Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area Research Articles

Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area Quantified In Vivo During Daily Activities.

In vivo measurements of patellofemoral joint contact area are scarce. Patellofemoral contact area has been measured in living people under static conditions with the knee held at fixed angles between 0 and 60° of flexion. No previous study to our knowledge has measured patellofemoral contact area in vivo during dynamic activity. The aim of this study was to measure and compare patellofemoral joint contact area in healthy people across a range of daily activities. Mobile biplane X-ray imaging was used to measure 3D tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in level walking, downhill walking, stair ascent, stair descent, and open-chain (non-weightbearing) knee flexion and knee extension. The kinematic data were combined with magnetic resonance imaging to determine patellofemoral joint contact area at each time point during each activity. The knee flexion angle explained, respectively, 83%, 80%, and 72% of the variability in the total, lateral, and medial patellofemoral contact areas measured across all participants and all activities. Total, lateral, and medial patellofemoral contact areas increased from 0 to 60° of knee flexion and then decreased as the flexion angle increased further, up to ~ 120°. Patellofemoral contact area was less sensitive to the type of activity and hence joint load. The lateral patellofemoral contact area was larger than the medial patellofemoral contact area throughout the range of knee flexion in all activities (p < 0.001). Knowledge of patellofemoral contact area during daily activities like walking improves our understanding of patellofemoral joint biomechanics and will assist in validating computational models of the patellofemoral joint.

Persons Who Have Undergone ACL Reconstruction Exhibit Altered Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area: Implications For Early Onset Patellofemoral Joint Arthritis

Persons Who Have Undergone ACL Reconstruction Exhibit Altered Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area: Implications For Early Onset Patellofemoral Joint Arthritis

Effects of Aging on Patellofemoral Joint Stress during Stair Negotiation on Challenging Surfaces.

This study examined the effect of age and surface on patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress magnitude and waveform during stair ascent and descent tasks. A total of 12 young and 12 older adults had knee biomechanics quantified while they ascended and descended stairs on normal, slick, and uneven surfaces. The peak of stance (0-100%) PFJ stress and associated components were submitted to a two-way repeated measures ANOVA, while the PFJ stress waveform was submitted to statistical parametric mapping two-way ANOVA. During stair ascent, older adults exhibited greater PFJ stress waveforms, from 55 to 59% and 74 to 84% of stance (p < 0.001) as well as greater PFJ stress-time integral across stance (p = 0.003), and later peak PFJ stress, than young adults (p = 0.002). When ascending on the uneven surface, participants exhibited smaller PFJ stress from 9 to 24% of stance compared to the normal surface, but greater PFJ stress from 75 to 88% and from 63 to 68% of stance (p < 0.001) as well as greater PFJ stress-time integrals compared to normal and slick surfaces (p < 0.032). During stair descent, older adults exhibited a smaller PFJ contact area range (p = 0.034) and peak knee flexion angle (p = 0.022) than young adults. When descending on the slick surface, participants exhibited smaller PFJ stress from 5 to 18% of stance, but greater stress, from 92 to 98% of stance (both: p < 0.001), compared to the normal surface. Negotiating slick and uneven stairs may produce knee biomechanics that increase PFJ stress, and the larger, later PFJ stress exhibited by older adults may further increase their risk of PFJ pain.

Contact area and pressure changes of patellofemoral joint during stair ascent and stair descent

PurposeTo investigate the differences of patellofemoral joint pressure and contact area between the process of stair ascent and stair descent.MethodsThe finite element models of 9 volunteers without disorders of knee (9 males) to estimate patellar cartilage pressure during the stair ascent and the stair descent. Simulations took into account cartilage morphology from magnetic resonance imaging, joint posture from weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging, and ligament model. The three-dimension models of the patella, femur and tibia were developed with the medical image processing software, Mimics 11.1. The ligament was established by truss element of the non-linear FE solver. The equivalent gravity direction (-z direction) load was applied to the whole end of femur (femoral head) according to the body weight of the volunteers, and the force of patella was observed. A paired-samples t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test to make comparisons between stair ascent and stair descent. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 using a P value of 0.05 to indicate significance.ResultsDuring the stair descent (knee flexion at 30°), the contact pressure of the patella was 2.59 ± 0.06Mpa. The contact pressure of femoral trochlea cartilage was 2.57 ± 0.06Mpa. During the stair ascent (knee flexion at 60°), the contact pressure with patellar cartilage was 2.82 ± 0.08Mpa. The contact pressure of the femoral trochlea cartilage was 3.03 ± 0.11Mpa. The contact area between patellar cartilage and femoral trochlea cartilage was 249.27 ± 1.35mm2 during the stair descent, which was less than 434.32 ± 1.70mm2 during the stair ascent. The area of high pressure was located in the lateral area of patella during stair descent and the area of high pressure was scattered during stair ascent.ConclusionThere are small change in the cartilage contact pressure between stair ascent and stair descent, indicating that the joint adjusts the contact pressure by increasing the contact area.

