PARP Inhibitors Research Articles

332 (PB320): Radiotherapy improves efficacy of the PARP inhibitor Niraparib in a preclinical model of triple negative breast cancer

332 (PB320): Radiotherapy improves efficacy of the PARP inhibitor Niraparib in a preclinical model of triple negative breast cancer

P85-7 PARP inhibitors and chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 gene mutations: a systematic review

P85-7 PARP inhibitors and chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 gene mutations: a systematic review

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer, Version 3.2024.

The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer provide multidisciplinary diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment recommendations for this disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail how the evolution of the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance and single-agent regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer informed panel recommendations in the guidelines.

P20-1 Photodynamic-controllable smart delivery of combined PARP inhibitor with natural nanoparticles for anticancer treatment

P20-1 Photodynamic-controllable smart delivery of combined PARP inhibitor with natural nanoparticles for anticancer treatment

A Genetically Encoded Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring of Poly-ADP-Ribosylation Dynamics In Vitro and in Cells.

ADP-ribosylation, the transfer of ADP-ribose (ADPr) from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) groups to proteins, is a conserved post-translational modification (PTM) that occurs most prominently in response to DNA damage. ADP-ribosylation is a dynamic PTM regulated by writers (PARPs), erasers (ADPr hydrolases), and readers (ADPR binders). PARP1 is the primary DNA damage-response writer responsible for adding a polymer of ADPR to proteins (PARylation). Real-time monitoring of PARP1-mediated PARylation, especially in live cells, is critical for understanding the spatial and temporal regulation of this unique PTM. Here, we describe a genetically encoded FRET probe (pARS) for semiquantitative monitoring of PARylation dynamics. pARS feature a PAR-binding WWE domain flanked with turquoise and Venus. With a ratiometric readout and excellent signal-to-noise characteristics, we show that pARS can monitor PARP1-dependent PARylation temporally and spatially in real-time. pARS provided unique insights into PARP1-mediated PARylation kinetics in vitro and high-sensitivity detection of PARylation in live cells, even under mild DNA damage. We also show that pARS can be used to determine the potency of PARP inhibitors in vitro and, for the first time, in live cells in response to DNA damage. The robustness and ease of use of pARS make it an important tool for the PARP field.

340 (PB328): Discovery of NODX-010, a novel, potent PARG inhibitor demonstrating robust in vivo efficacy and the potential for new clinical settings that benefit patients with tumours resistant to PARP inhibitors

340 (PB328): Discovery of NODX-010, a novel, potent PARG inhibitor demonstrating robust in vivo efficacy and the potential for new clinical settings that benefit patients with tumours resistant to PARP inhibitors

Utilizing therapeutic response as a criterion for PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in advanced triple negative breast cancer; promoting personalized medicine

Utilizing therapeutic response as a criterion for PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in advanced triple negative breast cancer; promoting personalized medicine

71 (PB059): The efficacy and safety of a selective PARP1 inhibitor ACE-86225106 in patients with advanced solid tumors: preliminary results from a first-inhuman phase 1/2 study

71 (PB059): The efficacy and safety of a selective PARP1 inhibitor ACE-86225106 in patients with advanced solid tumors: preliminary results from a first-inhuman phase 1/2 study

357 (PB345): Discovery and development of IMP1734 (EIK1003), a potent and selective PARP1 inhibitor

357 (PB345): Discovery and development of IMP1734 (EIK1003), a potent and selective PARP1 inhibitor

Donafenib inhibits PARP1 expression and induces DNA damage, in combination with PARP1 inhibitors promotes apoptosis in liver cancer cells.

Liver cancer is a prevalent malignant tumor globally. The newly approved first-line drug, donafenib, is a novel oral small molecule multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has significant antitumor effects on liver cancer. This study aims to investigate the antitumor effects of donafenib on liver cancer and to explore its potential mechanisms. Donafenib significantly inhibited the viability of Huh-7 and HCCLM3 cells, inhibited malignant cell proliferation, and promoted cell apoptosis, as demonstrated by CCK-8, EdU, and Calcein/PI (propidium iodide) staining experiments. The results of DNA damage detection experiments and western blot analysis indicate that donafenib caused considerable DNA damage in liver cancer cells. The analysis of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) in liver cancer patients using online bioinformatics data websites such as TIMER2.0, GEPIA, UALCAN, cBioPortal, Kaplan-Meier Plotter, and HPA revealed a high expression of PARP1, which is associated with poor prognosis. Molecular docking and western blot analysis demonstrated that donafenib can directly target and downregulate the protein expression of PARP1, a DNA damage repair protein, thereby promoting DNA damage in liver cancer cells. Western blot and immunofluorescence detection showed that the group treated with donafenib combined with PARP1 inhibitor had significantly higher expression of γ-H2AX and 8-OHdG compared to the groups treated with donafenib or PARP1 inhibitors alone, the combined treatment suppresses the expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl2 and enhances the protein expression level of the proapoptotic protein Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX). These data suggest that the combination of donafenib and a PARP1 inhibitor results in more significant DNA damage in cells and promotes cell apoptosis. Thus, the combination of donafenib and PARP1 inhibitors has the potential to be a treatment option for liver cancer.

