You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Staging II1 Apr 2014MP42-16 COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE ACCURACY OF THE PARTIN TABLES VS MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI IN FORECASTING ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE CANCER Niccolo Maria Passoni, Rajan T. Gupta, Christopher R. Kauffman, Kirema Garcia-Reyes, and Thomas J. Polascik Niccolo Maria PassoniNiccolo Maria Passoni More articles by this author , Rajan T. GuptaRajan T. Gupta More articles by this author , Christopher R. KauffmanChristopher R. Kauffman More articles by this author , Kirema Garcia-ReyesKirema Garcia-Reyes More articles by this author , and Thomas J. PolascikThomas J. Polascik More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.1193AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Introduction and Objectives Current treatment planning for prostate cancer relies on clinical variables, such as PSA, clinical stage and biopsy findings. These variables have been combined into predictive tools, such as the Partin tables, with the aim of predicting final pathological stage for treatment decision-making. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive accuracy of the Partin tables and mp-MRI in forecasting organ-confined (OC) prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We reviewed data on 60 men who underwent 3.0 T prostate mp-MRI (T2, DWI and DCE) with an endorectal coil and subsequent RP. All MRIs were reviewed by a single board-certified fellowship-trained and experienced radiologist blinded to all clinical parameters. Mp-MRI was used to assess clinical stage (T2a/b vs T2c vs T3a vs T3b). The updated version of the Partin tables were used to calculate the probability of each patient to harbor OC disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of mp-MRI in detecting OC and extra-capsular extension (ECE) were calculated. Linear logistic regression models prediciting OC pathology were created using either clinical stage at mp-MRI or Partin tables probability and AUC was used to calculate the predictive accuracy. Results Median PSA at diagnosis was 5 ng/mL (IQR 4.1-6.7 ng/mL). Overall, 52 (86.7%) men had cT1 disease, 7 (11.7%) had cT2a/b and 1 (1.6%) had cT3b at DRE. Biopsy Gleason score was 6, 3+4=7, 4+3=7, 8 and 9-10 in 28 (46.7%), 15 (25%), 3 (5%), 10 (16.7%) and 4 (6.6%) patients, respectively. At mp-MRI, clinical stage was defined as cT2a/b, cT2c, cT3a and cT3b in 11 (18.3%), 23 (38.3%), 21 (35%) and 5 (8.4%) patients. At final pathology 38 men (63.3%) had OC disease,,18 (30%) ECE and 4 (6.7%) seminal vesicle invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of mp-MRI in detecting OC were 81.6%, 86.4%, 91.2% and 73.1%, respectively, while in detecting ECE were 77.8%, 83.4%, 66.7% and 89.7%, respectively. At linear logistic regression, both Partin tables and mp-MRI clinical staging were significantly associated with OC disease (all p<0.01). The AUCs of the Partin tables and that of mp-MRI were 0.69 and 0.82, respectively (p=0.04). Conclusions The predictive accuracy of mp-MRI in predicting OC disease at pathological analysis significantly improves upon that of the Partin tables. Mp-MRI had a high PPV (91.2%) when predicting OC disease and a high NPV (89.7%) with regards to ECE. Mp-MRI should be considered when planning prostate cancer treatment in addition to readily available clinical parameters. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e474 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Niccolo Maria Passoni More articles by this author Rajan T. Gupta More articles by this author Christopher R. Kauffman More articles by this author Kirema Garcia-Reyes More articles by this author Thomas J. Polascik More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...