Effect of change in patellofemoral joint contact area by the decrease in vastus medialis muscle activation on joint stress

Purpose Patellofemoral pain syndrome is a common orthopedic trauma among runners. It is unclear whether patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS) is the highest (or lowest) when the knee joint flexion angle and extension moment are in combination under the condition that vastus medialis (VM) activation decreases. This study aimed to investigate the effects of changes in the PFJ contact area by decreasing the activation of the VM muscle on PFJS. Methods A PFJ sagittal model was used to quantify PFJ reaction force and PFJS. The PFJ model and mathematical modelling procedure were used to quantify PFJS based on previous studies. The simulation ranges were set to knee joint flexion angles of 10–45 degrees and extension moments of 0–240 Nm. PFJS was calculated for the normal condition (NC) and decrease condition (DC) in VM activation. Results When the knee joint angle and knee joint moment were at the maximum, the PFJS showed the maximum value under both conditions (NC; 14.9 N/cm2, DC; 16.4 N/cm2). PFJS was found to be higher in DC than that in NC for all simulation ranges. Conclusions Decreased VM activation may be involved in the mechanism of patellofemoral pain syndrome. In addition, the results of this study provide evidence that clinicians can enhance VM to relieve pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

An Updated Model Does Not Reveal Sex Differences in Patellofemoral Joint Stress during Running.

Structure-specific loading may have implications in understanding the mechanisms of running related injury. As females demonstrate a prevalence of patellofemoral pain twice that of males, this may indicate differences in patellofemoral loads between males and females. Previous works investigating differences in patellofemoral joint stress have shown conflicting results, but the models employed have not used estimates of muscle forces or sex specific contact areas. The aim of this study was to examine sex differences in patellofemoral joint stress using an updated model to include estimates of quadriceps muscle force and sex-specific patellofemoral contact area. Descriptive Laboratory Study. Forty-five healthy recreational runners ran at a controlled speed down a 20-meter runway. Kinetic and kinematic data were utilized to estimate muscle forces using static optimization. Quadriceps muscle force was utilized with sex-specific patellofemoral joint contact area in a two-dimensional patellofemoral joint model to estimate patellofemoral joint stress. Multivariate tests were utilized to detect sex differences in patellofemoral loading and hip and knee kinematics. No differences were found between sexes in measures of patellofemoral loading or quadriceps force. Females displayed a reduced knee extension moment and greater hip adduction and internal rotation than males. The inclusion of static optimization to estimate quadriceps muscle force and sex-specific contact area of the patellofemoral joint did not reveal sex differences in patellofemoral joint stress, but differences in non-sagittal plane hip motion were detected. Therefore, two-dimensional patellofemoral models may not fully characterize differences in patellofemoral joint stress between males and females. Three-dimensional patellofemoral models may be necessary to determine if sex differences in patellofemoral joint stress exist. 3b.

Influence of sex and knee joint rotation on patellofemoral joint stress

Purpose Females are two times as likely to experience patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) than males; however, the reason for this sex difference remains unclear. Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress is believed to contribute to PFPS alterations through knee joint rotation alignment, but the influence of knee joint rotation conditions on PFJ stress is unclear. We aimed to investigate the influence of sex and knee joint rotation alignment on PFJ stress. Methods Simulation ranges were set to knee joint flexion angles of 10°-45° (common to both sexes) and extension moments of 0-240 Nm (males) and 0-220 Nm (females). The quadriceps force and effective lever arm length at the quadriceps muscle were determined as a function of the knee joint flexion angle and extension moment. The PFJ contact area, which is specific to sex, and knee joint rotation was calculated from cadaver data, and PFJ stress was estimated. Results In all knee joint rotation conditions, PFJ stress was higher in females than in males. Additionally, PFJ stress in males and females was the largest under neutral conditions compared with other rotation conditions. Conclusions The results may be useful for understanding the underlying mechanisms contributing to the differences in PFPS in males and females.