334 (PB322): PARP1 inhibitor resistant cell line generation and DDR cell panel development

334 (PB322): PARP1 inhibitor resistant cell line generation and DDR cell panel development

47 (PB035): MOMA-313 is a potent, selective Polθ inhibitor that enhances response to PARP inhibition in HR-deficient tumor models

47 (PB035): MOMA-313 is a potent, selective Polθ inhibitor that enhances response to PARP inhibition in HR-deficient tumor models

A boost or a redundancy? on the value of combination of androgen receptor signal inhibitor and PARP inhibitor for advanced prostate cancer

AbstractPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi), as a novel endocrine therapy, has been investigated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in recent years. Multiple large-scale clinical trials have consistently demonstrated that various PARP inhibitors, including olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib, confer longer radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) compared to new hormonal agents (NHA) in mCRPC patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 and above adverse events did not significantly increase. Additionally, when combined with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI), olaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib have shown significant extension of rPFS but also an increased occurrence of serious adverse events in HRD-positive patients. Only PROpel yielded positive results among the homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutation negative population. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether ARSI-PARPi combination therapy should be considered as first-line treatment for mCRPC patients without HRR mutations. In this review article, we aim to elucidate the necessity and feasibility of combination therapy versus monotherapy specifically within the HRR mutant population while exploring its potential applicability to other non-HRR mutant subtypes. Furthermore, we conducted a comprehensive search on registered clinical trials at present to summarize the research progress of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer patients at different disease stages.

Novel Intraprostatic MR-Guided Implantation of Multidrug-Eluting Microdevice for Testing of Systemic Therapy Agents In Situ: Proof of Concept in Intermediate-Risk and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

The purpose of this study was to assess safety and feasibility of percutaneous MR-guided placement of an implantable microdevice (IMD) to evaluate in situ intratumor response to multiple pharmacologic agents in men with intermediate-risk and high-risk localized prostate cancer. Biocompatible IMDs measuring 750 µm in diameter and 5 mm in length were prepared with 20 reservoirs containing candidate drug and drug combinations including second-generation androgen inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, and conventional chemotherapy. Men with intermediate-risk or high-risk localized prostate cancer and MRI-visible lesions were enrolled. Up to 4 IMDs were placed using a transperineal approach into MRI-visible tumors 2 days before planned radical prostatectomy. After radical prostatectomy, the IMDs and a small segment of surrounding tumor tissue were removed and sectioned, stained, and analyzed for tissue drug response by a variety of pharmacodynamic markers. Fourteen patients were enrolled: 7 (50%) with intermediate-risk and 7 (50%) with high-risk localized prostate cancer. A total of 53 IMDs were implanted (mean 3.8 per patient), and 49 IMDs (92%) were successfully retrieved. All men underwent uncomplicated robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection 2 days after IMD placement. There were no severe adverse events. Pathological examination of the tissues adjacent to the IMDs demonstrated differential drug response within patients and between patients. Limitations include small sample size. A multidrug IMD can be safely placed percutaneously into MRI-visible lesions before radical prostatectomy, enabling assessment of tumor-specific local response to multiple agents simultaneously within the tumor's normal stromal environment to guide targeted systemic therapy.

Large-scale analysis of CDH1 mutations defines a distinctive molecular subset with treatment implications in gastric cancer.

