Parastomal Hernia Recurrence Research Articles

Open Retromuscular Sugarbaker vs Keyhole Mesh Placement for Parastomal Hernia Repair

Durable parastomal hernia repair remains elusive. There is limited evidence comparing the durability of the open retromuscular Sugarbaker and keyhole mesh configurations. To determine if the open retromuscular Sugarbaker mesh placement technique would lower parastomal hernia recurrence rates. In this single-center, randomized clinical trial, 150 patients with a permanent stoma and associated parastomal hernia who were candidates for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair were enrolled and randomized from April 2019 to April 2022 and followed up for 2 years. Following intraoperative assessment to determine the feasibility of either technique, enrolled patients were randomized to receive either retromuscular Sugarbaker or keyhole synthetic mesh placement. The primary outcome was parastomal hernia recurrence at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, wound complications, reoperations, as well as patient-reported pain, abdominal wall-specific quality of life, stoma-specific quality of life, and decision regret at 1 year and 2 years. A total of 150 patients were randomized, and with 91% follow-up at 2 years, there were 13 (17%) parastomal hernia recurrences in the retromuscular Sugarbaker arm and 18 (24%) in the keyhole arm (adjusted risk difference, -0.029; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.153, and adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.69). There were no statistically significant differences between the Sugarbaker and keyhole groups regarding reoperations for recurrence (2 vs 7, respectively), nonhernia intra-abdominal pathology (4 vs 10, respectively), stoma necrosis (1 vs 0, respectively), mesh-related complications (4 vs 1, respectively), patient-reported pain, abdominal wall-specific quality of life, stoma-specific quality of life, and decision regret at any time point. In the setting of open parastomal hernia repair, a retromuscular Sugarbaker mesh placement technique was not superior to a keyhole configuration 2 years after repair. Further innovation is necessary to improve parastomal hernia repair outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03972553.

Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

IntroductionParastomal hernia is a debilitating complication of stoma creation. Parastomal hernia repair with mesh reduces recurrence rates in open and laparoscopic settings. Recent comparative studies conflict with previously pooled data on optimal mesh repair technique. The objective of this study is to examine parastomal hernia recurrence rates after Sugarbaker and keyhole repairs by performing an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. MethodsA systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, SCOPUS, and the PROSPERO registry was performed according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021290483). Studies comparing parastomal hernia recurrences after Sugarbaker and keyhole repairs were included. Studies with overlapping patient cohorts (duplicate data), non-comparative studies, studies that did not report the primary outcome of interest, and studies not in the English language were excluded. Study bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Forest plots and funnel plots were generated. Study quality was analyzed using MINORS. Additional subgroup analysis of modern studies was performed. ResultsTen comparative studies published between 2005 and 2021 from 5 countries were included for analysis comprising 347 Sugarbaker repairs and 246 keyhole repairs. There were no differences in patient age, sex, or BMI between the groups. There was no difference between the groups regarding surgical site infection (OR 0.78; CI 0.31–1.98; P = 0.61) or post-operative bowel obstruction (OR 0.76; CI 0.23–2.56; P = 0.66). Sugarbaker repairs were significantly less often associated with parastomal hernia recurrence when compared to keyhole repairs (OR 0.38; CI 0.18–0.78; P = 0.008). There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies comparing parastomal hernia recurrence (I2 = 32%; P = 0.15). Quality analysis revealed a median MINORS score of 11 (range 6–16). Subgroup analysis of studies performed after the previously published pooled analysis (2015–2021) revealed no significant difference in parastomal hernia recurrence between the two groups (OR 0.58; CI 0.24–1.38; P = 0.22) with a significant subgroup effect (P = 0.05). ConclusionsThough there were lower rates of parastomal hernia recurrence with Sugarbaker repairs on overall analysis, this phenomenon disappeared on subgroup analysis of modern studies. Randomized controlled trials with contemporary cohorts would help further evaluate these repairs and minimize potential bias.

