Pathway-related Uncertainty Factors Research Articles

Inter-phenotypic differences in CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 metabolism: Bayesian meta-regression of human population variability in kinetics and application in chemical risk assessment

Quantifying variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicokinetics (TK) provides a science-based approach to refine uncertainty factors (UFs) for chemical risk assessment. In this context, genetic polymorphisms in cytochromes P450 (CYPs) drive inter-phenotypic differences and may result in reduction or increase in metabolism of drugs or other xenobiotics. Here, an extensive literature search was performed to identify PK data for probe substrates of the human polymorphic isoforms CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Relevant data from 158 publications were extracted for markers of chronic exposure (clearance and area under the plasma concentration-time curve) and analysed using a Bayesian meta-regression model. Enzyme function (EF), driven by inter-phenotypic differences across a range of allozymes present in extensive and poor metabolisers (EMs and PMs), and fraction metabolised (Fm), were identified as exhibiting the highest impact on the metabolism. The Bayesian meta-regression model provided good predictions for such inter-phenotypic differences. Integration of population distributions for inter-phenotypic differences and estimates for EF and Fm allowed the derivation of CYP2C9- and CYP2C19-related UFs which ranged from 2.7 to 12.7, and were above the default factor for human variability in TK (3.16) for PMs and major substrates (Fm >60%). These results provide population distributions and pathway-related UFs as conservative in silico options to integrate variability in CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 metabolism using in vitro kinetic evidence and in the absence of human data. The future development of quantitative extrapolation models is discussed with particular attention to integrating human in vitro and in vivo PK or TK data with pathway-related variability for chemical risk assessment.

The Refinement of Uncertainty/Safety Factors in Risk Assessment by the Incorporation of Data on Toxicokinetic Variability in Humans

The derivation of safe levels of exposure in humans for compounds that are assumed to cause threshold toxicity has relied on the application of a 100-fold uncertainty factor to a measure for the threshold, such as the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) or the benchmark dose (BMD). This 100-fold safety factor consists of the product of two 10-fold factors allowing for human variability and interspecies differences. The International Programme on Chemical Safety has suggested the subdivision of these 10-fold factors to allow for variability in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. This subdivision allows the replacement of the default uncertainty factors with a chemical-specific adjustment factor (CSAF) when suitable data are available. This short review describes potential options to refine safety factors used in risk assessment, with particular emphasis on pathway-related uncertainty factors associated with variability in kinetics. These pathway-related factors were derived from a database that quantified interspecies differences and human variability in phase I metabolism, phase II metabolism, and renal excretion. This approach allows metabolism and pharmacokinetic data in healthy adults and subgroups of the population to be incorporated in the risk-assessment process and constitutes an intermediate approach between simple default factors and chemical-specific adjustment factors.

Human variability in xenobiotic metabolism and pathway-related uncertainty factors for chemical risk assessment: a review

This review provides an account of recent developments arising from a database that defined human variability in phase I metabolism (CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, hydrolysis, alcohol dehydrogenase), phase II metabolism (N-acetyltransferases, glucuronidation, glycine conjugation, sulphation) and renal excretion. This database was used to derive pathway-related uncertainty factors for chemical risk assessment that allow for human variability in toxicokinetics. Probe substrates for each pathway of elimination were selected on the basis that oral absorption was >95% and that the metabolic route was the primary route of elimination of the compound (60–100% of a dose). Intravenous data were used for compounds for which absorption was variable. Human variability in kinetics was quantified for each compound from published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in healthy adults and other subgroups of the population using parameters relating to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC)) and acute exposure (Cmax) (data not presented here). The pathway-related uncertainty factors were calculated to cover 95%, 97.5% and 99% of the population of healthy adults and of each subgroup.Pathway-related uncertainty factors allow metabolism data to be incorporated into the derivation of health-based guidance values. They constitute an intermediate approach between the general kinetic default factors (3.16) and a chemical-specific adjustment factor. Applications of pathway-related uncertainty factors for chemical risk assessment and future refinements of the approach are discussed. A knowledge-based framework to predict human variability in kinetics for xenobiotics showing a threshold dose below which toxic effects are not observed, is proposed to move away from default assumptions.