Comparisons of trunk and knee mechanics during various speeds of treadmill running between runners with and without patellofemoral pain: a preliminary study.

[Purpose] To determine if runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP) exhibit higher patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress and trunk extension compared to pain-free runners during treadmill running. [Participants and Methods] Twelve runners (7 with PFP and 5 pain-free) participated in this study. Participants ran at 3 different running conditions: self-selected, fast (120% of self-selected), and slow (80% of self-selected) speeds. Kinematics and kinetics of trunk and lower extremities were obtained. PFJ stress, PFJ reaction force, and PFJ contact area were determined using a biomechanical model. Two-factor ANOVAs with repeated measures were used to compare outcome variables between 3 speeds and between 2 groups. [Results] There was no significant difference in peak PFJ stress between groups across the 3 speeds. Peak PFJ stress was lowest during slow running compared to fast and self-selected running speed conditions across both groups. No significant difference was found in trunk flexion angle, PFJ reaction force, or PFJ contact area between groups across the 3 speeds. [Conclusion] Runners with and without PFP exhibited similar peak PFJ stress and trunk flexion angle during treadmill running. This preliminary work does not support the theory that reduced trunk flexion during running contributes to increased PFJ stress in runners with PFP.

A mathematical modelling study investigating the influence of knee joint flexion angle and extension moment on patellofemoral joint reaction force and stress

BackgroundPatellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common orthopaedic condition among runners. Individuals with PFP exhibit greater patellofemoral joint (PFJ) reaction force and stress when compared with pain-free controls. However, it is not clear whether PFJ reaction force and stress are the highest (or lowest) when knee joint flexion angle and extension moment are in which combinations. We aimed to investigate the influence of knee joint flexion angle and extension moment on PFJ reaction force and stress. MethodsA PFJ sagittal model was used to quantify PFJ reaction force and stress. Based on the public dataset of the previous study, peak knee joint flexion angle and extension moment at various running speeds was calculated. Based on the calculated peak value, simulation ranges were set to knee joint flexion angle of 10–45° and extension moment of 0–240 Nm. The quadriceps force, effective lever arm length at quadriceps muscle, and PFJ contact area were determined as a function of the knee joint flexion angle and extension moment, and finally PFJ forces and stress were estimated. ResultsPFJ reaction force increased as the knee flexion angle and extension moment increased. Although PFJ stress also increased as the knee extension moment increased, it was at the highest and lowest at 10° and about 30° knee joint flexion angles, respectively. ConclusionsIncorporating knee flexion posture (approximately 30°) during running may help in reducing PFJ stress, which would be useful in the prevention of pain and act as an optimal treatment program for PFP.

Patellofemoral joint stress during incline and decline running

ObjectivesTo compare patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress between level, incline, and decline running. DesignExperimental study. SettingUniversity laboratory. ParticipantsTwenty recreational runners. Main outcome measuresKinematics and kinetics of the trunk and lower extremity were obtained under 3 treadmill conditions: level, 6° incline, and 6° decline. PFJ stress, PFJ reaction force, and PFJ contact area were determined using a biomechanical model. One-way ANOVAs with repeated measures and post-hoc analyses were used to compare outcome variables across the 3 conditions. ResultsPeak PFJ stress and PFJ stress-time integral (cumulative PFJ stress over the stance phase) during decline running were significantly higher than during level and incline running. There was no difference in peak PFJ stress and PFJ stress-time integral between level and incline running. The increased peak PFJ stress during decline running was related to increased PFJ reaction force, resulting from a decrease in trunk flexion angle. ConclusionsRunning on a decline treadmill resulted in higher peak PFJ stress and stress-time integral. Peak PFJ stress and PFJ stress-time integral were similar during level and incline running. Results from this study may be used to prevent excessive PFJ stress during decline running, by targeting a postural strategy utilizing increased trunk flexion.