Risk factors and prevent strategy of parastomal hernia

Parastomal hernia is one of the common complications of stoma surgery with an incidence of more than 30%, which can be diagnosed by physical examination and abdominal CT. Risk factors of parastomal hernia might include stoma approaches including the selection of intestine, relationship between stoma and peritoneum, stoma location, aperture size, operation time and the patient's own conditions. It is essential to prevent parastomal hernia in order to improve patients' quality of life. Prophylactic mesh and perioperative care might prevent parastomal hernias. The mesh type might also influence the incidence of parastomal hernia. To reduce the incidence of recurrence of parastomal hernia, placement of mesh by the laparoscopic Sugarbaker technique was an effective surgical approach. How to prevent and repair parastomal hernia and cure parastomal hernia repair still needs further high-quality research to provide evidence.

Biologic vs Synthetic Mesh for Parastomal Hernia Repair: Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Parastomal hernias are often repaired with mesh to reduce recurrences, but the presence of an ostomy increases the wound class from clean to clean-contaminated/contaminated and makes the choice of mesh more controversial than in a strictly clean case. We aimed to compare the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh for parastomal hernia repair. This is a post hoc analysis of parastomal hernia repairs in a randomized trial comparing biologic and synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. Outcomes included rates of surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), reoperations, stoma/mesh-related adverse events, parastomal hernia recurrence rates (clinical, patient-reported, and radiographic) at 2 years, quality of life (EQ-5D, EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale, and Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey), and hospital costs up to 30 days. A total of 108 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair (57 biologic [53%] and 51 synthetic [47%]). Demographic and hernia characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant differences in SSOPI rates or reoperations were observed between mesh types. Four mesh erosions into an ostomy requiring reoperations (2 biologic vs 2 synthetic) occurred. At 2 years, parastomal hernia recurrence rates were similar for biologic and synthetic mesh (17 [29.8%] vs 13 [25.5%], respectively; p = .77). Overall and hernia-related quality of life improved from baseline and were similar between the two groups at 2 years. Median total hospital cost and median mesh cost were higher for biologic compared with synthetic mesh. Biologic and synthetic mesh have similar wound morbidity, reoperations, 2-year hernia recurrence rates, and quality of life in parastomal hernia repairs. Cost should be considered in mesh choice for parastomal hernia repairs.

Comparing Sugarbaker versus keyhole mesh technique for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair: study protocol for a registry-based randomized controlled trial

BackgroundParastomal hernia, common after stoma creation, negatively impacts patient quality of life. For patients with a permanent stoma, durable parastomal hernia repair remains a challenge, with few high-quality studies for guidance. An alternative to open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair with retromuscular “keyhole” mesh is the recent Sugarbaker modification. We aim to compare these two techniques in a head-to-head prospective study.MethodsThis is a registry-based randomized controlled trial designed to investigate whether the retromuscular Sugarbaker technique is superior to the retromuscular keyhole technique for parastomal hernia repair. The primary study endpoint is parastomal hernia recurrence at 2 years. Secondary endpoints include hospital length-of-stay, readmission, wound morbidity, mesh-related complications, re-operation, all 30-day morbidity, and patient-reported outcomes, including hernia-related quality of life, stoma-specific quality of life, pain, and decision regret.DiscussionBased on the post hoc analysis of a recent randomized controlled trial, we hypothesize that the retromuscular Sugarbaker technique will reduce parastomal hernia recurrence by 20% at 2 years compared to the retromuscular keyhole mesh technique. The results of this study may provide evidence-based guidance for surgeons repairing parastomal hernias.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03972553. Registered on 3 June 2019

High recurrence rate after posterior component separation and keyhole mesh reconstruction for complex parastomal hernia: A case series study.

This study aimed to describe the results of complex parastomal hernia repair after posterior component separation and keyhole reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively sustained database in one single complex abdominal wall referral centre. We analysed the data of patients who underwent the posterior component separation technique using modified transversus abdominis release for complex parastomal hernia and retromuscular keyhole mesh repair from February 2014 to January 2017. Demographic data, hernia characteristics, operative details and outcomes were analysed. The primary outcome measured was the recurrence rate during the follow-up. Twenty patients were included in this study. Among the patients who underwent surgery for parastomal hernia, 17 patients had a colostomy (85%) and three patients had a ureteroileostomy after the Bricker procedure (15%). The mean body mass index was 33.2kg/m2 (range 25-47). Twelve patients had an expected associated risk according to the Carolinas equation for determining associated risk classification of >60%. Sixty per cent of our patients had contaminated or dirty/infected wounds. The overall complication rate was 60%. Surgical site infection was observed in 25% of the cases. The mortality rate in our study group was 5% (n=1). We found clinical or radiological evidence of parastomal hernia recurrence in nine out of 20 (45%) patients during follow-up. No hernia recurrence was detected in the concomitant incisional hernias. Although posterior component separation in the form of modified transversus abdominis muscle release allows abdominal wall reconstruction, keyhole mesh configuration at the stoma site does not offer satisfactory results in terms of long-term recurrence rate at the parastomal defect.