Although histological and molecular classifications have been extensively studied for gastric cancer (GC), targeted therapies for GC remain limited. CDH1 mutations (MT) are characteristic of genomically stable GC and are associated with poor prognosis, but lack effective or targeted therapies. Here, we showed the overall mutation frequency of CDH1 was 9.7% (155 of 1596). CDH1-MT GC showed significantly lower rates of PD-L1 positivity (CPS score ≥1) than CDH1-wildtype (WT) GC (56.7% vs. 73.3%, p < 0.05). Compared to CDH1-WT GC, mutations of ARID1A, WRN, POT1, CDK12, and FANCC were significantly higher, while TP53 and APC were significantly lower in CDH1-MT GC (p < 0.05); The rates of KRAS and HER2 amplifications were significantly lower, while CRKL and IGF1R amplifications were significantly higher in CDH1-MT GC, compared to CDH1-WT GC (p < 0.05). Frequently altered genes in CDH1-MT GC were especially enriched in DNA damage repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Inhibition of E-cadherin sensitized GC cell lines to PARP and Wee1 inhibitors by disrupting DNA damage repair pathway and cell cycle checkpoint. This is the largest study to investigate the distinct genomic landscape of CDH1-MT GC. Our data indicated GC patients with CDH1 mutations could potentially benefit from agents targeting PARP and Wee1.

TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusion Might Predict Resistance to PARP Inhibitors in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

The emergence of novel DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways in molecular-target therapy drugs (MTTD) has shown promising outcomes in treating patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). About 25% of mCRPC patients have actionable deleterious aberrations in DDR genes, primarily in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. However, the response rate in patients with BRCA1/2 or mutations in HRR-related genes is only 45%-55%, when exposed to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-based therapy (PARPi). A frequent characteristic feature of prostate cancer (PC) is the occurrence of genomic rearrangement that affects the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and E26 transformation-specific (ETS)- transcription factor-related gene (ERG). In this study, a total of 114 patients with mCRPC had their RNA and DNA sequenced using next-generation sequencing. Based on their genetic profile of deleterious gene alterations of BRCA1/2 or ATM, six patients were selected for PARPi. Patients with TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion and homozygous alteration in ATM or BRCA2 (n=2) or heterozygous alterations (BRCA1 or BRCA2) and lack of TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion (n=2) did not show clinical benefit from PARPi (treatment duration <16 weeks). In contrast, patients (n=2) without TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion and homozygous deleterious alterations in ATM or BRCA2 all had clinical benefit from PARPi (treatment duration ≥16 weeks). The TMPRSS2:ERG transcript product might be used as a PARPi resistance biomarker.

Exploring Molecular Drivers of PARPi Resistance in BRCA1-Deficient Ovarian Cancer: The Role of LY6E and Immunomodulation.

Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer harbor tumors with mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or other genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HR). The presence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is an approved biomarker for poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as a maintenance treatment following a positive response to initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Despite this treatment option, the development of resistance to PARPis is common among recurrent disease patients, leading to a poor prognosis. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using publicly available datasets to elucidate the molecular mechanisms driving PARPi resistance in BRCA1-deficient ovarian cancer. Our findings reveal a central role for the interferon (IFN) pathway in mediating resistance in the context of BRCA1 deficiency. Through integrative bioinformatics approaches, we identified LY6E, an interferon-stimulated gene, as a key mediator of PARPi resistance, with its expression linked to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) encouraging tumor progression and invasion. LY6E amplification correlates with poor prognosis and increased expression of immune-related gene signatures, which is predictive of immunotherapy response. Interestingly, LY6E expression upon PARPi treatment resistance was found to be dependent on BRCA1 status. Gene expression analysis in the Orien/cBioPortal database revealed an association between LY6E and genes involved in DNA repair, such as Rad21 and PUF60, emphasizing the interplay between DNA repair pathways and immune modulation. Moreover, PUF60, Rad21, and LY6E are located on chromosome 8q24, a locus often amplified and associated with the progression of ovarian cancer. Overall, our study provides novel insights into the molecular determinants of PARPi resistance and highlights LY6E as a promising prognostic biomarker in the management of HRD ovarian cancer. Future studies are needed to fully elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of LY6E in PARPi resistance.

