The Holy Roman Empire, Reconsidered, edited by Jason Philip Coy, Benjamin Marschke, and David Warren Sabean. Spektrum: Publications of the German Studies Association, 1. New York, Berghahn Books, 2010 (hardback), 2013 (paper), xvii, 328 pp. $34.95 US (paper). The title of this book may not sound very enticing to many readers. After all, few historians spend a lot of time considering the Holy Roman in the first place, so why reconsider it? Yet in fact the Holy Roman Empire, which existed for over a thousand years and encompassed much of central Europe, is a subject of profound interest to anyone who wants to understand how such an unwieldy political organism could constantly reshape itself to meet the evolving needs of German society. Voltaire's tedious witticism that the Holy Roman was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire is too readily quoted by those who do not want to bother to find out how and why this remarkable political entity lasted so long and commanded so much allegiance before it finally collapsed under the weight of Napoleon's armies in 1806. At the annual meeting of the Gentian Studies Association in 2007, a total of ten separate sessions were devoted to reconsidering the Holy Roman Empire. Fourteen of the more than thirty papers given at that meeting have now been collected in this volume. All of the contributions are refreshingly short, reflecting their origins as twenty-minute conference papers. Many of these essays demonstrate the communicative turn in the study of history--the notion, simply stated, that signs, symbols, and words are not mere representations of the factors of power on which historians focus, but may be what political and social interactions are actually about. Though the Holy Roman was founded in the year 800, only one chapter in this volume focuses on the medieval Empire. Len Scales argues that the repeated transfer of the imperial crown from one great dynasty to another in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, which is normally seen as a sign of the Empire's weakness, exposed the signs and symbols of imperial power to more and more people in various parts of central Europe. The other thirteen chapters deal mostly or wholly with the last three centuries of the Holy Roman Empire, corresponding to the early modern era of European history. Four authors focus on rulers, especially those whose unusual behaviour made them stand out from the multitude of German princes. Michaela Hohkamp revisits the story of Duke Ulrich of Wurttemberg, whose marital troubles in the 1510s contributed to his being driven out of his duchy by the Emperor. In the resulting war of words both the duke and his duchess were mercilessly smeared by their opponents, but Hohkamp shows that these competing accounts must not be taken literally as they drew on gendered stereotypes and served specific political goals. Michael Sikora examines a different kind of marital problem in princely families--cases when a prince insisted on marrying beneath his station, a seemingly private act which often had huge dynastic and political implications. Benjamin Marschke offers a new interpretation of the eccentric Prussian soldier-king Frederick William I, arguing that the king's famously unconventional behaviour actually posed little challenge to the Empire's fundamental values. Werner Trossbach considers princes who behaved so scandalously that imperial officials stepped in to remove them--but points out that this could only happen in the case of tiny territories whose rulers had no means to resist such intervention. …
Read full abstract