Parastomal Hernia Research Articles

Hybrid Technique for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: Description and Early Results.

Objective Ventral hernia repair is a widely practiced surgical procedure worldwide. The objective of this paper is to evaluate and analyze the results of a hybrid approach for treating ventral hernias. Methods All patients with clinically and radiologically proven ventral hernia underwent hybrid laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at Princess Royal University Hospital, London, United Kingdom using a retrospective approach with the same surgical team. Large defects >10 cm, inguinal hernia, para-stomal hernia, incarcerated patients, and spigelian hernia were excluded. We utilized the laparoscopic approach for the dissection and isolation of the sac and used the port site for the delivery of mesh into the abdominal cavity. Results Our study comprises 67 patients, with 39 males (58.2%) and 28 females (41.8%). The median age in our study group was 41 years (range: 18-65 years). The median BMI was 38 kg/m2 (range: 24-52 kg/m2). The majority of the cases were umbilical or paraumbilical hernias (n = 46). The median defect size in our study was 5.4 cm (range: 2-10 cm). The median operative time was 67 minutes. We have not encountered any recurrences in this group. Conclusion This hybrid approach combines the advantages of both the open and laparoscopic approaches.

Evaluating risk factors for development of a parastomal hernia: a retrospective matched case-control study

Evaluating risk factors for development of a parastomal hernia: a retrospective matched case-control study

Parietal complications after cystectomy: Incisional and parastomal hernia, epidemiology and risk factors

IntroductionIncisional and parastomal hernias are frequent complications after cystectomy. The aim of our study was to define their incidence, identify risk factors related to the patient and the surgical technique, and identify means of prevention. MaterialThis was a multicenter, retrospective study, analyzing clinical and radiological data from 521 patients operated on for cystectomy between January 2010 and December 2020. ResultsIn total, 521 patients, 471 men and 50 women, mean age 68.8years, were included. Thirty-one patients (6.6%) presented with an evisceration. Risk factors were a history of evisceration (OR: 14.1; 95% CI: [3–66]; P=0.0008), COPD (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: [1.3–9 .4]; P=0.0119), ischemic heart disease (OR: 4; 95% CI: [1. 6–10]; P=0.0036), and split-stitch closure (OR: 3.1; 95% CI: [1.065–8.9]; P=0.0493). Fifty-one patients (9.9%) presented with an incisional hernia. Risk factors were a history of COPD (OR: 4, 95% CI: [2.1–7.6]; P<0.001) and postoperative pulmonary infection (OR: 5.3; 95% CI: [1.05–26.4]; P=0.0079). Seventy-nine patients (15.28%) had a parastomal hernia. Overweight was a risk factor (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: [1.3–4.5]; P=0.0073). ConclusionPatients who are overweight or have pulmonary comorbidities are at greater risk of developing parietal complications after cystectomy. Level of evidenceIII.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia in urological surgery.

To evaluate the incidence of incisional hernia in patients undergoing direct access to the abdominal cavity in urological surgery. We conducted a systematic review in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central from 1980 to the present according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Eighty-four studies were selected for inclusion in this analysis, and meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed. The total incidence in the 84 studies was 4.8% (95% CI 3.7% - 6.2%) I2 93.84%. Depending on the type of incision, it was higher in the open medial approach: 7.1% (95% CI 4.3%-11.8%) I2 92.45% and lower in laparoscopic surgery: 1.9% (95% CI 1%-3.4%) I2 71, 85% According to access, it was lower in retroperitoneal: 0.9% (95% CI 0.2%-4.8%) I2 76.96% and off-midline: 4.7% (95% CI 3.5%-6.4%) I2 91.59%. Regarding the location of the hernia, parastomal hernias were more frequent: 15.1% (95% CI 9.6% - 23%) I2 77.39%. Meta-regression shows a significant effect in reducing the proportion of hernias in open lateral, laparoscopic and hand-assisted compared to medial open access. The present review finds the access through the midline and stomas as the ones with the highest incidence of incisional hernia. The use of the lateral approach or minimally invasive techniques is preferable. More prospective studies are warranted to obtain the real incidence of incisional hernias and evaluate the role of better techniques to close the abdomen.

Complications associated with loop ileostomy: analysis of risk factors.