Keyhole versus Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective nationwide cohort study

BackgroundPrevious research on parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion is limited. This nationwide cohort study aims to present the results of keyhole and Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair in the setting of ileal conduit urinary diversion.MethodAll patients in this cohort underwent primary elective parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion in four university hospitals and one central hospital in Finland in 2007–2017. Retrospective clinical data were collected from patient registries to compare keyhole and Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair techniques. The primary outcome was parastomal hernia recurrence during the follow-up from primary surgery to the last confirmed follow-up date of the patient. The secondary outcomes were reoperations during the follow-up and complication rate at 30 days’ follow-up.ResultsThe results of 28 hernioplasties were evaluated. The overall parastomal hernia recurrence rate was 18%, the re-operation rate was 14%, and the complication rate was 14% during the median follow-up time of 30 (21–64) months. Recurrence rates were 22% (4/18) after keyhole repair and 10% (1/10) after Sugarbaker repair. Re-operation rates referred to keyhole repair were 22% and Sugarbaker repair 0% during follow-up. The majority of reoperations were indicated by recurrence. Complication rates were 17% after keyhole and 10% after Sugarbaker repair during the 30 days’ follow-up.ConclusionThe results of parastomal hernia repair in the setting of ileal conduits are below optimal in this nationwide cohort comparing keyhole to Sugarbaker repair in elective parastomal hernia repair. Nonetheless, the Sugarbaker technique should be further studied to confirm the encouraging results of this cohort in terms of recurrence.

Parastomal Hernia Repair; Seldom Performed and Seldom Reported: Results From a Nationwide Survey.

Parastomal hernia is common, but there are few population-based studies showing the frequency and outcome of parastomal hernia repair in routine surgical practice. The aim of this study was to identify patients undergoing surgery for parastomal hernia in Sweden and to define risk factors for complication and recurrence. A broad search of the Swedish National Patient Register 1998-2007 for all possible parastomal hernia repairs using surgical procedure codes. Records of all patients identified were reviewed and those with a definite parastomal hernia procedure were included and analyzed. A total of 71 patients were identified after review of the records. The most common reason for surgery was cosmetic and the most frequent method was relocation of the stoma. Parastomal hernia recurrence rate was 18% during follow-up of a minimum 2 years. Overall, a surgical complication occurred in 32%. Possible risk factors were analyzed including emergency surgery versus planned, gender, age, indication for surgery, and method of surgery; none of which was significant. The frequency of parastomal hernia procedures was much lower than suggested by previous studies. The number of procedures per surgeon was even lower than expected. No specific risk factor could be identified. Parastomal hernia auditing in the form of a nationwide quality register should be mandatory. Centralization should be considered.

Parastomal hernia repair using the “top hat” technique - An initial experience in 30 patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Parastomal hernia repair remains a significant surgical challenge. Recurrence after standard “keyhole” or primary suture repair is common. We adopted and modified a new technique using a construct shaped like an inverted top hat. We review our experience over the last six years in the first 30 patients (31 consecutive procedures). Of these 31 procedures, six (19%) resulted in a parastomal hernia recurrence with a median follow-up of 31 months (range 0.5–80). Four of the recurrences occurred in our initial experience, when we constructed the top hat of xenograft alone. When the technique was modified, using a synthetic composite mesh for the underlay portion of the hat, there were only two subsequent recurrences in 16 patients (13%) with a median follow-up of 22 months. One of these “recurrences” was secondary to infection of the top hat construct, which had to be removed. This initial success in preventing recurrence of parastomal hernia is probably due to the design of the construct, for it occludes the vulnerable stoma/fascial angle, through which most parastomal hernia recurrences occur.

