A study of early Tertiary and Pleistocene gravels on Salisbury Plain demonstrates the nature of the early Tertiary surface there and indicates its preservation in the contemporary landscape on the highest summits of the Chalk. The composition of the Pleistocene gravels is treated as a guide to the character and former extent of the early Tertiary outcrop, of which only a few isolated and disturbed outliers remain. The early Tertiary gravels show affinities with the Tertiary outcrop in the western part of the Hampshire Basin. They appear to have rested on a polycyclic surface from which, in the later stages of its development, much of the Upper Chalk had been eroded. This surface is now represented in a small number of residual summits rising above the more extensively preserved mid-Tertiary surface. THE PRINCIPAL hypotheses of landscape evolution in southern England (P. Pinchemel, 1954; S. W. Wooldridge and D. L. Linton, 1955) disagree most significantly in the interpretation of the early Tertiary period. The scope for disagreement is evident on Salisbury Plain, where undoubted Tertiary deposits are absent and the configuration of the sub-Tertiary surface is correspondingly doubtful. This problem, on Salisbury Plain and elsewhere, was clearly appreciated by the officers of the Geological Survey. A. J. Jukes-Browne (1906) regarded the clay-with-flints as a relic of the Reading Beds and suggested that, where it occurs, the sub-Eocene surface is preserved. His conclusions implied that the elevation and partial denudation of the Pewsey anticline, and related folds, were of pre-Tertiary date. H. J. 0. White (1907) inferred uniform overstep of the Tertiaries from the Hampshire Basin northward across successively lower zones of the Chalk, and rejected the pre-Tertiary folding of the Chalk. Both geologists appear to have regarded the sub-Tertiary surface as an extension of the sub-Reading Beds surface. The implications of White's account are manifest in the work of Wooldridge and Linton. Their sub-Eocene contours (1955, Fig. 5) show a surface corrugated by Alpine structures and imply that the Alpine movements occurred after the modelling of the sub-Eocene surface. It is not clear whether the Chalk retained a mantle of Eocene sediments at the time of the folding; or whether these sediments were already partly denuded and the Chalk subject to erosion. Linton (1956) suggests that renewed erosion of the Chalk is likely to have occurred before the folding, but most of the erosion, and in particular the denudation of the Alpine folds, is inevitably referred by Wooldridge and Linton to the mid-Tertiary cycle. Over the crests of the principal anticlines this implies the removal of a few hundred metres of material during this cycle. The sub-Eocene surface is therefore identified by Wooldridge and Linton as a limited facet on the Chalk dip-slope near the present boundary of the Eocene outcrop, whereas the summit planation of the Chalk they regard as a product of the mid-Tertiary cycle. This view of Tertiary events is challenged by Pinchemel (1954), who accepts the extensive survival of an early Tertiary surface on the Chalk summits of southern England and suggests that the surface is of polycyclic origin. More recently M. J. Clark, J. Lewin and R. J. Small (1967), arguing from the distribution of Eocene debris and from the nature of the relief, have also concluded that the hill-top peneplain, at least near Marlborough, may be 'the outcome of a composite Eogene cycle'.