REVIEWS 381 mixup thedetailsofwhatthey weredestined tosee,hearordo manydecades ago. Moreover,theyofteninterpret thoseeventsfromthevantagepointof their contemporary ideological standof,say,Communists turned Zionists and Americanpatriots. In otherwords,in theirrecollections informants reveal their present-day perception oftheperception thatthey had at thetimeofthe events. For all that,Shternshis - whoseresearch projectsoughtto establish how theSovietmachinery ofJewish culture had beenperceived bythepopulation - conducted 225in-depth interviews withpeoplebornon theterritory ofthe SovietUnionno laterthan1930.She metsomeofherinformants in Russia, butthemajority ofthemwereimmigrants livingin Americaand Germany. She knewthattheirstories had to be manytimesfiltered beforefinding a place in herbook.As a result, she is confident that' [c]ross-examination of testimonies witharchival andpublished datagivesusthefullest picture todate ofthedailylivesofSoviet Jewsduring thisperiod'(p.xviii). Methodologically, Soviet andKosher can be seen as an exampleof successful utilization of oral history. The title, Soviet andKosher, reflects themainthesisoftheresearch: Jewish traditions did notdisappear, butweresignificantly transformed in theSoviet environment. Whilein urbansettings acculturation was verystrong and the younger urbanités' Jewish identity was,toborrowthewordsoftheAmerican historianArcadius Kahan [EssaysinJewishSocialandEconomic History, Chicago, IL, 1986,p. 189)'leftonlyas a mythical, almostmystical qualityincomprehensiveto theirenvironment and one thatcould become incomprehensible to themselves', olderpeople did notreplacetheirfaith in God by a faithin Communism. Old-timers had a chanceto preserve theirtraditional lifestyle, especiallyiftheychose to stayput in the shtetl.Meanwhile,the younger generation was takenin bytheKremlin'spropagandaand underwent rapid Sovietization. Still,the generationinterviewed by Shternshis could speak Yiddishand remembered songs,sayings, legendsand otherelements ofEast EuropeanJewish lore. Thanksto thiswell-written and informative study, the Soviet-and-kosher population appearslessenigmatic. In anycase,one can easierunderstand the problems ofgauging the(post-) Soviet Jewish identity byapplying toitWestern yardsticks ofJewishness. Skirball Department ofHebrew and Judaic Studies G. Estraikh NewYork University Bernstein, Frances Lee. TheDictatorship ofSex:Ltfestyle Advice for theSoviet Masses.NorthernIllinoisUniversity Press,DeKalb, IL, 2007. xvii + 246 pp. Illustrations. Notes.Bibliography. Index.$42.00. Frances Lee Bernstein'sTheDictatorship ofSexcontinues thehistorical investigation ofRussia'smedicalprofession by NancyFriedenand Laura Engelstein ,as wellas thatofRussiansexuality by IgorKon, Engelstein and Eric Naiman. By comparisonto these other scholars,Bernsteindraws more overtly upon Foucaultto explainhow the earlySovietmedicalprofession 382 SEER, 87, 2, APRIL 2OO9 constructed sexand sexuality foruse as a knowledge-technology in itsbidfor authority and power.Sovietsexologists 'weremotivated bothbythedesireto contribute tosocialist society and thepressing needtoassert andmaintain the independence and integrity of theirprofession and theirinstitutions' writes Bernstein (p. 4), who further argues:'The sexual knowledge producedby medicalenlighteners and themethods usedtoassert their professional authorityoversexuality in the1920swouldpave thewayforthestate'sadoptionof repressive policiestowardsex duringthe 1930s'(p. 5). Of course,physicians had no wayofseeingwhatlayahead,buttheirgoal to dictatetheterms by whichsexwas tobe understood and practised servesas further evidencethat the Stalinist dictatorship resulted fromtrendsoriginating 'below' as wellas 'above'. Before theonsetofwhatBernstein admitsis thecontroversial notion ofthe'GreatRetreat', Russianaetiology differed from Bolshevism insofar as itportrayed 'healthy' sexuality in negative terms. This paradigmsupposedly provedunsustainable whenfacedbythefive-year plans'demandsforhuman as wellas material productivity. Sovietsexologists differed fromtheirEuropean counterparts, too.Despiteattending international conferences and readingmanyof thesamejournals,theydid not sharethenotionthatmutual pleasurewaskeytoa couple'shealthy sexlife.Alluding to Orthodoxy and its traditional exaltation ofsuffering, Bernstein nevertheless failsto accountfor thisprudery. Medicos wereprimarily concernedwithdefining 'normal'sexuality and rigidly defining genderroles.In thechaptercalled'MakingSex', Bernstein's graspofperiodicalliterature allowsherto showhowphysicians medicalized discursively-constructed cultural assumptions ofmasculinity and femininity by aligning themto theories ofglandularactivity. Havingestablished normsof appearanceand behaviour,theycould pathologizeanything outsidethese definitions. The resultant (and inevitable) conclusion was thatRussia'swas a sexuallysicksocietyurgently requiring physicians' expertise, treatment and precautions. Bernstein insists theirvestedinterest in sucha diagnosisshould notlead one to concludethattheywantedtheir patients to remainsickand dependent, butthis isillogical. Although mostphysicians undoubtedly believed themselves trueto theirHippocraticoaths,theNEP's facilitation ofmarket forces createda situation inwhichsexologists' powerand authority absolutely dependedon maintaining thisdiagnosis. Quitesimply, itwastheir raison d'être. As Bernstein's own evidenceshows,theyapplied the diagnosisso widely it perversely accountedforthevastmajority, not minority, of the general population. The Dictatorship ofSexpresents an impressive amountofinformation detailing how Sovietsexuality was constructed duringthe1920s.The extent to which physicians hoped to create 'new people' by informing themabout what did and did not constitute appropriate sexual acts and desiresperpetuated the intelligentsia's traditional paternalistic attitude towardthe 'masses'and amounted toa socialengineering project runbycivilian authorities. However, whyandhowthestatecutshort this medicaldictatorship isnotwellexplained, and thisposesa problemforBernstein's assertion thatitpaved thewayfor Stalinist sexualrepression. Also,thetextisrepetitive and consists oftoomany lengthy synopses ofjournalarticles andtoolittle analysis ofthem. Forexample, thereaderistoldseveral times thatphysicians inveighed against masturbation REVIEWS 383 in thebeliefthatit led to impotenceand lassitudeand therefore rendered youngpeople unserviceable to nationalneeds. But what thissays about physicians' attachment to a service-state ethosis leftundeveloped. Similarly, Bernstein quotesrepeatedly from a 'Commissar Semashko'whoseinitials...