Summary. In teleseismic and crustal seismic studies, source–receiver distances are commonly expressed in degrees rather than kilometres. The earlier use of geographic latitudes in determining a meridional distance led to variations in the number of kilometres per degree of up to 1.0 per cent (1.1 km deg-1) and discrepancies up to 64.2 km in epicentral distance at Δ= 90°. The present standard practice of using geocentric latitudes reduces this maximum variation by a factor of 3 to 0.34 per cent (0.37 km deg-1) and maximum discrepancies to 21.4 km at Δ= 90°. A third, arbitrarily defined latitude is here proposed which reduces this maximum variation by a further factor of 800 to 0.00042 per cent (0.00047 km deg-1) and reduces the maximum discrepancy by a further factor of 1600 to 0.0135 km (or 13.5 m) at Δ= 45° (zero at Δ= 90°). This equidistant latitude will be useful in certain geophysical applications where a consistent proportionality between angular distances, Δ, and arc lengths, u, is of prime importance. This could be the case at a high-latitude station observing many events, or for a single high-latitude event observed at many stations; in whichever case all source–receiver paths are close to meridional. An additional correction is presented which removes distance discrepancies between meridional and nonmeridional (in the worst case, equatorial) paths; this latter correction being equivalent to the conventional path-length correction for Earth-encircling urface waves (namely in the single-station method). Some areas of application, where the improved accuracy attainable by using equidistant latitudes might be significant, are suggested. In the determination of surface-wave velocities by the two-station method, the use of geocentric latitudes introduces relative errors of ∼ 10-3, Such errors could be significant with high-accuracy data; and for very long-period surface waves (τ? 200s) errors of this same order of magnitude are removed by the period dependent apparent-path-length correction. Combining this correction with equidistant latitudes would reduce relative errors to ∼ 10-5 or 10-6. In determining epicentral distances for local earthquakes (say Δ < 5°) the use of geocentric latitudes leads to a maximum discrepancy of 0.16 km within a single locality around 45° latitude, although the discrepancies among all geocentric 5° paths on the Earth can reach 1.9 km. By Richter's rectangular coordinate method, maximum discrepancies are of the same order as the geocentric ones within a single locality; moreover they remain at this level for any two such paths (Δ < 5°) on the Earth. With equidistant latitude, however, the maximum discrepancies are 4 × 10-4 km for a single locality around 22½° or 67½° latitude and 2 × 10-3km for the whole Earth.