Clinical outcomes after parastomal hernia repair with a polyester monofilament composite mesh: a cohort study of 79 consecutive patients.

Different techniques and mesh materials are used in parastomal hernia repair with recently reported recurrence rates ranging from 10 to 28%. The aim of this cohort study was to examine the risk of recurrence and chronic pain after Sugarbaker or keyhole parastomal hernia repair with intraperitoneal placement of a polyester monofilament macroporous composite mesh. Data on all patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair with Parietex™ Composite Parastomal Mesh at our institution during a 4-year period were examined. Patients with urostomy were excluded. A team of three experienced surgeons performed all repairs. Follow-up including physical examination was done after 10days, 6 and 12months, and hereafter as annual structured telephone interviews. Patients suspected of hernia recurrence were offered computed tomography scan. Chronic pain was defined as pain requiring out-patient visit(s) and/or regular use of analgesics. 79 patients (Sugarbaker, n=69; keyhole, n=10) were included. Of those, 72 procedures were performed laparoscopically and seven by open technique. Two patients were reoperated within 30days with removal of the mesh. In total, seven (9%) patients had parastomal hernia recurrence (reoperation, n=3; conservative management, n=4) during follow-up of median 12months (range 0-49months). In univariable logistic analyses, type of stoma was associated with recurrence (ileostomy 28% vs colostomy 3%, p=0.007). Three patients (4%) reported chronic pain. In this study, we found low rates of recurrence and chronic pain following parastomal hernia repair using intraperitoneal reinforcement with a polyester monofilament composite mesh.

The Longtan Modification: An Effective and Economical Surgical Innovation for Parastomal Hernia Post-Intraperitoneal Sigmoidostomy.

This study was designed to introduce a new surgical innovation, referred to as the "Longtan modification," for cases with parastomal hernia (PSH) following intraperitoneal sigmoidostomy, and to assess the safety and feasibility of this procedure. Between January 2013 and June 2016, a total of 26 consecutive cases with PSH successfully underwent this procedure. The patient demographics, surgical outcomes, stoma-related complications, and the stoma function were collected and analyzed. Mean diameter of the hernia ring was 7.6 cm, mean operation time was 94.2 minutes, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 18.0 mL. The mean period of postoperative hospitalization was 4.4 days while the mean hospitalization cost was only $3,750 USD. There were no severe complications such as postoperative hemorrhage, ischemic necrosis, peritoneal infection, or intestinal obstruction, although one case suffered from postoperative infection at the site of incision. None of the cases had a recurrence of PSH during the follow-up period. In addition, the stoma functioned efficiently and appropriately following the Longtan modification. Overall, the Longtan modification appears to be an effective and economical surgical innovation for cases with PSH following intraperitoneal sigmoidostomy.

Application value of the preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum in parastomal hernia repair