Loop ileostomy is a common surgical procedure but is associated with complications such as outlet obstruction (OO), parastomal hernia (PH), and high-output stoma (HOS). This study aimed to identify risk factors for these complications, as well as their causal relationships. The study included 188 consecutive patients who underwent loop ileostomy between April 2016 and September 2021. Clinical factors and postoperative stoma-related complications (OO, HOS, and PH) were analyzed retrospectively. Stoma-related factors were evaluated using specific measurements from computed tomography (CT) scans. The incidence, clinical course, and risk factors for the stoma-related complications were investigated. OO was diagnosed in 28 cases (15.7%), PH in 60 (32%), and HOS in 57 (31.8%). A small longitudinal stoma diameter at the rectus abdominis level on CT and a right-sided stoma were significantly associated with OO. Creation of an ileostomy for anastomotic leakage was independently associated with HOS. Higher body weight and a large longitudinal stoma diameter at the rectus abdominis level on CT were significantly associated with PH. There was a significant relationship between the occurrence of OO and HOS. However, the association between OO and PH was marginal. This study identified key risk factors for OO, HOS, and PH as complications of loop ileostomy and their causal relationships. Our findings provide insights that may guide the prevention and management of complications related to loop ileostomy.

PARASTOMAL HERNIA REPAIR IN BRICKER TYPE URINARY DIVERSION USING THE MODIFIED PAULI TECHNIQUE: A CASE REPORT

Abstract Introduction The incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) associated with Bricker ileal urinary diversion is approximately 20%. Surgery becomes necessary in the presence of symptoms or development of complications. Clinical case A 77-year-old woman with a Bricker urinary diversion following radical cystectomy presented to the emergency department with 72 hours of evolving obstructive symptoms, coupled with a large PH featuring incarcerated bowel. A CT scan confirmed complete intestinal obstruction. Urgent surgery was conducted, revealing ileum incarceration without perforations. Reduction of the intestinal content was performed, restoring viability. Transversus abdominis release (TAR) around the stoma was executed, followed by the placement of a retromuscular progrip mesh using the Pauli technique. The patient was discharged after 8 days without complications. Discussion The surgical treatment of PH remains controversial, lacking a consensus as the most effective technique. We opted for modified Pauli technique, involving retromuscular dissection, subsequent components separation via TAR and mesh repair according to the Keyhole technique. This combination leverages the advantages of each of procedures to reduce the recurrence risk: retromuscular mesh placement physiologically pushing the wall, utilization of wider prostheses reinforcing a larger surface area, complete mesh contact with the wall facilitating integration around the defect, and direct stoma exit without the need for repositioning. Conclusions The modified Pauli technique with Keyhole mesh placement, while demanding, can provide advantages in emergency surgery without causing significant postoperative complications.

STAGED, LAPAROSCOPIC HYBRID EPAULI REPAIR FOR LARGE PARASTOMAL HERNIA – CASE REPORT

Abstract Background Managing large parastomal hernias poses significant challenges due to their high recurrence rates and the elevated risk for peri- and post-operative complications. Method Case report of a successful repair of a large parastomal hernia using a staged minimally invasive, hybrid approach. Results The patient underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic total colectomy in 2016 for ulcerative colitis. Several years later, in 2020, the patient presented to our hospital with a large parastomal hernia with obesity as comorbidity. To address this complex hernia, the patient was referred to the obesity team and underwent laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection in autumn 2021. In 2022, the patient's BMI had decreased to below 30, prompting the decision to proceed with hernia surgery. In May 2022, we performed chemical component separation using 300 units of Botox. Four weeks later, laparoscopic hybrid Epauli repair was undertaken. The laparoscopic component involved reducing hernia contents, abdominal wall dissection with Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR), mesh placement, and closing the posterior layer. Open surgery was interspersed throughout the laparoscopic procedure and at its conclusion. This included temporary stoma closure and reduction, temporary stoma site closure, medial repositioning of the stoma through rectus, excess skin excision, and stoma re-suturing. The patient experienced an uncomplicated recovery. In January 2023, the patient underwent complete abdominoplasty. A one-year postoperative CT scan and clinical control demonstrated a satisfactory outcome. Conclusion For complex and large parastomal hernias, hybrid surgery, combining open and minimally invasive approaches, offers a valuable operative strategy for managing such large hernias.

