Parastomal Hernia Research Articles

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Ileostomy Complications: An Updated Review.

An ileostomy is associated with multiple complications that may frequently or persistently affect the life of ostomates. All healthcare professionals should have knowledge of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ileostomy complications. Peristomal dermatitis is caused by watery and highly alkaline effluent. Skin protective products are typically used for local treatment. Ischemia/necrosis occurs due to insufficient arterial blood supply. Retraction is seen in patients with a bulky mesentery and occurs following ischemia. Convex stoma appliances can be used for skin protection against fecal leakage. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and occurs only at the stoma site. Trans-stomal decompression is most effective in these cases. High output stoma (HOS) is defined as a condition when the output exceeds 1,000- 2,000 ml/day, lasting for one to three days. Treatment includes intravenous fluid and electrolyte resuscitation followed by restriction of hypotonic fluid and the use of antimotility (and antisecretory) drugs. Stomal prolapse is a full-thickness protrusion of an inverted bowel. Manual reduction is attempted initially, whereas emergency bowel resection may be needed for incarcerated cases. A parastomal hernia (PSH) is an incisional hernia of the stoma site. Surgery is considered in cases of incarceration, but most cases are manageable with non-surgical treatment.

Small-bowel plication prevents ileostomy prolapse in young children with inflammatory bowel disease.

Young children with medically refractory very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) sometimes benefit from ileostomy diversion alone or may be offered subtotal colectomy with ileostomy. Though generally well-tolerated, ileostomy complications are frequent. Prolapse is particularly frustrating as it can be difficult and painful to reduce, becomes a recurring problem is some patients, and often requires ostomy revision or bowel resection. Over the course of the past 6months, eight consecutive children with VEO-IBD underwent 10 creation or revision of a diverting ileostomy (two underwent subsequent colectomy with ileostomy revision). In each of these 10 cases, we plicated the ileum just proximal to the ileostomy for a distance of approximately 3cm using a running permanent monofilament suture. No patient who underwent plication of bowel has developed ileostomy prolapse. There were no cases of ileostomy retraction, parastomal hernia or ostomy-level obstruction. One patient required a lysis of a single band adhesion for a more proximal small bowel obstruction. The stomas have functioned well and there have been no complications. Simple bowel plication appears to be a quick and effective way to prevent ileostomy prolapse in young children with VEO-IBD with an ileostomy who are at high risk for prolapse.

Contemporary management of parastomal hernia

Contemporary management of parastomal hernia

Gastric Outlet Obstruction Secondary to Incarcerated Stomach in Parastomal Hernia

Gastric outlet obstruction due to an incarcerated stomach in a parastomal hernia is extremely rare. Here, we present the management of such a case with a review of the literature. A 79-year-old woman presented with a 3-week history of postprandial vomiting and associated parastomal and epigastric pain. She had a loop colostomy created for severe fecal incontinence secondary to anal stenosis. Imaging revealed a large parastomal hernia with an incarcerated gastric antrum. She was initially managed nonoperatively with a nasogastric tube. She underwent a semi-elective open Sugarbaker mesh repair of the parastomal hernia with good results. Gastric outlet obstruction secondary to incarceration of the stomach in a parastomal hernia is uncommon. A conservative approach with nasogastric tube decompression is a reasonable initial approach in a patient who is not critically unwell, which allows time for consideration of different parastomal hernia repair techniques.

Perspectives of prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia-what do we really know and where should we go?

Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication after ostomy formation, causing a significant reduction of the quality of life of patients. In contrast to surgical dogmas dealing with the surgical technique of ostomy formation, mesh-based prophylaxis of parastomal hernia seemed to be effective, leading to the strong recommendation in the European Hernia Society(EHS) guidelines. More recent studies do not favor prophylaxis of parastomal hernia anymore, mainly due to the lack of clearly differentiating the techniques. The mostly used keyhole technique (flat mesh) cannot be equated with the “chimney technique” (3-dimensional mesh) that can be easily performed laparoscopically. Very recent results of the Finnish Randomized Study showed a dramatic reduction of parastomal hernia using the chimney technique. Concerning therapy of parastomal hernia, the chimney technique was also revealed to be effective. The laparoscopic “sandwich technique” should also be used therapeutically with very promising mid- and long-term results and seems to be superior to any other approaches. In a conclusion, investigating the prevention of parastomal hernia should clearly differentiate between the keyhole and chimney techniques and adopt strict technical standardization. Therapy of parastomal hernia should be based on the most effective sandwich or the chimney technique in specialized centers, according to recent registry results. Both techniques are based on the intraperitoneal placement of meshes requiring 3-dimensionality or the possibility of overlapping two meshes. Up to now, these requirements are only fulfilled by meshes made by polyvinylidene fluoride.