Identification of BBC3 as a novel indicator for predicting prostate cancer development and olaparib resistance

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a commonly occurring malignancy in elderly men. Olaparib, a poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor, is utilized in PCa treatment. However, patients often develop resistance to olaparib after a period of treatment. Genetic alterations may play a significant role in this resistance, but the specific genes involved remain unclear. This study collected RNA-sequence data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database on both olaparib-sensitive and -resistant PCa cells to identify genes crucial for resistance. Subsequently, the enriched pathways of these genes were analyzed, and a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed to identify hub genes. The effect of these hub genes on PCa occurrence, progression, and prognosis was assessed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Chinese Prostate Cancer Genome and Epigenome Atlas databases. Finally, this study validated our findings in clinical PCa samples and cells. From the GSE189186 dataset, 50 upregulated genes and 2 downregulated genes were identified in olaparib-resistant C4-2B and LNCaP cells. Utilizing the PPI network, eight upregulated genes (BBC3, TP53I3, FDXR, DDB2, CDKN1A, GADD45A, ZMAT3, and SESN1) were identified as hub genes for olaparib-resistant PCa cells. Furthermore, some of these genes were central to PCa occurrence, with BBC3 also influencing progression and prognosis. Importantly, BBC3 expression was upregulated in clinical PCa samples and affected PCa cells sensitive to olaparib, suggesting its potential as a predictive marker for PCa development and olaparib resistance.

DDB2 expression lights the way for precision radiotherapy response in PDAC cells, with or without olaparib

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers. Therapeutic options for PDAC are primarily restricted to surgery in the early stages of the disease or chemotherapy in advanced disease. Only a subset of patients with germline defects in BRCA1/2 genes can potentially benefit from personalized therapy, with the PARP inhibitor olaparib serving as a maintenance treatment for metastatic disease. Although the role of radiotherapy in PDAC remains controversial, the use of radiosensitizers offers hope for improving cancer management. Previously, we have shown that damage-specific DNA binding protein 2 (DDB2) is a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response in PDAC. In this study, we investigated the function of DDB2 in radiotherapy response, with and without radiosensitization by olaparib in PDAC cells. Our findings demonstrated DDB2 resistance to radiation effects, thereby improving cell survival and enhancing the repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. We observed that DDB2 expression enhances the cell cycle arrest in the G2 phase by phosphorylating Chk1 and Chk2 cell cycle checkpoints. Additionally, we identified a novel link between DDB2 and PARP1 in the context of radiotherapy, which enhances the expression and activity of PARP1. Our findings highlight the potential of low-DDB2 expression to potentiate the radiosensitization effect of olaparib in PDAC cells. Collectively, this study provides novel insights into the impacts of DDB2 in the radiotherapy response in PDAC, enabling its employment as a potential biomarker to predict resistance to radiation. Furthermore, DDB2 represents a significant step forward in precision radiotherapy by widening the scope of patients who can be benefiting from olaparib as a radiosensitizer. Hence, this research has the potential to enrich the limited use of radiotherapy in the care of patients with PDAC.

BUB1 Inhibition Overcomes Radio- and Chemoradiation Resistance in Lung Cancer.

Background: Despite advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, traditional treatments like microtubule stabilizers (paclitaxel, docetaxel), DNA-intercalating platinum drugs (cisplatin), and radiation therapy remain essential for managing locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer. Identifying novel molecular targets could enhance the efficacy of these treatments. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that BUB1 (Ser/Thr kinase) is overexpressed in lung cancers and its inhibition will sensitize lung cancers to chemoradiation. Methods: BUB1 inhibitor (BAY1816032) was combined with cisplatin, paclitaxel, a PARP inhibitor olaparib, and radiation in cell proliferation and radiation-sensitization assays. Biochemical and molecular assays evaluated the impact on DNA damage signaling and cell death. Results: Immunostaining of lung tumor microarrays (TMAs) confirmed higher BUB1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) compared to normal tissues. In NSCLC, BUB1 overexpression correlated directly with the expression of TP53 mutations and poorer overall survival in NSCLC and SCLC patients. BAY1816032 synergistically sensitized lung cancer cell lines to paclitaxel and olaparib and enhanced cell killing by radiation in both NSCLC and SCLC. Molecular analysis indicated a shift towards pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative states, evidenced by altered BAX, BCL2, PCNA, and Caspases-9 and -3 expressions. Conclusions: Elevated BUB1 expression is associated with poorer survival in lung cancer. Inhibiting BUB1 sensitizes NSCLC and SCLC to chemotherapies (cisplatin, paclitaxel), targeted therapy (olaparib), and radiation. Furthermore, we present the novel finding that BUB1 inhibition sensitized both NSCLC and SCLC to radiotherapy and chemoradiation. Our results demonstrate BUB1 inhibition as a promising strategy to sensitize lung cancers to radiation and chemoradiation therapies.