TIMING OF THE STOMA REVERSAL, WHAT IS THE SAFE PERIOD?: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Objective: The objective of the study is to determine the most suitable timing for the reversal of enteric stomas and to investigate the complications associated with the presence and reversal of stomas among different age groups and genders. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in the Department of General Surgery of a tertiary care medical institute. The institutional ethical committee approved the study. We reviewed the digitally recorded data of patients who had undergone both the creation and reversal of stomas at our institution over various time intervals spanning from January 2017 to December 2022. Beyond the electronically stored clinical data encompassing patient demographics, stoma type, and complications encountered between stoma insertion and reversal, we conducted a thorough review of the database containing information on outpatient follow-ups for a month. The gender and age distribution, indications for surgery, type of stoma, and its correlation with age and gender were analyzed. Duration from surgery to stoma reversal and complications were also analyzed. Categorical data were presented as frequency and percentage, whereas quantitative data were summarized using the mean and standard deviation. Closure of the stoma after surgery was compared based on age and sex, employing an independent t-test. Results: In this study 82 patients undergoing stoma surgery, 68.29% were male and 31.71% were female. The mean age of male and female patients was found to be 44.26 and 35.96 years, respectively. Males had a higher median duration for ileostomy and jejunostomy reversals at 14 and 17 weeks, respectively, whereas females showed longer durations for ileostomy at 15 weeks. Common indications for surgery included intestinal obstruction (32.9%) and peritonitis (20.7%). Post-stoma closure 50% of the patients experienced complications, with 24% occurring within 1 month of reversal. Major complications occurred in 41% of cases, including parastomal hernia and suspected anastomotic leaks. Minor complications were observed in 28 patients, representing 35% of all surgeries. Conclusion: Stoma reversal between 8 and 12 weeks post-surgery is recommended for minimizing complications and avoiding psychological burden. While early closure may reduce hospital stay, it increases the risk of infections. Optimal timing for stoma closure is complex, requiring personalized, collaborative decision-making.

Diverting Stoma-Related Evisceration: A Comprehensive Review of 28 Case Reports Published in the Medical Literature in English.

Evisceration is an exceptional complication of diverting a stoma (a common procedure, often considered a minor surgery) with peculiar, specific, features (distinct-to-usual incisional evisceration), due to the presence of a stoma. Available data are limited to a few case reports; some aspects are not fully documented. The results of 28 case reports (full-text articles published in the English literature) were analyzed using 14 variables: age and gender; pathology; surgical setting; index surgery and type of stoma; intended stoma creation; time from surgery to evisceration; type of evisceration; visceral content; cause of evisceration; specific predisposing/risk factors; surgical approach; resection of nonviable content; surgical stoma treatment; and short-term outcome. Urgent surgery resulted in 46.42% resection of nonviable eviscerated content and 7.14% mortality. All issues (some not discussed in previous reviews) were analyzed, to highlight their clinical relevance for surgical practice. The mechanisms (types of evisceration) are different in parastomal and transstomal/intrastomal evisceration; they should be considered as distinct entities. The real (underlying) etiology was identified in 26/28 case reports (92.85%): surgical failure, such as inadequate technique/tactics/strategy (12/26 case reports, 46.15%); trauma (7/26 case reports, 26.92%); and spontaneous necrosis (6/26 case reports, 21.42%). Parastomal hernia and/or prolapse (10/28 case reports, 35.71%) were specific predisposing factors; in such cases, early surgical treatment is recommended. Temporary stoma was a potential risk factor, both for early as well as for late evisceration (e.g., long-standing temporary stoma); in such cases, early take-down or conversion to definitive stoma is beneficial. A local surgical approach (avoiding median laparotomy) was used in 13/28 (46.42%) of case reports. Seven different surgical options were used for surgical stoma treatment, demonstrating versatility; the initial stoma site was preserved in 22/28 (78.57%) of case reports.

Outcomes of posterior sheath supplementation with Vicryl mesh in TAR-a single-center study.

