Civil War because it focuses almost exclusively on the war of words in France, in the press, between supporters and opponents of intervention, showing how French journalists and writers—some admirably objective, others violently partisan—at once expressed but also manipulated public opinion to suit their ideological purposes. Through the lens of French newspapers, the reader is treated to op-eds, reports from Spain (including from the battle front), outright propaganda, and current events (frontier incidents,the delivery of arms,the arrival of foreign volunteers,and espionage activities). However, it remains uncertain to what extent public opinion was swayed by the press since opinion polls had not yet become the norm to gauge it. In all likelihood the press is still the most reliable barometer of public opinion—though we should note that the truth is usually the first victim of war. This original, meticulouslyresearched , and well-written study features several useful appendices, including an annotated list of important personages and a brief history of the French press. It will be well-received not only by specialists but also by the general reader interested in 1930s France. St. Norbert College (WI) Tom Conner Rochefort, Harriet Welty. Joie de Vivre: Secrets of Wining, Dining, and Romancing Like the French. New York: St. Martin’s, 2012. ISBN 978-1-250-00456-7. Pp. 304. $25. In her third guide to the French lifestyle, Rochefort identifies joie de vivre, reveling in the moment and taking pleasure in all things, as the key to understanding what the French are about. She discusses male/female relations, small pleasures and attention to detail, savoir-faire, conversational style, and contrarian behavior as cultural traits, leisure,the French woman,food,wine,and the associated rituals.Her summary: pleasure is not sinful, time is not money, work is not your life, expressing yourself is good for the heart, the French think of the pleasure of others and“put out for them”(303–04). Her account is more a synthesis than a chronicle, and not overall original, but the style is engaging and she offers a welter of examples. She is most acute on: conversation; Americans’ food issues; the reasons for French insouciance as well as pessimism, compared to Americans; and generally looking for what is instructive rather than problematic about other lifestyles. She is good at unpacking French cultural logic, although given her thematic approach this involves some repetition and some procrustean squeezing.As she acknowledges, she has deliberately not sought to resolve contradictions (even grouchy service fits in). She usually follows a protocol of observation first, then an explanation, and finally—but not consistently—the exception(s) to the rule. She has for example several interesting if familiar pages on la Parisienne, but only one sentence acknowledging there are few Parisiennes on the Metro, and only belatedly brings up the question of equality with men as a kind of footnote to her 250 FRENCH REVIEW 88.2 Reviews 251 lengthy and admiring portrait. Rochefort draws principally on her own experiences, her French husband and his family, and her circle of friends, as well as quoting frequently from other American writers, most often Edith Wharton (implying cultural continuity). These are also the limits of her vision, however. She and her husband live in a trendy quartier populaire but we learn that they own their apartment and have a second home near La Baule. Her in-laws have downsized from their large Paris apartment and also own a home in the country. Moreover, she reports the trend toward second homes got “democratized” in the 1970s, by which she seems to mean other Europeans are buying in France, not less affluent French. Her scattered allusions to the contrary notwithstanding, and given her shopping priorities, we have to wonder which France she is really talking about, in terms of place, social class, variation in general. And to which America she is comparing that France. More pointedly, how much does she really know firsthand about today’s America(s), having grown up in a small Midwest town, moved to France after college over 40 years ago and lived there longer than here? Even accurately interpreted behavior is not perforce characteristic of a majority...
Read full abstract