indeed function in PRR. The fact that the spm2 − spu13 − double mutant showed sensitivity similar to that of the single mutant indicates that these two gene products act at the same step. Hence, our data strongly support the hypothesis that the PRR function mediated by UBC13– MMS2 is conserved throughout eukaryotes.

Posttranscriptional Regulation of the RAD5 DNA Repair Gene by the Dun1 Kinase and the Pan2-Pan3 Poly(A)-Nuclease Complex Contributes to Survival of Replication Blocks

The yeast Dun1 kinase has complex checkpoint functions including DNA damage-dependent cell cycle arrest in G(2)/M, transcriptional induction of repair genes, and regulation of postreplicative DNA repair pathways. Here we report that the Dun1 forkhead-associated domain interacts with the Pan3 subunit of the poly(A)-nuclease complex and that dun1pan2 and dun1pan3 double mutants are dramatically hypersensitive to replicational stress. This phenotype was independent of the function of Dun1 in regulating deoxyribonucleotide levels as it was also observed in strains lacking the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. dun1pan2 mutants initially arrested normally in response to replication blocks but died in the presence of persistent replication blocks with considerably delayed kinetics compared with mutants lacking the Rad53 kinase, indicating that the double mutation does not compromise the intra-S phase checkpoint. Interestingly, the RAD5 gene involved in error-free postreplication repair pathways was specifically up-regulated in dun1pan2 double mutants. Moreover, inducible overexpression of RAD5 mimicked the double mutant phenotype by hypersensitizing dun1 mutants to replication blocks. The data indicate that Dun1 and Pan2-Pan3 cooperate to regulate the stoichiometry and thereby the activity of postreplication repair complexes, suggesting that posttranscriptional mechanisms complement the transcriptional response in the regulation of gene expression by checkpoint signaling pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Noncovalent Interaction between Ubiquitin and the Human DNA Repair Protein Mms2 Is Required for Ubc13-mediated Polyubiquitination

Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variants share significant sequence similarity with typical E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating) enzymes of the protein ubiquitination pathway but lack their characteristic active site cysteine residue. The MMS2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes one such ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variant that is involved in the error-free DNA postreplicative repair pathway through its association with Ubc13, an E2. The Mms2-Ubc13 heterodimer is capable of linking ubiquitin molecules to one another through an isopeptide bond between the C terminus and Lys-63. Using highly purified components, we show here that the human forms of Mms2 and Ubc13 associate into a heterodimer that is stable over a range of conditions. The ubiquitin-thiol ester form of the heterodimer can be produced by the direct activation of its Ubc13 subunit with E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme) or by the association of Mms2 with the Ubc13-ubiquitin thiol ester. The activated heterodimer is capable of transferring its covalently bound ubiquitin to Lys-63 of an untethered ubiquitin molecule, resulting in diubiquitin as the predominant species. In (1)H (15)N HSQC ((1)H (15)N heteronuclear single quantum coherence) NMR experiments, we have mapped the surface determinants of tethered and untethered ubiquitin that interact with Mms2 and Ubc13 in both their monomeric and dimeric forms. These results have identified a surface of untethered ubiquitin that interacts with Mms2 in the monomeric and heterodimeric form. Furthermore, the C-terminal tail of ubiquitin does not participate in this interaction. These results suggest that the role of Mms2 is to correctly orient either a target-bound or untethered ubiquitin molecule such that its Lys-63 is placed proximally to the C terminus of the ubiquitin molecule that is linked to the active site of Ubc13.

Mutations in recombinational repair and in checkpoint control genes suppress the lethal combination of srs2Delta with other DNA repair genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The SRS2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a DNA helicase that is active in the postreplication repair pathway and homologous recombination. srs2 mutations are lethal in a rad54Delta background and cause poor growth or lethality in rdh54Delta, rad50Delta, mre11Delta, xrs2Delta, rad27Delta, sgs1Delta, and top3Delta backgrounds. Some of these genotypes are known to be defective in double-strand break repair. Many of these lethalities or poor growth can be suppressed by mutations in other genes in the DSB repair pathway, namely rad51, rad52, rad55, and rad57, suggesting that inhibition of recombination at a prior step prevents formation of a lethal intermediate. Lethality of the srs2Delta rad54Delta and srs2Delta rdh54Delta double mutants can also be rescued by mutations in the DNA damage checkpoint functions RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, and MEC3, indicating that the srs2 rad54 and srs2 rdh54 mutant combinations lead to an intermediate that is sensed by these checkpoint functions. When the checkpoints are intact the cells never reverse from the arrest, but loss of the checkpoints releases the arrest. However, cells do not achieve wild-type growth rates, suggesting that unrepaired damage is still present and may lead to chromosome loss.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 Group Is Composed of an Error-Prone and Two Error-Free Postreplication Repair Pathways

The RAD6 postreplication repair and mutagenesis pathway is the only major radiation repair pathway yet to be extensively characterized. It has been previously speculated that the RAD6 pathway consists of two parallel subpathways, one error free and another error prone (mutagenic). Here we show that the RAD6 group genes can be exclusively divided into three rather than two independent subpathways represented by the RAD5, POL30, and REV3 genes; the REV3 pathway is largely mutagenic, whereas the RAD5 and the POL30 pathways are deemed error free. Mutants carrying characteristic mutations in each of the three subpathways are phenotypically indistinguishable from a single mutant such as rad18, which is defective in the entire RAD6 postreplication repair/tolerance pathway. Furthermore, the rad18 mutation is epistatic to all single or combined mutations in any of the above three subpathways. Our data also suggest that MMS2 and UBC13 play a key role in coordinating the response of the error-free subpathways; Mms2 and Ubc13 form a complex required for a novel polyubiquitin chain assembly, which probably serves as a signal transducer to promote both RAD5 and POL30 error-free postreplication repair pathways. The model established by this study will facilitate further research into the molecular mechanisms of postreplication repair and translesion DNA synthesis. In view of the high degree of sequence conservation of the RAD6 pathway genes among all eukaryotes, the model presented in this study may also apply to mammalian cells and predicts links to human diseases.

The pattern of sensitivity of yeast dna2 mutants to DNA damaging agents suggests a role in DSB and postreplication repair pathways

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA2 gene encodes a DNA-stimulated ATPase and DNA helicase/nuclease essential for DNA replication. In characterizing dna2 mutants, we have found that Dna2p also participates in DNA repair or in damage avoidance mechanisms. dna2 mutants are sensitive to X rays, although they are less sensitive than rad52 mutants. The X-ray sensitivity of dna2 mutants is suppressed by overexpression of a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease, the yeast FEN-1 structure-specific nuclease, encoded by the RAD27 gene, which also suppresses the growth defect of dna2-ts mutants. SGS1 encodes a helicase with similar properties to Dna2 protein. Although sgs1Δ mutants are resistant to X rays, dna2-2 sgs1Δ double mutants are more sensitive to X rays than the dna2-2 mutant. Temperature sensitive dna2 mutants are only slightly sensitive to UV light, show normal levels of spontaneous and UV induced mutagenesis, and have only a 2.5-fold elevated level of dinucleotide tract instability compared to wildtype. However, dna2Δ strains kept alive by overproduction of RAD27 are highly sensitive to UV light. These phenotypes, in addition to the epistasis analysis reported, allow us to propose that Dna2 is involved in postreplication and DSB repair pathways.