In the Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) procedure, ideally, the posterior sheath is completely reapproximated to establish an interface isolating the polypropylene mesh from visceral contents. When primary closure of the posterior sheath is unachievable, Vicryl mesh is commonly used to supplement the posterior sheath closure and an uncoated polypropylene mesh is placed superficial to the Vicryl mesh. The long-term implications of utilizing Vicryl mesh as an antiadhesive barrier are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess our outcomes when utilizing Vicryl mesh to supplement the posterior sheath defects when placed underneath polypropylene mesh in patients undergoing posterior component separation. Adult patients who underwent VHR with concurrent TAR procedure with a permanent synthetic mesh and posterior sheath supplementation with Vicryl mesh in the Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health between January 2014 and December 2022 were queried retrospectively from a prospectively collected database in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. We evaluated 30-day wound morbidity, perioperative complications, long-term mesh-related complications, and pragmatic hernia recurrence. 53 patients who underwent TAR procedure with posterior sheath supplementation using Vicryl mesh and had a minimum 12-month follow-up were identified. Of the53 patients, 94.3% presented with recurrent hernias, 73.6% had a midline hernia, 7.5% had a flank hernia, and 18.9% had concurrent parastomal hernia. The mean hernia width was 24.9 cm (± 8.8 cm). No Vicryl mesh-related operative complications were identified in our study, with no instances of mesh erosion, fistulas, or interventions for small bowel obstruction. Skin necrosis requiring reoperations was observed in three patients (5.7%), leading to permanent mesh excision in two cases (3.8%) without intraabdominal visceral involvement. Throughout the 12-month follow-up, 23 incidences (43.4%) of surgical site occurrences (SSOs) and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) were documented. Our findings suggest that posterior sheath supplementation with Vicryl mesh is a feasible approach to achieve posterior sheath closure in challenging abdominal wall reconstruction cases. Given the absence of notable mesh-related complications and a similar hernia recurrence rate to cases without posterior sheath supplementation, Vicryl mesh can be used to safely achieve posterior sheath closure in complex reconstructions with insufficient native tissue.

Parastomal Hernia: A Case Report, Repaired by Modified Laparascopic Sugarbaker Technique

Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication of intestinal stomata. Mesh repair gives the best outcomes, with the lattice embedded by means of laparotomy or laparoscopically. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique utilizing composite mesh Is most acknowledged in view of its low recurrence rate.

Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement for Non-Midline Incisions: A Systematic Review.

Many abdominal-pelvic surgeries utilize incisions not along the linea alba, such as transverse, laparoscopic, ostomy reversal, or ostomy formation incisions. The prevalence of ventral incisional hernias (VIH) at these sites and the efficacy of prophylactic mesh in preventing VIH remains unclear. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception to September 2022. We included published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared prophylactic mesh reinforcement versus no mesh. The primary outcome was the incidence of VIH at postoperative follow-up equal to or greater than 24 months. Secondary outcomes included surgical site infection (SSI) and surgical site occurrence (SSO). Of 3186 screened articles, only 3 RCTs with at least an 80% 2-year follow-up, encompassing a total of 901 patients, were included for analysis of non-midline VIH. Fifteen additional RCTs were included for analysis of secondary outcomes. The rate of parastomal hernias with prophylactic mesh was 21%, while it ranged from 44%-64% in the control group. The rate of incisional hernia after ostomy reversal with prophylactic mesh was 10%, and 16% in the control group. No clear evidence of a difference was found in rates of SSI or SSO between groups. There is limited evidence on the role of prophylactic mesh in preventing non-midline VIH. More studies at low risk for bias are needed to elucidate the balance of the long-term risks and benefits of prophylactic mesh for non-midline incisions.

Parastomal hernia repair, trying to optimize the impossible reconstruction

PurposeParastomal hernias are a common and challenging problem with high rates of wound complications and hernia recurrence after repair. We present our approach to optimizing parastomal hernia repair through preoperative preparation, surgical approach, and postoperative management.MethodsPatients are carefully evaluated and optimized prior to surgery. Our typical surgical approach involves a generous midline laparotomy and retrorectus dissection followed by a posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release. We typically utilize a Sugarbaker technique for retromuscular mesh placement but also use the retromuscular keyhole or cruciate technique if there is insufficient bowel length.ResultsPreviously published results from our institution include wound complication rates of up to 16% after open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair. Stoma-specific complications, such as mesh erosion in the bowel, may be attributed to the mesh placement techniques. Hernia recurrence rates range from 11 to 30% up to 2 years postoperatively.ConclusionWe prefer an open retromuscular approach with a Sugarbaker mesh configuration to treat complex parastomal hernias. However, wound morbidity and repair failure rates remain high, and additional research is needed to optimize surgical outcomes.

High Subcutaneous Fat Area Is an Independent Risk Factor for Parastomal Hernia after Transperitoneal Colostomy for Colorectal Cancer.

