WCN 2013 No: 1168 Topic: 36 — Other topic Changes in presynaptic inhibition during movement restriction of unilateral lower limb in a hemiparetic patient and healthy individuals M. Morishita, H. Yamaguchi, K. Egawa, A. Hirohata, M. Kobayashi. Kibi International University, Takahashi, Japan; Watanabe Hospital, Shiseikai Medical Corporation, Niimi, Japan; Graduate School, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan Background:We previously reported that movement restriction of the non-paretic lower limb improved gait patterns in hemiparetic patients. Objective: We assessed presynaptic inhibition (PI) to determine if movement restriction of the non-paretic lower limb is regulated by upper motor neuron mechanisms in hemiparetic patients compared with healthy individuals. Patients and methods: This study included one hemiparetic patient and 16 young healthy individuals. Participants walked with a knee brace on the non-paretic/non-dominant side. The subjects walked normally for about 10 min and then with the brace for another 10 min (gait training period). PI was measured before and after every 5 min in both conditions. PI was assessed in the soleus muscle on the paretic/ dominant side, and conditioning stimulation of the common peroneal nerve was used prior to soleus H-reflex measurement. Results: The single limb support time for the paretic/dominant side was longer after gait training in both the hemiparetic and healthy individuals. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction for time and restriction effects in healthy individuals. After gait training, PI was greater than during normal walking conditions in healthy individuals. In the hemiparetic patient, only slight PI was observed before gait training, but PI appeared to the same degree as in healthy individuals after gait training. Conclusion: Our results suggest that gait training with a knee brace may be effective not only for improvement of gait patterns, but also for regulation of upper motor neuron systems caused by increasing weight bearing ratio in paretic lower limbs. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.07.2152 Abstract — WCN 2013 No: 1165 Topic: 36 — Other topic Comparison of reposition rate between headshaking maneuver and vibration maneuver in ageotrophic horizontal BPPV H.S. Han, D.S. Shin. Neurology, St Carollo Hospital, Suncheon-si, Republic of Korea Background: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is one of the most commondisorders causingdizziness. Posterior Canal(PC)-BPPVhas been said to account for 60–90% of all BPPV cases, and Horizontal Canal(HC)-BPPV for 5–30% of the cases. However, HC-BPPV now appears to be more prevalent than was previously thought. The apogeotropic type is usually persistent, resistant to reposition maneuver, and its pathophysiology is cupulolithiasis in majority. We compare reposition rate between headshaking with modified Semont maneuver and vibration with modified Semont maneuver. Method: The subjectwere 64 patientswith ageotrophic type of HC-BPPV whowere diagnosed by the supine roll test using videonystagmography. We perform modified Semont maneuver after headshaking on 33 patients. We performed modified Semont maneuver after vibration on 31 patients. The patients with remaining vertigo after maneuver were retreated with the same method. After 1 week, We interviewed all patients using call whether vertigo has subsided. 4 patients had vertigo but they didn't come to the hospital because of private reason (3 in headshaking group and 1 in vibration group). We count the number of performance and compare with headshaking group and vibration group. Result: Fifty twice maneuvers were performed in headshaking group and fiftieth maneuvers were performed in vibration group (P N 0.05). The more vertigo is severe, the less maneuver was performed in both groups. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in recurrence rate between headshaking group and vibration group. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.07.2153 Abstract — WCN 2013 No: 1163 Topic: 36 — Other topic Symbiosis of neuro-interventionists: From parallel practice to interdisciplinary patient care WCN 2013 No: 1163 Topic: 36 — Other topic Symbiosis of neuro-interventionists: From parallel practice to interdisciplinary patient care T.W. Leung, M. Tang, A. Chan, G.K. Wong, S.C. Yu. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Backgrounds: In centers with endovascular service established by radiologists, neurosurgeon, cardiologists and/or vascular surgeons, budding interventional neurologists may struggle to portray their role. Objective: In a university teaching hospital, we delivered neurointerventional treatment by a team-oriented approach consisting of radiologists, neurosurgeons and interventional neurologists. We aimed to evaluate this multidisciplinary patient care model through a quantitative framework construct survey. Methods: Responded on a voluntary basis, doctors, nurses, and radiographers defined the existing mode of collaboration over a continuum with parallel practice and non-hierarchical integration at both ends, and gave opinions on 4 major aspects: philosophy (believes in benefits of interprofessional collaboration and knowledge of each other's treatment approach), trust, process (knowledge exchange, physician centrality and conflicts associated with interprofessional collaboration) and outcomes (job satisfaction, personal growth, intention to leave in the following year, and research output). Abstracts / Journal of the Neurological Sciences 333 (2013) e579–e628 e618