Kinematic analysis of the load-response mechanism during stair descent in women with patellofemoral pain

Changes in patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress are related to the development and course of PFJ dysfunctions. Different methods for PFJ stress calculation have been used, making the comparison of PFJ stress values across different studies difficult. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the methods for PFJ stress calculation and highlight the differences among the methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases. Included studies examined PFJ stress in subjects with or without musculoskeletal conditions. Of 12,670 identified studies, 53 were included, with a total of 1134 subjects evaluated. The main differences among the methods to calculate PFJ stress were: i) method to calculate PFJ contact area; ii) method to calculate a constant (coefficient k) that defines the relation between quadriceps force and PFJ reaction force; iii) the inclusion of adjustments for sagittal plane forces. Considerable variability in PFJ stress results was observed. The greatest PFJ stress value was 55.03 MPa during a dance jump and the lowest value was 1.9 MPa during walking at the speed of 1.4 m/s. Most studies applied methods which use data from previous studies. However, methods which use data from their own participants for most parts of the calculation might be preferred to minimize potential errors. When direct measures are not possible, a standard method could be applied to facilitate comparisons among studies.

Biomechanics of hyperflexion and kneeling before and after total knee arthroplasty.

The capacity to perform certain activities is frequently compromised after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to a functional decline resulting from decreased range of motion and a diminished ability to kneel. In this manuscript, the current biomechanical understanding of hyperflexion and kneeling before and after TKA will be discussed. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint contact area, contact pressure, and kinematics were evaluated in cadaveric studies using a Tekscan pressure measuring system and Microscribe. Testing was performed on intact knees and following cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized TKA at knee flexion angles of 90°, 105°, 120°, and 135°. Three loading conditions were used to simulate squatting, double stance kneeling, and single stance kneeling. Following TKA with double stance kneeling, patellofemoral contact areas did not increase significantly at high knee flexion angle (135°). Kneeling resulted in tibial posterior translation and external rotation at all flexion angles. Moving from double to single stance kneeling tended to increase pressures in the cruciate retaining group, but decreased pressures in the posterior stabilized group. The cruciate retaining group had significantly larger contact areas than the posterior stabilized group, although no significant differences in pressures were observed comparing the two TKA designs (p < 0.05). If greater than 120° of postoperative knee range of motion can be achieved following TKA, then kneeling may be performed with less risk in the patellofemoral joint than was previously believed to be the case. However, kneeling may increase the likelihood of damage to cartilage and menisci in intact knees and after TKA increases in tibiofemoral contact area and pressures may lead to polyethyelene wear if performed on a chronic, repetitive basis.

Validation of an MRI‐based method to assess patellofemoral joint contact areas in loaded knee flexion in vivo

To develop and validate short axial and sagittal MRI scans (<1min) to assess in vivo patellofemoral contact areas in loaded knee flexion. Contact area was assessed in four cadaver knee specimens from axial and sagittal scans using two contact area extraction techniques (delineation and intersection) and three calculation techniques (slice thickness multiplication, linear interpolation, and spline interpolation). Error was expressed as the mean absolute and percentage difference from a dye staining-based reference standard. Intrareader and intrasubject repeatability, expressed as the mean standard deviation, was determined. Contact area assessments from the sagittal MRI scans using the delineation and slice thickness multiplication technique had the smallest error (47.7 ± 38.1 mm(2) or 10.7%). The intrareader repeatability from assessments using the sagittal scans was smaller than those using the axial scans when the delineation method was used (<9.4 ± 4.3 mm(2) and <15.4 ± 14.1 mm(2) , respectively). The intrasubject repeatability of the assessment from the sagittal scan was less than 39.9 ± 23.0 mm(2) . This protocol yields assessments of contact area in less than 1 minute that have errors similar to those made using scans many times longer and can be used in series with kinematic scans to carry out simultaneous assessments in vivo to study patellofemoral joint disease.

The Effects of Quadriceps Strengthening on Pain, Function, and Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area in Persons with Patellofemoral Pain

Patellar malalignment is a major cause of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), but the relationship between clinical symptoms and changes in patellar position and knee muscle strength has not been confirmed. This study examined the effect of weight training on hip and knee muscle strength, patellofemoral joint contact area, and patellar tilt on subjects with and without PFPS, hoping to develop an optimal rehabilitation protocol for subjects with PFPS. The study uses a prospective independent group comparison. Fifteen subjects with and without PFPS were assessed for knee strength, patellofemoral joint contact area, and patellar tilt angle using magnetic resonance imaging. The subjects with PFPS were also examined and given a numeric pain rating score and a Kujala patellofemoral score. The subjects performed lower-limb weight training 3 times/wk for 8 wks, and the outcomes were assessed both before and after training. Subjects with PFPS have increased their patellofemoral joint contact area after weight training (P < 0.001). No statistical significant change was found on the patellar tilt angle. The isometric and isokinetic knee strength in subjects with and without PFPS have increased after weight training (P value increased from 0.007 to 0.05). Both numeric pain rating and Kujala patellofemoral score in the PFPS group improved after training (P < 0.001). Weight-training exercise increased knee muscle strength and the patellofemoral joint contact area, which could reduce mechanical stress in the joint, improving pain and function in subjects with PFPS.