Objective To investigate the application value of the preoperative progressive pneumoperi-toneum (PPP) in parastomal hernia repair. Methods The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The clinical data of 28 patients who underwent parastomal hernia repair using PPP in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from December 2014 to February 2017 were collected. Patients received abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan after admission, and volumes of the hernia sac and abdominal cavity and (volume of the hernia sac / total volume of the abdominal cavity)×100.0% were respectively calculated. Open or laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair was selected based on the effects of artificial pneumoperitoneum. Observation indicators: (1) PPP situations: ① completion; ② changes of volumes of the hernia sac and abdominal cavity before and after PPP; ③ adhesion and retraction of parastomal hernia contents after PPP; (2) surgical and postoperative recovery situations; (3) follow-up situations. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the postoperative long-term complications and recurrence of parastomal hernia up to May 2017. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as ±s. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Repeated measurement data were evaluated with the repeated measures ANOVA. Results (1) PPP situations: ① completion: 28 patients received successful ultrasound-guided indwelling catcher. Twenty-four patients completed PPP, with a completion rate of 85.7% (24/28)and an air injection volume of (3 995±531)mL, and 4 stopped PPP. Eighteen patients had varying degrees of abdominal pain, abdominal distension and scapular pain, including 17 with tolerance and 1 with disappearing of symptoms at day 6. Of 5 patients with shortness of breath, 3 were improved or well tolerated through breathing exercises, and symptoms of 2 disappeared at day 7 and 9. Three patients had mild subcutaneous emphysema. The arterial CO2 tension of 1 patient was high and then returned to normal at day 7. Some patients had simultaneously multiple adverse reactions. ② Changes of volumes of the hernia sac and abdominal cavity before and after PPP: volumes of the hernia sac before and after PPP were (699±231)mL and (993±332)mL, with a statistically significant difference (F=129.29, P 0.05). ③ Adhesion and retraction of parastomal hernia contents after PPP: results of abdominal CT showed anterior abdominal bulging, abdominal contents prostrated at the base of the abdominal cavity due to gravity, and gas was full of gaps. Abdominal adhesion signs: adhesions of banded fibrous connective tissue established a connection between the base of the abdominal cavity and anterior abdominal wall, and intestinal canals were found inside the adhesions. Parastomal hernia contents of 28 patients had varying degrees of retraction to abdominal cavity, including 9 with complete retraction, 13 with a great amount of retraction (retraction volume >50%) and 6 with a small amount of retraction (retraction volume <50%). Four patients were accompanied by incomplete stoma obstruction, and then obstruction disappeared or relieved after PPP. (2) Surgical and postoperative recovery situations: all the 28 patients underwent successful operations, without intestinal canal injury. Three patients received open parastomal hernia repair, including 2 receiving preperitoneal mesh repair using 8 layers Biodesign meshes (deep venous catheter for local drainage was placed and then removed at postoperative day 2 and 3) and 1 receiving Sugarbaker surgery using PCOPM mesh (peritoneal drainage-tube was placed and then removed at postoperative day 2). Other 25 patients received laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair and Sugarbaker surgery using PCOPM and Sepramesh meshes (no drainage-tube was placed). Bladder pressure of 28 patients at postoperative day 3 was (13±6)cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa), without an abnormal high pressure. Nine patients with postoperative complications were improved by conservative treatment, including 3 with seroma, 3 with delayed stoma defecation or incomplete intestinal obstruction, 2 with pulmonary infection and 1 with urinary tract infection. There were no occurrences of abdominal compartment syndrome, cardiac failure, lung failure, renal failure, other severe complications and perioperative death. Duration of postoperative hospital stay was (7.2±1.5)days. (3) Follow-up situations: 25 of 28 patients were followed up for 3-25 months, with a median time of 11 months. During follow-up, 2 patients had chronic pain around the operation and a sense of discomfort and then were improved by symptomatic treatment, and 1 with parastomal hernia recurrence at postoperative month 6 after open preperitoneal mesh repair underwent again open preperitoneal mesh repair, without recurrence. There were no occurrence of tardive mesh infection and other long-term complications. Conclusion PPP in the treatment of parastomal hernia repair is safe and feasible. Key words: Hernia; Stoma; Pneumoperitoneum; Hernia repair; Complications

Parastomal Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Mesh

Purpose Parastomal hernia is a common complication following a stoma and may cause leakage or incarceration. No optimal treatment has been established, and existing methods using mesh repair are associated with high recurrence rates and a considerable risk for short- and long-term complications including death. A double-layer intraperitoneal on-lay mesh (IPOM), the Parastomal Hernia Patch (BARD™), consisting of ePTFE and polypropylene, has been developed and tailored to avoid recurrence. To evaluate the safety of and recurrence rate using this mesh, a nonrandomised prospective multicentre study was performed. Method Fifty patients requiring surgery for parastomal hernia were enrolled. Clinical examination and CT scan prior to surgery were performed. All patients were operated on using the Parastomal Hernia Patch (BARD). Postoperative follow-up at one month and one year was scheduled to detect complications and hernia recurrence. Results The postoperative complication rate at one month was 15/50 (30%). The parastomal hernia recurrence rate at one year was 11/50 (22%). The reoperation rate at one month was 7/50 (14%), and further 5/50 (10%) patients were reoperated on during the following eleven months.

Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature. A systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various combination of the following keywords: stoma repair, laparoscopic, parastomal, and hernia. Case reports, studies with less than 5 patients, and articles not written in English were excluded. Eligible studies were further scrutinized with the 2011 levels of evidence from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Two authors reviewed and analyzed each study. If there was any discrepancy between scores, the study in question was referred to another author. A meta -analysis was performed using both random and fixed-effect models. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test. The primary outcome analyzed was recurrence of parastomal hernia. Secondary outcomes were mesh infection, surgical site infection, obstruction requiring reoperation, death, and other complications. Studies were grouped by operative technique where indicated. Except for recurrence, most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort and not by approach so they were analyzed across approach. Fifteen articles with a total of 469 patients were deemed eligible for review. Most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort, and not by approach. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 1.8% (95%CI: 0.8-3.2), and there was no difference between techniques. The most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection, which was seen in 3.8% (95%CI: 2.3-5.7). Infected mesh was observed in 1.7% (95%CI: 0.7-3.1), and obstruction requiring reoperation also occurred in 1.7% (95%CI: 0.7-3.0). Other complications such as ileus, pneumonia, or urinary tract infection were noted in 16.6% (95%CI: 11.9-22.1). Eighty-one recurrences were reported overall for a recurrence rate of 17.4% (95%CI: 9.5-26.9). The recurrence rate was 10.2% (95%CI: 3.9-19.0) for the modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker approach, whereas the recurrence rate was 27.9% (95%CI: 12.3-46.9) for the keyhole approach. There were no intraoperative mortalities reported and six mortalities during the postoperative course. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair is safe and effective for treating parastomal hernia. A modified Sugarbaker approach appears to provide the best outcomes.

A modified sublay–keyhole technique for in situ parastomal hernia repair

The surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia is always challenging due to the high incidence of recurrence following primary repair, or stoma relocation and severe morbidities in prosthetic repair with polypropylene materials. We therefore developed a modified sublay-keyhole technique employing a polypropylene material to minimize the associated high risk of the procedure. We herein describe our initial clinical experience with this modified procedure. A retrospective review was performed to obtain the clinical data for 11 patients with parastomal hernias who underwent the modified in situ Sublay-keyhole repair from November 2008 to August 2010. The mean hernia size was 58.7 cm(2) (range 30-96 cm(2)), with an average polypropylene mesh size of 376.3 cm(2) (range 270-464 cm(2)). The mean length of the operation was 147.9 min (range 120-195.0 min), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range 9-14 days). All patients had an uneventful incisional recovery, with no infections. Two seromas and one hematoma were found and treated with conservative management, such as with aspiration, physical therapy and compression. All patients had been followed up, with a mean length of follow-up of 23.5 months (range 11-39 months). One parastomal hernia recurrence was seen 11 months postoperatively. Breakdown of the sutures and an over-sized aperture cut in the mesh were detected as the causes of the recurrence during the secondary repair procedure. Only re-sutures in both the mesh aperture and myofascial dehiscence were executed for this patient, and no re-recurrence was observed during an additional follow-up of 15 months. No recurrence of the parastomal hernia or presentation of an incisional hernia was detected during the follow-up. The modified Sublay-keyhole repair appears to be an effective procedure for parastomal hernias, with a low incidence of recurrence and risk of morbidities. Collection of more cases and further follow-up examinations will be needed to confirm our findings.

Parastomal hernia. A study of the French federation of ostomy patients

The prevalence of parastomal hernia (PSH) varies considerably in the literature. This condition impacts negatively on quality of life. Yet there is no surgical consensus concerning treatment. The aim of the study was to determine treatment and recurrence rates of PSH in a large population of ostomy patients. This retrospective study was carried out by a self-administered questionnaire in a population drawn at random from the database of the French federation of ostomy patients (FSF). Seven hundred and eighty-two patients were eligible for the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 10.5 years. PSH was reported by 202 patients (25.6%) and appeared on average 18 months after creation of the stoma. In multivariate analysis, ileostomy had a lower risk of developing PSH than did colostomy; age mote than 60 years and peristomal complications at the time of stoma creation increased the risk. Only 24% of patients with PSH were free from symptoms related to the hernia. The main complaints were pain (35%), difficulties in fitting a stomal appliance with leakage (28%); 114 patients (56%) underwent operative repair. The morbidity rate of reoperation was 33%, and 57 patients (52%) had recurrence of PSH within an average of 6 months. Transposition of the stoma to another location and the use of prosthetic mesh decreased recidivism AF recurrence? PSH aggravates the inherently diminished quality of life of stoma patients. There are many proposed surgical treatments but recurrence occurs in more than half of patients. Randomized trials on the treatment of PSH are nonexistent. The use of a prosthetic mesh may reduce the risk of recurrence. The prophylactic use of prophylactic mesh at the time of initial stoma formation is a strategy worthy of consideration.

