ABSTRACT This research undertakes a thorough examination of the significant social and economic losses resulting from earthquakes throughout time, as well as the considerable destruction inflicted upon physical structures. Using the reinforced concrete frame structure as an illustration, it highlights several types of column damage that might potentially happen to the structure during seismic events. As cross-border projects become more frequent, it is crucial to have precise specification comparisons and parameter conversions as a reference for engineering projects happening worldwide. This article will now analyze and contrast the seismic building designs of China, the United States, Indonesia, and Australia. These nations are selected based on their susceptibility to earthquakes, with China, the United States, and Indonesia being earthquake-prone, while Australia has infrequent seismic activity. An assessment of each country’s standards is undertaken, specifically parameters in relation to seismic defence standards, seismic protection levels, method of determining shear wave velocity, method of determining site subsoil and the implementation of the seismic design response spectrum. An evaluation was made after analyzing each parameter based on the requirements in the standards, and a recommendation for the most practical and reasonable method from one of the countries for each parameter was provided. Overall, seismic standards from China were deemed the most thorough and considerate standard, which not only encompassed a broader range for each parameter but was also deemed the most technical and considerate in terms of parameter derivation.
Read full abstract