Impact of inter‐individual differences in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics on safety evaluation

Safety evaluation aims to assess the dose-response relationship to determine a dose/level of exposure for food contaminants below which no deleterious effect is measurable that is 'without appreciable health risk' when consumed daily over a lifetime. These safe levels, such as the acceptable daily intake (ADI) have been derived from animal studies using surrogates for the threshold such as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL). The extrapolation from the NOAEL to the human safe intake uses a 100-fold uncertainty factor, defined as the product of two 10-fold factors allowing for human variability and interspecies differences. The 10-fold factor for human variability has been further subdivided into two factors of 10(0.5) (3.16) to cover toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics and this subdivsion allows for the replacement of an uncertainty factor with a chemical-specific adjustment factor (CSAF) when compound-specific data are available. Recently, an analysis of human variability in pharmacokinetics for phase I metabolism (CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, hydrolysis, alcohol dehydrogenase), phase II metabolism (N-acetyltransferase, glucuronidation, glycine conjugation, sulphation) and renal excretion was used to derive pathway-related uncertainty factors in subgroups of the human population (healthy adults, effects of ethnicity and age). Overall, the pathway-related uncertainty factors (99th centile) were above the toxicokinetic uncertainty factor for healthy adults exposed to xenobiotics handled by polymorphic metabolic pathways (and assuming the parent compound was the proximate toxicant) such as CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (26), CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (52) and NAT-2 slow acetylators (5.2). Neonates were the most susceptible subgroup of the population for pathways with available data [CYP1A2 and glucuronidation (12), CYP3A4 (14), glycine conjugation (28)]. Data for polymorphic pathways were not available in neonates but uncertainty factors of up to 45 and 9 would allow for the variability observed in children for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 metabolism, respectively. This review presents an overview on the history of uncertainty factors, the main conclusions drawn from the analysis of inter-individual differences in metabolism and pharmacokinetics, the development of pathway-related uncertainty factors and their use in chemical risk assessment.

Human variability for metabolic pathways with limited data (CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, ADH, esterases, glycine and sulphate conjugation)

Human variability in the kinetics of a number of phase I (CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, alcohol dehydrogenase and hydrolysis) and phase II enzymes (glycine and sulphate conjugation) was analysed using probe substrates metabolised extensively (>60%) by these routes. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in healthy adults and available data on subgroups of the population (effects of ethnicity, age and disease) were abstracted using parameters relating primarily to chronic exposure [metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve (AUC)] and acute exposure (Cmax). Interindividual differences in kinetics for all these pathways were low in healthy adults ranging from 21 to 34%. Pathway-related uncertainty factors to cover the 95th, 97.5th and 99th centiles of healthy adults were derived for each metabolic route and were all below the 3.16 kinetic default uncertainty factor in healthy adults, with the possible exception of CYP2C9*3/*3 poor metabolisers (based on a very limited number of subjects). Previous analyses of other pathways have shown that neonates represent the most susceptible subgroup and this was true also for glycine conjugation for which an uncertainty factor of 29 would be required to cover 99% of this subgroup. Neonatal data were not available for any other pathway analysed.

728 Prediction of human variability using kinetec data and Monte Carlo modelling for the derivation of pathway-related uncertainty factors for compounds handled by multiple pathways

728 Prediction of human variability using kinetec data and Monte Carlo modelling for the derivation of pathway-related uncertainty factors for compounds handled by multiple pathways

Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors

CYP2C19-mediated oxidation and N-acetylation constitute major phase I and phase II polymorphic pathways of xenobiotic metabolism in humans. Analysis of human variability in kinetics for these pathways has been carried out for compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by these routes. Data for minor substrates for CYP2C19 metabolism (10–60%) have also been analysed. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in CYP2C19 non-phenotyped healthy adults (NPs), and phenotyped extensive (EMs), slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration–time curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed for the N-acetylation pathway using data for fast acetylators (FA) and slow acetylators (SA). Interindividual variability in the kinetics of CYP2C19 substrates after oral dosage was greater in EMs than in NPs (60 vs 43% for clearances and 54 vs 45% for Cmax). Lower variability was found for N-acetylation for both phenotypes (32 and 22% for FA and SA, respectively). The internal dose of CYP2C19 substrates in PM subjects would be 31-fold higher than in EMs, while for N-acetylated substrates there was a three-fold difference between SA and FA subjects. Pathway-related uncertainty factors were above the default safety factor of 3.16 for most subgroups and values of 52 and 5.2 would be necessary to cover to the 99 th centile of the poor metaboliser phenotype for CYP2C19 and N-acetylation, respectively. An exponential relationship ( R 2=0.86) was found between the extent of CYP2C19 metabolism and the difference in internal dose between EMs and PMs. The kinetic default factor (3.16) would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2C19 was responsible for up to 20–30% of the metabolism in EMs.