A New Classification of Parastomal Hernias - from the Experience at Bielański Hospital in Warsaw

Parastomal hernia is the most common local stoma complication. The incidence of parastomal hernia reaches 48%, and in a certain proportion of patients it is considered to be an inevitable consequence of stoma formation. The current classifications of parastomal hernias (Rubin, Devlin) are of little clinical value, which is supported by the fact that they have not been used in any publication presenting surgical treatment results in parastomal hernia. Moreover, these classifications do not include recommendations regarding surgical approach selection in those cases where surgical treatment is indicated. These disadvantages clearly indicate a need for developing a new classification of a greater practical value. was to present a suggested new parastomal hernia classification, based on structural criteria, and its use in surgical approach selection. The authors presented a group of 52 patients registered in Outpatient Stoma Clinic at Bielański Hospital in Warsaw, who had been diagnosed with parastomal hernia, defined as a type of hernia associated with postoperative artificial external intestinal fistula, who also had indications for surgical treatment of this stomal complication. These patients underwent a reconstructive procedure of their parastomal hernia with a surgical technique involving the placement of a monofilament polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space and repair of co-existing stomal complications using the variants of surgical techniques adequate for a given parastomal hernia type. Based on our studies and clinical experience, we propose a new classification of parastomal hernias, based on structural criteria. All hernias were divided into four groups (type I-IV) depending on hernia size and the presence of hernia in the postoperative scar. Qualification of a given hernia to a specific type was achieved based on physical examination, which makes the suggested classification a simple tool, useful in everyday practice. Each parastomal hernia type requires selecting a suitable surgical approach. In the study group, 44 patients were diagnosed with primary hernia, and 8 - with recurrent hernia. In one case of recurrent hernia it was another recurrence. There were 11 type I hernias, 7 type II hernias, 24 type III hernias, and 4 type IV hernias in the study group. No statistically significant relationship between the type of hernia and the sex of the patients was observed for p = 0.05. However, there was a significant difference between the BMI values and individual hernia types. Patients with type I hernia had the lowest mean BMI value and patients with type IV hernia had the highest mean BMI value. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 58 months. There were 5 cases (9.6%) of parastomal hernia recurrence in the study group. A statistical analysis of the results showed that parastomal hernia types identified based on structural criteria differ from one another in parameters such as BMI, indications for surgery, or recurrence rates. The new classification of parastomal hernias is a simple way of identifying patients who require a different therapeutic approach. Thus, it has a practical application as it helps to select a suitable surgical technique. It may be also used for identification of homogeneous groups of patients and therefore allows for a reliable and objective comparison of treatment outcomes.

Modified technique for parastomal hernia repair in patients with intractable stoma‐care problems

Although stoma relocation is generally the first choice of treatment for parastomal hernia, a repair using polypropylene prosthetic mesh is sometimes employed in cases of parastomal hernia recurrence. Use of this mesh, however, has been associated with a high risk of bowel erosion, adhesions formation, and fistulization. We therefore began to use expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh to perform an onlay parastomal hernia repair. Our initial clinical experience with this procedure is described. Sixteen patients aged 39-70 years with intractable stoma problems underwent a modified intra-abdominal onlay technique with implantation of a large (26 x 36 cm) sheet of ePTFE mesh. During a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 5-52 months), no mesh-related bowel erosion, fistulization, or adhesion formation were observed. Two patients had a recurrence of the hernia due to technical failure. Re-operation in one of these resulted in wound dehiscence and removal of the contaminated mesh. Another patient developed intestinal obstruction postoperatively. The mesh was removed, and a gastrointestinal stromal tumour was found. Finally, a nonmesh related small bowel erosion required removal of the mesh in one patient. All other patients had full relief of symptoms. The modified onlay technique using a large sheet of ePTFE prosthetic mesh is a feasible option for treatment of parastomal hernia recurrence. Possible advantages of the procedure include stoma preservation, strengthening of the abdominal wall, and a reduced risk of recurrence, contamination, fistulization, and bowel adhesions and erosion.