The first robotic STORRM: A case report

Abstract Parastomal hernias present a continued challenge to the general surgeon. There are a myriad of techniques available, with hernia recurrence rates varying between 10 to greater than 50%. Mesh reinforcement and underlay or sublay placement are associated with lower hernia recurrence rates. Many patients with parastomal hernia have associated comorbidities which increase their risk for perioperative wound complications. Robotic and minimally invasive techniques offer decreased rate of wound complications, but can be challenging to perform if the stoma needs to be relocated. For patients with complex parastomal hernias requiring abdominal wall reconstruction with transversus abdominis release and retromuscular mesh placement, it can be difficult to align the layers of the abdominal wall and create an aperture in the mesh to allow for a straight passage of the conduit and prevent subsequent angulation of the bowel. Stapled Transabdominal Ostomy Reinforcement with retromuscular mesh, or STORRM technique, has been previously described elsewhere as a technique whereby a circular EEA (End-to-End Anastomoses) stapler is used to create a straight tunnel through the mesh and abdominal wall layers, standardize sizing, fixate the mesh, and substitute traditional cruciate incisions with a stapled reinforcement of the aperture in the mesh/tissues.

Parastomal Hernias: An Education and Prevention Pilot Evidence-Based Program

Parastomal Hernias: An Education and Prevention Pilot Evidence-Based Program

What is new in parastomal hernia repair: An overview

What is new in parastomal hernia repair: An overview

Totally laparoscopic combined perineal and parastomal hernia repair following pelvic exenteration and ileal conduit: A rare case report and technical aspects

Totally laparoscopic combined perineal and parastomal hernia repair following pelvic exenteration and ileal conduit: A rare case report and technical aspects

Incidence of Complications of Colostomy in Children with Hirschsprung Disease and Anorectal Malformation

Colostomy formation, A surgery used in the management of Hirschsprung's disease, and anorectal malformations. colostomy complications were represented both in children with Hirschsprung's disease and in those with anorectal malformation Objective: To estimate the incidence rate of major complications after colostomy formation surgery. Methods: A prospective longitudinal descriptive study was performed to calculate the incidence rates of complications following the surgical intervention of colostomy formation. All 200 cases of consecutive young children (age 2 days to 60 days) who received a colostomy between (date January 2017 to January 2020) were included. The incidence of major colostomy-related complications was calculated. This was analyzed for colostomy formation. Non-colostomy-related complications were not included in study. Results: 200 young children were included. And a follow-up of 6 months of this study to review the complications of colostomy formation in infants and children with Hirschsprung's disease or an anorectal malformation. 80% experienced colostomy-related complications, colostomy prolapse (35% in HD more with a transverse colostomy, 20% in Anorectal malformation), colostomy stenosis (15% in HD, 35% in Anorectal malformation), Skin excoriation (40% in HD, 25% in Anorectal malformation), Revision of colostomy (15% in HD, 12% in Anorectal malformation), colostomy bleeding almost same in both conditions 30%, Parastomal herniation, 5% in both conditions, colostomy wound infection were also recorded, Same in both conditions 5%. Conclusions: Consider the risks associated with a colostomy formation before undergoing surgery in both Hirschsprung's disease and anorectal malformation. complications can be excluded with careful surgery and proper nursing care.

Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

IntroductionParastomal hernia is a debilitating complication of stoma creation. Parastomal hernia repair with mesh reduces recurrence rates in open and laparoscopic settings. Recent comparative studies conflict with previously pooled data on optimal mesh repair technique. The objective of this study is to examine parastomal hernia recurrence rates after Sugarbaker and keyhole repairs by performing an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. MethodsA systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, SCOPUS, and the PROSPERO registry was performed according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021290483). Studies comparing parastomal hernia recurrences after Sugarbaker and keyhole repairs were included. Studies with overlapping patient cohorts (duplicate data), non-comparative studies, studies that did not report the primary outcome of interest, and studies not in the English language were excluded. Study bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Forest plots and funnel plots were generated. Study quality was analyzed using MINORS. Additional subgroup analysis of modern studies was performed. ResultsTen comparative studies published between 2005 and 2021 from 5 countries were included for analysis comprising 347 Sugarbaker repairs and 246 keyhole repairs. There were no differences in patient age, sex, or BMI between the groups. There was no difference between the groups regarding surgical site infection (OR 0.78; CI 0.31–1.98; P = 0.61) or post-operative bowel obstruction (OR 0.76; CI 0.23–2.56; P = 0.66). Sugarbaker repairs were significantly less often associated with parastomal hernia recurrence when compared to keyhole repairs (OR 0.38; CI 0.18–0.78; P = 0.008). There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies comparing parastomal hernia recurrence (I2 = 32%; P = 0.15). Quality analysis revealed a median MINORS score of 11 (range 6–16). Subgroup analysis of studies performed after the previously published pooled analysis (2015–2021) revealed no significant difference in parastomal hernia recurrence between the two groups (OR 0.58; CI 0.24–1.38; P = 0.22) with a significant subgroup effect (P = 0.05). ConclusionsThough there were lower rates of parastomal hernia recurrence with Sugarbaker repairs on overall analysis, this phenomenon disappeared on subgroup analysis of modern studies. Randomized controlled trials with contemporary cohorts would help further evaluate these repairs and minimize potential bias.

