Paravertebral Block For Postoperative Analgesia Research Articles

Feasibility study of bilateral thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

To investigate the feasibility of bilateral thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). Upon the approval of institutional Ethics Committee and informed consent, forty patients ASAII or III aged 52-77 yr with BMI (body mass index) < 30 kg/m(2), undergoing OPCABG, were randomly divided by random numbers into two groups(n = 20 each):thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia group (group P) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group (group I). Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block and insertion epidural catheter were performed at T3, 4 interspace prior to induction of anesthesia in group P. At the end of the operation , an infusion of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected at the rate of 5 ml/h up to 48 h.Group I received PCIA with morphine. Dermatomes of hypoalgesia in group P were recorded. The following indexes were recorded at 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after postoperative analgesia beginning: VAS scores of rest pain, cough pain and sedation score. To evaluate stability of circulation. Cycle time, complications and side effects after operation were recorded. Dermatomes of hypoalgesia was 5.1 ± 1.0 segments in group P. VAS scores of rest pain (2.4 ± 0.4, 2.6 ± 0.5, 2.4 ± 0.4, 2.2 ± 0.3 vs 3.7 ± 0.7, 3.6 ± 0.8, 3.4 ± 0.6, 3.1 ± 0.6, all P < 0.01), cough pain (3.7 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.0, 3.8 ± 1.1, 3.8 ± 0.9 vs 4.4 ± 1.1, 4.9 ± 1.3, 4.8 ± 1.3, 4.3 ± 1.2, P < 0.05, <0.01) and sedation scores (2.2 ± 0.4, 2.0 ± 0.4, 1.9 ± 0.3, 1.8 ± 0.3, 2.6 ± 0.5, 2.5 ± 0.4, 2.4 ± 0.5, 2.2 ± 0.4, P < 0.05) in group P were significantly lower than in group I at the four points. The incidences of sinus tachycardia (5% vs 25%) and hypertension (0 vs 30%) in group P were significantly reduced than in group I (P < 0.05), and there were no significant difference in the incidences of sinus brachycardia (30% vs 15%) and hypotension (20% vs 10%) (P > 0.05) . Compared with group I, extubation time (5.5 ± 1.4 vs 7.1 ± 1.7) and residence time in ICU (17.3 ± 4.2 vs 21.4 ± 5.8) were shortened significantly in group P (P < 0.05), and there were no significant difference in length of stay after operation (10.5 ± 2.6 vs 11.7 ± 2.8, P > 0.05). The incidence rate of nausea in group P was significantly lower than in group I (5% vs 25%, P < 0.05), and there were no significant difference in the other complications and side effects after operation (P > 0.05). Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia could be used safely and efficiently and accelerate the cycle time in patients after OPCABG.

Comparison between Continuous Thoracic Epidural and Paravertebral Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy: Systematic Review

Background and objective: Thoracotomy is a procedure associated with postoperative severe pain. Epidural block (EB) is considered the gold standard for its control. Paravertebral block (PVB) is an option for the management of postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate by meta-analyses the effectiveness of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks for pain management after thoracotomy and the incidence of adverse effects. MethodThe study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. We analyzed primary (postoperative pain at rest) and secondary outcomes (urinary retention, nausea, vomiting, hypotension). We estimated the weighted mean difference for continuous variables and odds ratios for categorical variables. ResultsWe included eight prospective, randomized, controlled studies. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding the outcomes of postoperative pain at rest at four, eight, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, and 48hours. Incidence of urinary retention was higher in EP group (OR = 7.19, CI95 = 1.87 to 27.7). The occurrence of hypotension was higher in PVB group (OR = 10.28, 95 = 2.95 to 35.77). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the outcome nausea/vomiting (OR = 3.00, CI95 = 0.49 to 18.45). ConclusionThere were no statistically significant differences in pain relief after thoracotomy between EB and PVB. PVB showed a lower incidence of side effects with reduced frequency of urinary retention and hypotension.