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication of colostomy; however, its risk factors remain poorly investigated. In this study, we examined the associations between sarcopenia, visceral and subcutaneous fat, and PSH in patients who underwent transperitoneal colostomy for colorectal cancer. This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann's procedure for colorectal cancer between November 2010 and February 2022. Stoma creation was uniformly performed using the transperitoneal approach, and PSH was diagnosed via abdominal computed tomography (CT) at 1 year postoperatively. Visceral fat areas (VFAs) and subcutaneous fat areas (SFAs) were measured through preoperative CT images using an image analysis system. Risk factors for PSH were retrospectively analyzed. PSH was diagnosed in 13 (21.7%) patients. In the univariate analysis, PSH was significantly associated with body mass index >22.3 kg/m2 (p=0.002), operation time >319 min (p=0.027), estimated blood loss >230 mL (p=0.008), postoperative complications (p=0.028), stoma diameter >18.6 mm (p=0.015), VFA >89.2 cm2 (p=0.005), and SFA >173.2 cm2 (p=0.001). Multivariate analyses confirmed that SFA >173.2 cm2 (odds ratio: 16.7, 95% confidence interval 1.29-217.2, p=0.031) was an independent risk factor for PSH. Subcutaneous fat area is significantly associated with the development of PSH after transperitoneal colostomy. Applying these insights could help to prevent PSH.

Prophylactic Use of Biologic Mesh in Ileal Conduit (PUBMIC): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

We assessed the effect of prophylactic biologic mesh on parastomal hernia (PSH) development in patients undergoing cystectomy and ileal conduit (IC). This phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (NCT02439060) included 146 patients who underwent cystectomy and IC at the University of Southern California between 2015 and 2021. Follow-ups were physical exam and CT every 4 to 6 months up to 2 years. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive FlexHD prophylactic biological mesh using sublay intraperitoneal technique vs standard IC. The primary end point was time to radiological PSH, and secondary outcomes included clinical PSH with/without surgical intervention and mesh-related complications. The 2 arms were similar in terms of baseline clinical features. All surgeries and mesh placements were performed without any intraoperative complications. Median operative time was 31 minutes longer in patients who received mesh, yet with no statistically significant difference (363 vs 332 minutes, P = .16). With a median follow-up of 24 months, radiological and clinical PSHs were detected in 37 (18 mesh recipients vs 19 controls) and 16 (8 subjects in both arms) patients, with a median time to radiological and clinical PSH of 8.3 and 15.5 months, respectively. No definite mesh-related adverse events were reported. Five patients (3 in the mesh and 2 in the control arm) required surgical PSH repair. Radiological PSH-free survival rates in the mesh and control groups were 74% vs 75% at 1 year and 69% vs 62% at 2 years. Implementation of biologic mesh at the time of IC construction is safe without significant protective effects within 2 years following surgery.

Parastomal hernia repair according to Modified Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique (mSMART): which are the results ?

Parastomal hernia repair is a real surgical challenge because of the high rate of recurrence. The Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique (SMART) is a keyhole-like technique in which the mesh is stapled to the fascia using a circular mechanical stapler. A prospective study from January 2021 to February 2023 was conducted including all patients operated with the SMART technique. Primary endpoint was the recurrence rate during the follow-up. Secondary endpoints were reoperation, Surgical site Occurrence (SSO) and deep (mesh) surgical site infection (SSI) within 30days postoperatively. Sixteen patients operated on SMART procedures were included. The mean follow-up was 11.3 ± 9.2months. The SSO rate was 18.7% (n = 3). A seroma was drained radiologically (IIIa), one haematoma was evacuated surgically (IIIb) and one patient presented a postoperative lesion of a ureter after a parastomal Bricker's hernia repair. In addition, there was one death due to multiple organ failure (V). There was no SSI. The recurrence rate was 57.1% during the follow-up. This study shows disappointing results for this SMART technique, with a high recurrence rate.

Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) Repair Versus Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) Repair in Primary Ventral Hernias: Experience With 50 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background Primary ventral hernias are abnormal protrusions of abdominal viscera through the areas of weakness in the fascia of the abdominal wall. The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and complications, and the overall outcome in the Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) repair in the management of primaryventral hernias. Methods After obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance, this prospective comparative study between IPOM Plus and eTEP-RS was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from December 2020 to January 2022. A total of 50 patients presenting with primary ventral hernias were included in the study, of whom 25 underwent IPOM Plusand 25 underwent eTEP-RS repairs. Group selection was doneby simple randomization using the lottery method. Patients more than 18 years of age with primary ventral hernias presenting with a hernial defect width less than 6 cm, consenting to the study, were included in the study. Patients who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, strangulated/obstructed hernias, recurrent/incisional hernias, connective tissue disorders, skin infections, enterocutaneous fistulas, pregnancy, morbid obesity, and parastomal hernias were exclusion factors. Results The mean intraoperative duration in the eTEP-RS group (192.3 ± 16.20 min) was significantly higher than in theIPOM Plus group (102.6 ± 16.78min, p=0.001). The mean duration of hospital stay in the IPOM Plus group (5.9 ± 2.19 days) was longer than in the eTEP-RS group (4.6 ± 3.17 days, p=0.02). The mean postoperative pain scores, from the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS), on days 1, 7, and 90 were 3.2 ± 1.11, 2.64 ± 1.11, and 1.68 ± 1.46in the IPOM Plus group and 1.84 ± 0.688, 0.76 ± 0.66 and 0.08 ± 0.40 in the eTEP-RS group, respectively(p=0.001). Conclusion Despite being a technically easy procedure requiring less intraoperative time, IPOM Plus had several disadvantages, such as increased postoperative pain, longer duration of hospital stays, higher chances of wound site seromas, and higher rates of postoperative paralytic ileus.On the other hand, eTEP-RS was a more challenging procedure requiring more intraoperative time; however, it had several advantages: less postoperative pain, less duration of hospital stay, early recovery, and fewer chances of seromasand paralytic ileus.However, more robust data is required to compare and validate the differences between both procedures' short- and long-term outcomes.

Robotic modified Sugarbaker technique for parastomal hernia repair: a standardized approach.

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a prevalent long-term morbidity associated with stoma construction, and the optimal operative management remains uncertain. This study addresses the need for a standardized approach to symptomatic PSH repair, focusing on the robotic-assisted modified Sugarbaker technique with composite permanent mesh. The study, conducted in a high-volume colon and rectal surgery referral practice, outlines a systematic approach to patient selection, surgical procedures, and postoperative care. Preoperative evaluations include detailed medical and surgical histories, impact assessments of PSH, and oncological history reviews. The surgical technique involves the Da Vinci Xi™ robotic platform for adhesiolysis, hernia content reduction, stoma revision if needed, narrowing of the enlarged stoma trephine, lateralization of the stoma limb of bowel, and securing the mesh to the abdominal wall. Outcomes are reported for 102 patients undergoing robotic parastomal hernia repair from January 2021 to July 2023. Conversion to open surgery occurred in only one case (0.9%). Postoperative complications affected 39.2% of patients, with ileus being the most frequent (24.5%). Recurrence was observed in 5.8% of cases during an average follow-up of 10 months. In conclusion, parastomal hernia, a common complication post-stoma creation, demands surgical intervention. The robotic-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair technique, as outlined in this paper, offers promising results in terms of feasibility and outcomes.

Hybrid parastomal hernia endoscopic repair (HyPER): novel approach to parastomal hernia surgery.

Hybrid parastomal hernia endoscopic repair (HyPER): novel approach to parastomal hernia surgery.

Assessment of the quality of online patient information resources for patients considering parastomal hernia treatment.

The aim was to examine the quality of online patient information resources for patients considering parastomal hernia treatment. A Google search was conducted using lay search terms for patient facing sources on parastomal hernia. The quality of the content was assessed using the validated DISCERN instrument. Readability of written content was established using the Flesch-Kincaid score. Sources were also assessed against the essential content and process standards from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) framework for shared decision making support tools. Content analysis was also undertaken to explore what the sources covered and to identify any commonalities across the content. Fourteen sources were identified and assessed using the identified tools. The mean Flesch-Kincaid reading ease score was 43.61, suggesting that the information was difficult to read. The overall quality of the identified sources was low based on the pooled analysis of the DISCERN and Flesch-Kincaid scores, and when assessed against the criteria in the NICE standards framework for shared decision making tools. Content analysis identified eight categories encompassing 59 codes, which highlighted considerable variation between sources. The current information available to patients considering parastomal hernia treatment is of low quality and often does not contain enough information on treatment options for patients to be able to make an informed decision about the best treatment for them. There is a need for high-quality information, ideally co-produced with patients, to provide patients with the necessary information to allow them to make informed decisions about their treatment options when faced with a symptomatic parastomal hernia.