Presenter: Courtney Chen MD | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are a heterogenous group of pancreatic neoplasms and comprise 1-2% of pancreatic malignancies in the US. Resection of PNENs without extrapancreatic extension confers a survival benefit, particularly in tumors ≤2cm, with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WDPNETs) having better prognosis compared to pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PNECs). Optimal resection strategies using minimally invasive (MIS) approaches versus open resection remain controversial despite increasing use of MIS. This study aims to identify predictors for overall survival (OS) after MIS versus open distal pancreatectomy (DP) for PNENs. Methods: The NCDB was queried from 2010-2016 for pancreatic tail PNEN patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, or open DP (n=2252; WDPNET n = 1373; PNEC n = 879). Exclusion criteria included extrapancreatic extension and distant metastases. Patients were grouped based on histology (WDPNET vs PNEC). Patient demographics, pathologic tumor characteristics, and surgical outcomes were compared. Mann-Whitney U and Pearson’s Chi-squared tests were used for nonparametric continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan Meier estimate was used to assess mean OS between groups, with the log rank test to test for significance. Cox proportional hazard analysis were performed and included age, Charlson/Deyo comorbidity (CDC) score, tumor grade, pathologic tumor and nodal stages, surgical approaches, R1 resection, and lymphovascular invasion. Results: A total of 2252 PNEN patients who underwent DP (robotic DP = 313; laparoscopic DP = 991; open DP = 948) were included. MIS approaches resulted in significantly lower 90-day mortality and length of stay (LOS) (p=0.03, p<0.01 respectively), although PNENs resected with MIS DP (robotic median size = 22mm, laparoscopic median size = 20mm) had smaller tumors compared to open DP (open median size = 25mm) (robotic vs laparoscopic p=0.81; robotic vs open p=0.04; laparoscopic vs open p<0.01; p=0.01 overall). Robotic DP had a significantly higher rate of R1 resection compared to laparoscopic DP (p=0.03). R1 resection had no impact on OS for WDPNETs (HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.24-3.23) or PNECs (HR=1.08, 95% CI 0.32-3.56) on cox regression analysis. Laparoscopic DP had significantly better OS only with PNECs (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.92). Pathologic N1 status in WDPNETs was associated with significantly worse survival (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.05-5.09) but was not significant for PNECs. Higher grade tumors (Grade 3) had worse prognosis as expected (HR 5.73, 95% CI 2.63-12.47). Conclusion: Patients who undergo MIS DP for PNENs likely benefit from short-term decreases in morbidity and mortality with non-inferior oncologic outcomes compared to open DP, even with R1 resection. Consideration of MIS DP for pancreatic tail PNENs of all histologic types is warranted, and future studies are needed to identify potential benefits beyond short-term decreases in morbidity, mortality, and hospital LOS.