Robotic repair of non-midline hernias.

Non-midline abdominal wall hernias present unique anatomic challenges, making repair more complex. The constraints of the peritoneal cavity, pelvis, and costal margin limit the utility of intraperitoneal mesh repair, and extra-peritoneal repairs have traditionally been performed using open techniques, often resulting in higher wound morbidity. Advances in minimally invasive surgery make visualization and dissection of such complex cases feasible, with all the attendant benefits of a minimally invasive over an open approach. In this study, we examined the use of the robotic platform to repair non-midline hernias. Retrospective review of all non-midline abdominal wall hernias was performed robotically at Prisma Health, excluding parastomal hernias. Study conducted and outcomes reported according to STROBE statement. Repair was performed in the retro-rectus (n = 3) or retro-rectus + transversus abdominis release (TAR) (n = 39), pre-peritoneal (n = 22), and intraperitoneal (n = 1). Mean hernia width was 9.4cm, permanent synthetic mesh used for all repairs. Mean LOS was 1.5days. Surgical-site occurrence (SSO) occurred in 49.2%, 78% of which were simple seroma. Three patients (4.6%) developed surgical-site infection (SSI). Two recurrences were identified with a mean follow-up of 11 mos. The robotic platform facilitates complex dissection to allow minimally invasive, extra-peritoneal repair of complex non-midline hernias. This approach overcomes the anatomic constraints of intraperitoneal mesh repair and the wound morbidity of open repair.

Absorbable mesh in a contaminated field: hernia repair outcomes.

Hernia repair mesh aids in the stability of incisional hernia repair and can reduce the need for subsequent operations. There is, however, debate among surgeons over which type of hernia mesh-synthetics, biologics, or biosynthetics-is indicated as best for specific patients. A retrospective case review comparing surgical outcomes based on wound class and mesh materials may provide insights into this question. This study evaluates patient outcomes using biosynthetic mesh based upon CDC wound classification. Following Institutional Review Board approval, the local National Surgery Quality Improvement (NSQIP) databases were queried for open ventral hernia repaired with absorbable mesh implants from January 2013-December 2017. Factors for comparison included patient demographics, operative details, and an analysis of clinical outcomes. Our study identified 112 ventral hernia repair cases with absorbable mesh placement, 32% (n = 36) were wound classes II-IV. Higher wound class correlated statistically with diabetes (33.3%), prior hernia repair (61.1%), and parastomal hernia (44.4%). Higher wound classes were associated with more emergent presentations, involved bowel resection more frequently, required larger mesh implants, increased post-operative surgical site infections, and wound disruption. Increasing wound class was also associated with longer hospital stays and greater need for readmission (38.9% vs. 11.8%). Compared to patients with clean wounds, biosynethic mesh repair patients with contaminated wounds exhibited more emergent presentations, increased incidence of bowel resection, increased mesh size, and more readmissions. Despite these peri-operative outcomes, hernia recurrence rates among biosynethic mesh hernia repair were similar in CDC class II-IV patients as class I.

Robotic hernia surgeryIV. English version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results.

The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of afunnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing acomprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.

Perceptions and experience on the use of support garments to prevent parastomal hernias: a national survey of Australian stomal therapy nurses

Perceptions and experience on the use of support garments to prevent parastomal hernias: a national survey of Australian stomal therapy nurses

Risk factors and prevent strategy of parastomal hernia

Parastomal hernia is one of the common complications of stoma surgery with an incidence of more than 30%, which can be diagnosed by physical examination and abdominal CT. Risk factors of parastomal hernia might include stoma approaches including the selection of intestine, relationship between stoma and peritoneum, stoma location, aperture size, operation time and the patient's own conditions. It is essential to prevent parastomal hernia in order to improve patients' quality of life. Prophylactic mesh and perioperative care might prevent parastomal hernias. The mesh type might also influence the incidence of parastomal hernia. To reduce the incidence of recurrence of parastomal hernia, placement of mesh by the laparoscopic Sugarbaker technique was an effective surgical approach. How to prevent and repair parastomal hernia and cure parastomal hernia repair still needs further high-quality research to provide evidence.

