Background and purposeYoung children with autism spectrum disorder (autism) have bedtime and sleep disturbances at much higher frequency and persistency than their neurotypical counterparts. Hence, access to early, effective treatment is critical in view of the importance of sleep in early childhood. Telehealth delivery could be a means to expand access to such early treatment if efficacious. The aim of this randomized control trial (RCT) was to compare a manualized, telehealth delivered, behaviorally based sleep parent training (SPT) intervention for parents of young children with autism and sleep disturbances to a control condition, a telehealth delivered parent education program with one sleep focused session (SPE). We hypothesized that the SPT group would show more improvements on child measures of sleep outcome measures, and daytime behaviors and parent measures of stress and sense of competence. We further aimed to explore the overall feasibility of telehealth delivery of SPT and SPE. Participants and methodsParents of 77 young children, ages 2–7 years, with autism and co-occurring sleep disturbances were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomized to either SPT or a comparison arm that included non-sleep related parent education except for one session. Each participant was individually administered a 5 session program delivered over 10 weeks. Outcome measures, including child sleep measures, child daytime behavior and parent stress and sense of competency were collected at weeks 5 and 10 after the baseline time point. Feasibility indicators (treatment fidelity, parent adherence, and parent attendance), and safety measures were also collected. ResultsOf 77 randomized participants, data were available for 36 participants randomized to SPT and 38 participants randomized to SPE. The mean age was 3 years, 8 months. Results support the efficacy of this manualized SPT intervention for bedtime and sleep disturbances. Sleep outcome measures were significantly improved in the SPT group compared to SPE on the Modified Simonds & Parraga Sleep Questionnaire-Composite Sleep Index (MSPSQ – CSI) (p < 0.001) with a large effect size of 0.83 at week 10. Positive response to treatment, as determined from the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) at week 10 was observed in 56% of SPT participants compared to 32% in SPE (p = 0.037). There were no significant group differences in either the ABC-I as measure of daytime behaviors or in parental stress. There were group differences in favor of SPT over SPE on the PSOC, a measure of parent sense of competency. Feasibility and safety were further demonstrated with telehealth delivery. ConclusionsThis RCT demonstrated the efficacy of a telehealth delivered parent training intervention for bedtime and sleep disturbances in young autistic children compared to an active control condition. Further, parents in SPT reported more confidence in their parenting role than those in the SPE group, but SPT did not result in overall decreases in parental stress. Telehealth delivery allowed for a much broader reach with enrolled participants from 24 states. This study supports a telehealth approach to a manualized behavioral parent mediated intervention for sleep disturbance in young autistic children and offers an alternative to in-person delivered approaches. This telehealth delivery has the potential to improve access for families who have a young autistic child with sleep disturbances. Given the small sample size, determining predictors and moderators of treatment response was not possible and should be examined in a larger trial.