The influence of reduced hamstring length on patellofemoral joint stress during squatting in healthy male adults

Increased patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress has been implicated in the development of PFJ pathologies. Previous studies have identified a relationship between reduced hamstring length and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Hamstring stretching is also recommended in the management thereof. However, the relationship between reduced hamstring length and PFJ stress has not been explored in vivo during activities that load the PFJ, such as squatting. The objective of this study was to determine if persons with reduced hamstring length demonstrate increased PFJ stress during squatting compared with individuals without reduced hamstring length. Eight participants with, and eight participants without, reduced hamstring length were assessed to determine their PFJ contact area using magnetic resonance imaging, and their PFJ reaction force during squatting using motion analysis. Data collected were entered into a biomechanical model to calculate medial, lateral and total PFJ stress. It was found that participants with reduced hamstring length had significantly greater total (393.39 Pa/kg vs. 213.01 Pa/kg) and lateral (311.23 Pa/kg vs. 142.55 Pa/kg) PFJ stress at 60° knee flexion during squat descent and ascent (427.75 Pa/kg vs. 255.64 Pa/kg and 337.75 Pa/kg vs. 170.63 Pa/kg, respectively). This was due to significantly increased PFJ reaction force at 60° knee flexion during squat descent (12.18 N/kg vs. 7.21 N/kg) and ascent (13.03 N/kg vs. 8.72 N/kg), and lower medial PFJ contact area at 60° knee flexion (88 mm 2 vs. 160 mm 2). The results of this study demonstrate a relationship between reduced hamstring length and increased PFJ stress during squatting due to increased PFJ reaction force and reduced medial PFJ contact area.

Biomechanical Effects of Kneeling After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Kneeling following total knee arthroplasty can be a difficult task, impairing the activities of patients to varying degrees. Little is known about the biomechanical effects of kneeling following total knee replacement. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of kneeling on patellofemoral joint contact areas and pressures, knee joint reaction force, and patellar kinematics. Total knee arthroplasties were performed on eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, and they were tested with use of a custom knee jig, which permits the simulation of physiologic quadriceps loading as well as the application of an anterior force to simulate kneeling. The knees were tested at flexion angles of 90 degrees , 105 degrees , 120 degrees , and 135 degrees with no anterior force (mimicking a squatting position) and with an anterior force application simulating double-stance kneeling and single-stance kneeling. Patellofemoral joint contact areas and pressures were measured with pressure-sensitive film, and the knee joint reaction force was measured with use of a six-degree-of-freedom load cell. Patellar kinematics were assessed with use of digital photographs tracking fixed markers on the patella. Compared with the condition without kneeling, both single-stance and double-stance kneeling demonstrated significant increases in patellofemoral contact area (p < 0.05) and pressure at all flexion angles (p < 0.05), with the exception of double-stance kneeling at 135 degrees of flexion. The resultant knee joint -reaction force increased with kneeling at all flexion angles. The compressive component of this force increased with kneeling for most conditions, while the lateral component of this force decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with kneeling only at 90 degrees , and the anterior component of this force increased significantly at all knee flexion angles (p < 0.05). Overall, kneeling had minimal changes on patellar tilt, with significant changes in patellar tilt seen only with kneeling at 120 degrees (p = 0.02 for double stance, and p = 0.03 for single stance). The findings of this study suggest that kneeling at a higher flexion angle (135 degrees ) after total knee arthroplasty has a smaller effect on patellofemoral joint contact area and pressure than kneeling at lower flexion angles (<or=120 degrees ).

Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area Is Influenced by Tibiofemoral Rotation Alignment in Individuals Who Have Patellofemoral Pain

Observational, cohort study. To test the hypothesis that patellar alignment and tibiofemoral rotation alignment explain unique portions of variance in patellofemoral joint contact area in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and in pain-free control subjects. PFP has been proposed to result from increased patellofemoral joint stress due to decreased contact area. Patellar malalignment (lateral displacement and tilt) is believed to be the main contributor to decreased contact area. Recent studies suggest that transverse plane rotation of the femur and/or tibia may also contribute to decreased contact area. Twenty-one subjects with PFP (16 female, 5 male) and 21 pain-free subjects (14 female, 7 male) participated. Subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging with the knee in full extension and the quadriceps contracted. Measures of patellofemoral joint contact area, lateral patellar displacement, patellar tilt angle, tibiofemoral rotation angle, and patellar width were obtained. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed for each group using contact area as the dependent variable. The order of independent variables was patellar width, patellar tilt angle, and tibiofemoral rotation angle. To avoid multicolinearity, lateral patellar displacement was not included. In the PFP group, patellar width and tibiofemoral rotation angle explained 46% of the variance in contact area. In pain-free subjects, patellar width was the only predictor of contact area, explaining 31% of its variance. Patellar tilt angle did not predict contact area in either group. Addressing factors that control tibiofemoral rotation may be indicated to increase contact area and reduce pain in individuals with PFP. Future studies should investigate the contributions of patellar alignment and tibiofemoral rotation to patellofemoral joint contact area at a variety of knee flexion angles.

Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area Is Influenced by Tibiofemoral Rotation Alignment in Individuals Who Have Patellofemoral Pain

Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area Is Influenced by Tibiofemoral Rotation Alignment in Individuals Who Have Patellofemoral Pain

Patella Alta

Background: Patella alta is a condition which may predispose individuals to patellofemoral joint dysfunction. We compared patellofemoral joint alignment and contact area in subjects who had patella alta with subjects who had normal patellar position, to determine the effect of high vertical patellar positions on knee extensor mechanics. Methods: Twelve subjects with patella alta and thirteen control subjects participated in the study. Lateral patellar displacement (subluxation), lateral tilt, and patellofemoral joint contact area were quantified from axial magnetic resonance images of the patellofemoral joint acquired at 0°, 20°, 40°, and 60° of knee flexion with the quadriceps contracted. Results: With the knee at 0° of flexion, the subjects with patella alta demonstrated significant differences compared with the control group, with greater lateral displacement (mean [and standard error], 85.4% ± 3.6% and 71.3% ± 3.0%, respectively, of patellar width lateral to the deepest point in the trochlear groove; p = 0.007), greater lateral tilt (mean, 21.6° ± 1.9° and 15.5° ± 1.8°; p = 0.028), and less contact area (157.6 ± 13.7 mm2 and 198.8 ± 14.3 mm2; p = 0.040). Differences in displacement and tilt were not observed at greater knee flexion angles; however, contact area differences were observed at all angles evaluated. When data from both groups were combined, the vertical position of the patella was positively associated with lateral displacement and lateral tilt at 0° of flexion and was negatively associated with contact area at all knee flexion angles. Conclusions: These data indicate that the vertical position of the patella is an important structural variable that is associated with patellofemoral malalignment and reduced contact area in patients with patella alta.

Patella Alta

Background: Patella alta is a condition which may predispose individuals to patellofemoral joint dysfunction. We compared patellofemoral joint alignment and contact area in subjects who had patella alta with subjects who had normal patellar position, to determine the effect of high vertical patellar positions on knee extensor mechanics. Methods: Twelve subjects with patella alta and thirteen control subjects participated in the study. Lateral patellar displacement (subluxation), lateral tilt, and patellofemoral joint contact area were quantified from axial magnetic resonance images of the patellofemoral joint acquired at 0°, 20°, 40°, and 60° of knee flexion with the quadriceps contracted. Results: With the knee at 0° of flexion, the subjects with patella alta demonstrated significant differences compared with the control group, with greater lateral displacement (mean [and standard error], 85.4% ± 3.6% and 71.3% ± 3.0%, respectively, of patellar width lateral to the deepest point in the trochlear groove; p = 0.007), greater lateral tilt (mean, 21.6° ± 1.9° and 15.5° ± 1.8°; p = 0.028), and less contact area (157.6 ± 13.7 mm2 and 198.8 ± 14.3 mm2; p = 0.040). Differences in displacement and tilt were not observed at greater knee flexion angles; however, contact area differences were observed at all angles evaluated. When data from both groups were combined, the vertical position of the patella was positively associated with lateral displacement and lateral tilt at 0° of flexion and was negatively associated with contact area at all knee flexion angles. Conclusions: These data indicate that the vertical position of the patella is an important structural variable that is associated with patellofemoral malalignment and reduced contact area in patients with patella alta.