Paravertebral Block for Post-Operative Analgesia after Breast Cancer Surgery, Effects of Adding Morphine: Double Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial

Introduction: Thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) block is frequently used in breast cancer surgery for postoperative pain management. Adding opioids to local anaesthetics has been shown to have beneficial effects during epidural analgesia. Our hypothesis was that adding morphine to bupivacaine for PVB would improve analgesia provided by this procedure. Methods: 60 patients (25 - 75 years) undergoing elective surgery for breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups received a single injection thoracic paravertebral block; group BAM with 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine, epinephrine and morphine while group BA received identical block except morphine was given subcutaneously. All patients had general anaesthesia. Results: Severity of pain and nausea was low in both groups. Pain scores remained below 20/100 after the first 2 hours throughout the 72 hours of the study. There was no significant difference between the groups in pain scores, consumption of additional morphine or nausea scores. Shoulder mobility was also very good in both groups. Conclusion: Thoracic paravertebral block with bupivacaine and epinephrine was associated with good postoperative analgesic effects and low incidence of nausea and vomiting. The addition of morphine to the local anaesthetic solution in paravertebral block did not have any additional analgesic effects.

Intra-operative paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in thoracotomy patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for post-thoracotomy pain relief but is contraindicated in certain patients. An alternative is paravertebral block. We investigated whether ropivacaine, administered through a paravertebral catheter placed by the surgeon, reduced postoperative pain. In a randomized double-blind study, adult patients with a paravertebral catheter placed by the thoracic surgeon after thoracotomy were randomly assigned to receive through this catheter, either a 0.1 mlkg(-1) bolus of 0.5% ropivacaine, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 mlkg(-1)h(-1) for 48 h, or saline at the same scheme of administration. Patients also benefited from patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine (bolus 1mg, lockout time 7 min), paracetamol, and nefopam. The primary endpoint was pain intensity on a visual analog scale at rest and on coughing. Secondary endpoints were total morphine consumption and side effects during the first 48 postoperative hours. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, and all the nurses and caring staff involved in this study were blinded. Solutions of saline and ropivacaine were prepared identically by the central pharmacy, without any possible identification of the product. Forty-seven patients with contraindications to epidural anesthesia were included. There were no significant differences between the groups receiving ropivacaine and saline in terms of pain severity at rest and on coughing, mean postoperative morphine consumption (45.7 mg for ropivacaine, 43.2mg in controls), and incidence of morphine-related side effects (nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, respiratory rate, and sedation). Paravertebral block using a catheter placed by the thoracic surgeon was ineffective on postoperative pain after thoracotomy and did not confirm the analgesic effect that has been observed after percutaneous catheter placement. A direct comparison of these two placement methods is required.

Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery

Minimally invasive surgery with robotic assistance should elicit minimal pain. Regional analgesic techniques have shown excellent analgesia after thoracotomy. Thus the aim of this study was to compare thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) technique with paravertebral block (PVB) technique in these patients with regard to quality of analgesia, complications, and haemodynamic and respiratory parameters. This was a prospective randomised study involving 36 patients undergoing elective robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). TEA or PVB were administered in these patients. The results revealed no significant differences with regard to demographics, haemodynamics, and arterial blood gases. Pulmonary functions were better maintained in PVB group postoperatively; however, this was statistically insignificant. The quality of analgesia was also comparable in both the groups. We conclude that PVB is a safe and effective technique for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted CABG and is comparable to TEA with regard to quality of analgesia.

Post–dural headache associated with thoracic paravertebral blocks

The thoracic paravertebral block is effective in providing anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for thoracic and abdominal surgeries. This case report describes a suspected post–dural puncture headache following bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia after an umbilical hernia repair.

Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

Objective: To compare continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery for quality of analgesia, complications, compliance to chest physiotherapy, hemodynamics, and respiratory effects. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: Specialty research hospital. Participants: Forty-one consenting patients undergoing MIDCAB surgery. Interventions: Patients in the TEA group had an epidural catheter inserted at the T4-5 interspace, whereas patients in the PVB group had a catheter inserted in the paravertebral space on the left side at the T4-5 level. Measurements and Main Results: Parameters evaluated included visual analog scale pain scores at rest and while coughing, supplemental analgesic requirement, complications, hemodynamics, and respiratory parameters. Measurements were made at 2-hour intervals for 12 hours beginning at 10 minutes after endotracheal extubation. There was no statistically significant difference in visual analog scale scores and requirement of supplemental analgesia between the 2 groups. Cardiac index at 4 hours and 6 hours was significantly higher in the TEA group. Patients in the PVB group had significantly lower respiratory rates at 8, 10, and 12 hours. All other parameters were comparable. In 1 patient, the epidural space could not be catheterized. One patient in the TEA group had transient hypotension, and 1 patient complained of backache at the site of the epidural catheter insertion. Conclusion: PVB is as effective as TEA for postoperative analgesia after MIDCAB surgery. PVB is technically easier than TEA and may be safer than TEA because no complications were seen in the PVB group. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company