Surgical strategy for stoma creation in the challenging patients

Stoma is a commonly used surgical procedure in clinic practice. However, for obese patients with thick abdominal wall, short and thickened mesentery, and for patients with intestinal obstruction and abdominal distension (difficult stoma), establishing a tension- free and well blood-supplied stoma is still a great challenge. Careful preoperative planning, including stoma location marking, careful consideration of all alternatives and attention to technical details, will help to make an optimal stoma under challenging conditions. For enterostomy of obese patients, the pullout intestine must be free of tension and must have sufficient blood supply, the structure of the abdominal wall should be incised vertically, and the intestine should be pulled out vertically as well. For enterostomy of patients with intestinal obstruction, the diameter of the stoma incision should not exceed 3 cm to avoid parastomal hernia, which commonly occurs after bowel retraction.

A two-stitch continuous suture method for single-lumen ileostomy

Objective: To explore the value of a two-stitch continuous suture in single- lumen ileostomy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data for 98 patients who underwent single-lumen enterostomy were retrospectively collected between 1 January 2021 and 1 May 2022 at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University. All patients met the indications for prophylactic single-lumen ileostomy. Those older than 80 years of age, with complex underlying diseases, extremely poor systemic conditions who could not tolerate surgery, poor blood supply at the end of the bowel, and severe edema or severe infection at the end of the bowel were excluded. Among the included patients, patients who underwent surgery before 1 October 2021 underwent ileostomy with interrupted suture (control group, n=60), and patients operated on and after 1 October 2021 routinely underwent two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy (two-stitch stoma group, n=38). Two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy is performed as follows: the first continuous suture is used to suture the intestinal seromuscular layer, peritoneum, posterior sheath, and anterior sheath from deep to superficial layers. The bowel wall is then opened. The second continuous suture is used to suture the full thickness of the bowel and the skin. The differences in postoperative ostomy-related complications and operation time were compared between the groups. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline data between the groups (all, P>0.05). The operative time in the two-stitch stoma group was shorter than that of the control group (16.6±2.2 minutes vs. 25.1±2.4 minutes, respectively; t=-17.874;P<0.001). The incidences of mucocutaneous separation, dermatitis, and stoma rebound in the two-stitch stoma group were lower than those of the control group [5.3% (2/38) vs. 31.7% (19/60), χ2=9.633, P=0.002;5.3% (2/38) vs. 28.3% (17/60), χ2=7.923, P=0.005; and 2.6% (1/38) vs. 18.3% (11/60), P=0.026, respectively], while the incidences of parastomal hernia and stoma prolapse, and the postoperative visual analog scale scores in the two groups were similar (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional single-lumen ileostomy, two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy has the advantages of short operation time, simplicity, esthetic appearance of the stoma, and a significant reduction in the postoperative complications associated with ileostomy.

Prevention and management of stoma-related complications after surgery for low rectal cancer

The related technology of enterostomy is a professional skill that colorectal surgeons need to master, and it is clinically important to prevent the occurrence of enterostomy-related complications of low rectal cancer. The early complications of enterostomy include stoma retraction, stoma ischemic necrosis, stoma edema and peripheral dermatitis, and the long-term complications include parastomal hernia, stenosis and stoma prolapse. In addition, the rare or easily neglected stoma cancer, difficulty of stoma closure and following social psychological disorders should also be paid attention to by surgeons. Effective reduction of enterostomy complications can lead to better quality of life for patients, which is the best interpretation of the concept of "patient-centered ness" by colorectal surgeons.

Radiological incidence of donor-site incisional hernia and parastomal hernia after vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap-based reconstruction following colorectal surgery.

A vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap is commonly used to reconstruct perineal defects for low rectal and anal cancer. The incidence of midline incisional hernias after VRAM reconstruction varies from 3.6% when detected clinically to 50% when detected radiologically. The aim of this study is to accurately determine the radiological incidence of donor-site incisional and parastomal hernia following VRAM reconstruction. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing colorectal surgery requiring VRAM reconstruction over 10 years. Data were collected on patient demographics, indication for surgery and surgical procedure, including details of any hernia repair. Images from surveillance CTs were reviewed for the presence and size of midline incisional and/or parastomal hernias. Parastomal hernias were classified based on the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification. One hundred and seventy three patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 67 years (range 29-88 years) and the median length of follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range 24.3-71.0months). The cumulative incidence of donor-site incisional hernia after VRAM at 1, 2 and 5 years was 15.1%, 25.4% and 29.1%, respectively. The cumulative incidence for PSH at 1, 2 and 5 years was 33.1%, 46.6% and 53.3%, respectively (95% CI 45.4%-60.5%). Most patients who develop donor-site incisional hernia and parastomal herniation following VRAM tend to do so within the first 2 years. Although the use of CT imaging improves the diagnosis of donor-site incisional and parastomal hernias, the clinical significance of this is unknown.